What Kind of Family Are You About to Create?


The question before marriage is not simply, ‘Whom shall I marry?’ It is, ‘What kind of family are we about to create, and what kind of community will that family become for generations yet to come?


From National Systems Research to the First Human Community

What Kind of Family Are You About to Create?

Questions for Individuals, Couples and Families Before Marriage

Contents

Introduction

Family Formation: The First Human Community

  • Why the family is society’s first institution
  • Why marriage is more than a personal decision
  • The purpose of this framework

Part I – Questions for the Individual

1. The Man Who Has Not Yet Healed from a Previous Relationship

  • Questions about Healing
  • Questions about Readiness
  • Questions about Commitment
  • Questions about the Family He Hopes to Create

2. The Woman Without Children Who Has Not Yet Healed from a Previous Relationship

  • Questions about Healing
  • Questions about Readiness
  • Questions about Commitment
  • Questions about the Family She Hopes to Create

3. The Woman Who Has a Child and Has Not Yet Healed from Her Previous Relationship

  • Questions about Healing
  • Questions about Her Child
  • Questions about the Man She Is Considering
  • Questions about the Child’s Father
  • Questions about Building a New Family
  • Questions about Stewardship

4. The Man Who Has a Child and Is Entering a Relationship with a Woman Who Has No Children

  • Questions about Healing
  • Questions about His Child
  • Questions about the Woman He Is Considering
  • Questions about the Child’s Mother
  • Questions about Building One Family
  • Questions about Stewardship

5. The Woman with a Child Entering a Relationship with a Man Who Does Not Have a Child

  • Questions about Healing
  • Questions about Her Child
  • Questions about the Man She Is Considering
  • Questions about the Child’s Father
  • Questions about Building a New Family
  • Questions about Extended Families
  • Questions about Stewardship

6. The Man Without Children Entering a Relationship with a Woman Who Has a Child

  • Questions about Readiness
  • Questions about the Child
  • Questions about the Child’s Father
  • Questions about the Woman He Is Considering
  • Questions about Building One Family
  • Questions about Extended Families
  • Questions about Stewardship

Part II – Questions for the Couple

7. Questions Every Couple Should Ask Together

  • Questions about Shared Values
  • Questions about Trust
  • Questions about Communication
  • Questions about Conflict
  • Questions about Commitment
  • Questions about Finances
  • Questions about Careers and Life Direction
  • Questions about Children and Parenting
  • Questions about Extended Families
  • Questions about Building an Enduring Marriage

Part III – Questions for Parents

8. Parents Who Have Enjoyed an Intact Marriage

  • Questions about Their Own Motives
  • Questions about Listening
  • Questions about the Person Their Child Loves
  • Questions about Family Formation
  • Questions about Supporting Rather than Controlling
  • Questions about Becoming In-Laws
  • Questions about Stewardship

Part IV – Questions for Every Family

9. Questions Every Family Should Ask

  • Questions about Character
  • Questions about Commitment
  • Questions about Family Formation
  • Questions about Relationships
  • Questions about Future Generations
  • The Question Above Every Other Question

Part V – From Family Formation to Nation Formation

10. The Narratives We Choose to Hold Dear

  • Everyday Narratives that Shape Society
  • From Individual Decisions to Social Patterns
  • The Questions that Change What We Value
  • Family Stewardship and Intergenerational Responsibility
  • Narratives that Strengthen Human Capability
  • From Household Choices to National Outcomes

Part VI – A Gift to Families

11. From Understanding Persistent Unemployment to Strengthening the First Human Community

  • A Different Understanding of Persistent Unemployment
  • The Family as Society’s First Institution
  • Interrupting Reinforcing Cycles
  • A Contribution to Human Formation
  • Our Gift

Recommended Reading

A Learning Journey in Family Formation

  • Understanding Yourself Before Marriage
  • Preparing for Marriage Together
  • Love, Communication and Relationships
  • Blended Families
  • Parents and Adult Children
  • Understanding Families as Systems
  • Systems Thinking and Human Formation

Closing Reflection

Building Families that Build Nations

  • Family formation as the foundation of human formation.
  • Human formation as the foundation of productive capability.
  • Productive capability as the foundation of national prosperity.
  • The family as society’s first and most enduring human community

Introduction

Family Formation: The First Human Community

Every human being belongs to a family. Whether that experience has been joyful or painful, stable or uncertain, the family is the first community into which we are born and the first place where we learn what it means to trust, to belong, to resolve conflict, to accept responsibility and to care for others. Long before we encounter schools, workplaces, governments or markets, we experience life through the relationships that exist within our families.

For this reason, the formation of a family is not merely a private decision between two adults. It is the creation of a new human community. The decisions made before marriage shape not only the lives of the couple but also the environment within which children may one day grow, grandparents may find new relationships, siblings may gain new family members, and future generations may develop their understanding of love, commitment, security and belonging.

Yet surprisingly little attention is given to the questions that precede this transition. Couples often ask whether they love one another, whether they are compatible, or whether they will be happy together. These are important questions. They are not, however, the only questions. Before creating a family, individuals and those who care about them have a responsibility to think beyond the wedding day and consider the kind of community they are about to establish.

The purpose of this paper is therefore not to tell people whom they should marry, nor to suggest that every family begins under identical circumstances. Rather, it seeks to present a framework of questions that may help individuals, couples and parents reflect carefully before making one of life’s most consequential decisions. Different life circumstances call for different questions. Some people enter marriage after healing from previous relationships, while others bring children, extended family responsibilities or other complexities into the relationship. The purpose of these questions is not to judge those circumstances but to ensure that they are thoughtfully understood before commitments are made.

Every family begins long before a wedding ceremony. It begins in the lives of the individuals who choose to form it. Each person brings into a relationship experiences, values, expectations, wounds, hopes, and responsibilities that inevitably shape the family they are about to create. Before two people can intentionally build a healthy family together, each must first understand the foundations they themselves are bringing into that new community.

For this reason, the questions that follow begin not with the couple, but with the individual. They are not intended to judge anyone’s past or prescribe a particular life journey. Rather, they invite thoughtful reflection towards oneself on whether the foundations being brought into marriage are capable of supporting the kind of family one hopes to build. Every family begins somewhere. These questions encourage us to begin with ourselves.


Part I – Questions for the Individual

The Man Who Has Not Yet Healed from a Previous Relationship

Every relationship leaves behind memories, lessons and, sometimes, wounds. Beginning a new relationship before understanding what remains unresolved from the previous one can unintentionally place new expectations upon a person who did not create those experiences. Before asking whether another person is the right life partner, a man should first consider whether he has become emotionally available to build a new family on its own foundations.

Questions about Healing

  • Have I fully accepted that my previous relationship has ended?
  • What emotions still influence my thinking?
  • Have I forgiven the other person?
  • Have I forgiven myself?
  • What lessons have I learned that will help me become a better husband?
  • What fears from that relationship still influence me today?
  • If I met my former partner tomorrow, what emotions would still remain unresolved?

Questions about Readiness

  • Am I seeking companionship, or am I seeking relief from loneliness?
  • Am I choosing this woman because of who she is, or because she helps me forget someone else?
  • If this relationship did not continue, would I still know who I am?
  • Am I emotionally ready to make promises that I intend to keep for life?

Questions about the Family I Hope to Create

  • What kind of family do I hope to build?
  • What kind of husband do I hope to become?
  • What kind of father do I hope my children will one day describe?
  • What values do I hope will define our home?
  • What atmosphere do I hope people experience when they enter our family?

The Woman Without Children Who Has Not Yet Healed from a Previous Relationship

The end of a relationship does not necessarily mark the end of its influence. A relationship may end physically while continuing emotionally through disappointment, mistrust, fear or regret. Time alone does not heal these experiences. Healing occurs when a person has reflected on what has happened, accepted what cannot be changed, learned from it and become emotionally available to begin again without asking a new relationship to repair the wounds of the last one.

Marriage invites two people to build a future together. That future is strongest when it is not overshadowed by unresolved questions from the past. Before deciding whether a man is the right life partner, a woman should first consider whether she is free to build a family upon new foundations rather than carrying forward expectations shaped by previous disappointments.

Questions about Healing

  • Have I fully accepted that my previous relationship has ended?
  • What emotions from that relationship remain unresolved?
  • Have I forgiven the other person?
  • Have I forgiven myself for decisions I now regret?
  • What fears continue to influence the way I think about relationships?
  • Can I speak about my previous relationship without anger, bitterness or the desire to prove something?
  • What have I learned about myself through that experience?
  • What strengths have emerged because of what I have been through?

Questions about Readiness

  • Am I seeking a husband, or am I seeking someone to restore what I feel I have lost?
  • Do I know who I am independently of being in a relationship?
  • If this relationship did not continue, would I still feel emotionally secure?
  • Am I choosing this man because I genuinely respect him, or because I am afraid of being alone?
  • Am I emotionally available to commit myself to another person?
  • Have I become the kind of woman I hope to bring into a lifelong marriage?

Questions about Commitment

  • What qualities do I most admire in this man?
  • What concerns have we openly discussed rather than avoided?
  • Have we spoken honestly about our expectations of marriage?
  • How do we each respond when we disagree?
  • Do I trust his character, or do I simply enjoy his company?
  • Would I still choose this relationship if life became significantly more difficult?

Questions about the Family I Hope to Create

  • What kind of family do I hope to build?
  • What kind of wife do I hope to become?
  • What values do I hope will shape our home?
  • What atmosphere do I hope our children will experience every day?
  • How do I hope our family will relate to grandparents, siblings and the wider community?
  • What kind of legacy do I hope our family will leave for the next generation?

Questions about Stewardship

Marriage is not only about finding someone to love. It is about accepting responsibility for the wellbeing of another person and for the family that may one day emerge from that relationship.

  • Am I prepared to place the wellbeing of our future family alongside my own aspirations?
  • What sacrifices am I prepared to make for the family we hope to build?
  • How will I contribute to creating trust, stability and peace within our home?
  • When our children one day observe our relationship, what do I hope they will learn about love, commitment and respect?
  • If my future daughter asked me why I chose her father, what answer would I hope to give?

These questions are not intended to create doubt where confidence already exists. Rather, they invite a woman to reflect upon the kind of family she is preparing to build and the person she is becoming in the process. The quality of a future marriage depends not only upon finding the right partner, but also upon becoming someone capable of building a home where trust, belonging and enduring commitment can flourish.


The Woman Who Has a Child and Has Not Yet Healed from Her Previous Relationship

When a woman enters a new relationship with a child, she is not making decisions for herself alone. Her child is already part of an existing family system, with relationships, experiences and emotional needs that deserve careful consideration. A new relationship therefore has implications that extend beyond the couple. It affects the child, the prospective husband, both extended families and, in many cases, the child’s biological father.

This does not make the formation of a new family impossible. It does, however, make it more complex. The question is not whether a woman who has a child should marry again. The question is whether everyone involved has taken sufficient time to understand the responsibilities that accompany the creation of a new family. The child’s wellbeing deserves to be considered alongside the hopes and aspirations of the adults.

Questions about Healing

  • Have I fully accepted that my previous relationship has ended?
  • What emotions from that relationship still influence my decisions today?
  • Have I forgiven the father of my child?
  • Have I forgiven myself for decisions that I now wish had been different?
  • What fears do I carry into this new relationship?
  • Am I looking for a husband, or am I hoping someone will solve problems that remain unresolved?
  • Have I become emotionally available to build a new family?

Questions about My Child

  • What does my child need most at this stage of life?
  • How has my previous relationship affected my child?
  • Have I taken time to understand how my child feels about the changes taking place?
  • Is my child emotionally ready to meet someone who may become part of our family?
  • Am I protecting my child’s need for stability while I make decisions about my own future?
  • If this relationship were not to continue, how would that affect my child?

Questions about the Man I Am Considering

  • Does he understand that he is entering an existing family system?
  • Has he shown genuine care and patience towards my child?
  • Does he understand that my responsibilities as a mother will always remain part of our marriage?
  • Have we discussed what role he hopes to play in my child’s life?
  • Is he prepared for the responsibilities that accompany becoming a husband and, potentially, a father figure?
  • Does he appreciate that earning a child’s trust takes time and cannot be demanded?

Questions about the Child’s Father

These questions are not intended to reopen past conflicts. They are intended to recognise that another parent may continue to influence the life of the child.

  • What relationship currently exists between my child and his or her father?
  • What responsibilities does the child’s father continue to fulfil?
  • Have I been honest with my prospective husband about that relationship?
  • What boundaries are necessary to protect peace within the new family?
  • How will important decisions concerning the child be made?
  • Have we discussed these matters openly before marriage rather than assuming they will resolve themselves afterwards?

Questions about Family Formation

  • What kind of family are we hoping to create together?
  • How will my child experience belonging within this new family?
  • If we later have children together, how will every child experience equal love, fairness and security?
  • What traditions do we hope to establish as a new family?
  • How will we build trust between all members of the household?
  • What values will define the culture of our home?
  • What conversations should occur now rather than after marriage?

Questions about Stewardship

The formation of a family is an act of stewardship. It requires adults to think beyond their immediate desires and consider the long-term wellbeing of everyone whose lives will be shaped by their decisions.

  • Am I making decisions that increase my child’s sense of safety and belonging?
  • Am I giving this relationship sufficient time to develop naturally?
  • Have I introduced this man into my child’s life gradually and thoughtfully?
  • Are we building a family on carefully considered commitments, or are we allowing circumstances to determine our future?
  • Twenty years from now, what do I hope my child will say about the way this family was formed?

These questions are not intended to discourage the formation of blended families. Rather, they recognise that a child already present within the relationship changes the structure of the family from its very beginning. Thoughtful preparation cannot eliminate every challenge, but it can help create a family in which trust, stability and belonging are intentionally nurtured for every member.


The Man Without Children Entering a Relationship with a Woman Who Has a Child

When a man without children enters a relationship with a woman who already has a child, he is making a decision that extends beyond choosing a life partner. He is also deciding whether he is prepared to become part of an existing family. Unlike two people who begin building a family together from the outset, he is entering a family system that already has relationships, routines, memories, responsibilities and emotional bonds. This does not diminish the possibility of building a loving and successful family, but it does require him to understand that he is not simply beginning something new; he is also joining something that already exists.

The quality of the future family will depend not only upon the relationship between the man and the woman but also upon the way in which the child experiences safety, belonging and acceptance. These questions are therefore intended to help a man consider not only whether he loves the woman, but also whether he is prepared for the responsibilities that accompany the family she already brings into the relationship.

Questions about Readiness

  • Why am I choosing this relationship?
  • What attracts me most to this woman?
  • Have I taken sufficient time to understand her life before I become part of it?
  • Am I emotionally prepared to become a husband and, potentially, a father figure at the same time?
  • Am I entering this relationship with realistic expectations?
  • Have I considered the responsibilities that already exist rather than only the future I hope to build?

Questions about the Child

A child is not an addition to the relationship. The child is already an integral member of the family the couple hopes to build.

  • Am I willing to accept this child as part of the family I hope to create?
  • What role do I hope to play in this child’s life?
  • Do I understand that trust cannot be demanded but must be earned?
  • Am I prepared to invest time, patience and consistency in building that relationship?
  • How will I respond if the child initially struggles to accept me?
  • What kind of relationship would I hope this child describes twenty years from now?

Questions about the Child’s Father

The presence of another biological parent introduces relationships that deserve thoughtful consideration rather than avoidance.

  • What role does the child’s father currently play?
  • How involved is he in the child’s life?
  • What responsibilities continue to exist between him and the child?
  • Have we discussed these matters openly and honestly?
  • What boundaries will help maintain peace and clarity for everyone involved?
  • How will disagreements affecting the child be handled?

Questions about the Woman I Am Considering

  • Have we discussed our expectations of marriage honestly?
  • Does she understand my hopes and concerns?
  • Have we spoken openly about parenting?
  • What values do we hope will shape our family?
  • How do we resolve disagreement?
  • What qualities in her give me confidence that we can build a stable family together?
  • Have we allowed enough time to know one another beyond the excitement of a new relationship?

Questions about Building One Family

One of the greatest responsibilities facing any blended family is not simply living together but becoming one family.

  • How will we create a sense of belonging for every member of the household?
  • If we later have children together, how will every child experience equal love, dignity and opportunity?
  • What family traditions shall we establish together?
  • How will we make important decisions as parents?
  • How will we ensure that our home becomes a place of stability rather than uncertainty?
  • What kind of family culture do we hope future generations will inherit from us?

Questions about Extended Families

Marriage joins more than two individuals. It joins parents, grandparents, siblings and extended families into new relationships.

  • How will my parents receive this woman and her child?
  • How will her parents receive me?
  • Have we discussed the role we hope our extended families will play in our lives?
  • What expectations should be clarified before marriage?
  • How can we encourage relationships that strengthen rather than divide our new family?

Questions about Stewardship

The decision to marry is ultimately a decision about stewardship. It is a commitment to care for the wellbeing of others over a lifetime.

  • Am I prepared to love not only this woman but also the life that comes with her?
  • Am I willing to place the long-term wellbeing of this family above my own convenience?
  • Are we making decisions because they are carefully considered, or because circumstances are pushing us forward?
  • If my future children asked me why I chose their mother, what answer would I hope to give?
  • If her child asked me, years from now, “When did you decide I was your family?” what answer would I want to be able to give?

The answers to these questions do not determine whether a marriage will succeed. They do, however, encourage a man to recognise that marriage is not simply about finding a life partner. It is about intentionally creating a family in which every person—adult and child alike—can experience trust, belonging, security and the opportunity to flourish.


The Woman with a Child Entering a Relationship with a Man Who Does Not Have a Child

When a woman who has a child enters a relationship with a man who has never had children, she is making a decision that reaches beyond her own future. She is not only considering whether this man may become her husband, but also whether he is prepared to become part of a family that already exists. Her child is not an extension of the relationship; the child is already a person with emotional needs, established relationships, memories and a developing sense of identity. Any new relationship must therefore be considered from the perspective of both the adults and the child.

This requires honesty, patience and maturity from everyone involved. The man deserves the opportunity to understand the responsibilities he is accepting before making a lifelong commitment. Equally, the child deserves the opportunity to experience trust gradually rather than being expected to accept a new parental figure simply because the adults have decided to marry. The woman therefore carries a dual responsibility: to nurture a healthy relationship with the man she hopes to marry while also protecting the emotional wellbeing of her child.

These questions are intended to encourage thoughtful reflection before decisions are made that will shape the lives of everyone who becomes part of the new family.

Questions about Healing

  • Have I fully accepted that my previous relationship has ended?
  • Have I forgiven my former partner?
  • Have I forgiven myself?
  • Am I entering this relationship because I am ready to build a new family, or because I am trying to recover from the last one?
  • What lessons have I learned that will help me become a better wife and mother?
  • What fears or disappointments from my previous relationship still influence my thinking today?
  • Am I emotionally available to make a lifelong commitment?

Questions about My Child

My child is not simply part of my history. My child is part of my future.

  • What does my child need most from me at this stage of life?
  • How has my child experienced the absence of his or her biological father?
  • Is my child emotionally ready for someone new to become part of our lives?
  • Am I protecting my child’s need for stability while this relationship develops?
  • Have I introduced this man into my child’s life gradually and thoughtfully?
  • Am I allowing my child sufficient time to develop trust naturally?
  • If this relationship did not continue, how would that affect my child?

Questions about the Man I Am Considering

A man without children may not yet fully understand the responsibilities that accompany becoming part of an existing family. Those responsibilities deserve to be discussed openly rather than assumed.

  • Does he understand that he is entering an existing family rather than beginning one from the beginning?
  • Have I been honest with him about my responsibilities as a mother?
  • Has he demonstrated patience, kindness and consistency towards my child?
  • Does he understand that trust from a child cannot be demanded but must be earned?
  • Has he asked thoughtful questions about my child rather than seeing my child as an obstacle to our relationship?
  • Does he appear ready for the long-term responsibilities of becoming both a husband and a father figure?

Questions about the Child’s Father

The presence of another biological parent is part of the family’s reality. It should neither be ignored nor allowed to create unnecessary uncertainty.

  • What relationship currently exists between my child and his or her father?
  • What responsibilities does the father continue to fulfil?
  • Have I spoken honestly with this man about those responsibilities?
  • What boundaries will protect the peace and stability of our future family?
  • How will decisions affecting the child be made?
  • Have we discussed these matters before making lifelong commitments?

Questions about Building a New Family

Marriage is not simply the joining of two adults. It is the creation of a family in which every member should experience belonging.

  • What kind of family are we hoping to create?
  • How will my child know that he or she truly belongs?
  • How will we build trust between all members of the household?
  • If we are later blessed with children together, how will we ensure that every child experiences equal love, fairness and dignity?
  • What values will define the culture of our home?
  • What family traditions do we hope to establish together?
  • What conversations should take place now rather than after marriage?

Questions about Extended Families

Marriage joins families as well as individuals. Grandparents, siblings and relatives all become part of the new family system.

  • How will my parents receive this man?
  • How will his parents receive both me and my child?
  • Have we discussed the role we hope our extended families will play in our lives?
  • Are there expectations that should be clarified before marriage?
  • How can we encourage relationships that strengthen rather than divide our new family?

Questions about Stewardship

Creating a family is an act of stewardship. It calls adults to think beyond immediate happiness and to consider the lives that will be shaped by the decisions they make today.

  • Am I making decisions that strengthen my child’s future?
  • Have I given this relationship sufficient time to mature?
  • Are we moving towards marriage because we have thoughtfully discerned our future together, or because circumstances are moving us in that direction?
  • Am I helping this man understand the responsibilities he is accepting, rather than assuming he will learn them after marriage?
  • Twenty years from now, what do I hope my child will say about the way this family was formed?
  • If my child one day chooses a life partner, what example do I hope this family will have provided?

No set of questions can remove every uncertainty that accompanies marriage. They can, however, help ensure that decisions are made with greater clarity, honesty and foresight. A woman entering marriage with a child is not simply beginning a new chapter in her own life. She is shaping the future of her child, inviting another person into an existing family, and laying the foundations upon which a new human community may grow. The more intentionally those foundations are established, the greater the opportunity for every member of that family to experience trust, belonging, stability and hope.


Part II – Questions for the Couple

Questions Every Couple Should Ask Together

Choosing to marry is one of the most significant decisions two people will ever make. Yet, in many societies, much of the attention surrounding marriage is devoted to the wedding itself—the ceremony, the celebrations, the guests and the beginning of life together. Comparatively little time is spent asking a more fundamental question: What kind of family are we about to create?

Marriage is more than the union of two individuals. It is the intentional formation of the first human community that the couple will build together. Within that community, values will be practised, responsibilities shared, children nurtured, traditions established and relationships extended across generations. The quality of that community will influence not only the lives of the couple themselves, but also the lives of everyone who comes after them.

For this reason, the most important conversations before marriage are seldom about the wedding. They are about the family that will exist long after the wedding has been forgotten. Couples who invest time in these conversations are not attempting to predict every challenge they may encounter. Rather, they are learning how to think together, how to discern together, and how to build together.

The questions that follow are not intended to determine whether two people should marry. They are intended to help couples see beyond immediate affection and ask whether they are intentionally preparing to establish a family capable of remaining whole, nurturing future generations and contributing positively to the communities and nation of which it will become a part.


Questions about Shared Purpose

Every enduring family begins with a shared understanding of why it exists.

  • Why do we want to marry?
  • Beyond loving one another, what purpose do we hope our family will serve?
  • What kind of home do we hope to create?
  • What values do we want people to experience when they enter our home?
  • What do we hope our children and grandchildren will one day say about our family?
  • Are we building a marriage for ourselves alone, or are we intentionally creating a family that will bless others?

Questions about Character

Strong marriages are built upon character before they are sustained by compatibility.

  • What qualities do we most admire in one another?
  • What weaknesses do we each acknowledge?
  • How do we help one another become better people?
  • Are we able to challenge one another with honesty and kindness?
  • What habits should we strengthen before we marry?
  • What habits should we leave behind?

Questions about Trust

Trust is not established on the wedding day. It is built through consistent choices long before marriage begins.

  • Can we speak honestly without fear?
  • Do we trust one another with disappointment as much as with success?
  • How do we rebuild trust when it is damaged?
  • What promises do we believe are sacred?
  • How will we protect trust throughout our marriage?

Questions about Communication and Conflict

Every marriage will experience disagreement. The question is not whether conflict will arise, but how it will be approached.

  • How do we communicate when we disagree?
  • Do we listen to understand or merely to respond?
  • How do we apologise?
  • How do we forgive?
  • What subjects are difficult for us to discuss?
  • How will we make important decisions together?

Questions about Previous Relationships

Every relationship has a history. Wisdom asks whether that history has been understood before a new future is built.

  • Have we each found peace with our previous relationships?
  • Are there responsibilities from previous relationships that remain?
  • Have we been honest with one another about those responsibilities?
  • Are there conversations that should take place before we marry?
  • Have we mistaken the passage of time for genuine healing?

Questions about Children and Family Formation

Marriage creates a family. Where children already exist, it enlarges a family that has already begun.

  • What responsibilities do we already carry?
  • How will every child experience love, security and belonging?
  • How will we speak about one another in front of our children?
  • What traditions do we hope to establish as a family?
  • How will we build trust patiently rather than expecting it immediately?
  • What does fairness look like within our family?

Questions about Stewardship

Every family becomes the steward of relationships entrusted to it.

  • What responsibilities accompany becoming a husband or wife?
  • What responsibilities accompany becoming a parent or parent figure?
  • How will we care for relationships that already exist?
  • What sacrifices will family life require of us?
  • What does faithfulness look like over the next thirty or forty years?

Questions about Work, Capability and Contribution

Families do not merely consume resources. They also develop the capabilities through which society flourishes.

  • What attitudes towards work do we hope will characterise our family?
  • How will we encourage curiosity, learning and discipline?
  • How will we nurture the talents entrusted to our children?
  • How will we encourage productive capability rather than dependence?
  • What example will our own work and service provide?
  • In what ways do we hope our family will contribute to our community and nation?

Questions about Extended Families

Marriage joins families as well as individuals.

  • How will we honour our parents while establishing our own family?
  • What relationships should be strengthened before marriage?
  • How will we welcome one another’s families into our lives?
  • What boundaries will help preserve healthy relationships?
  • How will we resolve tensions should they arise?

Questions about the Future

Every family begins with hope. Stewardship requires that hope to be accompanied by thoughtful preparation.

  • What kind of family do we hope to become twenty years from now?
  • What kind of grandparents do we hope one day to be?
  • What legacy do we hope our family will leave?
  • What values should survive long after we are gone?
  • What kind of society do we hope our family will help build?

The Conversation Above Every Other Conversation

As our understanding of family deepens, so too do the conversations we find worth having. We begin to recognise that marriage is not simply about choosing a life partner. It is about choosing the kind of human community we hope to create together. The questions become less concerned with the wedding day and more concerned with the generations that may one day emerge from the family we are forming.

The more we appreciate the interrelationships between family formation and nation formation, the more certain conversations naturally become important. We begin to ask not only whether we love one another, but whether we are preparing to build a relationship that is itself capable of remaining whole. We ask whether responsibilities from previous relationships have been understood and honoured, how children will experience continuity and belonging, how trust will be built with extended families, and whether important relationships should be nurtured before marriage rather than afterwards.

These questions are not intended to prescribe a single model of family life. Rather, they invite couples to recognise that the everyday narratives they choose to live by gradually become the foundations upon which families, communities and ultimately nations are built.

Ultimately, every couple preparing for marriage faces one question that stands above all the rest:

What kind of family are we intentionally choosing to create?

The answer to that question will shape far more than their own lives. It will influence the children they raise, the relationships they cultivate, the values they pass on, the capabilities they nurture and the communities they help to build. In this sense, every marriage is not only a personal commitment. It is an act of stewardship towards future generations, and a quiet but enduring contribution to the formation of society itself.


Part III – Questions for Parents

Parents Who Have Enjoyed an Intact Marriage

Parents who have built an enduring marriage often face one of the most delicate transitions of family life when their children become adults. For many years they have protected, guided and made decisions in the best interests of their children. Gradually, however, that responsibility changes. Adult sons and daughters must make their own decisions, including one of the most significant decisions of all—the choice of a life partner.

This transition requires wisdom from both generations. Parents who continue to control their adult children may weaken the very maturity they have worked hard to develop. Equally, parents who withdraw completely from the conversation may withhold the benefit of experience that could help their children avoid unnecessary pain. The challenge is neither to control nor to remain silent, but to offer wisdom in a way that preserves the dignity and responsibility of the adult child.

Parents who have themselves enjoyed an intact marriage possess something of great value. They have lived through the ordinary demands of building a family over many years. They understand that successful marriages are not sustained by emotion alone but by commitment, sacrifice, forgiveness, patience and shared purpose. Their experience does not make them infallible, but it does place upon them a responsibility to help their children think carefully about the families they hope to create.

The questions below are intended not only for parents to ask their children but also for parents to ask themselves. Discernment requires humility from every generation.

Questions about Our Own Motives

  • Why do we have concerns about this relationship?
  • Are our concerns based upon enduring principles or personal preferences?
  • Are we reacting to circumstances, or have we taken time to understand them?
  • Are we protecting our son or daughter, or are we protecting our own expectations?
  • Have we distinguished between what is unfamiliar and what is genuinely unwise?
  • Have we allowed fear to speak more loudly than understanding?

Questions about Listening

Before parents offer advice, they should first understand.

  • Have we listened carefully to our son or daughter without interruption?
  • Have we sought to understand before seeking to persuade?
  • Have we asked questions rather than reached conclusions?
  • Do we understand what our child sees in this relationship?
  • Have we invited honest conversation without creating fear or defensiveness?
  • Have we made it safe for our child to tell us the whole story?

Questions about the Person Our Child Loves

Every person deserves to be known as an individual before being defined by their circumstances.

  • Have we taken time to know this person beyond first impressions?
  • What strengths do we see in him or her?
  • What qualities would make this person a good husband, wife, father or mother?
  • Have we allowed one aspect of their life to overshadow the whole person?
  • What evidence have we seen of maturity, responsibility and integrity?
  • Have we been fair in our assessment?

Questions about Family Formation

Parents who have enjoyed an intact marriage understand that marriage creates far more than a couple.

  • What kind of family do we believe our child hopes to build?
  • Have we helped our child think beyond the wedding day?
  • Have we discussed the responsibilities of marriage rather than only the happiness it may bring?
  • Have we encouraged our child to think about future children, extended families and long-term commitments?
  • Have we asked questions that enlarge perspective rather than narrow it?

Questions about Supporting Rather Than Controlling

The purpose of parental wisdom is not to make the decision on behalf of an adult child but to help that child make a well-considered decision.

  • Are we offering wisdom or demanding agreement?
  • If our child ultimately makes a different decision from the one we would make, how will we respond?
  • Have we respected our child’s responsibility to choose?
  • Have we created space for thoughtful reflection rather than emotional pressure?
  • What questions might help our child see what we have learned through experience?
  • Have we remembered that our role is to prepare our children for independent adulthood, not perpetual dependence?

Questions about Becoming In-Laws

Marriage creates new relationships for parents as well.

  • If this marriage takes place, what kind of parents-in-law do we hope to become?
  • How can we contribute to the strength of this new family rather than become another source of tension?
  • How can we welcome new family members with grace while remaining true to our principles?
  • What example do we hope to set for our grandchildren?
  • How can we encourage unity between both families?
  • What relationships do we hope will exist twenty years from now because of the way we respond today?

Questions about Stewardship

Ultimately, parents are stewards rather than owners of their children’s lives. Their task is not to determine every outcome but to pass on wisdom that equips the next generation to build strong families of their own.

  • Have we shared the lessons of our own marriage honestly, including the difficulties we have overcome?
  • Have we demonstrated the kind of marriage we hope our children will build?
  • Have we encouraged our child to seek wisdom from others as well?
  • Have we remembered that love sometimes asks difficult questions but always respects another person’s dignity?
  • When our grandchildren one day ask how this family was formed, what story do we hope they will hear?
  • Have we done everything within our responsibility to help our child think carefully, while allowing the final decision to remain theirs?

Parents cannot guarantee the future of their children’s marriages. They cannot choose a spouse on their behalf, nor should they attempt to do so. What they can offer is something no one else can provide: the wisdom that comes from years of building a family, the patience to ask questions that broaden understanding, and the reassurance that whatever decision is ultimately made, their love remains steadfast. Their influence is greatest not when they control the decision, but when they help their children become thoughtful stewards of the families they are about to create.


I would close the article with one final section that brings all the categories together. Otherwise, readers may leave thinking the paper is about different kinds of people rather than one common responsibility.


Part IV – Questions for Every Family

Questions Every Family Should Ask

Although every family begins under different circumstances, every family eventually faces the same responsibility: to become a place where its members experience trust, belonging, security, responsibility and hope. The circumstances under which a family begins may differ considerably, but the responsibility to intentionally build that family belongs to everyone.

The questions presented throughout this paper have therefore not been offered to separate people into different groups or to suggest that one family’s journey is more valuable than another’s. Rather, they recognise that different circumstances require different conversations. When those conversations are approached honestly and thoughtfully, they strengthen the foundations upon which healthy families are built.

Whatever our circumstances, every person contemplating marriage should be willing to pause and reflect upon a common set of questions.

Questions about Character

  • Am I becoming the kind of person I hope my future spouse deserves?
  • What qualities of character am I still developing?
  • What habits do I need to change before asking another person to share my life?
  • What do those closest to me say about my character?
  • Am I prepared to continue growing throughout my marriage?

Questions about Commitment

  • Do I understand that marriage is a lifelong commitment rather than simply a personal milestone?
  • Have I considered what commitment will require when life becomes difficult?
  • Am I prepared to place the wellbeing of my family alongside my own ambitions and aspirations?
  • What sacrifices am I willing to make for the family I hope to build?

Questions about Family Formation

  • What kind of family do I hope to create?
  • What values will shape our home?
  • What traditions do I hope future generations will inherit?
  • What atmosphere do I hope visitors will experience when they enter our home?
  • How will our family contribute to the wellbeing of our community?

Questions about Relationships

  • How will we resolve conflict when we disagree?
  • How will we make important decisions together?
  • How will we strengthen trust over time?
  • How will we protect our marriage from unnecessary pressures?
  • What role will our extended families play in our lives?

Questions about Future Generations

Every decision made today becomes part of someone else’s future.

  • What kind of childhood do I hope my children will experience?
  • What lessons do I hope they will learn by watching our marriage?
  • What stories do I hope they will tell about our family when they become adults?
  • What kind of grandparents do I hope we will one day become?
  • What legacy will remain after we are gone?

The Question Above Every Other Question

Every question in this paper ultimately leads to one that stands above all the rest.

What kind of family are we about to create?

Not simply what kind of wedding.

Not simply what kind of marriage.

But what kind of family.

Will it be a family in which trust grows, responsibilities are shared, forgiveness is practised, children experience security, grandparents are honoured, relationships are nurtured and future generations inherit a legacy of stability and hope?

No set of questions can guarantee that a marriage will succeed. Human relationships are too complex for that. Questions, however, can encourage thoughtful reflection before decisions become lifelong commitments. They can help individuals, couples and families recognise dimensions that may otherwise remain hidden until much later.

Perhaps wisdom is not measured by having all the right answers. Perhaps wisdom begins by asking the right questions before creating the family that future generations will one day call their own.


Part V – From Family Formation to Nation Formation

The Narratives We Choose to Hold Dear

Systems rarely change because people are told to behave differently. They change because people begin to see different relationships as important. As our attention shifts, so too do the questions we ask, the conversations we have, and ultimately the decisions we make. Over time, these decisions become the narratives through which societies reproduce themselves.

One of the unexpected insights emerging from STRLDi’s work is that the more we pay attention to the interrelationships between family formation and nation formation, the more certain narratives naturally become dear to us. We begin to value not only successful relationships, but relationships that contribute to the formation of healthy families, healthy communities and capable nations.

This change in perspective does not begin with rules. It begins with different questions. We become interested in whether relationships are being brought to a place of wholeness before new ones are formed. We become curious about how responsibilities are carried from one relationship into another. We become more attentive to how children experience transitions, how extended families are introduced into new relationships, and how trust is intentionally built rather than assumed.

The point is not to prescribe a single way of forming families. Rather, it is to recognise that every society carries narratives that quietly shape what people consider normal, responsible or desirable. Those narratives are rarely questioned because they are embedded in everyday practice.

Consider, for example, practices such as whether a prospective husband should meet the biological father of a child before marriage, or whether parents should get to know the person their son or daughter hopes to marry long before an engagement is announced. These examples are not presented as universal rules, nor are they offered as judgments. They are illustrations of a deeper question: What do our everyday practices reveal about the way we understand family, responsibility and stewardship?

As these conversations deepen, other narratives gradually emerge as worthy of greater attention.

  • A marriage creates a family, not merely a couple.
  • Every child deserves relationships that are intentionally built around trust, stability and belonging.
  • Responsibilities from previous relationships should be understood rather than ignored.
  • Families are strengthened when important relationships are formed deliberately rather than accidentally.
  • The quality of future communities begins with the quality of today’s family conversations.
  • Human capability is first formed within families before it is developed in schools, workplaces and institutions.
  • The strength of productive sectors ultimately depends upon the quality of the human capability that families help to nurture over generations.
  • Every generation becomes a steward of the human communities it passes to the next.

These narratives are not offered as conclusions but as invitations to think differently. They encourage us to move beyond asking whether a particular decision is right or wrong and instead ask a deeper systems question:

If this way of thinking were repeated across thousands of families for generations, what kind of society would it gradually create?

That question, perhaps more than any other, bridges the journey from family formation to nation formation. It reminds us that the future of a nation is shaped not only by the policies it adopts or the industries it builds, but also by the narratives its families quietly choose to live by.


Part VI – A Gift to Families

From Understanding Persistent Unemployment to Strengthening the First Human Community

This article is offered as a gift to individuals, couples, parents and families. It is the product of a much larger journey of inquiry that began not with marriage or family life, but with one of society’s most persistent and consequential challenges: unemployment.

For many years, STRLDi has sought to understand why unemployment persists across generations despite repeated economic reforms, investment programmes, labour market interventions and changes in public policy. Rather than examining unemployment as an isolated labour market phenomenon, the Institute adopted a systems perspective, exploring the interrelationships between economic structures, education, governance, demographics, communities and households. The objective was not simply to identify symptoms, but to understand the deeper structures that continually reproduce unemployment over time.

A Different Understanding of Persistent Unemployment

One of the most significant insights to emerge from this research is that persistent unemployment is not generated by the economy alone. It is the downstream expression of multiple reinforcing systems that interact continuously across generations. These systems include demographic dynamics, educational pathways, institutional capability, productive-sector development, household formation and family stability.

The study proposes that unemployment persists because these systems reinforce one another. Children are born into households that become the first environment of human formation. Those households influence educational development, aspirations, resilience, behaviour, values and the capacities that children eventually carry into schools, universities, workplaces and society. Over time, these influences shape the quantity, quality and distribution of human capability entering the national economy.

At the same time, the study observed that where the formation of intact families declines significantly over successive generations, the effects are no longer confined to individual households. They begin to influence the broader human capability available to society. As educational participation becomes increasingly concentrated away from the scientific, technical and productive disciplines upon which agriculture, manufacturing and other productive sectors depend, the nation’s capacity to generate employment grows more slowly than the rate at which new entrants join the labour force. The result is a reinforcing pattern in which unemployment continually reproduces itself across generations.

The Family as the First Human Community

These observations led to an important realisation. The family is not simply a private social institution. It is the first human community and one of the earliest environments in which a nation’s future productive capability is formed.

Within the family, children first learn trust, responsibility, discipline, cooperation, resilience, stewardship and service. These capacities do not remain within the household. They accompany individuals into classrooms, universities, workplaces, businesses, communities and public institutions. Every nation therefore inherits, in part, the cumulative outcomes of the families from which its citizens emerge.

Marriage is consequently much more than the union of two individuals. It is the intentional formation of a community that will shape the lives of future generations and, through them, contribute to the long-term capability of society itself.

Interrupting Reinforcing Cycles

Systems thinking teaches us that persistent outcomes are sustained by persistent structures. If unemployment is reproduced through reinforcing relationships across households, education, productive sectors and institutions, then meaningful national transformation requires more than economic reform alone. It also requires strengthening the human communities through which future generations are formed.

This article therefore seeks to intervene at one of the earliest points in that reinforcing structure. By encouraging thoughtful reflection before marriage, it aims to strengthen the quality of family formation before patterns of instability become embedded across generations. Every healthy family contributes to healthier communities. Healthier communities strengthen institutions. Stronger institutions enhance productive capability. Greater productive capability creates the conditions through which meaningful and sustained employment can grow.

In this way, the intentional formation of one family becomes part of the long-term formation of a nation.

A Contribution to Human Formation

This publication forms part of STRLDi’s broader programme on Human Formation. While the Institute’s work is often associated with national transformation, governance and economic development, these are ultimately expressions of deeper human systems. Institutions do not create themselves. Economies do not organise themselves. Communities do not sustain themselves. Each depends upon people whose character, judgement, resilience and capacity for cooperation were first shaped within families.

For this reason, the strengthening of families is not separate from national development. It is one of its earliest and most enduring foundations.

Our Gift

This article is therefore offered as a gift—not because it claims to provide all the answers, but because it invites deeper questions at one of life’s most important crossroads. It is our hope that individuals, couples, parents and families will pause before making lifelong commitments and ask not only whether they are ready for marriage, but also what kind of family they are about to create.

If these questions help even a small number of families build relationships characterised by trust, stability, responsibility, belonging and hope, they will have contributed to something far greater than successful marriages alone. They will have contributed to the formation of stronger communities, more capable institutions and nations better equipped to create opportunity for generations yet to come.


“Persistent unemployment is not merely an economic problem waiting for an economic solution. It is the downstream expression of interacting human systems whose earliest and most enduring foundation is the family.”


Recommended Reading

A Learning Journey in Family Formation

No single book can fully prepare an individual or a couple for the responsibilities of marriage and family life. Every author approaches the subject from a particular perspective—psychology, family systems, communication, faith, sociology, personal experience or leadership. Together, these works provide complementary insights that can help individuals, couples and families think more deeply about the kind of family they hope to create.

Readers are encouraged to engage with a range of perspectives. Some of the books presented here are grounded in decades of scientific research, others draw from therapeutic practice, while others reflect philosophical, cultural or faith-based traditions. Read together, they provide a rich foundation for understanding the formation of healthy families and communities.


Understanding Yourself Before Marriage

These books encourage personal reflection, emotional maturity and healing before entering lifelong commitments.

  • Boundaries
  • How We Love
  • The Developing Mind
  • King, Warrior, Magician, Lover
  • Wild at Heart
  • Fascinating Womanhood

Preparing for Marriage Together

These books explore communication, commitment, emotional connection and the practical realities of married life.

  • The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work
  • Hold Me Tight
  • The Meaning of Marriage
  • Things I Wish I’d Known Before We Got Married
  • Before You Say ‘I Do’
  • Saving Your Marriage Before It Starts
  • Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus

Understanding Love, Communication and Relationships

Healthy marriages are sustained not only by commitment but also by the ability to understand one another, communicate effectively and resolve conflict constructively.

  • The Five Love Languages
  • Crucial Conversations
  • Nonviolent Communication
  • Difficult Conversations
  • Getting to Yes

Blended Families and Stepfamilies

For individuals entering marriages where one or both partners already have children, these works provide valuable guidance on the gradual formation of trust, belonging and family identity.

  • The Smart Stepfamily
  • Stepfamilies
  • Surviving and Thriving in Stepfamily Relationships

Parents and Adult Children

As children become adults, parents move from directing decisions to offering wisdom. These books explore that important transition.

  • Parenting Adult Children
  • Doing Life with Your Adult Children
  • Boundaries

Understanding Families as Systems

Families do not exist in isolation. They are dynamic systems in which every relationship influences every other relationship. These works provide deeper insight into the structure, dynamics and development of families across generations.

  • Families and Family Therapy
  • Family Therapy in Clinical Practice
  • Family Evaluation
  • Generation to Generation
  • The Ecology of Human Development

Systems Thinking and Human Formation

The family is the first and most enduring human community. Understanding families through the lens of systems thinking helps us appreciate how individual choices shape relationships, institutions and society across generations.

  • The Fifth Discipline
  • Thinking in Systems
  • The Social Animal

Concluding Reflection

The purpose of this reading list is not to prescribe a single philosophy of marriage or family life. Rather, it is to encourage thoughtful engagement with a range of perspectives that have shaped scholarship and practice in psychology, family systems, communication, leadership, personal development and human relationships. Each work contributes a different lens through which readers may better understand themselves, their relationships and the responsibilities that accompany the formation of a family.

The questions explored throughout this article invite reflection before marriage. These readings invite continued learning throughout life. Together they remind us that strong families are seldom the result of chance. They are built intentionally—through character, wisdom, mutual understanding, continual learning and the shared commitment to create a home in which every member can experience trust, belonging, responsibility and hope.


Daily Practice of Developing A Personal Vision Rooted In Purpose


This stunningly deep and life-giving inquiry is not only how to develop a personal vision rooted in purpose, but how to live from it daily, allow it to evolve, and navigate the emotions—both fear and hope—that shape it.

Here is a carefully structured response that unfolds across seven key questions you asked. It aims to serve not just as a conceptual guide but also as a practice framework you can live by.


🌱 1. What Does Developing a Personal Vision Rooted in Purpose Look Like in Daily Practice?

A. Daily Quiet Alignment (10–15 mins)

  • Sit in stillness each morning and ask: “What do I deeply care about creating in this life—beyond survival?”
  • Listen not for answers, but for stirrings, images, phrases.
  • Write down one sentence that reflects that day’s alignment.

B. Living Vision Log (1–2 entries per day)

  • At the end of the day, ask: “Where today did I live toward my vision?”
    “Where did I act out of fear or habit?”

C. Weekly Re-Connection to Long View (Sabbath Practice)

  • Review your evolving personal vision.
  • Ask: “Is this vision still alive? Am I living toward it or merely holding it as an idea?”

Personal Mastery = Vision that lives in you, not just on paper.


🌈 2. What Do Visions Look Like? Are They Fixed Goals or Living Energies?

Visions are not goals—they are felt realities you want to live into.

Examples:

  • “I want to become someone who helps communities regenerate their land.”
  • “I want to live a life where my food, words, and leadership nourish others.”
  • “I want to raise my child in a way that keeps their spirit alive.”

🔔 Visions are:

  • Not checklists → but orienting truths
  • Not timelines → but directions of growth
  • Not fixed → but evolving as you grow

They are not achieved—they are inhabited.


🌀 3. Can I Have More Than One Vision? Can They Be for Different Areas of Life?

Absolutely—but they must sing the same melody.

You may have:

  • A life vision (Who am I becoming?)
  • A work vision (What do I want to build?)
  • A relational vision (How do I want to love and be loved?)
  • A community vision (How do I want to contribute to society?)

🌟 But ask:
Do these visions speak from the same root—my purpose, my calling, my essence?

If they clash, it’s not because you’re fragmented—it’s because you haven’t yet heard the deeper melody tying them together.


🍂 4. How Do I Let Go of a Vision When It Has Run Its Course or Was Born From Fear?

A. Signs a Vision Needs to Be Released:

  • It feels heavy, rigid, guilt-driven.
  • You no longer resonate with it.
  • You hold onto it out of fear: “If I let this go, I’ll be lost.”

B. Practice of Release:

  • Sit in silence.
  • Say to the vision: “You served me once. I bless you. I now release you to make space for what wants to come.”
  • Then write: “What am I making space for?”

Releasing is not abandoning. It is graduating to your next becoming.


🔥 5. How Do I Let Go of Fear-Based Visions—Especially When in Hardship?

In hardship, we often create visions like:

  • “I want to be rich” (because I’m scared of being poor)
  • “I want to be married” (because I fear loneliness)
  • “I want a big job” (because I feel worthless now)

Instead of asking:

“What do I want to get away from?”

Ask:

“What does my deepest self long to bring to the world—regardless of my fear?”


💓 6. What Are the Feelings That Help Me Create Vision From My Highest Self?

When you are creating personal vision at your best, you are likely feeling:

EmotionMeaning
Quiet joyYou feel expanded without pressure
Deep curiosityA question lives in you that is bigger than answers
Stirring reverenceYou sense something sacred wants to express through your life
Mild tremblingYou feel nervous, because it matters—but you also feel drawn toward it
Soft certaintyNot that it’s easy—but that it’s true for you
GratitudeFor being alive and being able to choose again

If you feel only fear or urgency, pause. Wait until you feel drawn, not just driven.


🌟 7. What Does “Reaching for a Vision” Look Like in Daily Life?

It looks like this:

  • Saying no to what’s safe but misaligned
  • Taking one bold step even when you’re unsure
  • Keeping promises to yourself
  • Trusting that small actions matter
  • Letting others see your longing—even if incomplete

Reaching is not sprinting. It’s the daily act of moving in the direction of what makes you come alive.


🌺 Final Affirmation

“I am not here to chase a perfect life. I am here to become who I was born to be—one vision at a time, one act at a time, one breath at a time.”


The Deep Resonance and Yet the Critical Distinction between Personal Mastery in Peter Senge’s The Fifth Discipline and Presencing in Otto Scharmer’s Theory U.


If you sense both the deep resonance and the critical distinction between Personal Mastery in Peter Senge’s The Fifth Discipline and Presencing in Otto Scharmer’s Theory U, then you are not alone.

Both address the inner condition of the individual as the place from which systems change becomes possible. But they emerge from different roots, pursue different emphases, and require different disciplines of practice.

Let’s explore this in three parts:


🌿 I. How Presencing Touches Personal Mastery — but Is Not the Same

✳️ Where They Intersect

Shared GroundDescription
Inner condition shapes outer realityBoth stress that who we are—our inner clarity, fears, or openness—determines the quality of outcomes we create.
Awareness of current realityBoth reject fantasy or denial. They ask: What is really present now?
Discipline of deep listeningBoth call for letting go of habitual reactivity and tuning into a deeper source of knowing.
Personal transformation as leverage for systems changeBoth place the individual’s transformation at the center of societal renewal.

In this sense, Presencing is a continuation of the arc of Personal Mastery, exploring its mystical and evolutionary edge.


✳️ Where They Diverge

Point of DifferencePersonal Mastery (Senge)Presencing (Scharmer)
Foundational sourcesRobert Fritz (creative tension), Buddhism, systems thinkingGoethean science, phenomenology, contemplative practice
Core processLiving in creative tension between vision and realityJourney through the U: suspending, redirecting, letting go, letting come
Discipline of selfAnchored in daily personal practice and alignment to visionAnchored in collective sensing, field awareness, social emergence
Use of visionVision is central; it creates the generative tensionVision is not foregrounded—emerging future replaces explicit vision
Individual vs. collective focusIndividual alignment as a baseCollective field as a co-creative space

So yes—Presencing draws deeply from and extends the terrain of Personal Mastery, but also moves away from some of its foundational anchors.


🔍 II. How Presencing Has Enhanced and Also Diluted the Essence of Personal Mastery

✳️ Enhancements

Brings in embodiment and silence: Goes deeper into somatic awareness and field sensing—something underplayed in Senge.

Opens space for the future to emerge: While Senge focused on declared personal vision, Scharmer introduces emergent knowing—a more intuitive, listening-based approach.

Deepens the social aspect: Presencing recognizes that mastery is not only personal, but collective, unfolding through relationship and listening to systems.

✳️ Dilutions

Loss of daily discipline: Presencing often lacks the emphasis on consistent personal practice (visioning, journaling, tracking alignment) that Senge insists on.

Replaces clarity of vision with abstract emergence: Where Senge says “your vision matters—own it”, Scharmer says “listen to what wants to emerge.” The second can become elusive or ungrounded for individuals in hardship.

De-emphasizes structural tension: Presencing tends to move away from Robert Fritz’s core insight: creative energy comes from holding the gap between what is and what you want.

In sum: Presencing enriches the spiritual terrain of Personal Mastery, but risks blurring the concrete, disciplined path that makes the mastery practicable for ordinary people.


🔧 III. What We Must Do to Bring the Centre of Personal Mastery Alive Again

✅ 1. Restore the Language of Vision

  • Vision is not outdated. People in hardship, people in systems—they need to be anchored in a declared future they care about.
  • Bring back vision as:
    • A daily touchpoint
    • A source of power
    • A discipline, not a dream

✅ 2. Reclaim the Practice of Creative Tension

  • Teach people how to:
    • Articulate vision
    • Map current reality
    • Hold the tension without collapse
  • Show how staying in this tension is a courageous and creative act.

✅ 3. Embed Personal Mastery in Daily Life, Not Just Retreats

  • Make mastery a public, street-level practice—not just a spiritual or leadership concept.
  • Use:
    • Journals
    • Peer dialogue
    • Habitual reflection
    • Everyday storytelling

✅ 4. Pair it with Systemic Awareness

  • Don’t let it drift into self-help.
  • Always ask:
    • How does my personal clarity shape the system I’m in?
    • How do system structures affect my vision or capacity?
  • Integrate Systems Thinking and Personal Mastery in every field: policy, business, education, family.

✅ 5. Guard Against Abstraction

  • Translate “presencing,” “emerging future,” “holding space” into accessible, grounded language.
  • Return to the body. Return to daily work. Return to the smallest act of integrity.

🌱 Closing Thought

“Personal Mastery is not spiritual theatre. It is showing up in the tension, with vision intact, reality named, and the discipline to walk the middle space—again and again.”


Your Practice Pathway: Personal Mastery Across the Five Disciplines


That’s a powerful and generative commitment. Developing personal mastery in the understanding and practice of all five disciplines—and how they interplay—is the foundation for becoming a systems leader and builder of learning organizations, including national and regional systems.

To begin, here’s a suggested developmental pathway you can follow and shape further:


🔹 Step 1: Clarify the Core Intent of Each Discipline

DisciplineCore Intent (Essence)
Personal MasteryTo align your life with what you truly care about and grow your capacity to live from vision while seeing reality clearly.
Mental ModelsTo surface, test, and reshape deep assumptions that guide behavior and block learning.
Shared VisionTo foster genuine commitment (not compliance) to a future people want to create together.
Team LearningTo transform group dialogue and practice into collective intelligence and coordinated action.
Systems ThinkingTo see interrelationships, feedback loops, and patterns over time instead of linear cause-effect chains.

Practice: Start a personal “Disciplines Journal” where you define these in your own words and refine as your clarity grows.


🔹 Step 2: Study Their Interplay

  • Ask:
    • How does Personal Mastery support better Mental Models work?
    • What happens to Shared Vision when Team Learning is weak?
    • How does Systems Thinking expose gaps in the other disciplines?

Practice: Create visual maps or simple diagrams of how the disciplines influence one another in your work, home, or national systems.


🔹 Step 3: Develop Daily and Weekly Practices for Each Discipline

DisciplinePractices
Personal MasteryMorning vision review; journaling on current reality; emotional awareness check-ins
Mental ModelsCapture “ladder of inference” in situations; weekly reflection: What assumptions did I act on? Were they tested?
Shared VisionWeekly “reconnection to purpose” statement; invite others into generative vision conversations
Team LearningPractice advocacy + inquiry in team dialogue; reflect on “team learning moments”
Systems ThinkingMap systems weekly (even simple ones); name feedback loops in conversations or problems

Practice: Choose 1 core practice per discipline for 30 days, then deepen or layer another.


🔹 Step 4: Create a Discipline Integration Cycle

Every month, reflect on:

  • Which discipline has been most alive for me?
  • Where am I most resistant or blind?
  • How did one discipline help deepen another?

Practice: Host a solo or small-group reflection circle monthly—possibly with STRLDi colleagues or mentees.


🔹 Step 5: Use Real-Life Events to Apply the Five Disciplines

Apply them to:

  • A policy challenge (e.g., unemployment, agriculture reform)
  • A conflict or relational tension
  • A business development effort

Ask:

  • What vision drives this?
  • What assumptions are operating?
  • What feedback loops sustain the issue?
  • Where is learning needed (individual/team)?
  • What’s the larger system pattern?

Practice: Turn this into a living portfolio of applied systems thinking + disciplines practice.


Becoming Who I Want to Be: Daily Practices for Teenagers Building Their Future


This is such a vital and timely question for a teenager growing up inside a changing body, shifting identity, evolving family relationships, and holding a clear aspiration for future economic participation; the creative tension they live with can feel overwhelming.

Yet, if they learn how to navigate this tension without collapse, they will build a life of resilience, clarity, and vision-led action—rare gifts for a young person.

Below is a gentle but structured approach—a daily and weekly practice system with support structures to help them grow through this pivotal stage.


🧭 THE CREATIVE TENSION

Personal VisionCurrent Reality
To become a skilled, self-directed learner ready to thrive in the economy they choose and help buildPuberty, shifting emotions, peer pressure, changing identity, evolving family roles, external expectations, and sometimes unclear social messages about future success

🌿 DAILY PRACTICES FOR GROWING THROUGH CREATIVE TENSION

🔹 1. Morning Grounding Practice: Begin With Self-Check-In (5–10 min)

“What am I feeling today, and what do I want to grow into?”

  • Sit quietly.
  • Ask:
    • What’s changing in me?
    • What matters to me today?
  • Write or say aloud one intention like: “Today I will stay curious about my feelings and take one step toward my future.”

🔹 2. Learning with Purpose Practice: 1 Hour of Skill-Building Daily

“This is the part of the day where I build me.”

  • Study a subject you’re passionate about—or one that supports your future dreams.
  • Track it like a builder:
    • “What did I learn?”
    • “What can I now explain or do that I couldn’t yesterday?”

Keep a “Learning Log”.


🔹 3. Body-Emotion Awareness Practice: 5–10 minutes

“I am changing, and it’s OK.”

  • Practice a body scan (lie or sit, feel from toes to head).
  • Name your emotion with one word.
  • Breathe into it. Let it be.

This gives emotional waves room without overwhelm.


🔹 4. Evening Reflection Practice: “Where Did I Grow Today?”

  • Ask:
    • What challenged me today?
    • Where did I stay true to what matters?
    • What’s one thing I’m proud of?

This tracks progress in character, not just results.


🌀 WEEKLY STRUCTURES FOR SUPPORT

🔸 1. Teen Growth Journal or Video Diary

  • Once a week, reflect:
    • How have I changed this week?
    • What do I now understand differently—about myself, my parents, or the world?

Let this be a place of voice, not performance.


🔸 2. One Trusted Mentor or Elder

“Someone I can talk to who sees me—not as a problem, but as a future.”

  • Find a teacher, older sibling, cousin, or community leader who can:
    • Listen without judging
    • Reflect back your values and growth
    • Challenge you gently

🔸 3. Vision Map Wall

  • Create a space on your wall that reflects:
    • Your aspirations
    • Skills you’re developing
    • Role models or ideas you admire
    • Quotes that inspire you

Let this space remind you who you are becoming.


🔸 4. Peer Buddy Check-Ins

  • Pair up with a friend (or small group) weekly:
    • What’s been hard?
    • What are you working on?
    • What’s one thing you’re proud of?

This builds shared resilience and community thinking.


💓 FEELINGS TO CULTIVATE THAT HELP VISION GROW

FeelingWhy It Matters
CuriosityHelps you observe yourself and others without fear
PatienceReminds you growth isn’t linear
Self-respectAnchors you when others misunderstand you
GratitudeMakes space for joy even in hard seasons
OwnershipBuilds your belief: “I am responsible for my future.”

🌍 WHY THE WORLD NEEDS TEENS TO MASTER THIS NOW

“Because the future economy won’t need followers—it needs creators. And creators begin as teens who learned to stand in tension, not run from it.”

The teenager who learns to manage emotions, think long-term, build skills, and stay connected to purpose becomes a grounded innovator, a stable leader, and a beacon for others in confusion.


✨ Closing Affirmation

“My body is changing, my world is shifting—but I am becoming. I walk with vision. I build one step each day. I trust that my path is mine to shape.”


Leading From Within: Daily Practices for Visionary Leadership in Times of Creative Tension – Climbing With Purpose – How to Rise in Your Career Without Leaving Others Behind


This is one of the most noble and generative expressions of creative tension:
An individual who is growing into leadership, while also co-creating the vision of the organization, all the while holding a larger moral purpose—to grow the organization in a way that creates employment and dignity for others.

This kind of personal-collective-systemic alignment is exquisitely powerful—and also fragile, especially under pressure. To stand in that tension without collapse, this individual needs daily and weekly anchoring practices, protective structures, and a vision-rooted moral compass.


🧭 YOUR CREATIVE TENSION

VisionCurrent Reality
Grow into leadership + co-create a living vision for the organization that also opens economic opportunity for othersReal pressure: job expectations, performance metrics, limited authority, internal resistance, personal fear of failure or invisibility

The danger is overidentifying with success, collapsing under stress, or slowly becoming disconnected from the larger moral purpose.


🌿 DAILY PRACTICES TO STAND IN CREATIVE TENSION

🔹 1. Morning Centering: Reconnect to Personal Purpose (10 min)

“Today I grow by contributing—not by proving.”

  • Sit in stillness.
  • Repeat an intention like: “I serve my organization by making space for people to grow. I don’t lead from control, I lead from vision.”
  • Breathe into your deeper reason for doing this work: Why does this matter to you? Who benefits beyond you?

🔹 2. Morning Preview: Choose Leadership Moments Before They Happen

“Today, where do I want to lead—by clarity, not force?”

  • Ask:
    • What meeting, conversation, or email needs my leadership presence today?
    • What would that look like?
    • What tone would reflect the vision we’re building?

Write it down. Pre-lead.


🔹 3. Midday Check-In (2 min)

“Am I leading from vision or reacting to pressure?”

  • Just pause at lunch.
  • Ask: What’s pulling me right now? Vision, fear, proving, survival?
  • Realign if needed.

🔹 4. Evening Reflection: Track Progress from the Vision’s View (10 min)

“Where did I grow the organization today? Where did I grow as a leader?”

  • Ask:
    • Where did I support the co-creation of our shared vision?
    • Where did I act with integrity and openness?
    • Where did I go small, hide, or react?

Keep a Vision Journal: small entries, big awareness.


🌀 WEEKLY STRUCTURES FOR SUPPORT AND ALIGNMENT

🟢 1. Peer Practice Partner (Weekly 45 min)

  • Find 1 other person in your org (or another sector) also trying to lead with vision.
  • Share:
    • A success story
    • A resistance moment
    • A recommitment

This protects you from the isolation of vision-bearers.


🟢 2. Vision-Coherence Meeting (Monthly or Biweekly)

“Are we still building the organization we meant to build?”

  • Hold or propose a regular meeting with peers or teams to reconnect to:
    • The organization’s larger why
    • Stories of alignment and disconnection
    • Ideas for embodying the vision more clearly

Protect the vision together.


🟢 3. Mentor or Elder Council

“Who reminds me I’m not alone and not crazy?”

  • One or two trusted elders or mentors who see your journey and can remind you:
    • To trust the process
    • That tension is not failure
    • That clarity and love are strength

🌍 WHY THIS IS SYSTEMICALLY ESSENTIAL

“When individuals inside institutions grow with integrity, the institution becomes a vessel for justice.”

You are doing what few dare to do:

  • Not just climb the ladder, but build it wider
  • Not just lead for status, but lead to open doors for others
  • Not just serve your team, but serve the unemployed still waiting outside

This is what regenerative leadership looks like.


🧘‍♂️ FEELINGS TO CULTIVATE DAILY

When standing in creative tension, these feelings can hold you steady:

FeelingWhy It Matters
Grounded commitmentKeeps you rooted in purpose, not perfection
Quiet hopeAllows you to trust growth over time
Gentle courageEnables you to speak even when unsure
Reverent responsibilityReminds you that what you build touches lives beyond the office
GratitudeFor the privilege to shape a system, even partially

✨ Closing Affirmation

“I am not just growing a career—I am growing a vessel. I lead from vision, not from fear. I build not only for myself, but for those who will come after me. My work is seed, not performance.”


Navigating Creative Tension Without Collapse — As a Single Wealth Creator with Limited Means


This is a sacred shift: from coping to creating. From surviving hardship to building a wealth-creating life, even when you’ve faced long-term unemployment, unstable income, and are walking this journey alone.

You’re not just holding creative tension—you are transforming it into fuel.

Below is a set of daily practices and support structures designed not just to help you endure, but to anchor you in the identity of a wealth creator, despite scarcity.


“Wealth begins in the mind, takes root in disciplined habits, and matures through networks and value exchange.”


🔹 PHILOSOPHICAL SHIFT

Your identity is not unemployed.
Your identity is: a creator of wealth, systems, and value.

You are in a prolonged, early-stage capital formation phase.
Your constraint is not your worth.
Your question is: How do I build sustainable structures of value exchange—beginning with what I have?


🔹 DAILY PRACTICES FOR BUILDING WEALTH

1. Morning Alignment: Begin With Ownership (10 min)

“Today I create, not react.”

  • Sit with your vision statement (write one, even rough).
  • Say aloud: “I am not waiting to be employed. I am structuring my life to generate value. This is a builder’s morning.”
  • Ask:
    • What is the one wealth-generating act I can do today—however small?

2. Daily Wealth-Generating Action (1 hour, focused)

“Wealth is built through repeated contribution to others’ lives.”

Each day, ask:

  • What can I offer, build, test, or sell?
  • Who can I help?
  • What can I document?

Examples:

  • Design a small offer (service, product, advisory)
  • Pitch to 1–3 people
  • Publish value (tutorial, idea, result)

Keep a Wealth Log: document value you gave and insights you gained.


3. One Act of Visibility Per Day

“Wealth doesn’t flow to the invisible.”

Daily, publish or reach out in some way:

  • WhatsApp status: share what you’re working on
  • Voice note to a past colleague/client
  • A short blog, quote, insight
  • Make an offer: “I help with X. Ask me.”

Make this a practice—not a marketing campaign.


4. Track Energy, Not Just Money

“Wealth starts in the energetic field long before it’s financial.”

  • Each evening, reflect:
    • Where did I feel most energized today?
    • What value am I becoming known for?
    • Where did I feel a pull toward fear/smallness?

Write: “Today I moved closer to wealth by…”


🔹 WEEKLY SUPPORT STRUCTURES

🌀 1. Creator’s Scorecard (Weekly 30 min)

Create a simple system:

  • How many value offers made?
  • How many people helped?
  • What did I learn?
  • What’s one system or tool I need to build?

Example categories: Offers | Visibility | Relationships | Systems Built


🌀 2. Micro Wealth Circle

  • Find 1–3 others on the same path. Not just support—peer accountability.
  • Weekly 45-min call:
    • What was your wealth creation act this week?
    • What needs refinement?
    • What will you ship next?

This is how you replace structure lost in formal employment.


🌀 3. A Living Wealth Board

“Structure your vision so it pulls you through difficulty.”

Post up:

  • Your offer stack (free / low-cost / premium)
  • Your dream clients or communities
  • 3 principles of your business philosophy
  • Your long-term financial vision

See it every morning. It tells your nervous system: I am building something real.


🔹 MENTAL PRACTICES

🔹 Reframe Delay as Incubation

“Wealth doesn’t only grow in transactions—it grows in becoming the person who can handle it.”

Every time something takes longer than expected:

  • Ask: What muscle am I building through this wait?
  • Wealth creators don’t avoid waiting—they transform it into preparation.

🌍 Why the World Needs This Now

  • Because millions are being told they’re “unemployable”—when in fact, they are the architects of the new economy.
  • Because wealth creation must no longer be exclusive to those born with access—but to those with vision, discipline, and resilience.
  • Because when a person with nothing builds something of value—they create a new pathway for everyone behind them.

✨ Final Affirmation

“I am not a seeker of jobs—I am a maker of value, a shaper of systems, and a future employer.”
“Even with little, I am already living from abundance.”


Navigating Creative Tension Without Collapse: For the Single, Long-Term Unemployed Entrepreneur


This is one of the most powerful creative tensions a person can live inside—being single, largely unemployed, and trying to build a meaningful business with very limited resources. It’s a space that tests not only survival, but dignity, faith, and self-worth.

Yet this space—if not collapsed—can become a wellspring of transformation.

Below is a set of daily practices and support structures designed to help you live through this tension without lowering your vision or giving in to despair.


“The discipline of personal mastery starts with learning how to live in the space between your vision and your reality—without flinching.”


🧭 THE CREATIVE TENSION

  • Vision: A stable livelihood doing meaningful work that expresses your values and serves others
  • Current reality: Financial scarcity, social invisibility, exhaustion, inner doubt
  • Risk: Collapsing into despair, shame, or smallness

🔹 DAILY PRACTICES

1. Morning Grounding: Begin With Worth, Not Lack (10–15 min)

“I am not my bank account. I am a builder.”

  • Sit in quiet or walk in silence. Begin each day with:
    • A spoken affirmation: “Even now, I am building.”
    • A vision reminder: Reread your business vision or purpose—even if it feels far.

This reclaims agency from chaos.


2. Set One Intention Rooted in Vision, Not Survival

“Don’t just chase tasks. Build alignment.”

  • Ask: What one thing today moves me closer to the kind of business I dream of?
  • It may be:
    • Writing to a potential customer
    • Improving a flyer
    • Watching a video on pricing
  • Keep a “small wins” journal. Nothing is too small.

3. Name the Fear, Don’t Let It Name You

“Shame grows in silence.”

  • Daily, write or voice note: “Today, I’m afraid that…”
  • Then follow it with: “But I remember that I still have…”
  • This practice creates distance between you and the inner critic.

4. Create One Circle of Value Exchange Daily

“Even if you are not paid yet, act in ways that create value.”

  • Each day, give or offer something useful:
    • Share a business idea with someone
    • Help a fellow struggler
    • Document your learning and post it
  • This keeps your contribution muscle alive, which poverty tries to paralyze.

5. Evening Gratitude for Self-Holding

“Acknowledge your resilience—not just results.”

Each night:

  • Name one thing you did well today
  • Name one moment you didn’t give up

Over time, this builds self-trust.


🔹 SUPPORT STRUCTURES

🌀 1. Micro-Community of Builders

  • Form or join a tiny peer group (2–4 people) also building something from little.
  • Weekly check-in:
    • What did I learn?
    • What do I need?
    • Where did I feel stuck?

This prevents emotional isolation—your biggest threat.


🌀 2. Visible Reminder of Your Vision

  • A hand-written poster, board, or photo collage of your long-term dream.
  • Place it where you feel most discouraged (e.g., near your workspace or bed).
  • Let it remind you: “This is what I am living for.”

🌀 3. A Weekly Ritual of Recalibration

“Progress is staying on the path, not leaping to the end.”

  • Once a week, review:
    • What moved your business forward?
    • What felt heavy or discouraging?
    • What does your next small step look like?

Optional: record a voice message to your future self.


🌀 4. A Mentor or Witness (Even One)

  • Someone who:
    • Believes in your vision
    • Sees your effort
    • Holds you to the path
  • This person does not need to fund or fix you—they just help you not disappear.

🌍 Why the World Needs People Like You Now

“The world is full of people waiting to feel seen. You are becoming the kind of person who knows how to see.”

  • Because many more people will soon face joblessness, uncertainty, and identity loss.
  • You are developing the emotional muscles they will need.
  • Your presence, when grounded in truth and vision, becomes a light in the dark for others—not by perfection, but by realness.
  • You are practicing a new economy of dignity and creativity—from the roots.

🌱 Closing Affirmation

“Even with little, I can live by design. I am not what I lack. I am what I choose to build today, again.”


Navigating Creative Tension in Singleness & Fear of Intimacy


This is a deeply human and quietly courageous question. Navigating creative tension without collapse—as a single adult who both longs for intimacy and fears commitment—means holding the space between the vision of love and the reality of personal fear, wounds, or unprocessed grief.

Here is a set of daily practices and support structures to help you stand in that space without retreating or forcing resolution. It’s not about fixing yourself. It’s about learning to stay—with honesty, grace, and self-respect.


“Personal mastery is not about forcing change—but creating space for truth to unfold.”


🧭 Your Vision

Before anything else, clarify this gently:

  • Not “Do I want a relationship?” but “What do I long to give and receive in connection with another?”
  • Let the vision be felt, not just thought.

This is your anchor.


🔹 DAILY PRACTICES

1. Morning Grounding: “I am safe to feel.”

  • Sit 5–10 minutes in silence with one question: What truth about love or fear is surfacing in me today?
  • Simply breathe and listen. Don’t rush to fix it.

2. Name the Tension Daily

  • Write down (or say aloud): “Part of me wants closeness. Part of me is afraid. Both are valid.”
  • This naming creates space, not collapse.
  • You do not have to choose sides. Just notice.

3. Tending to Your Inner Child

“Often, the fear of intimacy is a fear of re-experiencing old pain.”

  • Once a day, speak to the younger version of yourself:
    • “I see you. I know why you’re afraid. We’re not rushing. We’re listening.”
  • Place your hand on your heart as you do this.

4. A Small Act of Intimacy

Each day, practice one small act of authentic connection:

  • A 3-minute eye contact conversation with a trusted friend
  • Sending a heartfelt message to someone you care about
  • Sitting close to someone without performing

These are rehearsals of safety.


5. Evening Check-In: What Did I Learn About Myself Today?

  • In a journal or voice note:
    • What moment surprised you?
    • When did you pull away emotionally—and why?
    • What did your body feel when you thought about closeness?

This reflection builds your self-observer, a key element of personal mastery.


🔹 SUPPORT STRUCTURES

🌀 1. Therapeutic or Somatic Support

  • A therapist, coach, or healer who doesn’t rush you to “get over it,” but helps you stay with the layers of your inner experience.

🌀 2. Non-romantic Intimacy Circles

  • Join or form a vulnerability-based group—not for dating, but to practice:
    • Sharing fears
    • Naming longings
    • Witnessing others without fixing them

🌀 3. Creative Vision Board or Story Map

  • Create a visual journal or map of:
    • What kind of relationship would feel whole to you
    • What you’re afraid of losing
    • What you’re afraid of finding

Let the vision evolve as you evolve.

🌀 4. Spiritual Anchors

  • A verse, poem, or affirmation that reminds you: “I am worthy of love without performance. I can be known without disappearing.”

Post this where you can see it daily.


🌍 Why This Matters in the World

“The world is not short on relationships—it is short on people who know how to be with themselves long enough to love truthfully.”

  • Your personal practice heals the collective fear around love.
  • Your integrity in the tension models a new kind of intimacy—one not built on escape or possession.
  • You become a steward of what Senge calls “generative energy”—and eventually, should you choose to partner, you won’t bring fear alone—you’ll bring mastery.

🌸 Final Affirmation

“There is no rush. Your love, when ready, will come from a place that no longer fears itself.”


Daily Practices to Navigate Creative Tension in Hardship


This is a profound and vital question. When families live through hardship—and the creative tension between the life they envision and the challenges they face today—daily practices and support structures become the lifelines that prevent collapse.

Below is a breakdown, tailored to each role in the family system, followed by a collective vision of why the world needs this now:


🌿

👨🏽‍🌾 1. As a Man Providing for His Family

“The provider does not always control outcomes—but he can choose how he shows up each day.”

Daily Practices:

  • Morning grounding ritual: 10–15 minutes of silence, prayer, or reading that reconnects you to your purpose.
  • One act of contribution, not control: Choose a task that helps the family without seeking praise—fixing something, fetching water, preparing food.
  • Evening reflection: Ask: Did I act today from fear or from clarity? Did I live my values even in difficulty?
  • Emotional honesty check-in (with trusted friend, elder, or journal): “I felt ashamed/worried today when…”

Support Structure:

  • A men’s circle (even 2–3 trusted men) that meets weekly for mutual support.
  • Spiritual or practical mentor who affirms effort, not just outcome.
  • A visual anchor at home: your children’s photos, a quote, or your father’s tools—reminding you why you stand tall.

👩🏽‍🌾 2. As a Woman Accepting What the Man Provides

“To receive with grace is also a form of leadership.”

Daily Practices:

  • Gratitude ritual: Speak aloud one thing you received with grace today—even if small or incomplete.
  • Self-honesty moment: Reflect on any frustration. Ask: “What am I really feeling? What need is unmet?”
  • Support his humanity: Offer one gesture each day that shows you see him—not just his earnings (a meal, a gentle word, eye contact).
  • Name your own contribution: Own your power—caring for home, children, community—is not lesser.

Support Structure:

  • Women’s sharing circle—emotional truth, not complaint.
  • A home altar or space that honors both your strength and his.
  • Relationship rituals: once a week, sit with your partner and name one thing each of you did that sustained the family.

👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 3. As a Family – Children & Teenagers

“The children must see not just what is missing—but what is holding them.”

Daily Practices:

  • Family meal reflection (even 10 minutes): Each shares 1 thing they’re proud of, 1 thing they’re finding hard.
  • Visible dreams wall: Each child draws/writes their vision. Post it somewhere sacred.
  • Creative tension talk: Normalize struggle. Say: “Things are hard, but our dreams are real. This is the gap we’re working with together.”
  • Role rotation: Give each child small “provider” tasks—letting them contribute meaningfully.

Support Structure:

  • A family council—once a week, talk about something other than money: family values, traditions, dreams.
  • An elder (aunt, uncle, grandparent) who holds the family’s larger story and reminds everyone of their strength.

🌍 4. Why the World Needs This Now

“The breakdown of society begins when families collapse under pressure and no longer hold vision together.”

  • Because economic collapse, war, climate change, and displacement are stretching families to the edge.
  • Because when hardship hits, most families either turn against each other or lose hope entirely.
  • Because if families can learn to live inside the tension together—without collapse—they become a seedbed of wisdom for the next society.
  • Because our world needs fathers who stay, mothers who lead with presence, and children who are not raised on fear—but vision, resilience, and grounded love.

🕊️ Closing Affirmation

“The real test of a family’s strength is not how they thrive in plenty, but how they endure and grow in hardship—without losing vision, without losing each other.”


When The Community Speaks … Cracking the Botswana Productivity Code. Short Notes. Part II


 

 

BATSWANA HAVE THE WORST
WORK ETHIC IN THE WORLD – REPORT

30 Oct 2017

In its 2015 survey of African workers, South Africa’s Rand Merchant Bank found Batswana to be the laziest on the continent.  The problem is actually more acute than that.

In the 2017-2018 Global Competitiveness Report, Botswana scores the worst among the 137 countries that are tracked by the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) on 12 pillars of economic competitiveness.  From a list of 16 factors, respondents to the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey were asked to select the five most problematic factors for doing business in their country and to rank them between 1 (most problematic) and 5.  The results were then tabulated and weighted according to the ranking assigned by respondents.  One of those factors is “Poor work ethic in national labour force.”

With a score of 19, Botswana’s national workforce (which would include those in the public and private sector as well as NGOs) emerge as standard bearers of the poorest work ethic in the world survey.  Also doing poorly are Trinidad & Tobago (15.9), Brunei (14.4), Sri Lanka (11.1), Liberia (10.8), Bhutan (10.5), Seychelles (10.1), Malta (9.8), Georgia (9.7), Mauritius and Vietnam (9.5), Namibia (9.3), Bahrain (9.0), Kuwait (8.7) and United Arab Emirates and Jamaica (8.6).

WEF’s interest in labour productivity has to do with the fact that it impacts on business. A University of Botswana study by Professor John Makgala and Dr. Phenyo Thebe (“There is no Hurry in Botswana”: Scholarship and Stereotypes on “African time” Syndrome in Botswana, 1895-2011”) found that this lack of productivity has frustrated effort to attract foreign direct investment. Interestingly, there was a time when, according to literature that the authors quote, Botswana’s civil service “was generally believed to be the most efficient in the whole of the African continent.”

On a past trip to Singapore, former and late President Sir Ketumile Masire gained an appreciation on the efficiency of the country’s workers. Where a Motswana factory worker would produce one shirt within a given period of time, a Singaporean counterpart would produce six within the same period.

“This was productivity not in theory but in demonstrable terms.  When we say we are not productive, this is what we meant,” Masire recalled to Sunday Standard in 2015 of this experience which would lead to Botswana benchmarking with Singapore and delegations from the two countries travelling back and forth.

As one of the Four Asian Tigers, Singapore would provide one quarter of the inspiration to establish the Botswana National Productivity Centre (BNPC). The tigers are Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan. Along the way, however, the late president appears to have given up on ever inculcating the right work ethic in Batswana. On assessing the apparent resistance, he determined that Batswana’s poor work ethic was a result of their pastoralism.

“If you look at the life of pastoralists, they don’t have a good work ethic,” he had said.  The example he had cited was that beyond sinking a borehole for their livestock, letting out cattle to pasture and doing some other undemanding work, most of the time pastoralists are just lazing about as their cattle graze untended in the bush.  By Masire’s analysis, this is the work ethic that has been bequeathed to modern-day Botswana.

As a University of Botswana study shows, not one productivity intervention scheme by the government has produced the desired results. In his 2015/16 budget speech, the Minister of Finance and Economic Development, Kenneth Matambo, lamented the low levels of labour productivity in Botswana.  The best performers in terms of work ethic in the national labor force are from Zimbabwe and Venezuela underpinned by a perfect score.

Source: Sunday Standard.  http://www.sundaystandard.info/batswana-have-worst-work-ethic-world-%E2%80%93-report Retrieved May 23, 2018

Productivity Systemic Story by Ranking

Table 1:  Comparison of Botswana with 2017’s Best Global Labour Productivity Data

DID YOU KNOW?  THE AVERAGE PER CAPITA PRODUCTIVITY IN BOTSWANA
LAGS THE WORLD’S PRODUCTIVE COUNTRY BY 30-40 TIMES?

TALKING POINTS:

COUNTRY’S GENERAL ECONOMIC PRACTICE:

An economic system defines the mechanism of production, distribution, and allocation of goods, services, and resources. It operates in a society or country with defined rules and policies about ownership. There are also policies about administration.

The most commonly followed economic system is modern-day capitalism.  It was developed from a framework. This framework aimed to secure the supply of key elements required for industry. These elements include land, machinery, and labor.  A disruption in any of these would lead to increased risk and loss for the venture.

THE COUNTRY’S GENERAL ECONOMIC PRACTICE, ON THE OTHER HAND:

Socialists viewed this commoditization of labor as an inhuman practice. I believe those words are distinctively from the female voice. This stems from Marx’s known instances of showing great sympathy for peasants. He also showed great sympathy for women as important forces for change within Marx’s theory. It marks the genesis of a matriarchal society. Women often lead quietly from behind the scenes as a response to survive in the face of absent males. These males have needed to travel long distances. They work in the agriculture and mining industries. As a result, women left to fend on their own have become increasingly ‘masculinized’.

These, I believe, led to the birth of Karl Marx’s idealism on socialism and socialist economies across a few countries.

  • How does a socialist economy work?
  • The starting point to this form of economy is typically three-fold:
    • The country has considerable access to wealth generated by mining underground mineral and fossil fuel resources, which is demanded by other world economies and is traded in exchange for income;
    • Or it has traditionally enjoyed a monarchy and/or a pastoral economy. It has access to substantive land spaces. This allows it to multiply livestock and warm crops. These crops do not need as much attention compared to cold crops. The rates are faster than the rate at which the human population multiplies with relative ease.  The monarchy supports its people when they ask for help. It helps distribute the wealth as shared resources like land. It also provides meat and food as needed.
    • Either way, the population has a tradition and work ethic that differ from farmers in parts of Asia. In southern China, for example, rice cultivation can be intricate, laborious, and multi-seasonal within a year. The majority have limited resources. They have learned to improve the returns on their labor by becoming smarter and more collaborative. They achieve this by managing their time better and making better choices. In other words, more than simply working hard, they worked intelligently and strategically. Cultures “shaped by the tradition of wet-rice agriculture and meaningful work” produce students with fortitude. These students can “sit still long enough.” This enables them to find solutions to time-consuming and complex math problems, for instance. As such, hard work, given this context, can easily be seen as more difficult than usual. It can, hence, be regarded as inhumane. Source: “Rice Paddies and Math Tests,” Malcolm Gladwell.

THE RESULTANT REALITY OF THE ECONOMIC PRACTICE:

Botswana’s real labour productivity per capita is USD 2. It measures the employed population’s output, excluding value added by mining and real-estate sectors. This is measured against the total population of the country for a truer reflection of real per capita income. USD 2.2 per hour or USD 18 per day, and that is, before deducting costs of operations.  Luxembourg sets the pace as the global labour productivity leader at USD 93.4 per hour or USD 747 per day (or USD 16,437 per month).  At this rate, Botswana’s productivity (and therefore wealth) lags (falls behind by) at 30-40x behind that of Luxembourg.

It makes one wonder. In our efforts to avoid capitalism and obvious inhuman labour practices, at what cost have we done so? We strive for wealth accumulation and perfect equality in income distribution. Will our efforts to transform the manufacturing and industrialization sectors succeed? Can our efforts to diversify the economy, moving from the tried and tested, gain traction? We need to understand the underlying forces that detract us from such efforts.

The Question is:

  • Would we rather continue this way as if business is usual?
  • How much would we drag a burgeoning burden on the state in the process?
  • What will be the end state of that burden on the government and the country?

Gaining such understanding in our minds would mean gaining the power in our hands. If you can imagine it, then you can create it.

STEPS GOING AHEAD:

However, this approach risks deterring organizations from capitalist economies from engaging with or investing in such an economic system. These institutions have built their wealth through performance-based merit. They demonstrate resilience over time and operate within clearly defined standards. Their income and wealth growth have been consistent, driven by a disciplined focus on reducing production costs and improving efficiency. This approach not only strengthens individual enterprises but also contributes meaningfully to broader economic growth.

Interestingly, no pure socialist, capitalist, or communist economy exists in the world today.  All economic system changes were introduced with a big bang approach. They had to make “adjustments” to allow appropriate modifications as the situation developed.

Over time, most state-run subsidy systems that lack high productivity standards become unsustainable in supporting expansive social programs. Despite receiving significant external aid, poverty levels often stay high. This dynamic worsens income inequality. It deepens the divide between the wealthy and the poor. It places an overwhelming and unsustainable burden on public welfare systems.

Reform efforts often aim to transition toward a mixed economy that incorporates free-market mechanisms. This involves reducing government control over small enterprises and phasing out redundant positions within the state workforce. Such measures are put in place to facilitate self-employment. They allow a significant portion—potentially up to 40%—of government employees to transition into the private sector. This structural shift lays the groundwork for a broader income tax base. It fosters greater fiscal self-reliance. It also reduces long-term dependency on state support.

In the short term, to alleviate economic pressure, policymakers will prioritize attracting increased foreign investment. This often involves the establishment of tax-free special development zones. These zones enable foreign companies to operate with minimal restrictions. They allow for the repatriation of profits without tariffs. These measures represent a departure from traditional centrally planned, socialist economic models. However, they are not a substitute for comprehensive structural reform. Relying solely on these mechanisms risks undermining long-term economic stability and self-sufficiency.

Fundamental change requires substantive reform—even when directed at a nation’s own citizens. These reforms must establish a clear link between wages and individual productivity. They should avoid relying on rank, seniority, or attendance as the basis for compensation. Without this shift, efforts toward transformation will remain partial and ineffective. For true and lasting change, citizens must understand their productivity’s direct impact. It contributes to both national prosperity and personal income. This awareness is essential for driving accountability, performance, and sustainable economic development.


THE BOTTOM LINE

Socialist economies across the globe have existed and continue to progress. However, there may not be any standard pure socialist economy remaining.  Timely and fundamental shifts in programs and policies have allowed such economies to thrive. China is the world leader among them.  The ones taking a rigid stand are facing severe problems or developing parallel markets.

Source: Socialist Economies: How China, Cuba And North Korea Work | Investopedia https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/081514/socialist-economies-how-china-cuba-and-north-korea-work.asp#ixzz5GKkjPmXQ
Follow us: Investopedia on Facebook

Underlying Mental Models and Beliefs that perpetuate low productivity as outlined in this post.

This blog post is titled “When the Economy Speaks: Cracking the Botswana Productivity Code – Short Notes Part II”. It explores the systemic and cultural factors. These factors contribute to Botswana’s persistent productivity challenges. Drawing from systems thinking principles, the article identifies several underlying mental models and beliefs that perpetuate low productivity.

1. Short-Termism and Preference for Immediate Gains

There is a prevalent focus on achieving quick, visible results rather than investing in long-term, foundational improvements. This mindset leads to prioritizing short-term projects that offer immediate benefits. But it often sacrifices sustainable growth and systemic change. Such an approach can result in recurring issues as underlying problems stay unaddressed.

2. Equating Compensation with Rank and Tenure

A common belief equates higher compensation with seniority or rank and, hence, attendance rather than actual productivity or performance. This perspective discourages merit-based incentives. It can lead to complacency. Employees do not feel motivated to improve efficiency or innovate if rewards are not tied to performance.

3. Perception of Government as Primary Provider

There exists a widespread expectation that the government is the main source of employment and economic support. This belief can stifle entrepreneurial initiatives. It can also reduce individual accountability. Citizens rely heavily on state provisions rather than seeking self-driven economic opportunities.

4. Resistance to Change and Innovation

Cultural norms that value tradition and established practices can lead to resistance against new approaches or technologies. This reluctance to embrace change hampers the adoption of innovative practices that enhance productivity and economic diversification.

5. Limited Emphasis on Systems Thinking

A lack of systems thinking in policy and organizational decision-making leads to fragmented approaches to problem-solving. Interventions need a holistic understanding of how different components of the economy interact. Otherwise, they tackle symptoms rather than root causes. This results in ineffective solutions.

6. Underinvestment in Human Capital Development

There is insufficient emphasis on developing skills and competencies that align with the evolving demands of the global economy. This gap in human capital investment limits the workforce’s ability to adapt to new technologies. It also constrains productivity growth by hindering adaptation to new processes.

7. Over-reliance on External Aid and Resources

Dependence on foreign aid and external resources can create a false sense of security. This reduces the urgency to develop internal capacities. It also delays the creation of self-sustaining economic strategies. This reliance also leads to policy decisions that prioritize donor preferences over local needs and contexts.

Addressing these deeply ingrained beliefs and mental models requires a concerted effort. We need to shift mindsets toward valuing long-term planning, merit-based systems, innovation, and self-reliance. Integrating systems thinking into education, policy-making, and organizational practices can help offer a more holistic approach. This integration leads to a sustainable way to improve productivity in Botswana.

REQUIRED RESEARCH ANALYSIS

FOR DETAILS OF DATA REQUIRED FOR RESEARCH ANALYSIS FOR THIS TOPIC, CLICK HERE.

FOR THE FULL STORY, CLICK HERE.


When Nature Speaks … Wildlife. Be calm. Love an elephant. What everybody should know about these gentle giants.


 

Quote2

That is … until you see them return to
the lands and vegetation we have
encroached into, when we settled in their habitat.

When elephants leave their habitats for
their watering holes, for however long,
it does not mean they have resettled.

And so, it becomes hard for us to
imagine the way a child intuitively
understands these gentle giants.  Instead, …

When we think of elephants, we conjure up
images of majesty and aggression!

ARTICLE OUTLINE:

  1. Introduction
  2. Basic Facts about elephants
    • The impact elephants have on the ecology
    • Historical reasons for the demise of elephants
  3. FAQS ABOUT HUNTING:
    • What is fuelling human’s obsession for hunting?
    • Why men trophy hunt?
  4. FAQs ABOUT POACHING:
    • About the elephants
    • About the tusk
    • About the poachers and the trade
    • About the end consumer
  5. Beijing master ivory carvers cling to their trade
  6. Who is the silent voice and what does it say?

Population. At the turn of the 20th century, there were a few million African elephants and about 100,000 Asian elephants. Today, there are an estimated 450,000 – 700,000 African elephants and between 35,000 – 40,000 wild Asian elephants.  Most captives are endangered Asian elephants; African bush elephants and African forest elephants are less amenable to training.  Animal rights organizations estimate there are 15,000 to 20,000 elephants in captivity worldwide. That brings the total number of elephants today to about 500,000.   Half a million.

The real question is, what would you do if it had been the global human population that has been decimated by up to three quarters of its numbers by another species?  And you are left with a quarter of you!

0.12957800_1460631700_27-20160430-l

 

INTRODUCTION

Elephants are among the most intelligent of the creatures with whom we share the planet, with complex consciousnesses that are capable of strong emotions.  Across Africa they have inspired respect from the people that share the landscape with them, giving them a strong cultural significance.  As icons of the continent elephants are tourism magnets, attracting funding that helps protect wilderness areas.  They are also keystone species, playing an important role in maintaining the biodiversity of the ecosystems in which they live.

Attribution:  http://www.savetheelephants.org/about-elephants-2-3-2/importance-of-elephants/

 

What is the spiritual meaning of an elephant?

Symbolic Elephant Meaning. … Symbolic elephant meaning deals primarily with strength, honor, stability and tenacity, among other attributes.  To the Hindu way of thought, the elephant is found in the form of Ganesha who is the god of luck, fortune, protection and is a blessing upon all new projects.

 

What does elephant symbolize?

Many African cultures revere the African Elephant as a symbol of strength and power.  It is also praised for its size, longevity, stamina, mental faculties, cooperative spirit, and loyalty.  South Africa, uses elephant tusks in their coat of arms to represent wisdom, strength, moderation and eternity.
 
 
DIY-frame-Majestic-African-Elephant-mammal-Animal-Art-Fabric-Poster-Print-Picture.jpg_640x640

 

 

What hunts the elephant?

Elephants generally do not have predators (animals that eat them) due to their massive size. Newborn elephants are however vulnerable to attacks from lions,tigers, and hyenas. The biggest danger to elephants are humans; elephants have been hunted for their tusks to near extinction in some cases.Oct 8, 2015
 

Yet, today they stand at the brink on its way of being wiped out.  Paving the way for the last man standing.  The man.

Yet, did you know that ….

 
 
  

As you read the article, notice the elephant (what we know about them: the facts, the emotions, the money trail, the larger-than-life images this animal conjures in our minds) that this majestic animal has brought into the room … and then, notice what is the “elephant that is not in the room”?

What do you think that is?  There right there, is our leverage.

 

BASIC FACTS ABOUT ELEPHANTS

Habitat loss is one of the key threats facing elephants. Many climate change projections indicate that key portions of elephants’ habitat will become significantly hotter and drier, resulting in poorer foraging conditions and threatening calf survival. Increasing conflict with human populations taking over more and more elephant habitat and poaching for ivory are additional threats that are placing the elephant’s future at risk.

Elephant, © Geoff Hall

 

© Geoff Hall

Defenders of Wildlife is working through the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) to maintain a ban on the sale of ivory as well as on regulations that govern worldwide elephant protection.

Of the two species, African elephants are divided into two subspecies (savannah and forest), while the Asian elephant is divided into four subspecies (Sri Lankan, Indian, Sumatran and Borneo). Asian elephants have been very important to Asian culture for thousands of years – they have been domesticated and are used for religious festivals, transportation and to move heavy objects.

Diet

Staples: Grasses, leaves, bamboo, bark, roots. Elephants are also known to eat crops like banana and sugarcane which are grown by farmers. Adult elephants eat 300-400 lbs of food per day.

Population

At the turn of the 20th century, there were a few million African elephants and about 100,000 Asian elephants. Today, there are an estimated 450,000 – 700,000 African elephants and between 35,000 – 40,000 wild Asian elephants.

Range

African savannah elephants are found in savannah zones in 37 countries south of the Sahara Desert. African forest elephants inhabit the dense rainforests of west and central Africa. The Asian elephant is found in India, Sri Lanka, China and much of Southeast Asia.

Behaviour

Elephants form deep family bonds and live in tight matriarchal family groups of related females called a herd. The herd is led by the oldest and often largest female in the herd, called a matriarch. Herds consist of 8-100 individuals depending on terrain and family size. When a calf is born, it is raised and protected by the whole matriarchal herd. Males leave the family unit between the ages of 12-15 and may lead solitary lives or live temporarily with other males.

Elephants are extremely intelligent animals and have memories that span many years. It is this memory that serves matriarchs well during dry seasons when they need to guide their herds, sometimes for tens of miles, to watering holes that they remember from the past. They also display signs of grief, joy, anger and play.

Recent discoveries have shown that elephants can communicate over long distances by producing a sub-sonic rumble that can travel over the ground faster than sound through air. Other elephants receive the messages through the sensitive skin on their feet and trunks. It is believed that this is how potential mates and social groups communicate.

Reproduction

Mating Season: Mostly during the rainy season.

Gestation: 22 months.
Litter size: 1 calf (twins rare).
Calves weigh between 200-250 lbs at birth. At birth, a calf’s trunk has no muscle tone, therefore it will suckle through its mouth. It takes several months for a calf to gain full control of its trunk.

Abstract from: https://defenders.org/elephant/basic-facts

 

The Impact Elephants have on the Ecology

Elephants are the keystone species of their habitat.

The planet earth is inhabited by diverse array of living organisms such as microorganisms, plants, animals and human beings which collectively constitute the biodiversity.  Each and every element of the living component of the system has its own role, either positive or negative, to play as a system component. So preservation and conservation of living organisms, whether they are tiny or large, become immense important in playing beneficial role in maintaining biodiversity.

Mega-herbivorous animal such as elephant has major impact on the terrestrial ecosystems in which they live and thus on the animals that depend on these habitats.  Elephant can be referred as “keystone species” because it facilitates:

    • Feeding by other herbivores that disperse seeds and supports large assemblages of invertebrates, such as dung beetles, and

 

    • Lower plants such as algae and fungi apart from enriching soil nutrients through dung piles.

 

    • These algae and fungi are preferred nutrient plants for some reptiles such as monitor lizard and star tortoise in the semiarid tropical forests.

 

    • Dung beetle accumulation attracts many insectivorous birds.

 

    • Dung deposition into water holes is being benefited to the Pisces and amphibians.

 

  • Wherever they live, elephants leave dung that is full of seeds from the many plants they eat. When this dung is deposited the seeds are sown and grow into new grasses, bushes and trees, boosting the health of the savannah ecosystem.
  • Seed dispersal through alimentary canal induces germination and survival capacity of the seedlings to maintain the forest heterogeneity; some species rely entirely upon elephants for seed dispersal.

Elephant also does some of the silvicultural practices such as

  • Creation of paths in dense forest.  When forest elephants eat, they create gaps in the vegetation. These gaps allow new plants to grow and create pathways for other smaller animals to use.
  • On the savannahs, elephants feeding on tree sprouts and shrubs help to keep the plains open and able to support the plains game that inhabit these ecosystems.
  • Maintenance of grazing lawns and height of the trees and thinning in thick vegetation cover to keep the sustainable utility of the forest.
  • Identification of subsoil water and natural salt licks through elephants’ strong sense is also shared by the other animals especially the herbivores for which intake of minerals from the natural soil is most important for many physiological activities.
  • During the dry season, elephants use their tusks to dig for water. This not only allows the elephants to survive in dry environments and when droughts strike, but also provides water for other animals that share harsh habitats.

The pachyderm (a very large mammal with thick skin, especially an elephant, rhinoceros, or hippopotamus) is under severe threat due to various conservation problems such as loss of habitat (see example below that of forest cover in Sumatra), habitat quality and corridors, reduction of home range, population increase, impact of developmental activities, human-elephant conflict issues and poaching for ivory.  Among the factors, some of them may be responsible for major proportions, and some of them involve less proportion.  But these are the reasons listed as conservation problems for the long-run conservation of elephants.

Abstract from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-6605-4_16

sumatra-forest-cover-province

 

 

Historically, trade and capture are responsible for elephants’ demise

Since the Proboscidea originated 60 million years ago, the order has included some 10 families, 45 genera and 185 species and subspecies, in a spectacular diversity of forms.  The African (Loxodonta africana and Loxodonta cyclotis) and Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) existing today are the sole remnants of that remarkable evolutionary radiation.  Representing a tiny fraction of their former numbers, the living elephants survive in only small pockets of the land they once roamed.  In many areas elephant populations have already gone extinct or are highly endangered.

Over centuries legal and illegal hunting (“poaching”) for the commercial ivory trade and, in Asia, the capture of elephants for human use, have been largely responsible for the elephant’s demise.  The number of wild Asian elephants now comprise less than a tenth of all remaining elephants, and continue to decline in shrinking habitat.  In Africa, elephants once inhabited the entire continent, from the Mediterranean down to its southern tip, but the ivory trade coupled with human expansion caused a continental decline in their numbers.  By circa 1600 North Africa was devoid of elephants. In modern Africa, poaching for ivory has been fuelled by poverty, political instability and civil unrest coupled with the easy availability of arms.  In recent history, between 1979 and 1989, Africa’s elephants underwent a dramatic and devastating decline, falling from approximately 1.3 million animals to an estimated 609,000. Human greed and rising prices of ivory were responsible for the appalling slaughter.

African elephants (Loxodonta africana) are imperiled by poaching and habitat loss.  Despite global attention to the plight of elephants, their population sizes and trends are uncertain or unknown over much of Africa.  To conserve this iconic species, conservationists need timely, accurate data on elephant populations.

Abstract from: https://www.elephantvoices.org/threats-to-elephants/-killed-for-their-ivory.html

There is an estimated population of 352,271 savannah elephants on study sites in 18 countries, representing approximately 93% of all savannah elephants in those countries.  Elephant populations in survey areas with historical data show it has decreased by an estimated 144,000 from 2007 to 2014, and populations are currently shrinking by 8% per year continent-wide, primarily due to poaching.  Though 84% of elephants occurred in protected areas, many protected areas had carcass ratios that indicated high levels of elephant mortality.  Results of the GEC show the necessity of action to end the African elephants’ downward trajectory by preventing poaching and protecting habitat.

Abstract from: https://peerj.com/articles/2354/

FAQs ON HUNTING

What is fuelling the obsession of trophy hunting poaching?

Why are savagery and violence so omnipresent among humans?
 
We suggest that hunting behaviour is fascinating and attractive, a desire that makes temporary deprivation from physical needs, pain, sweat, blood, and ultimately the willingness to kill tolerable and even appetitive.
 
Evolutionary development into the “perversion” of the urge to hunt humans, that is to say the transfer of this hunt to members of one’s own species, has been nurtured by the resultant advantage of personal and social power and dominance.  While breakdown of the inhibition towards intra-specific killing would endanger any animal species, controlled inhibition was enabled in humans in that higher regulatory systems, such as frontal lobe-based executive functions, prevent the involuntary derailment of hunting behaviour.
 
If this control – such as in child soldiers for example – is not learnt, the brutality towards humans remains fascinating and appealing.  Blood must flow in order to kill.  It is hence an appetitive cue as is the struggling of the victim.
 
Hunting for men, more rarely for women, is fascinating and emotionally arousing with the parallel release of testosterone, serotonin and endorphins, which can produce feelings of euphoria and alleviate pain. Bonding and social rites (e.g. initiation) set up the contraints for both hunting and violent disputes.  Children learn which conditions legitimate aggressive behaviour and which not.  Big game hunting as well as attack of other communities is more successful in groups – men also perceive it as more pleasurable.  This may explain the fascination with gladiatorial combat, violent computer games but also ritualized forms like football.
 
(Blog Author’s Note:  And as such conjures notions such as the “last man standing”  must necessarily therefore mean someone is more strong or witty than the rest who did not stay around to remain standing as he could.  Therefore, as such (in conclusion) no one, not his mother or his wife say he is ‘therefore not man enough’ for her.)
 

 

WHY MEN TROPHY HUNT: SHOWING OFF AND THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SHAME

Prominent evolutionary anthropologists (Brian Codding and Kristen Hawkes from the University of Utah) have studied hunter-gatherer populations for decades.

Interestingly, analyses of the types of animals hunter-gatherer men target are very similar in that they are often the largest animals in the landscape.  Importantly, they are also animals with high ‘failure rates’.  That is, men are likely to come home empty handed from hunting.  This is very different from women hunters, who target smaller animals that they are more assured to acquire and bring home as food.

On that hunt, on a lake outside Tampa, I met Jay, a hugely successful New York photographer and author, who said, “I watched Romancing The Stone as a kid. In the movie, Michael Douglas kills a crocodile and turns it into a pair of cowboy boots. That’s what I’m here. I want to wear a pair of cowboy boots and to be able to say to my friends, ‘I killed these’”.

And kill them he did, from a flat-bottomed boat after he first harpooned it with a buoy tied to a rope so it couldn’t swim away, making Jay holler “this is like something out of Jaws!”

Men who target these large, difficult-to-acquire animals, therefore, signal to others that they can absorb the costs of an inefficient behaviour.  It signals that they have high-quality underlying mental and physical characteristics to be able to absorb such costs.

This ‘costly signalling’ to which it’s referred in the evolutionary literature, provides a way for men to accrue status. And status is universally important for men to ward off competition and attract mates. (I’ll note here that hunter-gatherer populations consume the animals they kill, unlike most trophy hunters.  In no way do I advocate any opposition to the ways in which Indigenous peoples earn their livelihood).

What are your major messages?

We believe this ‘costly signalling’ model applies equally well to trophy hunters from the developed world. By paying big bucks to trophy hunt, or even forgoing smaller individuals within populations to wait for chances at the very biggest, imposes costs on trophy hunters. And it’s prestigious to signal that you can absorb these costs.  In other words, trophy hunters, whether they realize it or not, are likely hunting for status.  It’s like driving a luxury car, though in this case the lives of animals are taken.

How do your findings extend and differ from what others have written about trophy hunting?

People, including me, were confused as to why men do this.  Are they sick in the head? Bloodthirsty?  Some believe that these are appropriate terms.  For me, this evolutionary explanation goes deeper and asked, why did this behaviour evolve?  We think we offer a good explanation.

Some might argue, ‘Well, if this is natural behaviour, then it’s justified’.  I believe this is a dangerous argument referred to as the naturalistic fallacy.   My colleague and mentor, Dr. Paul Paquet of the Raincoast Conservation Foundation, makes this abundantly clear by reminding us, “Trophy hunting can neither be justified for being natural nor as an aid to help populations, given the enormous costs paid by individual animals – their lives.”

How might one apply what you found to put a stop to this reprehensible practice that some claim they do “in the name of conservation”?

One interesting observation post-Cecil (the lion’s death by trophy hunting) is that demand for lion hunting has declined owing to prohibitions on transporting the remains on planes, etc.  If hunters cannot bring the trophies home to boast with, then they have no costly signal.

 

 

FAQs ON THE POACHERS

The Elephant

How many elephants are killed by poachers every year?

100 Elephants are killed per day.  The U.N. says up to 100 elephants are being slaughtered a day in Africa by poachers taking part in the illegal ivory trade.  Mar 19, 2015.

How many wild elephants are left in the world?

Population at the turn of the 20th century, there were a few million African elephants and about 100,000 Asian elephants.  Today, there are an estimated 450,000 – 700,000 African elephants and between 35,000 – 40,000 wild Asian elephants.  That is a third or less than a third or even by as much as a quarter of the population of elephants that existed at the turn of the last century.  Three-quarters of them have disappeared effectively.

Endangered Asian elephants

Asian elephants are even more endangered than African elephants — but the threat isn’t poaching so much as human encroachment. The Asian species is smaller than the African, and none of the females and only some of the males have tusks. While some are hunted for ivory or meat, most of the Asian elephants taken from the wild are not killed, but domesticated for zoos, safari tourism, or timber hauling. There are only about 30,000 remaining wild Asian elephants, while 15,000 live in captivity. The wild herds in India, Sri Lanka, and Thailand are dwindling, too, as human development shrinks their habitat. Many populations are now cut off from migration routes and forced to inbreed.

Abstract from: http://theweek.com/articles/449437/tragic-price-ivory

The Tusk

What Exactly Is an Elephant Tusk?

An elephant’s tusk is a tooth. It’s an elongated incisor, one-third of which is embedded into the elephant’s skull. The tusk is made up of nerve endings and pulp matter, and removal is deadly.

Elephants use their tusks in a variety of ways. They are used to protect themselves and their herd from predators, and elephants can even use their tusks for digging water holes. However, elephants are also anintegral part of the environment. They are sometimes referred to as “mega gardeners,” and without them, hundreds of animal and plant species would cease to exist as well.

Why are Elephants Killed for Their Tusks?

Up to 70 percent of ivory poached goes to China, where half a kilogram of it can sell for as much as 1,000 U.S. dollars. This increase in demand has been fueled by the growth of a middle class in China.  People can now afford the material that they have grown up believing is better than diamonds.

Do Elephant Tusks fall off?

Tusks are specialized teeth and elephants have only one set that continue growing throughout the elephant’s life. They are sometimes broken off as a result of natural movements, such as digging and sparring with other elephants. If a tusk is not broken off at its root, then yes- the tusk will continue to grow.Feb 2, 2010

Can you cut off an Elephant’s Tusks without killing it?

A tusk can be removed without killing the elephant. … But poachers use darts, poison and high-powered automatic rifles with night scopes to take elephants down and, while they are dying, the tusks are gouged out of from the living elephant’s skull. Jul 30, 2014

The Poacher & The Trade

How much is a pound of Ivory worth?

Ivory fetched prices as much as $1,500 per pound due to demand in Asia, where elephant tusks are ornately carved into art.Jun 2, 2016

Poachers kill elephants for their valuable tusks — a single pound of ivory can sell for $1,500, and tusks can weigh 250 pounds.  That is USD375,000 (or just over a 1/3 million dollars) per tusk!  Nov 7, 2016

How extensive is the poaching?

Poachers are now slaughtering up to 35,000 of the estimated 500,000 African elephants every year for their tusks. A single male elephant’s two tusks can weigh more than 250 pounds, with a pound of ivory fetching as much as $1,500 on the black market. The ivory is so valuable because all across Asia — particularly in China — ivory figurines are given as traditional gifts, and ivory chopsticks, hair ornaments, and jewelry are highly prized luxuries. “China regards ivory as a cultural heritage; they are not going to ban it,” said Grace Gabriel of the International Fund for Animal Welfare. Many Chinese consumers don’t realize that elephants must be killed for their ivory; in one survey, more than two thirds of Chinese respondents said they thought tusks grew back like fingernails.

What impact has the slaughter had on the elephants?

Elephants are highly intelligent, social creatures that live in matriarchal groups, and poaching has ravaged much of their social structure. The biggest tusks are found on the largest breeding males and on the oldest females, who lead the elephant troops.  Where these animals are targeted and killed, elephant populations are reduced to leaderless groups of traumatized orphans huddling together. In the past year, even they are being wiped out, as some poachers have started dumping cyanide into watering holes, killing every animal that drinks there.  Last year, poachers killed an estimated 300 elephants in Zimbabwe’s largest park, Hwange, by lacing watering holes and salt licks with cyanide.  To read more about the impact poaching of elephants have had on Botswana, more here.

Who are the poachers?

Since the industry is illegal, those who run it largely come from criminal syndicates or terrorist organizations. Al-Shabab, the Somalia-based wing of al Qaida, raises $600,000 a month from poaching to fund its activities. Uganda’s Lord’s Resistance Army, the rebel group notorious for enslaving children, also raises money through poaching. “Poaching has become one of the most profitable criminal activities there is,” says Peter Seligmann, the CEO of Conservation International. Chinese mafia organizations mostly do the purchasing and distribution of ivory after it’s been obtained, selling it mostly in China and Southeast Asia but sometimes to markets in the U.S.

Why is the price so high?

When ivory became contraband, the supply got scarcer, but demand remained strong.  In 1989, the international community passed a global ban on the trade in new ivory to stop the killing of elephants. Only ivory that had been harvested before 1989 could be sold, so the ivory carving industry in China crumbled, and with it the demand for tusks.  Elephant populations rebounded — so much so that in 1999 the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), a global organization, decided to allow a “one-off” sale of pre-ban, stockpiled ivory to Japan (what did we not say here?).

Then in 2008 it authorized another “one-off”sale, this time to Japanese and Chinesemarkets. The Chinese carving industry roared back to life, as the Chinese government licensed dozens of carving factories and retail outlets. Since there’s no way to distinguish between pre-ban and new ivory, the illegal ivory trade has accelerated to meet the demand, and poaching is now worse than before the global ban.

(REUTERS/James Akena)

What steps are being taken to stop poaching?

Under pressure from some member nations, CITES refuses to institute a complete ban on the ivory trade.  But the U.S. is taking its own measures. The U.S. is the second-biggest ivory market, after China.  In a symbolic gesture last fall, U.S. officials smashed 6 tons of contraband ivory, including tusks and carvings, that had been seized from smugglers or confiscated from unwitting tourists. And in February, the Obama administration announced it would change regulations to ban interstate sales of all ivory except certified antiques, limit elephant trophy imports to two per hunter, and end commercial imports of antique ivory.

Is China cooperating?

Following the U.S.’s ivory crush, the Chinese government destroyed 6 tons this January, and Hong Kong authorities say they will destroy their 30-ton stockpile, one of the largest in the world.  Chinese environmentalists have also begun educating the public about the dire consequences of buying ivory. But it’s a tough sell in a country where ivory has long symbolized wisdom and nobility.With more disposable income in mainland China, many people are flaunting their wealth, and ivory is seen as a luxury product that confers status,” says Tom Milliken of the Wildlife Trade Monitoring Network.

Why is the ban so hard to enforce?

There is no reliable way to tell pre-ban from post-ban ivory, or a real antique from a fake — in any country.  “It’s not like you walk into a store and find someone selling cocaine, which is illegal on its face,” said Edward Grace, deputy assistant director for law enforcement at the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. In Chinese and U.S. shops alike, consumers simply assume that ivory trinkets are legal, and there is no way for law enforcement to prove that any particular item was made after 1989. Mary Rice, executive director of the Environmental Investigation Agency, says there’s only one real solution: “We need to learn from history and permanently shut down all ivory trade — international and domestic.

The End Consumer

Why is Ivory so popular in China?

A carved ivory ship model

Ivory is often used to make elaborate and expensive ornaments in China.

In China and Hong Kong, ivory is seen as precious material and is used in ornaments and jewelry. It’s also sometimes used in traditional Chinese medicine.

Some rich Chinese people think that owning ivory makes them look more successful. Others think that ivory will bring them good luck.

China has the biggest ivory trade in the world and wildlife experts believe that around 70 per cent of the world’s ivory ends up there.

It is said that buyers of ivory don’t understand they have blood on their hands. That notion is startling given where we are in the timeline of civilization and the increasingly global dissemination of knowledge.  Conservation efforts have never reached so far and wide through media as they do today.  So how can people not know about the tragedy behind their white gold trinkets? Accountability for this gross misconception seems to lie with the Chinese government.

EAL-IF-YOU-BUY-IVORY-YOU-KILL-PEOPLE-new-1Small

But from uncovering this bizarre ignorance, change has been set into motion.  A variety of conservation campaigns have been aimed at educating the middle class — those most likely to purchase ivory.  People who have seen these campaigns, such as posters depicting how an elephant’s life is sacrificed to harvest their tusks, are far less likely to purchase ivory products.  Japan was previously the largest demander of ivory, before organizations and celebrities raised awareness and reduced the consumption by 99 percent.

“Elephant teeth” is the direct translation of the Chinese word for ivory, xiangya, and it’s possible this has contributed to the idea that elephants are not harmed during ivory harvesting — an IFAW survey revealed that 70 percent of Chinese polled did not know that ivory was plucked from murdered elephants.

 

Beijing’s master ivory carvers cling to a controversial art

Beijing (CNN)When Li Chunke started carving ivory in 1964, the number of elephants in Africa was still on the rise. Demand for ivory in China was practically non-existent and tusks could be bought for under $7 a kilogram.

Today, this figure is closer to $1,100 — according to research by Save the Elephants.

But while this marks a significant increase over the course of Li’s career, the price of coveted xiangya (elephant teeth) has almost halved over the last 18 months.

An endangered art form?

Conservationists have welcomed the recent drop in demand, attributing it to awareness campaigns and President Xi Jinping’s commitment to abolish the ivory trade in China.

But for 65-year-old Li, these changing attitudes threaten an ancient art form and the livelihoods of many carvers.  “Ivory carving represents Chinese traditional culture” he says, sipping green tea in his small apartment in Beijing. “Chinese people love it because it is an ancient skill — it’s a practice that belongs to the imperial arts.”

At the state-owned factory where he spent his five-decade career, Li would sculpt everything from small trinkets to full-length tusks adorned with classical scenes.

Hong Kong to phase out ivory trade

Alternative raw materials to ivory

Legal restrictions mean that he is rarely able to keep raw ivory at his home.  Nonetheless, on the far side of his living room I find a small workshop besieged by chisels, drill bits and tools.  Some are electronic, but the majority are simple hand tools — the sort he trained with. From the clutter, Li picks out figurines carved from a variety of different materials.

Ivory’s rare combination of density and smoothness makes it ideal for intricate carving, but there are alternatives. Hippo, narwhal and walrus tusks possess similar qualities.  “When we don’t have ivory, we also use beeswax and agarwood,” he explains.

Li shows me a small horse statuette and an ancient goddess fashioned from a piece of mammoth tusk — an ivory substitute excavated from the Siberian permafrost.

“When we made carvings for export [in the 1960s] the products had to represent Chinese traditional culture — it was merchandise,” he recalls. “Now I can carve on any theme, including religion and modern life.”

Hong Kong’s illegal ivory trade exposed

Legal vs. illegal ivory trade

Since retiring from the factory in 2013, Li estimates he makes fewer than 10 carvings a year, and can spend as long as two months on a single item.  He appears despondent about elephant poaching and the black market that are now associated with his industry.  “We are legal ivory-carving professionals,” he says. “The ivory we used was from natural deaths. We ought to protect wildlife. I like animals and I’ve kept a puppy as a pet.  I find it shocking that elephants are killed by men.”

With the worldwide ban on ivory in 1989, factories like Li’s were able to stay open, as China still permitted domestic trade. A licensing system allowed the continued import of tusks sourced from natural elephant deaths and police seizures.

But the distinction between legal and illegal trade is becoming blurred, say conservationists.  A 2011 investigation by the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) found that almost 60% of licensed vendors and carving factories in China were involved in black market trade.

A high-profile campaign featuring former basketball star Yao Ming argues that all ivory consumption — even the licensed trade — feeds the cycle of killing.  “Yao Ming’s ‘no buying, no killing’ is only partly right — we still have to think about the inheritance of traditional Chinese culture,” Li says.  “Of course, the raw material can be replaced by alternatives, which is why my students also use woods and jade. But some of the nuances of carving — ones that can only be reflected in ivory — are at risk.”

Carvers are turning to ivory substitutes including beeswax, agarwood and even mammoth tusk dug up from Siberian permafrost.

Carvers are turning to ivory substitutes including beeswax, agarwood and even mammoth tusk dug up from Siberian permafrost.

Rise in demand for mammoth tusks

On the other side of central Beijing, one of Li’s students, Li Jiulong (no relation), leads me into his small, dusty workshop. The 26-year-old shares the space with four other apprentices. A fellow carver sits practicing her technique on a small block of wood, her engravings guided by ink markings.

Work surfaces are arranged in a square, each littered with hand tools for breaking down large chunks of tusk and more accurate electronic ones for finer details.  While his master is old enough to ignore the diminishing demand for ivory, the younger Li must keep his options open.

In addition to his apprenticeship he is also undertaking a master’s degree which sees him working with lacquer — a traditional colored finish applied to wood.  He can obtain ivory through “the proper channels,” but Li spends much of his time carving other materials, including mammoth tusks.

“These tusks have been buried underground for a long time, which can cause cracks and change their color,” he explains, sketching out their differing patterns of grain on a piece of paper. “They would [originally have been] white like the elephant tusks, but they’re also more compact than normal ivory.”

Imports of mammoth tusks from Hong Kong (the main route bringing them in from Russia) has more than tripled since 2000. But the young apprentice retains some hope for traditional ivory carving, despite the recent drop in demand.

“It’s true that ivory won’t be huge business in the future but it won’t vanish. It is part of our cultural heritage,” he says.  “It will survive and keep its place,” he argues.

Abstract from: 

https://edition.cnn.com/2016/03/13/asia/china-ivory-carvers/index.html 

 

So.

What is the “elephant” that is not in the room? Literally.

We can see what they do.  Can we see why it happens?
What do we not understand as yet?


What would that silent voice say to us?

When The Community Speaks … Cracking the Botswana Productivity Code. Short Notes. Part I


 

 

BATSWANA HAVE THE WORST
WORK ETHIC IN THE WORLD – REPORT

30 Oct 2017

In its 2015 survey of African workers, South Africa’s Rand Merchant Bank found Batswana to be the laziest on the continent.  The problem is actually more acute than that.

In the 2017-2018 Global Competitiveness Report, Botswana scores the worst among the 137 countries that are tracked by the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) on 12 pillars of economic competitiveness.  From a list of 16 factors, respondents to the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey were asked to select the five most problematic factors for doing business in their country and to rank them between 1 (most problematic) and 5.  The results were then tabulated and weighted according to the ranking assigned by respondents.  One of those factors is “Poor work ethic in national labour force.”

With a score of 19, Botswana’s national workforce (which would include those in the public and private sector as well as NGOs) emerge as standard bearers of the poorest work ethic in the world survey.  Also doing poorly are Trinidad & Tobago (15.9), Brunei (14.4), Sri Lanka (11.1), Liberia (10.8), Bhutan (10.5), Seychelles (10.1), Malta (9.8), Georgia (9.7), Mauritius and Vietnam (9.5), Namibia (9.3), Bahrain (9.0), Kuwait (8.7) and United Arab Emirates and Jamaica (8.6).

WEF’s interest in labour productivity has to do with the fact that it impacts on business. A University of Botswana study by Professor John Makgala and Dr. Phenyo Thebe (“There is no Hurry in Botswana”: Scholarship and Stereotypes on “African time” Syndrome in Botswana, 1895-2011”) found that this lack of productivity has frustrated effort to attract foreign direct investment. Interestingly, there was a time when, according to literature that the authors quote, Botswana’s civil service “was generally believed to be the most efficient in the whole of the African continent.”

On a past trip to Singapore, former and late President Sir Ketumile Masire gained an appreciation on the efficiency of the country’s workers. Where a Motswana factory worker would produce one shirt within a given period of time, a Singaporean counterpart would produce six within the same period.

“This was productivity not in theory but in demonstrable terms.  When we say we are not productive, this is what we meant,” Masire recalled to Sunday Standard in 2015 of this experience which would lead to Botswana benchmarking with Singapore and delegations from the two countries travelling back and forth.

As one of the Four Asian Tigers, Singapore would provide one quarter of the inspiration to establish the Botswana National Productivity Centre (BNPC). The tigers are Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan. Along the way, however, the late president appears to have given up on ever inculcating the right work ethic in Batswana. On assessing the apparent resistance, he determined that Batswana’s poor work ethic was a result of their pastoralism.

“If you look at the life of pastoralists, they don’t have a good work ethic,” he had said.  The example he had cited was that beyond sinking a borehole for their livestock, letting out cattle to pasture and doing some other undemanding work, most of the time pastoralists are just lazing about as their cattle graze untended in the bush.  By Masire’s analysis, this is the work ethic that has been bequeathed to modern-day Botswana.

As a University of Botswana study shows, not one productivity intervention scheme by the government has produced the desired results. In his 2015/16 budget speech, the Minister of Finance and Economic Development, Kenneth Matambo, lamented the low levels of labour productivity in Botswana.  The best performers in terms of work ethic in the national labor force are from Zimbabwe and Venezuela underpinned by a perfect score.

Source: Sunday Standard.  http://www.sundaystandard.info/batswana-have-worst-work-ethic-world-%E2%80%93-report Retrieved May 23, 2018

Productivity Systemic Story by Ranking

Table 1:  Comparison of Botswana with 2017’s Best Global Labour Productivity Data

DID YOU KNOW?  THE AVERAGE PER CAPITA PRODUCTIVITY IN BOTSWANA
LAGS THE WORLD’S PRODUCTIVE COUNTRY BY FOUR (4) TIMES?

TALKING POINTS:

Organizational Policy on Collective Responsibility and Financial Viability

1. Introduction
Economic conditions are challenging. A private organization cannot survive solely on government-issued tenders. These organizations must find alternative sources of income. To achieve long-term viability, an organization must independently generate income through domestic production and sales. It should also strategically develop export channels to meet international market demands. Organizations that fail to adopt this framework will face challenges. Continuing to depend on government-led initiatives, donors, or grants is not sustainable. They must recognize that personal incomes and livelihoods will remain uncertain. Such income sources cannot be used as bargaining tools.

Given the absence of long-term planning at the outset, urgent and decisive transformation is now required. The organization must implement immediate, radical shifts in mindset and operational practices to effectively respond to the current challenges.

2. Fundamental Organizational Principles
The next principles are essential to the organization’s integrity and must be upheld by all members. Violations occur when personal interests are prioritized over collective organizational welfare.


2.1 Collective Responsibility
The organization is a collective entity, comprising both employees and the employer. Each individual assumes equal responsibility for the organization’s success and failure upon joining. Mere attendance does not constitute work; only output that meets the employer’s standards and expectations is considered work.

Employees are not entitled to income generated by predecessors, investors, or the employer. Organizational participation demands sustained effort, alignment with the organization’s goals, and active collaboration rather than passive compliance.

Failure to internalize this principle, especially in the context of cultural and linguistic differences, can lead to miscommunication. It also weakens cooperation and causes a decline in the necessary skills for collective functioning. Such deficiencies undermine the organization’s ability to function as a cohesive and effective entity.


2.2 Authority Over Assets
The judicial system has sole authority. It determines if the organization’s assets are seized or liquidated. Employees do not have this right. Democratic processes allow employees indirect influence. Nevertheless, judicial action demands clear evidence of the employee’s direct contribution to the organization’s income generation.

Though these contributions are measurable, enforcement remains inconsistent, revealing a systemic gap. The organization does not offer exit benefits to employees without demonstrable contributions to income or growth. This is especially true during periods of financial strain or operational incapacity.


2.3 Compensation and Entitlement
Employers hire staff without long-term guarantees to sustain salaries. Still, it is structurally unsound to allow severance or exit benefits to be claimed as entitlements independent of performance. Compensation must be based on the employee’s proven ability, whether during or after employment. The employee should generate enough income to cover operational costs, return on investment (ROI), profit, and organizational growth.

Claims that exceed this threshold are unfounded. Severance is not a reward for leaving but deferred compensation for value delivered during employment. Employees are not entitled to income generated by others, like predecessors or the employer.


2.4 Salary Agreements
While salary terms are agreed upon at the time of appointment, such agreements can shield under-performance. Employees who fail to deliver measurable value still claim full compensation, leading to structural imbalance and threatening organizational sustainability.


2.5 Consequences of Non-Enforcement
Failure to set up, enforce, and adhere to these principles will lead to systemic degradation. Over time, the financial and operational stability of the organization will deteriorate, weakening its capacity to fulfill its mission.


2.6 Impact on Organizational Culture and Performance
As organizational health declines, employee morale, initiative, and innovation will suffer. Problem-solving capacity, resilience, and long-term outlook will also decline. These effects undermine both individual and collective performance, ultimately jeopardizing the organization’s sustainability.


3. Measuring Employee Contribution to Income Generation
To assess the value contributed by each employee, the following metrics should be used:

  • Revenue per Employee: The total revenue divided by the number of employees. This is a key metric for assessing productivity and profitability.
  • Sales per Employee: The total sales divided by the number of employees. This metric is particularly relevant for organizations focused on revenue generation.

This policy framework outlines essential principles that must be followed to ensure organizational integrity and long-term success. All employees must align with these principles and contribute to the organization’s collective well-being.

Mindsets and Beliefs (Thinking) that contribute to these challenges:

The article examines the systemic challenges impacting Botswana’s productivity. It highlights that certain prevailing mindsets and beliefs contribute to these challenges:

Reliance on Past Solutions: The belief that previous solutions will address current problems can be limiting. As noted in “Law #1: Today’s Problems Come From Yesterday’s Solutions,” this mindset obstructs innovation. It prevents the development of approaches necessary for current challenges. More here.

Quick-Fix Mentality: Seeking immediate remedies without considering long-term consequences can exacerbate issues. “Law #5: The Cure Can Be Worse Than The Disease” shows that short-term solutions lead to significant problems. These issues can intensify over time. More here.

Desire for Immediate Gratification: The expectation of achieving multiple benefits simultaneously without acknowledging necessary trade-offs can be problematic. “Law #9: You Can Have Your Cake and Eat It, Too” emphasizes the importance of recognizing trade-offs. It also highlights managing them in decision-making. More here.

Fostering a culture of continuous learning is essential. Embracing innovative solutions is also crucial. Understanding the complexities of systemic challenges further enhances productivity in Botswana.

Here’s a clearer breakdown of the ways of thinking and underlying beliefs that lead to the systemic challenges described in the article “Cracking the Botswana Productivity Code” by Sheila Singapore, with a focus on the mental models behind each:


1. Reliance on Past Solutions

Belief: “If it worked before, it will work again.”
Way of Thinking:

  • Linear thinking, where cause and effect are assumed to be stable and repeatable.
  • Over-reliance on tradition or precedent rather than adaptive learning.
  • Lack of reflection on whether the original solution created new unintended consequences.

Result:

  • Failure to deal with root causes in a changing environment.
  • Resistance to innovation or systems redesign.

Related Law from the article:
Law #1: Today’s Problems Come from Yesterday’s Solutions

This law warns that yesterday’s “fixes” often sow the seeds of today’s dysfunction. Over time, without continuous learning, these solutions become entrenched, even when they no longer serve the current reality.


2. Quick-Fix Mentality

Belief: “We need to act now—any action is better than no action.”
Way of Thinking:

  • Event-oriented thinking, focused on visible symptoms rather than underlying patterns.
  • Short-termism, driven by urgency or performance metrics.
  • Preference for symptomatic solutions instead of fundamental or structural ones.

Result:

  • When resources become available, there is often a tendency to focus on “low-hanging fruit.” These are initiatives that promise quick wins or visible results. While these offer short-term gains, they often come at the expense of fundamental investments (such as building the agriculture and manufacturing economic bases). These investments are necessary for long-term, sustainable growth and, therefore, profits and return. As a result, systemic issues stay unresolved, and progress becomes cyclical, fragile, and ultimately unsustainable.
  • Interventions that create new problems or worsen existing ones.
  • A culture of fire-fighting rather than strategic planning.

Related Law from the article:
Law #5: The Cure Can Be Worse Than the Disease

This law illustrates how applying quick solutions can escalate the problem in the long run. It stresses the need to pause, study the whole system, and design for lasting change rather than just immediate relief.


3. Wish for Immediate Gratification

Belief: “We can have it all now—there shouldn’t be trade-offs.”
Way of Thinking:

  • Magical or wishful thinking—assuming that multiple benefits can be achieved at the same time without tension.
  • Disregard for systemic delays and unintended consequences.
  • Inability to rank or sequence actions for sustainable impact.

Result:

  • Over-promising and under-delivering.
  • Undermining of trust and credibility when goals aren’t met.

Related Law from the article:
Law #9: You Can Have Your Cake and Eat It, Too—But Not All at Once

This law highlights the need for strategic trade-offs and pacing. It encourages leaders to resist the temptation of “everything, everywhere, all at once.” Instead, they should align their ambitions with system capacity and time.


Summary Thought:

Each of these beliefs reflects a limited mental model. Systems thinker Peter Senge cautions against this kind of model in The Fifth Discipline. These models block adaptive learning and creative problem-solving. Shifting toward systems thinking involves embracing uncertainty, learning from feedback, and engaging multiple perspectives for lasting, generative change.

Let’s map those unproductive ways of thinking and beliefs to leverage points that can help shift the process toward sustained productivity—using Donella Meadows’ leverage points framework (and with Fifth Discipline thinking sprinkled in):


🔁 Mapping Limiting Beliefs to Systemic Leverage Points

1. Reliance on Past Solutions

  • Belief: “If it worked before, it will work again.”
  • Limiting Mental Model: Fixed mindsets, failure to update strategies with changing conditions.

🎯 Leverage Point: Change the mindset or paradigm out of which the system arises (#2 on Meadows’ list)

  • Actionable Strategy:
    • Introduce system thinking education at leadership levels.
    • Help regular reflection sessions where teams critically assess past “solutions” and their unintended consequences.
    • Use learning histories or After Action Reviews to surface system feedback over time.

🧠 Fifth Discipline Insight:

Replace reactive problem-solving with “personal mastery” and “shared vision” to encourage progressive-thinking and co-created futures.


2. Quick-Fix Mentality

  • Belief: “Just do something. Anything.”
  • Limiting Mental Model: Immediate action is always the answer; no time for systems mapping or stakeholder engagement.

🎯 Leverage Point: Lengthen the delays to allow for system feedback and learning (#6)

  • Actionable Strategy:
    • Build delays into planning cycles for research, prototyping, and community engagement.
    • Adopt a “double-loop learning” model: don’t just ask “Are we doing things right?” but also “Are we doing the right things?”
    • Replace KPIs focused on immediate outputs with indicators of long-term ability (like “rate of organizational learning”).

🧠 Fifth Discipline Insight:

Avoid the “Shifting the Burden” archetype where symptomatic fixes distract from fundamental changes.


3. Desire for Immediate Gratification

  • Belief: “We can have it all right now.”
  • Limiting Mental Model: Trade-offs are unnecessary or signs of failure.

🎯 Leverage Point: Change the goals of the system (#3)

  • Actionable Strategy:
    • Redefine success to include sustainability, capability-building, and resilience—not just short-term gains.
    • Use a balanced scorecard that includes social, learning, and environmental capital alongside financial metrics.
    • Build public awareness of delayed gratification as part of national development (e.g., through storytelling or national campaigns).

🧠 Fifth Discipline Insight:

Shift to a “generative orientation”—focus on capacity to grow and evolve over time, not just on immediate results.


🔧 Practical Implementation for Botswana or Your Org:

Limiting BeliefSuggested InterventionTarget Leverage PointWho Leads?
Relying on outdated solutionsSystems thinking workshops; “sunsetting” old programsParadigm shiftResearch & Policy Units
Quick fixes preferredCreate slow-down protocols; delay mechanismsDelays in feedbackPMO / Strategic Planning Units
Wanting it all nowAlign vision with phased growth plansSystem goalsBoard / Exec Leadership

Here’s the visual causal mapping between the limiting beliefs and their corresponding systemic leverage points:

  • 🔴 Reliance on Past Solutions links to a Paradigm Shift, calling for deeper mindset transformation.
  • 🟡 Quick-Fix Mentality connects to Delays & Feedback Loops, urging better pacing and long-term learning.
  • 🔵 Desire for Immediate Gratification maps to Changing System Goals, emphasizing a shift toward sustainability and capacity building.

Here’s the enhanced systemic leverage map, showing:

  1. Limiting beliefs (left),
  2. The leverage points needed to shift the system (center),
  3. The key stakeholders or institutional roles responsible for enabling those shifts (right).

This format is ideal for strategic planning sessions or policy discussions, making it easy to assign ownership and co-design interventions.

REQUIRED RESEARCH ANALYSIS

FOR DETAILS OF DATA REQUIRED FOR RESEARCH ANALYSIS FOR THIS SUBJECT, CLICK HERE.

THE FULL STORY, CLICK HERE.

National Article 14: What is the right answer?


Focussing on how one teaches or how one learns?  Can one exclude the other?  Which would lead the other within the school system?

When a student shows he has understood (by his grades) what the teacher has taught him, would that mean he is learning?

Would that mean should the teacher stop teaching (such as when the child leaves school), what would happen to its learning?

Should the student or the child lead the learning instead i.e. when the child seeks it out or is curious to learn (even before the teachers teaches), what would we call that?  Do we have a name for that?  Often we usually do not even go there, because we say we are straying away from the syllabus (the point, the agenda, the plan, the meeting).  Sounds familiar?

An adorably curious kittyyay its adorable, i l...
Image via Wikipedia

It has fascinated me to watch, that should I google for the word “curiosity”, there are two (well three) images that would typically return from the search.

The first is it shows images of cats and their curiosity almost leading the foregone proverb, ‘Curiosity killed the cat’.  I am not sure which one we see more of.  The image or the proverb in our head.

The other often shows pictures of children looking cheekily up the skirt of a woman.  I am not sure whether to frown or to smile with this one.

And the third shows rows of children standing in a straight line within buildings that houses institutions of learning, I mean education.

But I could not easily find any other image to illustrate that word.   Try it out yourself.  Do let us know what you see.

But images and suggestions aside, what would inspire a child to want to be curious to learn?
Because should the child be curious to learn (anything), is there anything that could stop the education decline?

I say inspires because this is different from feeling desperation, meaning should I not learn, the school and eventually the society would leave me behind.  But I do not want to be left behind.  So, I’ll do anything to be number one.  Even if it means having to study under the lights of the street!

We sometimes carry such thoughts into the workplaces, often leading to corruption, underhanded work tactics becoming a way of life and these in turn create a general sense of lethargy and impasse among workmates (because no one wants to be left behind)!  So the consequences of that desperation would often show up as a stalemate.

So what today is killing the willingness of the child to want to be curious to learn?  Where did it start?  The child or the home?

What would encourage it to turn it around for the child?  Is it the child or the adult?

What if what we thought was right is wrong?   Then again, learning is not about arriving at the destination (concluding something is right or wrong) but being willing to be part of a journey.

I have found these two resources inspiring in trying to understand the answers to this question.

  • One is a quaint little book on Toto Chan.  One of the few books in my adult years that I could not put down until I had finished it.  It is touted as a must-read for all educators.Totto Chan: The Little Girl At The Window is a memoir by Tetsuko Kuroyanagi about her childhood, mostly about her days as a student at a unique school called Tomoe Gakuen.  Tomoe is a school for ‘special children’, and Tomoe was taken there by her mother because she was expelled from her first school in the first grade itself, for being a distraction to the rest of the class.  Her mother realizes that what Totto-chan needs is a school where more freedom of expression is permitted.  So she takes Totto-chan to meet the headmaster of the new school, Mr. Kobayashi.  From that moment a friendship is formed between master and pupil.Totto Chan, the name by which Tetsuko was fondly called, took to Tomoe instantly. Which child would not – when the classrooms are made of old railroad cars that are no longer in use? Tomoe is run by an exceptional headmaster, Mr. Kobayashi, who had extensively studied the imparting of ‘knowledge’ to children, rather than the imparting of ‘education’.The book goes on to describe the times that Totto-chan has, the friends she makes, the lessons she learns, and the vibrant atmosphere that she imbibes.  All of these are presented to the reader through the eyes of a child. Thus the reader sees how the normal world is transformed into a beautiful, exciting place full of joy and enthusiasm.  The reader also sees in their role as adults, how Mr. Kobayashi introduces new activities to interest the pupils. One sees in Mr. Kobayashi a man who understands children and strives to develop their qualities of mind, body and heart. His concern for the physically handicapped and his emphasis on the equality of all children are remarkable. In the school, the children lead happy lives, unaware of the things going on in the world.  World War 2 has started, yet in this school, no signs of it are seen.  But one day, the school is bombed, and was never rebuilt, even though the headmaster claimed that he looked forward to building an even better school the next time round. It was never done and this ends Totto-chan’s years as a pupil at Tomoe Gakuen.Tomoe was criticised by many for not being a conventional kind of school. Children were encouraged to study whatever subjects they liked first, they were taken to ‘field kitchens’ and ‘farming lessons’ to learn the practical aspects of cooking food and farming, first hand. The headmaster personally saw to it that the meals of all the kids was nutritious and balanced.  The headmaster knew the children in and out, and the children were so comfortable with him that they fought with each other for a chance to get on to his lap and climb on his back!  The headmaster personally saw to it that no child developed complexes, and no child felt any different from the rest.  This and much more was special at Tomoe.  If you are always one for practical education, you would like this book, which is all about ’free teaching” and ‘practical learning’?It was Tomoe that brought out the best in Totto Chan, as it did in a lot of other children. It was Tomoe that made Totto Chan what she bacame – an eminent TV personality in Japan. Tomoe was indeed a special school, and Mr. Kobayashi was indeed a gifted headmaster.

    Sounds impossible? It might, but it was not. Such a school actually existed in Japan before it met a rather sad end. The famous TV personality of Japan, Tetsuko Kuroyanagi, actually studied in Tomoe. The epitome of kindnes, love for children – Mr. Kobayashi – was really the headmsater of Tomoe.

  • The other must be this.  It is a publication by Dr Sandra Seagal called Human Dynamics: A New Framework for Understanding people and Realizing the Potential on Our Organizations presents a new body of work that identifies fundamental distinctions in people’s functioning — including distinctions in how people communicate, learn, problem-solving, exercise leadership, function on teams, become stressed, maintain wellness, and develop, personal, interpersonal and trans-personal.  The insights and tools that the book offers for enhancing the quality and efficiency of organizations are equally applicable in the context of family life. The book also indicates the significance of this new body for the fields of education, health care, and cross-cultural bridge-building.  The short of it.  She basically says that our personality distinctions (and our learning styles) are hard-wired at birth centred as either as physical, emotional or mental functioning.  In total there are nine distinct types of which five are dominant across the world.  Three in the western hemisphere an up to parts of Central Asia and two in the eastern hemisphere (and including Africa).  These distinctions play out differently in the ways we learn from and / or teach to others.

Human Dynamic Book

Love to hear your reactions to these publications!

National Article 5: Is life one big party … and then four days of study? When do we learn? Or did the dead cat just killed our curiosity?


“What would it take to see the levels of education in the country rise without having the need to set standards (and the government having to invest in) for it?”

Hmm …. have we thought of this question?  As a country?

education
education (Photo credit: Sean MacEntee)

To appreciate the question, first we will need to find out what is causing the standards of education to go down persistently!  Or did we choose not to ask (or think about) the question, because we thought it was a non-starter?  Or we just did not go “there” to think?

That is to stand back and wonder that us and perhaps generations before us had worked hard to set up whole institutions (in the adult world) and invested resources  just so to remind us and if not, to correct falling standards of education.  To do so we would have put in place measurements to make sure standards stay up.

This is different from what we would otherwise like to see happen for our children (in the child world), i.e. to see our child reach out for  rising levels of educational standards.  Yes?

So we (the adult) work hard to teach, but they (the child) are not learning?

So, what causes standards of education to go down despite having had measures, standards, resources, infrastructure to prop it up for these years?  Has anyone counted how much we have already spent?  Within the country?  As a globe?  Since post WWII?  That is 50-60 years.  How many dropped out of school compared to those who have acquired PhD?

REALITY NO. 1:

How has levels of education compare with the investments placed into it.  Did you say, it has gone down not as expected?  How does the trend of resources compare?  It has gone up?  Hmm … that does not make sense, does it?

So what went wrong?

What would instead cause things to turn around to see levels of education go up?

But if we asked that question, then our attention would shift to the teachers (the adults).  Yes?  It is one adult world (parents) talking to another (the teachers).

Then if so, what is the question we should ask, so that our attention is on where it matters?   The learners (or the minds of the learners (the child)).

So what is stopping or preventing the child from wanting to / being willing to learn?

Because once we have figured that out, there would be no stopping in the standards of education reached by the children.  They would easily outstrip and standards we set for the teachers.  Yes?

Except which is easier to manage?  The motivations of the teacher or that of the student?

But taking the easy way out would usually leads us back into the problem.

REALITY NO. 2:
It would be great to transpose the following trends showing revenues and numbers gained at (indicative of where the adults’ attention may have been) over the years:
  • Brewery and prescription drug industry (it would have been great to learn also the number of school going persons who consume (regardless that they buy) alcohol)
  • Contributions to and attendance at religious groups
  • Participation at sports and recreation
  • Level of livestock births and consumption (+sales)
  • Level of petroleum / gasoline / transport / construction industry growth
  • Level of litigation cases filed at courts around the country (divorces, land issues, crime, property, business contracts, corruption, etc.)
  • Level of population level changes (by districts) = Births (showers), deaths (funerals), marriages (weddings, engagements, showers)
  • teacher number changes (we can see the student number changes are going down – that’s interesting! – where are they going?)
I suspect the trends in these areas will not be heading downwards (like the school grades).  Instead it may even show a strong positive trends.  What happens or consumes the adult in the adult world and takes him or her away from the child has an impact on the child learning world!
It is almost like saying, Reality No. 2 is growing at the price of Reality No. 1.
Students do however need adults (parents, older brothers and sisters) around them, to help them understand the subjects (of the adult world: Chemistry, Development Studies, Mathematics, Accounts, etc. ) they are learning (including the teachers but not limited to them) and not merely focus on grades.  Teacher at times (especially in the developing world) defer her success exclusively to the commitment by student almost to a fault.  Yet the child is learning from and about the adult world.   A world she did not come from.  One cannot say that the student should learn because the course objectives have been laid out for the child.   Adults need to also take it as their responsibility to make success happen for their child  with the child.  Rather than say, if she does not pull up her sock, she will just end up like me.  And then leave it.
And if parents are busy dealing with reality 2, it gets in the way of the child’s learning.  Learning is systemic.  But I am sure we would still hear our (parents) voices in the media and in parliament blaming everyone else for the downfall of our child’s grades.
This interrelationship points to an important element to bring a systemic awareness of what helps a child learn in totality.  The child is not here to fend the family only.  This is I suspect is perhaps the reason where most male students may end up in when they drop out of school early.  In the developing world they would move into to herd livestock or in the developed world, they may succumb to addiction of substances (e.g. alcohol).  These boys are now lost to the growth of the nation.  We may also see more female students compared to male students graduate the school system, which means more teachers in the teaching system would eventually become women.  This can have an effect to crowd out the male students even further.
Well, we can almost “throw in the towel” and say we can’t have everything.  But “You can have your cake and eat it too, but not at once”.  There is an order in which causality happens.  Not all Ministry can vie to be #1 at the same time.  The easy way out  will then try to prevail.  There is an order in which it needs to happen.
A thought going forward
It would be interesting to see if we bring together parents and community across the school grades:
  • Take parents of students with Grade A* and have them have conversations side-by-side with typical teachers as well as parents of  students with Grade C or D or E.  For the latter, take parents who went through their experience a few years back – as their emotions would have flared down and they are better able to see what has been happening for their child.
  • Keep these conversations running for several months, if not years.  No media.  Just understanding.  Listening, asking questions and understanding.  Keep repeating the exercise.  That’s all you’d need to do.
  • This is different from meetings at the Community Hall between the Ministry and the community leaving the Ministry or the parent to defend their side.  This will otherwise encourage defensiveness on both sides, but no systemic learning by the parents, children and the Ministry.  The only result?  Just defensiveness and more pushing of the Ministry of Education, school heads, teachers and another round of Performance Management Systems.  The former conversation is an opportunity for learning by the country.  But keep it quiet.  Do not push it.  Otherwise, if not done carefully, it can agitate the system.  Slower is faster so we can understand how our cures do not make the disease worse.
  • Do not link this activity directly with these results.  I am sure the Ministry will figure that out.  That calls for creativity.

Not the fireman!

How much will this action cost us?  I suspect it would cost us almost next to nothing to bring about a systemic change!
How much would it have otherwise cost us?  As a nation?  As a globe?

I could not, at any age, be content to take my place by the fireside and simply look on.  Life was meant to be lived. Curiosity must be kept alive. One must never, for whatever reason, turn his back on life.

Eleanor Roosevelt

This slideshow requires JavaScript.