When Economy Speaks … The Global Diamond Market


Strategic Insight Brief: Understanding the Crisis in the Diamond Industry

Global demand for natural & lab-grown diamonds combined has dropped by more than 30%

Policy Brief

Title: Reimagining the Diamond Industry’s Role in National Development

Date: June 2025
Prepared by: Ms Sheila Damodaran, STRLDi, Botswana


Executive Summary

The global diamond industry is undergoing a profound transformation. Driven by shifting generational values, declining cultural relevance, and the rise of lab-grown alternatives, overall diamond consumption has dropped by 30–40% per decade since 2005. If these trends persist, the industry could face near collapse by mid-century. This decline is not due to dwindling reserves but reflects a broader societal shift away from the systems—marriage, stable employment, and cultural rituals—that once gave diamonds their meaning.

Botswana and other diamond-producing nations must confront this reality. The choice is stark: transition away from diamonds as a foundational economic sector, or invest in rebuilding the institutional, cultural, and economic infrastructure needed to sustain diamond relevance globally.


Background

Historically, diamonds contributed substantially to Botswana’s public revenue, infrastructure, and export earnings. Yet the diamond industry is capital-intensive, with limited job creation and weak economic linkages beyond mining. Most value is captured downstream—branding, design, and retail—by foreign entities.

The luxury market where diamonds are sold rarely loops profits back into producer economies. Without downstream control and national branding, countries remain locked into the low-value, high-risk end of the global value chain.


Core Challenge

The structural driver of the diamond market decline lies in societal transformation:

  • Marriage and family formation are declining.
  • Millennials and Gen Z prioritize experiences, sustainability, and ethics over status symbols.
  • Formal employment, a precondition for consumer spending and ritual-based consumption, is eroding.

Lab-grown diamonds, though growing in volume, only delay the broader collapse in symbolic relevance.


Strategic Options for Botswana and Similar Economies

Transition Strategy

Diversify economic reliance away from diamonds toward sectors with stronger employment multipliers (e.g., agriculture, tech, creative industries).

Reinvest the fiscal surplus from diamond sales into education, manufacturing, and entrepreneurial ecosystems.

Revitalization Strategy

Develop a fully localized value chain: cutting, polishing, jewelry design, luxury branding, and retail.

Create Botswana-based luxury brands that connect diamonds to modern, ethical, and culturally relevant narratives.

Build capacity in gemology, retail, and e-commerce infrastructure.

Institutional Renewal

Promote formal employment, family stability, and cultural rituals that restore symbolic value to diamonds.

Support public campaigns that reframe diamond giving for modern contexts (e.g., achievement, self-love, sustainability).


Conclusion

The decline of the diamond market is not a temporary downturn—it is a systemic, structural shift. Botswana must act decisively. Either we transition out of diamonds as the core of our economy, or we invest in revitalizing the social and economic foundations that once made the industry thrive. The diamond’s value was never in the stone alone—it was in the systems that supported its meaning. It is time to choose which path to take.

Contact: STRLDi | Sheila Damodaran | June 2025

Going Back to the Beginning

What has been / or continues to be the role of the diamond market in economy building?

The diamond market is deeply connected to the global economy—but its role in economy building beyond mining, processing, and marketing remains underexplored and unevenly distributed. Here’s a breakdown of how connected it is, and what untapped potential it holds:


Where It Is Globally Connected

Global Value Chains
Diamonds follow a complex journey:

Mining (Botswana, Russia, Canada, etc.)

Trading & Sorting Hubs (Antwerp, Dubai, Mumbai)

Cutting & Polishing (India, Thailand)

Retail (USA, China, UAE)
These links make the market highly interconnected, with shocks in one area (e.g. sanctions on Russia, inflation in the U.S.) having ripple effects globally.

Foreign Exchange and Trade Balances
For producer countries like Botswana, Angola, or Namibia, diamonds are a critical source of export earnings. Their trade performance is often heavily influenced by the global diamond market.

Public Revenue and Infrastructure
In countries like Botswana, diamond revenues contribute significantly to national budgets, funding education, health, and infrastructure.

Finance and Investment Vehicles
In luxury economies, diamonds are now being considered alternative investment assets (like gold), though with mixed success due to valuation opacity.


Where It Falls Short in Economic Building

Limited Industrial Multipliers
Outside of mining and polishing, few countries have leveraged diamonds to create robust industrial ecosystems, similar to those found in oil (e.g., petrochemicals) or agriculture (e.g., agro-processing).

There is limited R&D, design, or technology transfer related to diamonds.

The luxury sector, where diamonds end up, rarely loops back profits into producer economies.

Employment Creation is Narrow
The sector is capital-intensive, especially mining. Beyond artisanal mining (often informal), the job multiplier per carat is low unless local cutting, polishing, or jewelry production is developed intentionally.

Weak Integration with Broader Economic Sectors
Very few linkages are built with:

Tourism (e.g., gem museums, high-end retail tourism)

Education (e.g., geological sciences, luxury branding schools)

Creative industries (e.g., fashion, art, design)

Dependence on Multinationals
Large firms (e.g., De Beers, Alrosa) dominate the extraction and early processing stages. This reduces local ownership and weakens long-term economic resilience.


🔄 Missed Opportunity: Diamonds as a Driver of Diversification

A more systemic understanding of diamonds could transform their role in economic building by:

  • Developing national brands (e.g., “Botswana Diamonds” as a finished product line)
  • Fostering local luxury goods sectors (e.g., high-end jewelry design, fashion)
  • Building educational and technical hubs (e.g., institutes for gemology, retail management)
  • Integrating diamonds with tourism (e.g., high-value travel, showroom experiences)

Conclusion

Globally, the diamond market is highly connected in trade and finance, but weakly connected when it comes to sustainable, inclusive economy building. Most of the economic value is still captured downstream in richer countries. Unlocking its full potential will require reimagining diamonds not just as a commodity, but as a platform for industrial, creative, and service-sector growth.

What is preventing the luxury sector from looping profits back into producer economies?

Several interlinked factors prevent the luxury sector, where diamonds end up, from looping back profits into producer economies:


1. Value Is Captured Downstream

  • Markup happens after the diamond leaves the source country.
    A rough diamond might be sold for $200 at the mine, but once it’s cut, branded, and retailed in Paris or New York, it may sell for $10,000 or more.
  • Most of this margin is captured by brands, retailers, and marketers, not miners or producers.

2. Lack of Control Over the Full Value Chain

  • Producer countries typically do not control:
    • Cutting & polishing centers (mostly in India, Israel, Belgium)
    • Branding and marketing (e.g., Cartier, Tiffany & Co., De Beers)
    • Retail distribution and e-commerce platforms
  • This makes it hard to claim a bigger share of the value pie.

3. Weak Domestic Luxury Ecosystems

  • Most diamond-producing countries lack developed luxury industries:
    • No local high-end jewelry brands
    • Few globally recognized designers
    • Weak logistics, packaging, branding, or export capabilities for luxury goods
  • As a result, they cannot compete at the high-margin end of the market.

4. Foreign Ownership and Concessions

  • Mining rights and upstream operations are often owned or co-owned by foreign multinationals (e.g., De Beers, Alrosa).
  • Even when revenue-sharing agreements exist, they rarely include profit-sharing from final luxury goods sales.

5. Luxury Is Built on Intangible Value

  • The luxury price of diamonds is shaped more by brand, story, and perception than by the physical diamond itself.
  • These intangibles are created and monetized in Western markets, not where the diamonds are mined.
  • Without owning the brand or narrative, producers can’t profit from this intangible premium.

6. Global Trade Structures and Power Imbalances

  • Trade agreements, tax structures, and global finance are often biased in favor of capital-rich countries.
  • Producer countries may face barriers to exporting finished luxury goods or lack leverage to demand better terms from multinationals.

7. Low Local Demand

  • The luxury sector is built on wealthy consumer markets, which are concentrated in the Global North.
  • Without strong domestic demand, it’s harder to justify luxury-focused industries within producer countries.

🔄 Summary

The luxury diamond sector doesn’t loop back profits because the real value isn’t in the stone—it’s in the story, branding, and distribution, which are controlled by entities far from the mine. Without reclaiming more of the downstream chain—design, finishing, branding, and sales—producer economies remain trapped in the low-value, high-risk end of the market.

Diamond Industry Capital Structure

The diamond industry has a very distinct capital structure compared to other leading industries. Here’s a comparative breakdown showing how and why its capital demands stand apart, using key economic dimensions:


1. Diamond Industry

Capital Demand TypeCharacteristics
Upfront CapitalExtremely high – mining exploration, licensing, and equipment often cost hundreds of millions to billions USD.
Working CapitalHigh – especially in polishing, inventory, and speculative trading. Diamonds are held for long periods to maximize returns.
Return CycleLong and uncertain – exploration may take years, and finished diamonds are speculative, driven by luxury market trends.
Barriers to EntryVery high – due to geological scarcity, state concessions, and powerful existing players (e.g., De Beers, Alrosa).
Capital IntensityHigh – requires heavy fixed investment (mining) and expertise-intensive processing (cutting, grading, certification).
Risk TypeGeological, geopolitical, reputational, market volatility (luxury demand), and synthetic diamond competition.
Profit CaptureSkewed downstream – capital tends to flow toward branding and retail, not extraction.

2. Manufacturing (e.g., Automobiles, Electronics)

Capital Demand TypeCharacteristics
Upfront CapitalHigh – large plants, R&D, automation lines, but better amortized over consistent output.
Working CapitalModerate to high – raw materials, labor, and logistics, but with predictable cycles.
Return CycleMedium – structured sales channels and consumer markets.
Barriers to EntryModerate to high – driven by tech and scale, but new entrants like EV startups are rising.
Capital IntensityHigh – but more productive per dollar than diamonds.
Risk TypeMarket shifts, tech disruption, raw material prices.
Profit CaptureAcross value chain – strong brands capture margins, but OEMs and suppliers also share.

3. Agriculture (Commercial Scale)

Capital Demand TypeCharacteristics
Upfront CapitalModerate – land, equipment, and infrastructure.
Working CapitalHigh – tied to seasonal inputs, labor, irrigation, and market delays.
Return CycleShort to medium – usually seasonal, except tree crops.
Barriers to EntryRelatively low – but scale matters for profitability.
Capital IntensityMedium – mechanization improves output, but lower than diamonds.
Risk TypeWeather, disease, price fluctuations, and political interference.
Profit CaptureThin – unless integrated into processing, branding, or export.

Digital Tech (e.g. SaaS, Fintech)

Capital Demand TypeCharacteristics
Upfront CapitalLow to moderate – mainly into software development and talent.
Working CapitalLow–lean operations, scalable servers.
Return CycleRapid–recurring revenue models (subscriptions, transactions).
Barriers to EntryLow for basic platforms; high for trusted or regulated fintech.
Capital IntensityVery low – extremely high return per dollar.
Risk TypeTech obsolescence, data breaches, and platform dependency.
Profit CaptureHigh – High-near-monopoly profits for market leaders.

Summary Table

IndustryUpfront CapitalWorking CapitalReturn CycleBarriers to EntryCapital IntensityProfit Capture Skew
DiamondVery HighHighLongVery HighHighDownstream (Retail)
ManufacturingHighModerate/HighMediumModerate/HighHighShared
AgricultureModerateHighShort/MediumLow/MediumMediumThin (unless integrated)
Digital TechLow/ModerateLowShortLowLowPlatform Owners

Key Insight:

The diamond industry’s capital requirements are heavy, front-loaded, slow-returning, and speculative, with profit largely captured by entities downstream in brand- and consumer-driven markets. This is fundamentally different from more agile, tech-based, or cyclical industries where capital can turn over quickly and returns can be reinvested internally or locally.

Here is a side-by-side costed example in USD of what it would take to start a diamond value chain in Botswana vs an agriculture value chain, assuming each is designed to be fully vertically integrated (i.e., from production to value addition and local or export sales).


A. Starting a Diamond Value Chain in Botswana

StageActivityEstimated Cost (USD)
1. Exploration & LicensingGeological surveys, core sampling, licenses$5–10 million
2. Mine DevelopmentPit/mineshaft construction, equipment, housing$50–100 million
3. Mining OperationsYear 1 operating capital: staff, fuel, maintenance$10–20 million
4. Sorting & Valuation CentreSecure facility + graders, training local staff$2–5 million
5. Cutting & Polishing HubEquipment, clean rooms, skilled labor training$3–6 million
6. Jewelry Design & ProductionEquipment + local design studio setup$0.5–1.5 million
7. Brand & MarketingBuild local diamond brand + export market access$2–4 million
8. Retail (Domestic or Export)Flagship store, e-commerce platform$1–2 million

💰 Total Estimate: $75 million–$150 million+

🔻Note: This excludes downstream risks like inventory holding (millions of USD in rough/finished stones) and assumes government cooperation. The ROI cycle is long (7–15 years) and profits are often not retained locally unless tightly controlled.


B. Starting an Agriculture Value Chain in Botswana (Horticulture)

StageActivityEstimated Cost (USD)
1. Land & Soil DevelopmentPurchase or lease (100 ha), soil improvement$100,000–$250,000
2. Irrigation InfrastructureDrip/pivot systems, borehole or dam$200,000–$400,000
3. Greenhouses/NurserySeedling production for value chain crops$50,000–$100,000
4. Farming EquipmentTractors, implements, cold storage$150,000–$300,000
5. Production & OperationsInputs (fertilizers, seeds, labor, energy) Year 1$100,000–$200,000
6. Post-Harvest HandlingPackhouse, sorting, grading, cold chain$100,000–$250,000
7. Processing FacilityValue addition (e.g. drying, juicing, bottling)$200,000–$500,000
8. Brand & Market AccessBranding, packaging, export compliance, logistics$50,000–$150,000

💰 Total Estimate: $950,000–$2.15 million

🔻Note: ROI is faster (1–3 years depending on crop) and job creation is broad across skill levels. There is also room to scale down (e.g., 10 ha model at $250k) or up.


Comparison Summary

FactorDiamond ChainAgriculture Chain
Startup Cost$75M–$150M+$950K–$2.15M
Time to Return7–15 years1–3 years
Job CreationLow (capital-intensive)High (labor-intensive)
Profit ConcentrationDownstream (outside)Can be retained locally
Scalability for LocalsVery limitedHigh
Risk TypeGeological, geopoliticalWeather, price volatility
Policy LeverageConstrained by MNCsHigh flexibility for local govt

Insight:

While diamonds generate massive fiscal revenues, they lock capital, limit participation, and take decades to yield broader socioeconomic value—unless downstream is fully localized.

In contrast, agriculture offers faster, inclusive returns, greater resilience, and broader economy-building benefits per dollar spent.

Here is a visual comparison of the startup capital requirements for launching a diamond value chain versus an agriculture value chain in Botswana. While the diamond sector demands upwards of $100 million, agriculture can be initiated with under $2 million, offering far quicker returns and broader economic participation.

Performance of the Global Diamond Industry

The global diamond industry has undergone dramatic shifts from the 1900s to today, marked by monopoly control, wars, technological disruption, and changing consumer values. Here’s a structured overview of its performance across five key periods:


1. Early 1900s–1940s: Monopoly & Expansion

  • Dominated by De Beers, which controlled over 90% of global diamond supply through a single-channel marketing system.
  • Diamonds were marketed as rare and valuable, although they were relatively abundant.
  • Major discoveries in South Africa, then later in the Belgian Congo and South-West Africa.
  • Rise in industrial use (drill bits, saws) and early gem market for European elites.
  • WWII period: Industrial diamond use surged, while gem sales declined.

🔹 Global Impact:
Consolidated power in the hands of a few players; strong price control and limited transparency.


2. 1950s–1980s: Boom Years & Cultural Dominance

  • The De Beers slogan “A Diamond is Forever” (1947) redefined diamonds as essential for engagement and love.
  • Massive growth in the U.S. consumer market, followed by Japan and Europe.
  • Strong growth in mining outputs from Botswana, Namibia, and Zaire.
  • New cutting hubs established in India (for small diamonds).
  • Cartel-like price stability was maintained by De Beers through stockpiling and supply control.

🔹 Performance Summary:

  • Revenues grew exponentially.
  • Diamonds became a cultural symbol of love and commitment.
  • Strong economic contribution to Southern African economies (e.g., Botswana).

3. 1990s–Early 2000s: Conflict & Competition

  • “Blood diamonds” (conflict diamonds) from Sierra Leone, Angola, and the DRC triggered global backlash.
  • UN sanctions and the Kimberley Process (2003) attempted to restore consumer confidence.
  • Emergence of new players like Alrosa (Russia) and Rio Tinto (Canada, Australia).
  • De Beers’ dominance dropped from 90% to ~40%.
  • Antwerp and Dubai rose as major trade hubs.

🔹 Global Shift:

  • The industry became more fragmented and competitive.
  • Consumer trust became a vulnerability.
  • Increased pressure for ethical sourcing and traceability.

4. 2010s: Disruption & Synthetic Diamonds

  • Growth of lab-grown diamonds (LGDs), indistinguishable from natural diamonds but far cheaper.
  • Millennials and Gen Z challenged traditional narratives—valuing ethics, sustainability, and price.
  • De Beers entered the LGD market with Lightbox (2018) at budget pricing, acknowledging the disruption.
  • China and India emerged as both producers and major consumers.
  • E-commerce changed the diamond buying journey—more transparency, less mystique.

🔹 Performance Reality:

  • Prices for smaller natural stones softened.
  • The industry faced an identity crisis: value, ethics, and romance all questioned.

5. 2020s: COVID, Collapse & Realignment

  • COVID-19 halted supply chains, production, and luxury spending temporarily.
  • But demand rebounded strongly in 2021–2022, especially in the U.S. and China.
  • Since 2023–2024, the market has declined sharply:
    • Oversupply of both natural and lab-grown diamonds
    • Drop in prices—especially for smaller polished diamonds
    • Rising geopolitical tension: Russian sanctions hit Alrosa, diverting supply
    • De Beers IPO postponed; company considering strategic restructuring
  • Producer countries (like Botswana) renegotiated terms to gain more control over downstream benefits.

🔹 Current Landscape:

  • Uncertain demand outlook.
  • Excess inventory and falling prices across many categories.
  • Sustainability, transparency, and local beneficiation are becoming critical.

Performance Snapshot (1900s–2020s)

PeriodKey TraitsControl StructureProfit Concentration
1900s–1940sMonopoly formation, global expansionDe Beers (monopoly)Mining houses
1950s–1980sConsumer boom, diamond myth solidifiedDe Beers (cartel-like)Centralized (SA, UK)
1990s–2000sFragmentation, ethics scandalsMultipolar (Alrosa, etc.)Shifting, partial leakage
2010sDisruption via synthetics, e-commerceMore fragmentedRetailers, labs, brands
2020sCrisis, restructuring, realignmentIn fluxUnclear, margin shrinking

Conclusion:

From a century of dominance under a single cartel to a complex, fragmented, and disrupted global industry, the diamond market has shown strong historical performance, but is now under existential threat. The way forward lies in transparency, beneficiation, sustainable branding, and possibly national value chain repositioning—especially for producers like Botswana.

Here is a timeline summary of the global diamond industry’s performance from the 1900s to the 2020s. It highlights the industry’s evolution in key traits, control structures, and profit distribution across five major historical phases.

Lab-grown diamonds have grown, but have yet to match natural diamonds

The demand for lab-grown diamonds (LGDs) has grown rapidly, but it has not yet matched natural diamonds in total value or volume. However, it is disrupting the market significantly and shows signs that it could reshape demand dynamics, especially in key consumer segments.

Here’s a breakdown:


1. Market Share: Natural vs Lab-Grown (as of 2024)

CategoryNatural DiamondsLab-Grown Diamonds
Global Jewelry Market Value~$70–80 billion~$15–20 billion
Share of U.S. Engagement Rings~60%~40% and rising
Annual Production (Carats)~110–120 million~10–15 million (gem quality)
Average Retail Price per CaratMuch higher~60–85% lower

🔹 Trend:
In the U.S.—the world’s largest diamond consumer market—LGDs made up about 40–50% of engagement rings sold by 2023–2024, up from less than 5% in 2016.


2. Key Growth Drivers for Lab-Grown Diamonds

  • Price Accessibility: Up to 70–85% cheaper than natural diamonds for the same size and appearance.
  • Sustainability Appeal: Seen as more ethical, especially by Millennials and Gen Z.
  • Technological Advancements: Better color, size, and clarity control.
  • Retailer Adoption: Major jewelers (e.g., Pandora, Signet, De Beers’ Lightbox) now offer LGDs.

3. Constraints on Matching Natural Diamond Demand

FactorLimiting LGD Growth
Perceived ValueConsumers still associate natural diamonds with rarity and lasting value.
Resale/Investment ValueLGDs have very low resale value and no investment appeal.
Regulatory ConfusionSome countries require stricter labelling, reducing appeal.
Luxury Brand ResistanceHigh-end brands often refuse to use LGDs to protect their brand exclusivity.

4. Will LGDs Overtake Natural Diamonds?

  • In volume (units sold): Highly likely within the next 5–10 years, especially for smaller stones and mid-range markets.
  • In value (total market size): Unlikely, unless luxury perception radically shifts or natural diamond supply is intentionally constrained.
  • In symbolic/luxury markets, Natural diamonds still dominate due to emotional, cultural, and status associations.

Summary

DimensionLab-Grown DiamondsNatural Diamonds
Market Growth RateHighFlat or Declining
Symbolic ValueEmergingDeeply entrenched
Price TrendFallingStabilized or rising for larger stones
Investment ValueNoneHistorically moderate
Luxury AdoptionLow (except newer brands)High

Final Insight:

Lab-grown diamonds are reshaping consumer behavior, but they are not replacing natural diamonds—yet. The two may evolve into distinct product categories: one for affordable, ethical luxury, the other for status, tradition, and investment.

Comparative Overview of Natural and Lab-Grown Diamond Production

The global diamond industry has experienced significant shifts in production volumes between natural and lab-grown diamonds from 2000 to 2024. Here’s a comparative overview:


Natural Diamond Production (2000–2024)

Natural diamond production peaked in the mid-2000s and has seen fluctuations since:

  • 2005: Approximately 177 million carats were produced globally.
  • 2017: Production reached around 152 million carats.
  • 2019: Approximately 135.8 million carats produced.
  • 2023: Production estimated at 111 million carats. (kenturay.com, voguebusiness.com, nature.com)

These figures indicate a gradual decline in natural diamond production over the past two decades.


Lab-Grown Diamond Production (2000–2024)

Lab-grown diamonds have seen a significant rise in production:

  • 2000–2010: Production was minimal, with most lab-grown diamonds under half a carat. (gia.edu)
  • 2020: Global production estimated at 6–7 million carats. (gia.edu)
  • 2024: Production has continued to grow, with significant contributions from China and India.

While lab-grown diamonds still represent a smaller portion of the market compared to natural diamonds, their share has been increasing steadily.


Comparative Overview

YearNatural Diamonds (Million Carats)Lab-Grown Diamonds (Million Carats)
2005177Negligible
2010~133<1
2015~135~2
2020~1116–7
2024~111Increasing

Key Insights

  • Market Share: Lab-grown diamonds have increased their market share, especially in the U.S., where they account for a significant portion of engagement ring sales.
  • Price Dynamics: The price gap between lab-grown and natural diamonds has widened, with lab-grown diamonds being up to 80% cheaper by 2022.
  • Consumer Preferences: Younger consumers are increasingly opting for lab-grown diamonds due to ethical and environmental considerations.(reddit.com)

In summary, while natural diamonds continue to dominate in terms of total volume, lab-grown diamonds are rapidly gaining ground, reshaping consumer preferences and market dynamics.

Here is a comparative table summarizing natural vs lab-grown diamond consumption across key dimensions:


Comparative Table: Natural vs Lab-Grown Diamond Consumption

DimensionNatural DiamondsLab-Grown Diamonds (LGDs)
Global Market Share (2023)~75–80% by value~20–25% by value; ~35–40% by volume (rising)
Primary ConsumersU.S., China, India, Middle EastU.S. (dominant), India (rising), Europe (select markets)
Use CasesEngagement rings, luxury jewelry, investments, industrialEngagement rings, fashion jewelry, budget luxury, tech use
Consumer MotivationTradition, rarity, long-term value, statusPrice accessibility, ethics, sustainability, and tech-savvy
Age DemographicOlder Gen X, Boomers, luxury-focused MillennialsMillennials, Gen Z, eco-conscious, and price-sensitive buyers
Sales ChannelsBrick-and-mortar retail, luxury boutiquesE-commerce platforms, direct-to-consumer brands
Symbolic ValueHigh (love, permanence, prestige)Emerging (ethical, modern love, innovation)
Resale/Investment ValueModerate to High (depending on cut, size, rarity)Very low resale value
Pricing (per carat)$4,000–$12,000+ (retail, varies widely)~$1,000–$2,500+ (dropping due to overproduction)
Growth Trend (last 5 years)Flat to decliningStrong double-digit growth
Perceived AuthenticityNatural, billions of years oldManufactured, “not real” to some consumers
Environmental/Ethical DebateHigh impact (mining, ecosystem disruption, labor)Lower impact (energy-intensive but cleaner)
Typical Marketing Theme“Forever,” prestige, exclusivity“Affordable luxury,” sustainable love, modern identity

Key Takeaways:

  • Natural diamonds still dominate the high-end and symbolic value space, but their growth is stagnating.
  • Lab-grown diamonds are winning over younger, ethically minded, and value-conscious consumers, especially in markets like the U.S.
  • The volume gap is narrowing, but the value gap remains large, with LGDs positioned more as an affordable luxury or fashion item.

Here is a comparative table showing global consumption volumes of major gemstones—natural diamonds, lab-grown diamonds, emeralds, rubies, and sapphires—from 2000 to 2024. Due to the limited availability of precise annual data for colored gemstones, the figures for emeralds, rubies, and sapphires are presented as approximate averages over five-year intervals.


Global Gemstone Consumption by Volume (2000–2024)

YearNatural Diamonds
(Million Carats)
Lab-Grown Diamonds
(Million Carats)
Emeralds (Million Carats)Rubies
(Million Carats)
Sapphires
(Million Carats)
2000~126Negligible~20~10~160
2005~177Negligible~25~12~128
2010~133<1~30~15~115
2015~135~2~35~18~100
2020~1116–7~40~20~90
2024~111~10+~45~22~85

Notes:

  • Natural Diamonds: Production peaked around 2005 and has since declined due to mine depletion and reduced demand.
  • Lab-Grown Diamonds: Have seen rapid growth since 2010, with significant increases in production and market share.
  • Emeralds: Production has gradually increased, with major contributions from Colombia and Zambia.
  • Rubies: Notable production growth, especially from Mozambique since the discovery of significant deposits in 2009.
  • Sapphires: Production has been declining, with Australia and Madagascar being key sources.(en.wikipedia.org)

Note: The figures for emeralds, rubies, and sapphires are approximate and based on available data from various sources, including the U.S. Geological Survey and industry reports.


What is the meaning of the very first table on this page?

Going back to the very first table on this page, we note that the table visually confirms two major trends:


📉 Key Observations from the Table

Natural Diamond Consumption:

Sharp, consistent decline in volume over the last two decades.

From ~177 million carats in 2005 to ~111 million carats in 2024 = ~37% drop.

Total Diamond Consumption (Natural + Lab-Grown):

Despite the rise in lab-grown diamonds, total volume is still falling.

The combined market is declining at 30–40% per decade.

If trends persist, global diamond consumption could vanish by ~2050.


What’s Driving the Collapse in Diamond Consumption?

1. Changing Generational Values

  • Millennials (those born between 1981 and 1996 – in thier 30s) and Gen Z (1997-2012 in their 20s today) are less interested in traditional symbols like diamonds.
  • Prioritize experiences over possessions.
  • Skeptical of marketing tropes like “relationships like diamond are forever.”
  • Increasing number of the populations across the globe are marrying late or not marrying at all. Their children are growing up in households that do not experience marriages.

2. Affordability vs. Symbolism Crisis

  • Lab-grown diamonds are far cheaper, yet carry lower symbolic value and poor resale potential.
  • This bifurcates the market: traditional buyers age out, while new buyers don’t value diamonds the same way.

3. Saturation and Overproduction

  • Global supply exceeded demand for years, especially post-2010.
  • Lab-grown production capacity (especially in China and India) has flooded the market.

4. Digital-Era Consumer Behavior

  • Online comparisons and transparency have eroded pricing power.
  • Consumers now bypass traditional retailers, cutting retail markup and perceived value.

5. Ethical and Environmental Concerns

  • Mining’s human rights and ecological impact have tarnished the natural diamond narrative.
  • Even lab-grown diamonds are now scrutinized for their energy use and synthetic origin.

6. Lack of Investment Value

  • Unlike gold or art, diamonds are not considered reliable investment assets.
  • Their resale value is often less than 50% of the purchase price.

7. Retailer & Industry Fragmentation

  • The fall of De Beers’ monopoly removed central price control.
  • Fragmented markets and no strong industry-wide innovation have diluted value.

What Is The Average Annual Take-home Income of Diamond Buyers?

The average annual take-home income of individuals purchasing diamond rings or jewelry varies based on the type of purchase and demographic factors.

Engagement Ring Buyers

For engagement rings, buyers typically have higher household incomes:

  • A survey by BriteCo found that over half (53%) of engagement ring purchasers had household incomes of $100,000 or more annually. (amorefinejewelry.com)
  • The average cost of an engagement ring in the U.S. is approximately $5,200, with variations based on location and personal preferences. (theknot.com)

General Diamond Jewelry Buyers

For general diamond jewelry purchases:

  • High-income individuals, particularly those earning $200,000 or more annually, tend to spend the most on jewelry, averaging $1,657 per household. (en.clear.sale)
  • The 45–54 age group, often in their peak earning years, spends the most on jewelry annually, averaging $304.60 per person. (classywomencollection.com)

Purchasing Trends

While traditional norms suggested that men purchase diamond jewelry for women, recent trends indicate a shift:(glamour.com)

  • A significant number of women now purchase diamond jewelry for themselves, reflecting changes in purchasing power and societal norms. (glamour.com)

In summary, while there’s a range in income levels among diamond jewelry buyers, engagement ring purchasers often have higher household incomes, and spending habits can vary based on age, income, and personal preferences.

The average income (in constant 1900 USD) for individuals earning less than $50,000 annually, by continent

Here’s a timeline graph showing the average income (in constant 1900 USD) for individuals earning less than $50,000 annually, by continent from 1900 to 2025.

Notable trends:

  • Africa and South America maintain the lowest income averages, rising steadily but modestly over the century.
  • Asia displays moderate gains, especially post-1970, reflecting rapid industrial growth in emerging economies.
  • Europe and North America show higher income levels even among sub-$50K earners, with consistent growth across the timeline.

The estimated percentage of the population earning less than $50,000 annually by continent from 1980 to 2025, by continent


Here is the timeline graph showing the estimated percentage of the population earning less than $50,000 annually by continent from 1980 to 2025.

Key observations:

  • Africa: Over 90% of the population continues to earn below $50,000, though there is gradual improvement.
  • Asia: Significant decline in low-income share, especially after the year 2000 due to economic booms in countries like China and India.
  • Europe and North America: Lower percentages, but still notable segments of the population remain under the $50K threshold.
  • South America: Similar trajectory to Asia but with slower gains due to economic volatility.

Here is the timeline graph showing the estimated percentage of the population who are unmarried by continent from 1950 to 2020.

Highlights:

  • Europe and North America show the highest increases in unmarried populations, linked to delayed marriage, higher divorce rates, and more cohabitation.
  • Asia and South America show a steady rise, particularly from 1980 onward.
  • Africa has a slower but consistent increase, reflecting both urbanization and shifting cultural norms.

This visualization is based on trend-aligned estimates using UN, Pew, and Our World in Data sources. Let me know if you’d like the data segmented by gender or age group.

What This Signals for the Future

This cultural and generational shift is perhaps the single most disruptive force affecting the global diamond market today. It marks a deep, structural change in values, not just a temporary drop in spending. Here’s a breakdown of the impact:


1. Value Displacement: Diamonds No Longer Symbolize Life’s Milestones

  • Millennials (born 1981–1996) and Gen Z (1997–2012) are rethinking what symbols matter.
  • The traditional narrative—“a diamond is forever”—was built on the assumption of:
    • Early marriage,
    • Lifelong partnerships,
    • And social status through possessions.
  • Today, those assumptions are unraveling.

🔻 Impact:
Diamonds are no longer seen as essential markers of love or adulthood. Demand weakens not because buyers can’t afford diamonds—but because they don’t see the point.


2. Shifting Life Timelines = Collapsing Core Market

  • The average age of first marriage has increased globally:
    • In the U.S., it rose from 22 (women) and 24 (men) in 1980 to 29 and 31, respectively, in 2023.
    • In parts of Europe and Asia, it’s even later.
  • A growing number of people are not getting married at all.
  • Many children are now raised in households without weddings or wedding-related rituals.

🔻 Impact:
The ritual of diamond giving disappears not only from one generation but possibly from the next, creating generational demand decay.


3. Experiences Over Possessions

  • These younger generations value travel, education, career exploration, and wellness far more than owning luxury goods.
  • Even those who buy jewelry prefer:
    • Minimalist, sustainable, or locally crafted pieces.
    • Items with meaning and ethical integrity, not high-status price tags.

🔻 Impact:
Diamonds are being replaced by other forms of meaning and expression. The market loses emotional relevance, not just material appeal.


4. Cynicism Toward Marketing & Institutions

  • Millennials and Gen Z are skeptical of corporate storytelling.
  • Marketing phrases like “forever” feel inauthentic or manipulative, especially amid rising divorce rates and shifting relationship norms.
  • The rise of lab-grown diamonds is partly due to this pushback: a rejection of the industry’s inflated prices and outdated symbolism.

🔻 Impact:
The entire emotional foundation of the diamond market is eroding, especially among the very age groups that once sustained it.

Final Reflection: The Hidden Structural Driver

At the heart of this global collapse in diamond consumption lies a deeper, structural driver: the breakdown of societal systems that once reinforced marriage, family, and symbolic consumption through rituals like diamond gifting.

This transformation did not occur because the world ran out of diamonds—it occurred because the world ran out of reasons to value them. The ritual of diamond-giving was never about the stone; it was about the societal system that celebrated stability, formal relationships, and enduring economic participation.

That system is eroding. As formal employment becomes harder to access, fewer people earn the stable, high incomes needed to support both consumerism and long-term relationships. A generation that is unmarried, debt-burdened, and disillusioned with institutions is unlikely to sustain the myths or markets that supported diamond consumption.

Children growing up in households where marriage is absent or de-emphasized are less likely to view weddings or diamond exchanges as meaningful milestones. The cycle of diamond value, linked to emotional, cultural, and financial investment, is weakening across generations.

In this light, the collapse of the diamond industry is not just a market failure—it is a reflection of a broader systemic shift in how human beings organize themselves, work, and form families. Reversing this decline is not just about rebranding diamonds; it would require revitalizing the very social and economic institutions that gave diamonds meaning in the first place.

The industry must come to terms with a crucial blind spot: it is still largely run by a generation that once embraced the values underpinning diamond consumption—marriage, tradition, and symbolic milestones—but has failed to see that newer generations no longer hold these values in the same way. This disconnect between leadership and the evolving consumer mindset lies at the heart of the industry’s current crisis.


Conclusion: Demand is Structurally Shrinking, Not Temporarily Declining

This isn’t a cyclical downturn. It is a secular, values-driven shift that is unlikely to reverse. The traditional model—diamonds as status, love, marriage—has lost emotional resonance for a rising global majority.


  • Diamonds are becoming commoditized, not cherished.
  • Even lab-grown diamonds can’t stop the overall volume decline—they may have just delayed it.
  • Without a reinvention of meaning, value, and use, the entire diamond industry risks irrelevance within 30 years.

Here is the projected trend of global diamond consumption from 2005 to 2070:

  • It highlights a steep and steady decline, dropping from 177 million carats in 2005 to near zero by 2070.
  • Despite growth in lab-grown diamonds, overall consumption is shrinking, due to weakening cultural relevance, oversupply, and generational shifts.
  • A dramatic drop of over 60% in just 25 years.
  • Even with the rise of lab-grown diamonds, total consumption continues to shrink.
  • If current trends persist, the diamond industry is headed for a collapse by mid-century.

How can the world recover from this?

The collapse in global diamond consumption is not simply a market failure but a reflection of deeper structural shifts in society. As stable or formal employment, marriage, and traditional family systems decline, so too does the cultural relevance of diamond rituals that once symbolized commitment and prosperity. The value of diamonds was never inherent—it was rooted in the societal structures that upheld lifelong partnerships and economic stability. With fewer people forming such relationships or earning the incomes to sustain them, and with new generations growing up outside these traditions, the emotional and symbolic foundation of the diamond market is eroding. Reversing this trend would require not just marketing innovation, but a broader revitalization of the organizational and family institutions that once gave diamonds their meaning.

Or Else?

“We were overtaken—beginning as far back as 2005—not by a depletion of diamond reserves, which was a force within our control, but by a global shift in how diamonds are viewed and valued—a force beyond our control. The decline in demand reflects deeper changes in societal norms, income structures, and personal aspirations. As a nation, the sooner we recognise this, the sooner we will face a critical choice: either transition out of diamonds as a foundational economic sector, or commit to building as a globe the formal employment systems and social institutions—stable incomes, families, and cultural rituals—that once gave diamonds their meaning and lustre. Which path will we choose?”

Sheila Damodaran
STRLDi, Botswana
June 2025


📚 Data Sources Referenced for Estimation

The chart I provided is based on estimates but historically guided data, not directly from a single dataset. Here’s how the estimates were constructed and the sources they’re informed by:

World Bank – PovcalNet
Provides regional and global income and poverty distributions.
https://povertydata.worldbank.org/poverty/home/

Maddison Project Database (MPD 2020)
Historical per capita income (GDP) estimates from 1 AD to present by country and region.
https://www.rug.nl/ggdc/historicaldevelopment/maddison/

Pew Research Center (2015) – Global middle class and income distributions
Example: In 2011, only about 16% of the world was considered high income (>$20/day).
https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2015/07/08/a-global-middle-class-is-more-promise-than-reality/

International Labour Organization (ILO) – Global Wage Reports
Offers wage and employment data across time and regions.
https://ilostat.ilo.org

Our World in Data – Income, poverty, and inequality visualization tools
https://ourworldindata.org/income-inequality


When the World Speaks … National Development



Author’s Note

While listening to the remarks delivered by President Duma Boko in this speech, I was struck by his clarity. He articulated the evolving responsibilities of the public and private sectors in national development. His message prompted a deeper reflection on the true meaning of building an economy. Such an economy should be self-sustaining and productive. It must also align with the long-term aspirations of our nation.

This piece outlines a structured perspective on key themes that emerged from that reflection. It highlights the foundational role of STEM. It emphasizes the accountability of institutions. There is an urgent need to shift from dependency to performance-driven growth. It is not offered as a critique. Instead, it is a contribution to the ongoing national conversation about how we move from intent to meaningful impact.


Key Themes on National Revenue, Economic Responsibility, and the Role of STEM in Private Sector Performance


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Building a Self-Sustaining Economy: From Dependency to Performance

This paper is informed by the recent remarks of President Duma. It reflects on the evolving roles of the public and private sectors in Botswana’s development. It calls for a decisive transition. The transition is from a state-centric economic model reliant on taxation and external investment. It shifts to a performance-driven economy led by a globally competitive private sector. This economy is rooted in STEM capability and accountable institutions.

Key Messages

Redefining the Role of Government
The primary role of government is governance, not revenue generation. Taxes exist to sustain essential public services, not to drive economic development or build national infrastructure. The private sector must lead economic output. The nation’s best minds and talent should concentrate here to design and lead, not just follow.

Private Sector Must Own the Economy
Economic growth should be led and financed by the private sector. Infrastructure development must also be led by them. They should create value chains too. This should not occur through public procurement. Instead, it should be achieved through market competitiveness, exports, and reinvestment of earned revenues.

From Local Consumption to Global Trade
Botswana’s productive sectors must shift from serving a market of 2 million. They need to export competitively to a global market of 4–8 billion. Export revenues are the only sustainable source of private sector capital for national infrastructure.

Institutions Must Become Market-Makers
Agencies like MITI, BITC, and MIR must leave behind their gatekeeping roles. They should transition to active facilitators of global demand. They should enable Botswana-made goods and services to reach international markets. They must also ensure these products meet global standards.

STEM Is Not Optional—It Is Foundational
The deficit in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education is a core barrier. It hinders private sector innovation. It also affects systems design and national competitiveness. Addressing this gap must become a national priority.

Accountability and Performance Culture Needed
Both the public and private sectors suffer from a lack of performance culture. When salaries remain constant despite underperformance or economic decline, the system disincentivizes learning, growth, and adaptation.

Correcting Structural Market Distortions
National grocery chains granted access to public markets often exclude local farmers. This creates closed, exploitative loops that undermine domestic producers. STEM-informed policy could help establish fair structures—e.g., requiring local sourcing quotas.

Entertainment, Sports, and ICT Are Enablers. They are not drivers. Sectors like ICT and creative industries are important for national identity and modernization. However, they must support—not replace—the core economy. Youth should be redirected into value-creating roles in agriculture, manufacturing, and exports.

Rethinking Foreign Investment
Over-reliance on foreign capital masks deeper structural weaknesses. Foreign investors cannot carry the burden of transforming local performance. Sustainable growth must be built from within—through domestic capability, accountability, and reinvestment.


Conclusion

This is a call to action—not only to policy leaders, but to the private sector, educators, institutions, and families. Botswana’s economy will transform not by managing scarcity. It will transform by unleashing the performance of its people and systems.

We must shift our view—from managing what we have to building what we need. If this requires tightening our belts, then it must be embraced as a national prerogative. The imperative is clear: growth must be powered from within, not imported or outsourced.


STRATEGIC SOLUTIONS TO UNLESASH PERFORMANCE

1. The Role of the Public Sector: Governance, Not Revenue Generation

The public sector should not be held responsible for the country’s overall revenue performance. Taxes are not the primary engine of growth—they are designed to sustain essential government functions, not build mega national projects.

The role of government is to regulate, administer, and facilitate—not to generate income or directly build commercial infrastructure. Beyond national planning and oversight, the implementation of development and infrastructure should not fall under direct government responsibility. Economic output must be led by the private sector, where the nation’s best minds and talent should be concentrated.

2. Revenue Generation is a Private Sector Responsibility

The belief that “we know our local situation best” has failed to deliver the results we aspire to. It has discouraged some of the world’s best talent from contributing to our economic advancement. This inward-looking stance has constrained our ability to position the country meaningfully on the global economic stage. Our achievements are limited to visible successes in extraction industries, tourism, MICE, sports, and pageantry. These sectors serve global elites and hold value. However, they represent a very small portion of global economic activity. This is true in terms of GDP (please refer to the note below). To move forward, we must be willing to open up. We should engage in global collaboration. We need to compete with the world’s leading economic producers.

We must recognize our current limitations in leading the private sector. Consequently, we must be prepared to import seasoned industry leaders. These are individuals with proven records of accomplishment and success. They will guide our economic transformation. Alternatively, we must be willing to export our emerging talent. They can learn from the best in the world. This will equip them to return and lead. Their insight, discipline, and excellence are required to drive the economy forward.

This understanding aligns with the foundational ideas of neoliberalism, also referred to as market fundamentalism. At its core, neoliberalism maintains that human well-being is best advanced within an institutional framework characterized by:

  • Free markets
  • Minimal government intervention
  • Free trade
  • The absence of excessive economic regulation
  • Strong protections for individual property rights

The application of these principles must be sensitive to national context and social equity. The central idea remains: Economic vitality is best achieved when government creates the enabling environment. The private sector leads in innovation, value creation, and growth.

NOTES:

  • Tourism, encompassing MICE services, stands out with a significant 10% contribution to global GDP. It highlights its role as a major economic driver.
  • Extraction industries and the sports sector contribute notably. However, their combined impact is still less than that of manufacturing or healthcare.
  • Pageantry, while influential in cultural and promotional contexts, represents a smaller fraction of global economic activity.
  • In contrast, sectors like manufacturing, finance, and healthcare collectively dominate global GDP contributions, underscoring the importance of diversified economic development.

The private sector is the principal engine of national revenue and economic growth. The sector should ensure that human rights are upheld in the pursuit of profit. This is in its own long-term interest. Failure to do so undermines social trust. It ultimately threatens the sustainability and longevity of individual enterprises. The sector as a whole is also at risk.

This responsibility belongs not only to corporate leaders but to every individual within the sector. The private sector must take full ownership of national systems, including:

  • Logistics and transport infrastructure
  • Creative & sports industries
  • Healthcare systems
  • Agriculture value chains
  • Building and construction
  • Housing
  • Energy, water, and digital infrastructure (data)

While sectors like the creative and sports industries add cultural value, they are supportive, not foundational (see below). They help a nation celebrate achievements, but are not core economic drivers. Likewise, ICT and the digital economy is a vital enabler. It reinforces performance, particularly in agriculture and manufacturing. Both sectors remain central to long-term sustainability.


3. Infrastructure Must Be Privately Built and Sustained

Infrastructure—whether in transport, housing, energy, or healthcare—should be financed and developed by the private sector.

This reflects a necessary shift in mindset. National development should be led by those who create value. It should not be administered by the state.

For this to happen, the private sector must have access to earned resources—not allocations obtained through government tenders. A high-performing private sector reinvests its own revenues rather than relying on public procurement.

Capital prematurely locked in generational wealth is redirected to fuel domestic production

Primary sectors and manufacturing—which have already absorbed significant investment, possibly in the trillions—must also shift. Much of this capital remains locked in property. Some of it has flowed out of the country as payments for imported goods. Now, a portion sits idle as private assets or generational wealth. Will somebody do the math on these purchases and investments—particularly since the 1970s and 1980s? To reverse this trend, these goods and resources must be redirected to fuel domestic production. This will transform these sectors into productive engines. They need to become export-oriented engines of national value creation.

No longer viable to produce for two million only

It is no longer viable to produce merely for a population of two million. These industries must expand their markets and export at scale to the 4–8 billion people globally. The revenue from such scale can fund infrastructure, without dependency on foreign capital or subsidies.

This transformation depends on enabling institutions. Agencies such as MITI, BITC, and MIR must move from being gatekeepers to market-makers and global demand enablers. Their role is to:

  • Create international demand for Botswana-made goods and services
  • Build and support export channels
  • Ensure local products meet global standards

When value is created in Botswana that meets global demand, the world will invest. They will do so not because we ask but because we offer something worth investing in.

Rights to secure land and efficient allocation

Additionally, agricultural productivity cannot be scaled without secure land rights, efficient allocation, and an enabling environment for investment. Land must function as an economic asset—not merely a cultural or administrative claim.

Key reforms must include:

  • Guaranteeing land tenure security for commercial and smallholder farmers
  • Consolidating fragmented plots to enable production at scale
  • Improving access to land for emerging producers
  • Aligning infrastructure and zoning policies with agricultural potential
  • Streamlining land board processes to reduce delays and uncertainty

Unless land governance is addressed with the same rigor as export readiness and infrastructure investment, agricultural growth will remain stunted. Land is foundational to production. No serious development strategy can proceed without confronting this challenge directly.

Expanding Through Regional Integration and Strategic Alliances

A critical part of Botswana’s global competitiveness must begin with the region. Regional integration happens through platforms such as the Southern African Development Community (SADC). It also occurs via the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). These offer Botswana a powerful springboard. These frameworks:

  • Expand market access for Botswana’s exports within Africa
  • Allow for harmonization of regulatory standards, reducing trade barriers
  • Enable Botswana to participate in or lead regional value chains
  • Attract strategic investments by offering regional scale and logistical relevance

In parallel, forging bilateral and multilateral alliances with strategic partners in agriculture, energy, and technology is essential. These alliances will allow Botswana to leverage shared capabilities. They will accelerate its learning curve.

These partnerships must be grounded in performance. They are not charity. They are mutual economic strategies that expand production, employment, and competitiveness. When properly designed, regional and international alliances provide access to markets, know-how, and investment—without sacrificing sovereignty or long-term vision.


4. A Private Sector That Mirrors Public Inefficiency Is a Structural Risk

In many cases, the private sector has mirrored the inefficiencies of the public sector:

  • Weak accountability
  • Limited performance evaluation
  • Excessive labour protections shielding underperformance
  • A reluctance by courts and executives to enforce merit-based standards

When performance is neither measured nor rewarded, the sector fails its purpose. It becomes susceptible to corruption and eroded productivity. It can influence public systems, including the judiciary and executive, that serve private interests.


5. Education-Workforce Misalignment: Non-STEM Backgrounds Fall Short

Many are formally educated yet ill-equipped to meet the performance expectations of today’s private sector—especially in technical and productive sectors.

In fields such as agriculture and manufacturing, STEM capability is indispensable. These disciplines require system design, technical problem-solving, iterative problem-solving and applied implementation. The mismatch between educational preparation and sector demands limits national competitiveness and productivity.


6. The STEM Deficit is a Structural Barrier to Development

Without sufficient STEM expertise, the private sector cannot:

  • Identify systemic gaps
  • Design and implement solutions
  • Complete and manage efficient value chains

Correcting Market Distortions Through STEM-Informed Agricultural Policy

One example is the misalignment between national grocery chains and local agricultural producers. Currently, major chains have unrestricted access to public markets, sidelining local farmers who lack the influence to compete. This creates a closed system. Chains dominate both supply and retail. They exclude the very producers who are also their consumers.

STEM-informed policy (mathematics in particular) can correct these structural distortions. If national chains are allowed to operate in the public markets, then:

  • Ownership should be barred from also being their primary supplier, to prevent conflicts of interest, or
  • A local sourcing quota (e.g., 80%) should be mandated to support domestic producers.

Such measures ensure that money circulating in public markets reaches the hands of local farmers. These earnings are spent and reinvested locally. This spending gives rise to a private sector capable of funding national infrastructure. It sustains growth from within.

Here is a refined and professional version of your text, preserving your insights while improving flow, tone, and precision:


Rethinking Drought: Working With, Not Against, the Water Cycle

Our prevailing approach to drought is largely reactive and adversarial. We invest in crops engineered to resist drought, develop irrigation systems designed to minimize water loss, and breed plant varieties that retain moisture by limiting transpiration. Yet in doing so, we overlook a basic scientific principle taught in early education: the rain cycle depends on water vapor released through evaporation—from land and sea—and transpiration from plants.

Rather than amplifying this cycle, many current drought-resistance measures suppress it. Drip irrigation, for instance, delivers water only to plant roots, leaving the broader soil ecosystem dry. Similarly, drought-tolerant crops are often selected for their ability to conserve water, reducing transpiration and thus limiting the atmospheric moisture necessary for cloud formation and rainfall.

The consequence is cumulative and severe. As the land loses its capacity to contribute moisture to the air, the water cycle is disrupted. This often triggers violent, compensatory storms that bring pests and diseases—but not sustained rain. In their wake, they strip away topsoil, degrade land quality, and deepen drought conditions.

We must shift the question from “How do we survive drought?” to “How do we regenerate rain?” The sun will continue to heat the earth—but if there is no moisture to draw upward, no rain will return. Our agricultural practices and policies must align with the physics, chemistry, and biology of the natural water cycle—not work against them.

This is a systems problem. And it requires a systems-thinking solution—rooted in STEM disciplines—to repair the disconnect between well-intended interventions and the ecological realities they are meant to address.


7. STEM Strategy is Critically Missing from National Policy

There is a glaring absence of STEM strategy at the national level. Without it, neither the public nor private sectors are equipped for the complexity and demands of modern economies. A robust national future depends on building a society deeply capable in STEM—one that can design, innovate, and lead.


8. Shifting System-Building to the Private Sector Reduces Dependency and Abuse

Allowing the private sector to compete in designing infrastructure shifts the system from entitlement to performance.

This transition reduces reliance on government-led development, which is often hampered by:

  • Inefficiencies in procurement
  • Mismanagement of public funds
  • Bottlenecks in decision-making

Instead, a results-driven private sector promotes innovation, fiscal discipline, and infrastructure growth tied to real productivity.


9. Over-reliance on Foreign Investment Masks Deeper Structural Weakness

Dependency on foreign investment does not solve the fundamental issue. The country has a limited ability to generate internal revenue through productive work.

Until that story changes, structural transformation will remain elusive. Furthermore, when foreign investments yield limited returns and are trapped in procurement cycles, they fail to strengthen national resilience. This weakens fiscal capacity and autonomy when resources are needed most.


10. Entertainment, Sports, and ICT Are Enablers—Not the Core of Economic Purpose

Creative, sports, and ICT sectors play valuable roles—but they do not constitute the foundation of the economy.

  • Creative and sports industries, even when dominated by youth, are supportive rather than foundational. They flourish in celebration of economic success, not as its source.
  • ICT is a strategic enabler—scaling performance in other sectors—but it must serve real economic production.

Youth must be placed where their energy has the highest return: agriculture, manufacturing, and productive value chains. A resilient economy depends not on entertainment or digitization alone, but on the ability to produce and sustain real value.


11. Lack of Accountability Undermines Learning and Decision-Making

A culture of avoiding consequences—prevalent in both public and parts of the private sector—undermines progress.

When salaries remain static despite economic decline, there is no incentive to learn or improve. This is especially concerning in countries where the public sector is the largest employer—dragging down private sector performance with it.

It is not the role of foreign investors to elevate national standards or to teach performance excellence. That responsibility rests with the country and its citizens.

This mindset begins at home. The pursuit of “safe” white-collar jobs has often been valued over the discipline of productive, risk-informed decision-making.

When performance is neither rewarded nor punished, it leads to a concerning culture. In such a culture, individuals may ‘get away with murder’—figuratively, and sometimes literally. Crimes go scot-free, unnoticed or even approved by the courts. Such a system removes the conditions necessary for individuals to grow up. It prevents them from maturing and assuming personal responsibility for their actions. This would have debilitating effects when forming new relationships or building teams and organizations.

An economy that does not reward learning or penalize systemic error cannot build the leadership necessary for sustained growth. It also cannot build the workforce necessary for sustained growth, in either the public or private sectors.


STRATEGIC SOLUTIONS RANKED BY FOUNDATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE

This document is ordered below from the most fundamental solution to the least.

TIER 1: MOST FUNDAMENTAL SOLUTIONS (Core System Shifts)

6. The STEM Deficit is a Structural Barrier to Development

7. STEM Strategy is Critically Missing from National Policy

5. Education-Workforce Misalignment: Non-STEM Backgrounds Fall Short

1. The Role of the Public Sector: Governance, Not Revenue Generation

2. Revenue Generation is a Private Sector Responsibility

3. Infrastructure Must Be Privately Built and Sustained

Expanding Through Regional Integration and Strategic Alliances (integrated under Section 3)

Land Rights and Agricultural Productivity (within Section 3)


TIER 2: MID-TIER STRUCTURAL RISKS AND ENABLERS

4. A Private Sector That Mirrors Public Inefficiency Is a Structural Risk

11. Lack of Accountability Undermines Learning and Decision-Making

8. Shifting System-Building to the Private Sector Reduces Dependency and Abuse

9. Over-reliance on Foreign Investment Masks Deeper Structural Weakness


TIER 3: LEAST FUNDAMENTAL (SUPPORTIVE / DOWNSTREAM LEVERS)

10. Entertainment, Sports, and ICT Are Enablers—Not the Core of Economic Purpose

Conclusion: This is a call to action—not only to policy leaders, but to the private sector, educators, institutions, and families. Botswana’s economy will transform not by managing scarcity. It will transform by unleashing the performance of its people and systems.

We must shift our view from managing what we have to building what we need. If this requires tightening our belts, then it must be embraced as a national prerogative. The imperative is clear: growth must be powered from within, not imported or outsourced

NATIONAL STRATEGY TO REBUILD STEM CAPABILITY FOR ECONOMIC DIVERSIFICATION

To reverse a weak national STEM base—particularly after three generations of underinvestment—a country needs a comprehensive strategy. It should adopt a dual-track national strategy. This strategy must address both immediate economic needs and long-term systems development. Here’s a cohesive, high-impact approach:


1. Create a National STEM Acceleration Framework (Short- to Medium-Term)

Design a national program focused on retooling current and upcoming working-age adults (15–45 years) through:

  • STEM bridging programs for non-STEM graduates (e.g., engineers from arts backgrounds)
  • Sector-specific technical bootcamps (e.g., manufacturing, food processing, agritech, energy tech)
  • Adult vocational and skills retraining hubs in regional centers
  • Fast-track technical diplomas and certificates (6–18 months) aligned with economic diversification targets

2. Build National STEM Apprenticeships & Internships (Industry-Led)

Partner local and foreign private sector firms with government to:

  • Launch paid apprenticeships in sectors like agro-processing, renewable energy, data infrastructure, etc.
  • Offer on-the-job training with international experts (reverse mentorship)
  • Tie tax or subsidy incentives to companies that train and absorb workers

3. Leverage Strategic International Partnerships (Talent Import & Export)

Until domestic talent is ready, bridge the gap by:

  • Importing STEM-capable managers and technical mentors into core industries under strict knowledge transfer terms
  • Exporting top students and professionals abroad for 2–5 year placements in innovation-driven sectors with return agreements
  • Forming STEM cooperation pacts with countries like South Korea, Singapore, Germany, India, and Finland

4. Establish a National STEM Curriculum and School-to-Work Pipeline (10–15 Years Horizon)

  • Mandate computational thinking, systems science, coding, and applied science as core curriculum from primary levels
  • Convert underperforming schools into STEM-specialized academies across districts
  • Link school programs with internships, national labs, and industry visits
  • Incentivize teachers to reskill in STEM through scholarships, promotions, and salary uplift

5. Mobilize National Narrative & Cultural Reset

  • Launch a mass public campaign that redefines national success around problem-solving, engineering, and productivity
  • Profile and celebrate local STEM heroes and inventors
  • Align national holidays, awards, and media around makers, builders, and technical innovators—not just entertainers or politicians

6. Fund Results-Based STEM Education & Startups

  • Use a portion of sovereign wealth, natural resource rents, or regional grants to:
    • Fund technical colleges and university R&D partnerships
    • Back youth-led STEM startups in key diversification sectors
    • Pay for performance-based STEM scholarships

7. Establish a National STEM Governance Body

  • Create a STEM Diversification Council reporting to the President or Prime Minister
    • With authority to integrate policy across education, industry, economic planning, and trade
    • Charged with annual public reporting on STEM readiness and workforce transition metrics

This is not a one-ministry initiative—it requires a whole-of-government, whole-of-economy commitment. The strategy must view STEM not as an education issue. It must see it as a sovereign capability agenda that is tied directly to national wealth and independence.

What Nature Speaks Water Usage and Agriculture


In Cereal, Horticulture & Meat Production

Early Signals, Not Yet a Systemic Map


We do not yet have access to the extensive national data collection that underpinned the unemployment study. However, we have identified substantive datasets for Botswana and the region through FAOStats, which form a solid initial foundation. Using these, we are currently developing a case study to examine these dynamics at a global scale.

That said, the work would benefit significantly from deeper, locally anchored data. I would strongly welcome the opportunity for the Ministry to co-lead in organizing the data infrastructure. The region, more broadly, could also participate in strengthening the infrastructure. This is needed to support a systems thinking inquiry of this kind. Such collaboration would bring greater analytical depth. It would also ensure national and regional ownership of the insights that emerge.

At this point, our thinking is guided by what is publicly available through internet-based searches. While this has allowed us to outline key directions, we are acutely aware of the limitations. For that reason, I ask that you handle this information with professional discretion. Please do so until we are in a position to confirm and consolidate findings more robustly.

A distinctive aspect of our approach to systemic mapping is its ability to trace causal influences. It does this both at a specific point in time, but importantly, also traces these influences across time. This allows us to surface structural patterns. These include feedback loops, delays, and reinforcing behaviors. Such patterns often underpin not just the problem, but its persistence. We can begin this work with 20-year datasets. However, having a longer time series makes the causal structure more robust. This long-view perspective is especially important for policymakers seeking interventions that are not only responsive but also transformative.


Introduction

If the stories and explanations we’ve been using haven’t helped solve the problem, it’s time to take a step back. We need to ask new questions. Sometimes, we need to look deeper—or in entirely new directions—to find what’s really going on. Only then can we start telling a new story, one that brings real and lasting change.


**“We may not control the weather with the press of a button—but we are already influencing it, profoundly. The systems we built to extract water have altered rainfall patterns. This includes deforestation, exposed-field farming, and over-irrigation. These actions have weakened the water cycle. The question isn’t whether human action affects weather; it’s how we choose to act.

When we start to treat water as a partner, we create landscapes that invite rain. It’s not just a resource. Moist soils, living roots, and transpiring plants cool the land, seed clouds, and stabilize local climates. It’s not about control—it’s about cooperation with the natural systems we depend on.”**

Adapted for regenerative agriculture and water cycle resilience messaging


What Nature Speaks: Rethinking Water Use and Agriculture in Botswana – Summary

  • High water use, low returns: Botswana’s agriculture consumes large volumes of water but contributes minimally to GDP.
  • Cereal crops as a key outlier: While beef and horticulture align with global water-use norms, cereal crops are often drought-resistant. However, they use far more water and have lower productivity.
  • Not poor practice, but environmental exposure: The inefficiency stems from exposed-field farming in a semi-arid climate, leading to extreme evaporation.
  • Drought-resistance as a false solution: Over-reliance on drought-tolerant crops may suppress transpiration, disrupt rainfall cycles, and accelerate land degradation.
  • Yields and GDP suffer: Reduced rainfall and deteriorating soils weaken crop yields and reinforce the sector’s underperformance.
  • A call to ecological cooperation: The article urges a shift from controlling nature to partnering with it through regenerative practices.
  • Time to reintroduce water-cycle crops: Non-drought crops—especially horticultural varieties—can cool the land, restore rainfall patterns, and build resilience.
  • Toward a regenerative future: By designing agriculture to regenerate rather than extract, Botswana can improve climate stability. It can also boost productivity and enhance long-term economic contribution.

🔁 From Efficiency to Regeneration: Rethinking Water Use and Crop Strategy in Botswana

Dr. Rasbash’s analysis in “Thirsty Farms, Empty Returns” The Gazette, 28 May, 2025 (pg 24) highlights a critical issue. Botswana uses a lot of agricultural water. However, it experiences low economic returns.

We, like Dr Rasbash, noticed a significant deviation in water consumption per tonne of agricultural produce in Botswana. This is evident when compared to global benchmarks (for details refer to Part III below). The most striking difference, however, is in cereal production. Beef is the most water-intensive product. However, both beef and horticultural crops show water usage broadly comparable to international standards. Cereal crops, on the other hand, diverge sharply.

If so, this discrepancy may not be a reflection of poor farming practices, inefficient irrigation, or crop selection per se. Rather, it stems from the environmental context in which these crops are grown. Unlike horticultural crops, cereals in Botswana are typically cultivated in open fields without protective cover. The country’s semi-arid to arid climate causes a substantial loss of applied water due to evaporation. For details refer to: Comparison of Average Annual Evaporation by Climate Zones in Part III below. High solar radiation and ambient heat drive this evaporation process.

This insight now invites us to go beyond technical adjustments. It compels us to ask deeper questions:

What keeps the sector from understanding inefficiencies despite repeated episodes of the issue?
The answer may lie in the assumptions we’ve internalized about what defines “productive” agriculture in dryland conditions.

Rainfall cycles and cooler climates are supported by vegetation that actively contributes to transpiration. These plants boost atmospheric moisture. These traits are less common in drought-resistant crops (for details, refer to Part I below). By designing agricultural systems that collaborate with natural water cycles, Botswana can enhance resilience. These systems work with nature. They do not resist it. (For details on the consequences of resisting it, refer to Part II below). This approach allows Botswana to move toward climate-resilient productivity and long-term food security.

Too often, agricultural solutions default to scaling up drought-resistant crops—an understandable and technically sound response to erratic rainfall. However, this approach risks masking a deeper systemic challenge. While drought-resistant crops will buy us time, they cannot reverse the underlying drivers of desertification. Nor can they rebuild climate resilience if soil health continues to decline and vegetation cover is reduced. These conditions weaken the land’s capacity to retain water. They disrupt critical feedback loops in the water cycle. This disruption ultimately contributes to declining yields. It also fosters the perception that agriculture underperforms in driving national GDP.

Crops that promote transpiration and atmospheric moisture, on the other hand, include many horticultural varieties. These crops will initially require time to re-establish after years of disuse. However, they offer long-term potential to help restore local rainfall cycles and moderate surface temperatures. When grown under protective systems and supported by regenerative practices, they:

  • Improve soil structure and organic matter to retain moisture,
  • Reduce surface temperatures through better vegetative cover,
  • Ultimately lead to fewer heatwaves and more stable growing conditions leading to better yields and more stable climates.
  • Enhance transpiration, which supports cloud formation and rainfall,

This is not just a shift in crop choice. It is a recalibration of agriculture’s role. The focus is changing from resisting climate change to regenerating the conditions that make farming viable in the first place.

Instead, we should view agriculture as a partner in the water cycle, not just a consumer of it.


It’s true—we cannot “control” the weather in the way we control machines or systems with switches and dials. But we’re already influencing it, profoundly—just not always with awareness or intention. The very technologies and land-use systems we designed to maximize extraction have altered rainfall patterns. This occurs through deforestation, large-scale irrigation, or monocropping. They have also increased surface temperatures and weakened the water cycle.

The question is not whether human action affects the weather—it clearly does. The question is how we choose to act.

Think of it like a forest. No single tree controls the climate, but together, their presence regulates humidity, encourages rainfall, moderates temperature, and stabilizes soil. Likewise, agriculture, land cover, and soil practices can act like an ecological switchboard.

We see measurable improvements when we treat water as a partner in productivity. It’s not just a resource to be extracted. Moist soils reduce land temperatures. Vegetation increases transpiration, which adds moisture to the air. This feedback is slow, subtle, and cumulative. They are real and supported by growing evidence in agroecology, climate science, and satellite data.

We may not press a button to make it rain tomorrow. However, we can build landscapes that invite rainfall over the seasons. In doing so, we move from technological control to ecological cooperation—from managing components to designing for outcomes.


Without this shift, efforts at water efficiency—however well-intentioned—may end up reinforcing the vulnerabilities they aim to fix.

“Efficiency without regeneration risks accelerating the very vulnerabilities we aim to overcome.”

Ultimately, this calls for a paradigm shift. We need to move from maximizing extraction to optimizing contribution. Land, water, and communities should be healthier each season than the last. Botswana’s agricultural strategy must evolve from technical reform to systemic redesign, aligning with ecological processes rather than resisting them.


PART I

The Impact of Crops That Transpire Less

Crops that transpire less can significantly alter the local and regional water cycle, especially when adopted widely across a landscape. Here’s a breakdown of the key impacts:

1. Reduced Moisture Recycling (Less Local Rainfall)

Transpiration contributes to atmospheric moisture, which can return as local or regional rainfall.

  • When crops transpire less, less water vapor enters the atmosphere, leading to:
    • Lower humidity
    • Reduced cloud formation
    • Decreased local rainfall, especially in semi-arid and continental interiors

🔹 Impact: This can contribute to longer dry spells and a feedback loop of aridification, especially in areas already vulnerable to desertification.


2. Lower Evapotranspiration = Slower Water Cycling

Evapotranspiration (ET) = evaporation from soil + transpiration from plants.

  • Lower ET = slower movement of water from soil to atmosphere.
  • This can:
    • Reduce cooling of the land surface (because ET consumes heat)
    • Potentially increase surface temperatures during the day

🔹 Impact: Hotter days, reduced rainfall, and possible heat stress for crops and livestock.


3. Increased Soil Moisture Retention (Short-term Benefit)

Less water is lost to the atmosphere. As a result, soils may stay moist longer. This initially improves drought resistance and reduces irrigation needs. This initially improves drought resistance and reduces irrigation needs.

🔹 Impact: In the short term, this supports water conservation.
In the long term, if this leads to reduced rainfall, it can backfire.


4. Landscape-Level Hydrological Shifts

When drought-resistant, low-transpiration crops replace native vegetation or high-transpiration crops, they:

  • Disrupt ecosystem-level water cycling
  • Potentially lower groundwater recharge (fewer rain events = less infiltration)
  • Shift local climate patterns due to changes in surface albedo* and humidity

🔹 Example: Large-scale planting of low-transpiration crops across a savanna could reduce the frequency of convective afternoon rains.


Rainfall Levels for Botswana 1970 to 2020.

*Albedo is a scientific term. It refers to the reflectivity of a surface. Specifically, it describes how much sunlight (solar radiation) a surface reflects back into the atmosphere instead of absorbing it.


Simple Definition:

Albedo is the fraction of incoming solar energy that is reflected by a surface.

It is measured on a scale from 0 to 1:

  • 0 = No reflection (total absorption, like black asphalt)
  • 1 = Full reflection (perfectly reflective, like fresh snow)

Examples of Albedo in Nature and Land Use:

Surface TypeTypical Albedo
Fresh snow0.8 – 0.9
Dry sand/desert0.3 – 0.4
Grassland/crops0.2 – 0.25
Forest (dark vegetation)0.1 – 0.2
Water (angle-dependent)0.05 – 0.1
Black soil/asphalt0.04 – 0.1

Why It Matters in Agriculture and Climate:

  • Higher albedo = more solar radiation is reflected = cooler local temperatures.
  • Lower albedo = more solar radiation is absorbed = warmer local temperatures.

For example, deforestation lowers albedo because darker soil absorbs more heat, potentially intensifying local warming.

In agriculture, mulching, crop type, soil exposure, and canopy density each impact the albedo of a farming landscape. These factors influence microclimates and water loss.

Would you like a visual example or its role in climate feedback loops?

Summary Table

EffectLow-Transpiration Crops Impact
Local Rainfall↓ Decreases
Humidity↓ Decreases
Soil Moisture (Short-term)↑ Increases
Groundwater Recharge (Long-term)↓ Decreases
Temperature Moderation↓ Less evaporative cooling
Water Use Efficiency↑ Increases

Implications for Agricultural Planning in Botswana

  • Drought-resistant, low-transpiration crops help in the short term. However, relying on them without reforesting, mulching, and soil regeneration can be risky. It’s important to balance these crops with plants that transpire more. Otherwise, it may lead to a drier, hotter, and less predictable climate.
  • Strategic planning must balance plant-level efficiency with landscape-level water cycle stability.

KEY INSIGHTS:

Declining Rainfall in Key Production Areas:

Rainfall levels in Botswana have declined in specific cereal- and livestock-producing regions over the past 15 years. Other areas have remained unaffected, according to historical data from the Botswana Meteorological Department. This challenges the idea of a uniform global warming effect. It suggests that localized environmental degradation may be happening. This degradation is likely linked to agricultural land use and possibly deforestation.

Limitations of Cereal Investment Narratives:

There is a common assumption that increasing investment in cereal production alone can reverse national declines. However, efforts to regenerate ecological conditions must occur in parallel. This includes maintaining moisture levels and soil structure. Otherwise, such strategies may prove unsustainable, even for drought-resistant crops.

Escalating Desertification Risks:

Desertification is not static—it is steadily progressing. Without systemic change, even crops bred for resilience will eventually become non-viable. Long-term adaptation strategies must go beyond input substitution and address root climatic trends.

Rationale for Regenerative and Horticulture Focus

In response, STRLDi advocates for a regenerative agriculture strategy, particularly through horticulture. Horticulture is initially vulnerable to erratic weather. However, it offers a critical advantage by actively contributing to atmospheric moisture and soil regeneration. Over time, this enhances local microclimates and can help reverse drying trends caused by extractive practices.

Balancing Competing Agricultural Priorities:

The solution is not to swing policy wholly toward one system or another. Instead, it lies in designing a balanced agricultural model. This model must meet food security targets and restore ecological function.

Data Gaps Undermine Strategic Action:

Preliminary FAOSTAT data indicate a countrywide decline in cereal production, aligning with producer concerns over inconsistent field data. This may limit the Ministry’s capacity to regulate imports effectively or justify increased sectoral investment. Delayed payments to producers could be symptomatic of this deeper structural imbalance.


Recommendation:

There is an urgent need for a national effort to collect and analyze disaggregated, region-specific production and climate data. Policymakers, investors, and farmers need a systems-based understanding of Botswana’s agricultural future. This understanding will help them co-create a more resilient and self-sustaining agricultural sector.


Subject: Reflections on National Cereal Production and Data Trends

Dear Mr. Tema,

I had thus far refrained from commenting on the country’s cereal and meat production landscape. I felt it important to first examine more recent and comprehensive data sets in both sectors.

Fifteen years ago, I had noted that rainfall patterns were declining in certain areas. This was based on historical data from the Botswana Meteorological Department. These localities were known for cereal and livestock production. Interestingly, this trend was not mirrored in all parts of the country. This suggests that the issue may not solely be the result of a uniform global warming effect. Rather, it indicated possible localised environmental degradation. This could be linked to agricultural practices and land use changes. Such changes may include or even lead to deforestation. With more robust and longitudinal datasets, these causal relationships can be better defined and understood.

This point may appear subtle, yet it carries significant weight and is often overlooked in discussions. It illustrates how we identify high-leverage interventions. Specifically, it concerns the observed correlation between drought-resistant cereals and declining rainfall. The common conclusion is to increase investment in cereal production to counteract the decline—an understandable response. However, without addressing the underlying climatic shifts driving these patterns, we risk falling short of achieving true resilience. Long-term productivity gains are unlikely without confronting these deeper systemic changes.

I recall saying at that time that even drought-resistant crops will eventually be phased out. The climatic conditions they are meant to survive will worsen. Even they cannot withstand these changes. Desertification is not a fixed point—it is dynamic and constantly expanding. We must change land use, water retention strategies, and soil regeneration practices. Otherwise, we risk pursuing production targets in environments that are no longer viable.

This may help you understand why I have taken a regenerative agriculture approach. I have also placed emphasis on boosting horticulture production levels. Horticulture might initially suffer from the same drying effects of climate variability. However, when approached regeneratively, it presents a potential solution. It contributes to atmospheric moisture and enhances local microclimates. Unlike conventional cereal farming, it can help reverse some drying conditions. These conditions are caused by widespread cultivation of crops that, while drought-resistant, do not release moisture into the atmosphere. This occurs in combination with other extractive agricultural practices.  The key, I believe, is not to swing the pendulum entirely in one direction. Instead, a practical balance should be found. This balance is between systems that nourish the land and those that meet the country’s food needs.

I have compiled an initial set of figures from FAOSTAT to begin exploring these patterns. While the current dataset is limited, the preliminary trends suggest a sustained nationwide decline in cereal production. This situation may partly explain why producer associations feel caught between competing pressures. They are unable to rely on consistent field-level data to inform the Ministry’s regulatory decisions. This is particularly true concerning the timing and scale of import restrictions.

The Ministry itself may also be facing a difficult balancing act. Without clear evidence of import substitution, justifying increased allocations to the sector becomes challenging. There is no significant drop in the national import bill for cereals. This, in turn, likely affects its capacity to pay producers promptly, further exacerbating trust and viability within the sector.

A more coordinated effort is needed. We need to gather and analyze disaggregated, locality-specific production and climate data (see inbox below). This effort would shape responsive policies. These policies would strengthen national food security and protect the economic interests of our producers.

Warm regards,
Sheila Damodaran
Managing Director
Systems Thinking Research & Leadership Development Institute (STRLDi)
Botswana
Tel: 75987534

May 14, 2025


PART II

GRAIN PRODUCTION, DEMAND AND CONSUMPTION TRENDS 1960S – 2020S

Comparing Botswana’s grain production and demand from the 1960s to the present shows a persistent gap. Domestic production consistently falls short of consumption needs. This disparity has necessitated substantial grain imports to meet the country’s food requirements.

📊 Grain Production Trends (1960s–2020s)

  • 1960s–1980s: Grain production was generally low, with significant fluctuations due to droughts and limited agricultural infrastructure. For instance, in 1984, production dropped to a record low of 9,525 metric tons. (CEIC Data)
  • 1990s–2000s: Efforts to improve agricultural output led to some increases in grain production. However, challenges such as inconsistent rainfall and limited agricultural infrastructure continued to hinder substantial growth.
  • 2010s: Production levels varied, with some years witnessing improvements due to better rainfall and government support programs. For example, in 2017, the total grain production was 2,348 metric tons. However, by 2019, production had declined sharply to 583 metric tons, primarily due to drought conditions.
  • 2020s: Recent data indicates a gradual increase in grain production. In 2022, cereal production was reported at 85,049 metric tons. By 2028, grain production could rise to 64,100 metric tons. This is an increase from 59,000 metric tons in 2023. It reflects an annual growth rate of 1.3%.

📈 Grain Demand and Consumption

While specific year-on-year consumption data is limited, it’s evident that Botswana’s grain demand has consistently outpaced domestic production. The country’s reliance on grain imports underscores this gap. For instance, in 2023, Botswana ranked 143rd globally in grain production, with Lesotho surpassing it by producing 59,000 metric tons. (Taylor & Francis Online, ReportLinker)


📉 Production vs. Demand Gap

The persistent shortfall in grain production relative to demand has led to a dependence on imports to ensure food security. Factors contributing to this gap include:

  • Crop Production Choices Exacerbating Climate Variability
    Botswana’s semi-arid climate and recurrent droughts have long posed challenges to agricultural productivity. Current crop production choices are adding to the problem. They limit the landscape’s ability to support moisture recycling. As a result, they decrease rainfall. In this way, agricultural decisions are not only shaped by climate variability but may also reinforce it.

📚 Data Sources for Detailed Analysis

For a more comprehensive year-by-year breakdown of grain production and consumption statistics in Botswana, the following resources are recommended:

  • Statistics Botswana: Provides detailed agricultural survey reports and data. (Statistics Botswana)
  • FAO GIEWS Country Briefs: Offers insights into food security and agricultural trends. (FAOHome)
  • CEIC Data: Contains historical data on agricultural production and consumption. (CEIC Data)

To check the extent increases were the result of proceeds from sales or capital injections.  

CEREALS PRODUCED IN PANDAMATENGA

Pandamatenga, situated in Botswana’s Chobe District, stands as the nation’s primary hub for cereal production. The area’s favorable conditions are ideal for large-scale, rainfed agriculture. These conditions include flat terrain, fertile Vertisol soils, and annual rainfall averaging around 600 mm. (Wikipedia, African Development Bank Group)

🌾 Major Cereals Produced in Pandamatenga

Sorghum: As Botswana’s staple grain, sorghum is extensively cultivated in Pandamatenga. In the 2022–23 season, the region produced approximately 42,100 tonnes of sorghum, marking an 11% increase from the previous year. This output significantly contributes to national self-sufficiency in sorghum production. (Mmegi Online)

Wheat: Traditionally a minor crop, wheat cultivation in Pandamatenga has expanded in recent years. During the 2022–23 season, there was a nearly 30% increase in wheat production. This indicates a growing importance in the region’s agricultural portfolio. (Facebook, Mmegi Online)

Maize: Maize is a significant cereal crop nationally. However, its cultivation in Pandamatenga is less prominent compared to sorghum and wheat. However, it remains an essential component of the region’s cereal production.

Millet: Grown on a smaller scale, millet contributes to the diversity of cereals produced in Pandamatenga. Its cultivation supports food security, especially in areas with variable rainfall.(chobedestination.co.bw)

🌱 Additional Crops

Beyond cereals, Pandamatenga’s farmers also cultivate various pulses and oilseeds, including cowpeas, chickpeas, mung beans, sunflower, and sugar beans. These crops not only diversify agricultural output but also enhance soil fertility through crop rotation practices. (Mmegi Online)

🏗️ Infrastructure and Development

To support and enhance agricultural productivity, significant investments have been made in infrastructure within the Pandamatenga region. Notably, 12 modern steel grain silos are being constructed. Each silo has a capacity of 5,000 metric tonnes. This aims to improve grain storage and management. This development is expected to motivate farmers to increase grain production, thereby promoting food security. (Guardian Sun, Daily News)

In summary, Pandamatenga’s strategic importance in Botswana’s agricultural sector is significant. It contributes substantially to cereal production, focusing on sorghum and wheat. These contributions are supported by favorable agro-climatic conditions and ongoing infrastructure development.

Continue reading What Nature Speaks Water Usage and Agriculture

When the Community Speaks Personal Career Choices & Personal Emotional Drives


Meets needs fueled by Fear of Death or Overcome Fear of Failure or Battling Rejection and Seeking Acceptance.

Occupations that attract individuals motivated by the need to be alive or to avoid death:

Certain occupations attract individuals who are motivated by the need to avoid death or confront their deepest fears in a way that provides a sense of achievement, mastery, or control over those fears. These roles often involve risk, danger, or high stakes, and those who choose them may derive a sense of fulfillment from overcoming fear in the face of extreme situations. Here are some occupations that are most likely inspired by the need to avoid death or face significant life-threatening risks, where overcoming fear becomes part of the work’s achievement:

1. Firefighter

  • Why: Firefighters constantly face life-threatening situations, entering burning buildings and responding to emergencies where lives are at risk. The profession is heavily tied to overcoming the fear of death and the danger that comes with saving others from perilous circumstances.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of burns, smoke inhalation, collapsing structures, and even death by fire.
  • Achievement: The satisfaction of saving lives, preventing destruction, and pushing past personal limits.

2. Police Officer

  • Why: Police officers are frequently in situations where their own lives or the lives of others are at risk. They often face criminal threats, dangerous confrontations, and violent situations where their response determines life or death.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of being harmed or killed while responding to dangerous situations (e.g., armed confrontations, high-speed chases).
  • Achievement: The fulfillment of protecting the community, maintaining order, and ensuring public safety despite personal risks.

3. Military Personnel

  • Why: Soldiers in combat zones directly face the potential for injury or death. Their training is often focused on overcoming extreme fear, maintaining composure, and making decisions that could have life-and-death consequences.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of combat, death in battle, and the possibility of injury or loss.
  • Achievement: The honor of defending one’s country, achieving mission success, and the personal growth that comes with surviving high-stakes environments.

4. Paramedic/Emergency Medical Technician (EMT)

  • Why: Paramedics and EMTs work in high-pressure situations where life-threatening injuries and health crises are common. They often have to make life-or-death decisions in the field while under the stress of saving lives.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of losing patients, encountering fatal accidents, or being involved in high-stress emergencies.
  • Achievement: The reward of saving lives, bringing comfort in moments of crisis, and managing life-threatening medical situations.

5. Extreme Sports Athletes (e.g., Base Jumpers, Rock Climbers, Skydivers)

  • Why: These athletes actively seek to conquer or embrace extreme physical risks, engaging in activities that can result in serious injury or death if mistakes are made.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of falling, death from high-risk activities, and the danger of physical injury.
  • Achievement: The personal satisfaction of pushing physical limits, mastering fear, and achieving mastery over dangerous activities.

6. Stunt Performers (e.g., Movie Stunt Doubles, Stunt Drivers)

  • Why: Stunt performers intentionally put themselves in high-risk situations for film or television, where the possibility of injury or death is real but controlled through training and planning.
  • Fear Confronted: High-speed crashes, falls, explosions, and other physically dangerous acts.
  • Achievement: The thrill of performing dangerous feats safely and the pride in completing highly challenging and daring tasks for entertainment.

7. Search and Rescue Workers

  • Why: Search and rescue workers (e.g., mountain rescue, underwater search teams, disaster relief) frequently put their lives at risk to save others in dangerous, sometimes life-threatening situations.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of injury or death while rescuing people in disaster zones, collapse zones, or extreme environments.
  • Achievement: The satisfaction of saving lives, providing assistance in life-or-death situations, and overcoming environmental challenges.

8. Coast Guard/Rescue Swimmer

  • Why: Coast Guard members, particularly rescue swimmers, frequently put themselves in harm’s way to rescue people at sea or during emergencies like storms or shipwrecks. Their role requires a calm and decisive action in high-risk situations.
  • Fear Confronted: Drowning, rough seas, and the inherent danger of water rescues.
  • Achievement: The fulfillment of saving lives and being able to navigate hazardous conditions to bring people to safety.

9. Journalists in Conflict Zones (War Correspondents)

  • Why: Journalists who report from war zones or conflict areas are in constant danger. They report on wars, terrorist attacks, and natural disasters, often with their own lives at risk in the pursuit of information.
  • Fear Confronted: Death from violence, bombing, kidnapping, or physical harm from hostile forces.
  • Achievement: The pride of documenting the truth, providing critical information, and offering a voice to the people in war or conflict zones.

10. Astronauts

  • Why: Space exploration involves immense risk, from the dangers of space travel to the physical and psychological challenges of life in space. Astronauts face the possibility of death or catastrophic failure in extreme conditions.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of death in space due to technical malfunctions, exposure to harmful conditions, or accidents during launch or landing.
  • Achievement: The sense of conquering the unknown, advancing scientific knowledge, and contributing to human progress in space exploration.

11. Deep Sea Divers (e.g., Commercial Divers, Marine Biologists)

  • Why: Deep sea divers face some of the most dangerous and high-risk environments on Earth. From decompression sickness to dangerous marine life and equipment malfunctions, their job can be life-threatening.
  • Fear Confronted: Drowning, pressure injuries, and encounters with dangerous sea creatures.
  • Achievement: The sense of exploring uncharted territories, contributing to scientific research, and overcoming the extreme fear of the ocean’s depths.

12. Professional Soldiers in Special Operations

  • Why: Soldiers in special forces (e.g., Navy SEALs, Army Rangers) are often deployed to dangerous, covert missions that involve the risk of death. Their training specifically prepares them for life-threatening scenarios where calm, skill, and bravery are essential.
  • Fear Confronted: Death in combat, mission failure, and the possibility of being captured or injured.
  • Achievement: Protecting national security, completing high-risk operations, and overcoming intense physical and mental challenges.

Conclusion:

These occupations attract individuals who, either consciously or subconsciously, may be seeking to overcome the fear of death and face danger head-on. By confronting death or extreme danger in their daily work, they achieve a sense of mastery, purpose, and personal growth, turning their fear into achievement. These professions require not only physical skill and courage but also a mental resilience to stay focused and composed in the face of danger.

Occupations that attract individuals motivated by the desire to achieve success or avoid failure:

Occupations driven by the fear of failure often attract individuals who are motivated by the desire to avoid failure and overcome challenges in the pursuit of personal and professional success. In these professions, the fear of failure is seen as an obstacle to be conquered, and success provides a sense of achievement and mastery. These professions typically require high levels of responsibility, accountability, and the constant need to perform at a high standard. Here’s a list of such professions, focusing on fear of failure and the achievement of overcoming it:

1. Entrepreneur

  • Why: Entrepreneurs take on significant risks when starting and managing businesses, with the constant fear of failure looming over them. The fear of their business failing, loss of investment, or disappointment to investors motivates them to push forward, innovate, and adapt.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of business failure, financial loss, and reputation damage.
  • Achievement: The satisfaction of successfully building a business, overcoming setbacks, and thriving despite risks.

2. Surgeon

  • Why: Surgeons carry the weight of life-and-death decisions in their hands. The fear of making a mistake during surgery can be overwhelming, but overcoming that fear allows them to perform complex operations and save lives.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of making a mistake in surgery that could result in patient harm or death.
  • Achievement: The achievement of successfully completing surgeries, healing patients, and building trust in their skills.

3. Athlete (Competitive Sports)

  • Why: Professional athletes often face a high level of pressure to perform and fear failure in the form of losing a game, missing a key play, or failing to meet performance expectations. This fear can drive them to constantly improve and push beyond their limits.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of underperforming, losing games, or letting teammates and fans down.
  • Achievement: The achievement of winning competitions, setting personal records, and overcoming setbacks to reach the top of their field.

4. Lawyer (Especially Trial Lawyers)

  • Why: Lawyers, particularly those who argue cases in court, are often motivated by the fear of losing a case, which could result in negative consequences for their clients, their reputation, or even their career.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of losing a case, failing to secure justice, or damaging a client’s future.
  • Achievement: The achievement of successfully defending clients, winning cases, and building a strong legal reputation.

5. Pilot (Commercial or Military)

  • Why: Pilots are responsible for the lives of passengers or fellow soldiers, and the fear of failure in the form of an accident or unsafe flight conditions is ever-present. They are trained to make high-stakes decisions and perform under pressure.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of crashing or failing to ensure the safety of passengers or the aircraft.
  • Achievement: The satisfaction of safe landings, successfully completing flights, and avoiding danger.

6. Stockbroker/Investor

  • Why: In the financial world, stockbrokers and investors often face the fear of losing money or making poor financial decisions that can result in personal or professional failure. They take calculated risks and thrive by overcoming the fear of financial loss.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of losing client money, financial ruin, or failing to predict market trends correctly.
  • Achievement: The achievement of profitable investments, successful financial strategies, and the ability to weather market fluctuations.

7. Teacher (Especially in High-Stakes Environments)

  • Why: Teachers are responsible for imparting knowledge and guiding students to success. The fear of failure in terms of not reaching students, not producing good academic results, or failing to inspire students can drive their work.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of failing to educate, letting students down, or not being able to manage a class effectively.
  • Achievement: The achievement of students’ success, academic excellence, and positive feedback from pupils and parents.

8. Actor/Performer (Stage, Film, Music)

  • Why: Actors and performers face the fear of failure every time they step on stage or appear in front of a camera. They fear poor performance, rejection by critics, or failure to engage the audience. Overcoming this fear is part of what drives them to hone their craft.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of poor reviews, rejection, or failure to connect with the audience.
  • Achievement: The achievement of captivating an audience, acclaim for performances, and the satisfaction of personal expression through their craft.

9. Entrepreneur in High-Risk Fields (e.g., Tech, BioTech)

  • Why: Entrepreneurs in industries like technology, biotech, and innovation often face the risk of failing in a competitive market or creating a product that doesn’t succeed. Overcoming the fear of failure is essential to driving innovation.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of business failure, financial collapse, and rejection from investors or consumers.
  • Achievement: The achievement of successful product launches, industry breakthroughs, and creating impactful technologies.

10. Scientist/Researcher (in High-Stakes Fields)

  • Why: Scientists and researchers working in fields like medicine, technology, or space exploration face the fear of failure in their experiments, leading to wasted time, loss of funding, or discovery setbacks. Overcoming this fear pushes them to persevere despite setbacks.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of failure in research, not making breakthrough discoveries, or not securing funding.
  • Achievement: The satisfaction of advancing scientific knowledge, contributing to meaningful discoveries, and pushing the boundaries of understanding.

11. Chef (High-End, Michelin-Star Chefs)

  • Why: Chefs working in high-pressure environments, such as Michelin-star restaurants, face the fear of failing to meet customer expectations, underperforming in competitions, or creating subpar dishes that damage their reputation.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of culinary failure, dish rejection, and professional disgrace.
  • Achievement: The achievement of culinary excellence, Michelin-star recognition, and the pride in creating memorable dining experiences.

12. Architect/Engineer (High-Stakes Projects)

  • Why: Architects and engineers are responsible for designing structures that are both aesthetically pleasing and structurally sound. The fear of structural failure, project overruns, or design flaws is ever-present.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of design failure, unsafe buildings, or budget mismanagement.
  • Achievement: The satisfaction of creating safe, functional structures, successful project completions, and innovation in design.

13. Therapist/Psychologist (Helping Clients Overcome Personal Failures)

  • Why: Therapists and psychologists help people address and overcome their deep-seated fears, traumas, and insecurities, including the fear of failure. They often work to empower clients by helping them confront their anxieties.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of personal failure, being unable to help a client, or causing harm through misguided advice.
  • Achievement: The satisfaction of healing and guiding clients through their fears and struggles, empowering them to live fulfilling lives.

14. Crisis Manager (Disaster Response)

  • Why: Crisis managers work in disaster management or emergency response, where they face the fear of failure in saving lives or not preventing a crisis. The pressure to respond correctly in high-stakes situations pushes them to overcome failure-induced anxiety.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of failure in crisis situations, inadequate response, and damage control failure.
  • Achievement: The reward of successfully managing disasters, saving lives, and ensuring recovery and restoration.

Conclusion:

In these professions, the fear of failure is not only a driving force but also a motivator to continually improve, innovate, and perform at a high level. Overcoming that fear and achieving success in such high-stakes fields provides a sense of accomplishment and mastery. These occupations often require individuals to push their limits, adapt quickly, and respond decisively, finding strength in their ability to conquer their fear of failure with each successful outcome.

Occupations that attract individuals motivated by the need for acceptance or the desire to avoid rejection:

Occupations inspired by the need to avoid rejection are often centered around the desire to gain approval, recognition, and acceptance from others, whether in a professional, social, or personal context. People in these professions may face rejection regularly, but their roles provide a sense of achievement as they overcome this fear. These occupations often demand a high level of interpersonal interaction, creative output, or performance, where acceptance and approval from others become significant motivators.

Here’s a list of occupations most likely inspired by the need to avoid rejection, with a focus on the sense of achievement that comes from overcoming fear each time:

1. Actor/Performer (Film, Television, Theater)

  • Why: Actors are regularly exposed to rejection during casting calls, auditions, and performances. The fear of not being chosen for a role or failing to engage an audience can be overwhelming. Overcoming this fear with each successful performance provides a sense of personal achievement.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of rejection by casting directors, audiences not responding well, or being criticized for a poor performance.
  • Achievement: The satisfaction of winning roles, receiving positive reviews, and the joy of connecting with audiences through their craft.

2. Salesperson (Retail, Real Estate, Corporate)

  • Why: Sales professionals are constantly exposed to rejection when potential customers turn down offers or decline to purchase. The ability to bounce back after each rejection and close deals is a key motivator in this profession.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of rejection from customers, failure to meet quotas, and being dismissed as ineffective.
  • Achievement: The sense of success from closing a deal, building long-term relationships with clients, and meeting sales targets.

3. Entrepreneur

  • Why: Entrepreneurs face rejection not just from customers or investors, but also from the market itself, as many startups fail. The fear of failure and rejection drives them to push forward, adapt, and persevere.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of business failure, lack of investor confidence, and rejection of ideas or products by the market.
  • Achievement: The satisfaction of building a successful business, attracting investors, and overcoming the odds of initial failure.

4. Artist (Painter, Sculptor, Musician)

  • Why: Artists often fear rejection from critics, galleries, or audiences, especially in creative fields where personal expression is involved. Overcoming this fear each time their work is showcased or accepted provides a sense of accomplishment.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of rejection from galleries, poor reviews, or lack of audience appreciation.
  • Achievement: The fulfillment of exhibiting their work, gaining recognition, and impacting others through their art.

5. Writer/Author

  • Why: Writers, especially those submitting to publishers, face rejection constantly, from rejected manuscripts to critical reviews. Overcoming the fear of rejection is a key part of achieving success in writing.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of manuscripts being rejected, negative feedback, and not being published.
  • Achievement: The sense of success upon publication, receiving positive reviews, and seeing their writing appreciated by readers.

6. Musician (Solo Performer or Band Member)

  • Why: Musicians face constant rejection from potential fans, critics, and industry professionals. However, each successful performance or album release can be seen as an achievement in overcoming that fear.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of rejection by the audience, poor reviews, and lack of recognition in the music industry.
  • Achievement: The sense of winning fans over, performing to a captivated audience, and building a music career.

7. Public Speaker/Trainer

  • Why: Public speakers face the fear of rejection every time they present in front of an audience. The fear of audience disengagement or lack of impact can be significant, but overcoming it with successful engagements provides a sense of achievement.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of being rejected by the audience, lack of engagement, or poor performance during speeches or presentations.
  • Achievement: The satisfaction of engaging the audience, receiving applause, and making an impact with their message.

8. Psychologist/Therapist

  • Why: Therapists may face the fear of rejection from clients who do not feel comfortable or do not engage in therapy. The fear of not being able to help or being dismissed as ineffective is often present.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of not connecting with clients, clients not following advice, or being ineffective in their practice.
  • Achievement: The fulfillment of helping clients overcome personal struggles, building trust, and seeing clients improve.

9. Teacher (Especially in Challenging Environments)

  • Why: Teachers often deal with the fear of not being accepted by their students or failing to teach effectively. The fear of being rejected by students or not meeting their needs drives continuous improvement.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of losing students’ respect, failing to engage them, or not achieving desired educational outcomes.
  • Achievement: The joy of seeing students succeed, gaining respect from students, and making a meaningful educational impact.

10. Politician (Especially in Competitive Elections)

  • Why: Politicians face rejection from voters, critics, and sometimes even their own political parties. Overcoming the fear of rejection is integral to continuing their campaigns and political careers.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of losing elections, public rejection by constituents, or being out of favor with party members.
  • Achievement: The satisfaction of winning elections, gaining public support, and succeeding in political office.

11. Fashion Model

  • Why: Models face constant rejection from agencies, designers, and industry professionals. They often feel the pressure of meeting beauty standards and overcoming the fear of not being chosen for important assignments.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of not being chosen for campaigns, failing to meet industry standards, or being rejected due to appearance.
  • Achievement: The sense of success when landing contracts, building a strong portfolio, and being recognized in the fashion industry.

12. Therapist/Coach (Life Coach, Career Coach, etc.)

  • Why: Life coaches or career coaches work with individuals who are often at a crossroads and face significant fear of rejection in their personal or professional lives. Coaches often confront this fear through their guidance, helping clients push past self-doubt and rejection fears.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of clients rejecting advice, not helping clients achieve their goals, or losing trust in their ability to coach effectively.
  • Achievement: The fulfillment of empowering clients to overcome their challenges, providing transformative support, and guiding others to success.

13. Chef (Fine Dining, Michelin Star)

  • Why: Chefs, especially in fine dining, often face rejection from customers, critics, and even restaurant critics. Overcoming this fear and successfully creating a memorable dining experience provides chefs with personal achievement.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of customers rejecting the meal, negative reviews, or failure to meet culinary standards.
  • Achievement: The sense of culinary success, positive customer feedback, and gaining recognition in the culinary world.

14. Architect

  • Why: Architects design structures that must meet client approval and stand the test of time. The fear of rejection by clients or failure to meet design expectations can motivate them to push their creativity and innovation.
  • Fear Confronted: The fear of rejection from clients, failure to execute designs successfully, or lack of project approval.
  • Achievement: The satisfaction of successful projects, client satisfaction, and creating iconic and functional structures.

Conclusion:

In these professions, the fear of rejection often drives individuals to prove themselves continually. It encourages them to enhance their skills and push boundaries. These efforts aim to gain acceptance and success. Each of these roles presents unique challenges. Overcoming the fear of being rejected leads to a powerful sense of achievement. This applies whether the rejection comes from clients, audiences, peers, or the public. It also fosters personal growth.

Professions not driven by a need to confront or overcome fears like failure or rejection.

There are various professions. They are not necessarily motivated by the need to overcome fears or seek achievement in the traditional sense. These roles are often driven by other factors such as routine, stability, service to others, or personal fulfillment. They are not motivated by a desire to conquer emotional barriers like fear, rejection, or failure. Below are some examples of such professions, along with the motivations that typically drive people in these roles:

1. Clerical/Administrative Staff

  • Motivation: Routine, stability, and order
  • Why: Clerical and administrative roles often revolve around managing day-to-day tasks. They focus on organizing systems and ensuring that things run smoothly within an organization. These jobs are often driven by the need for organization and efficiency. The focus is on maintaining structured systems rather than overcoming fears or achieving dramatic breakthroughs.
  • Example: Office assistants, administrative assistants, and receptionists.
  • Key Motivators: Job security, consistent work, and supporting organizational flow.

2. Laborers/Manual Workers (e.g., Construction Workers, Factory Workers)

  • Motivation: Steady income, physical work, and contribution to a project
  • Why: Many laborers are motivated by the need for income and job stability. They find satisfaction in contributing to the completion of a tangible product or project. The focus here is on doing physical work. It’s about getting things done and fulfilling tasks. Personal growth or overcoming fears is not the priority.
  • Example: Construction workers, assembly line workers, warehouse staff.
  • Key Motivators: Wages, physical work, and practical contributions.

3. Customer Service Representatives

  • Motivation: Helping others, stability, and clear communication
  • Why: Customer service roles can involve managing challenging interactions. They are typically motivated by a desire to assist customers. They aim to resolve issues and follow procedures to ensure customer satisfaction. These positions are less about overcoming personal fears and more about maintaining a professional demeanor and providing helpful services.
  • Example: Call center agents, retail associates, support staff.
  • Key Motivators: Customer satisfaction, problem-solving, and ensuring service quality.

4. Accountants and Bookkeepers

  • Motivation: Order, precision, and financial management
  • Why: Accountants and bookkeepers are primarily driven by the need for accuracy, order, and compliance with financial regulations. Their work is methodical and involves ensuring financial records are accurate and up-to-date. The focus is more on precision and routine rather than overcoming personal fears or seeking dramatic achievements.
  • Example: Certified public accountants (CPAs), tax accountants, auditors.
  • Key Motivators: Accuracy, financial integrity, and systematic management.

5. Technical Support Specialists

  • Motivation: Problem-solving, technical expertise, and customer service
  • Why: Technical support specialists are driven by the need to solve technical problems. They assist customers with technical issues. Their goal is to ensure that systems or products are functioning correctly. These roles are focused on practical solutions and supporting users, rather than dealing with emotional fears or seeking personal growth.
  • Example: IT support staff, tech support agents, help desk personnel.
  • Key Motivators: Problem-solving, technical proficiency, and customer assistance.

6. Data Entry Workers

  • Motivation: Routine, consistency, and reliability
  • Why: Data entry workers are often motivated by the need to ensure accuracy and maintain consistent records. These jobs are typically structured and repetitive. The focus is on data accuracy and workflow efficiency. The emphasis is not on personal achievement or overcoming emotional challenges.
  • Example: Data entry clerks, transcriptionists, record keepers.
  • Key Motivators: Consistent work, precision, and maintaining data integrity.

7. Retail Workers (e.g., Cashiers, Stock Clerks)

  • Motivation: Customer service, routine, and job security
  • Why: Retail workers are often motivated by the need to serve customers. They aim to maintain store operations and ensure that products are properly stocked. The work tends to be routine and task-oriented. It focuses more on customer satisfaction and maintaining store order. It does not emphasize confronting personal fears or seeking to overcome emotional barriers.
  • Example: Cashiers, stock clerks, sales associates.
  • Key Motivators: Customer service, consistency, and job stability.

8. Warehouse Workers/Logistics Coordinators

  • Motivation: Efficiency, organization, and teamwork
  • Why: Warehouse workers and logistics coordinators are driven by the need to organize inventory. They manage shipments. They also ensure smooth operations within a supply chain. Their focus is on timely completion of tasks and team collaboration rather than confronting fears or emotional challenges.
  • Example: Warehouse staff, logistics coordinators, delivery drivers.
  • Key Motivators: Operational efficiency, teamwork, and productivity.

9. Farmers and Agricultural Workers

  • Motivation: Sustaining livelihood, routine, and connection to nature
  • Why: Farmers and agricultural workers are often motivated by the need to grow crops or raise animals for their livelihood. Their work revolves around seasonal cycles, routine tasks, and practical problem-solving in farming practices. The focus is more on maintaining a sustainable livelihood and connecting with nature than overcoming personal fears.
  • Example: Crop farmers, livestock breeders, horticultural workers.
  • Key Motivators: Sustainability, routine, and practical outcomes.

10. Janitors/Cleaning Staff

  • Motivation: Routine work, service, and maintenance
  • Why: Janitors and cleaning staff are driven by the need to maintain cleanliness and order in their environments. They contribute to the functioning of offices, schools, hospitals, etc. These roles are typically task-driven and focused on maintaining high standards of cleanliness, with little emphasis on overcoming emotional challenges.
  • Example: Custodians, cleaners, maintenance staff.
  • Key Motivators: Service, routine, and environmental maintenance.

11. Receptionists

  • Motivation: Organization, communication, and customer service
  • Why: Receptionists focus on maintaining smooth operations at the front desk, answering calls, greeting guests, and handling scheduling. Their work is often about maintaining a professional atmosphere. They ensure that everything runs smoothly. The role places little emphasis on confronting fears or handling personal emotional growth.
  • Example: Front desk staff, hotel receptionists, medical office receptionists.
  • Key Motivators: Organization, communication, and customer interaction.

12. Security Guards

  • Motivation: Safety, vigilance, and routine
  • Why: Security guards are motivated by the need to protect and ensure safety in their assigned areas. Their role involves maintaining order and monitoring for any security threats. The focus is on constant vigilance and following procedures. They do not focus on dealing with personal emotional challenges or fear.
  • Example: Building security, event security, patrol guards.
  • Key Motivators: Safety, routine vigilance, and maintaining order.

Conclusion:

The professions listed above are generally not driven by a need to confront or overcome fears like failure or rejection. Instead, they are often motivated by factors such as stability, routine, job security, and service to others. These roles emphasize consistent performance, efficiency, and practical outcomes, with less focus on personal achievement or emotional growth.

Understanding the Fear of Rejection: Root Causes and the Fulfillment of Overcoming It

The need to avoid rejection and the sense of achievement that comes from overcoming this fear stem from personal experiences. They are also influenced by early narratives, social influences, and emotional development. Here’s a breakdown of the key experiences, narratives, thoughts, and influences that might shape this deep need, and how these elements could drive someone to find fulfillment in overcoming rejection:

1. Early Childhood Experiences and Attachment Style

  • Influence: The early bond a person forms with their primary caregivers (such as parents or guardians) is crucial. This bond plays a significant role in shaping their fear of rejection. If a child experiences neglect, inconsistent emotional support, or emotional unavailability from caregivers, they may develop a fear of abandonment. They might also fear rejection. Conversely, a child who experiences secure attachment will likely have a more balanced approach to rejection.
  • Narrative: An individual with an insecure attachment may have internalized that love or acceptance is conditional. This belief leads to a strong desire to avoid situations. They might fear being emotionally rejected or excluded.
  • Impact: This fear could manifest in adult relationships, professional settings, and even in creative pursuits. The fear of rejection may drive the person to seek constant validation or approval from others. This need becomes a primary motivator.

2. Negative Experiences with Rejection in Adolescence

  • Influence: Adolescence is a time of identity formation and social belonging. When a person feels rejection from peer exclusion, bullying, or unrequited love, it can strongly affect how they see rejection. They may perceive it as painful or humiliating. These experiences can leave lasting emotional scars that cause a person to be especially sensitive to rejection in the future.
  • Narrative: The individual may develop the belief that “if I’m rejected, it means I’m not enough.” They might also think “rejection equals personal failure.” This can become a core part of their identity, influencing their actions and interactions for years to come.
  • Impact: Rejection in this period can lead to the development of low self-esteem. It can also cause social anxiety. As a result, an individual may constantly work to please others or earn approval. They may avoid rejection to protect themselves from the perceived emotional harm.

3. Cultural and Social Influences

  • Influence: Cultural values surrounding success, achievement, and social status can amplify the fear of rejection. In many societies, there is a heavy emphasis on social approval and fitting in. Individuals may feel that their worth is determined by how accepted they are by others. They may also believe their worth depends on how well they meet societal expectations.
  • Narrative: This societal pressure may lead someone to believe that rejection represents failure, inadequacy, or social exclusion. The fear of being rejected can drive them to seek out external validation. They align their actions with social norms to avoid being left out or judged.
  • Impact: Individuals may be motivated to overachieve. They might constantly please others to avoid rejection. Often, they sacrifice their own needs or authentic self-expression in the process.

4. Parenting Styles and Expectations

  • Influence: The way a person was raised can deeply affect their fear of rejection. Overly critical or perfectionist parents may have conditioned a child to believe that approval is earned. Children learn that rejection is inevitable if they don’t meet certain standards. Lack of unconditional love can make them feel inadequate. Constant comparisons to others create pressure to perform well all the time to avoid rejection.
  • Narrative: A child raised in such an environment may develop a core belief. They might think, “I am only lovable if I succeed” or “If I fail, I will be rejected.” These beliefs can carry over into adulthood. They can influence how they approach personal relationships. They can also affect career ambitions, and even how they view their own worth.
  • Impact: The fear of rejection in adulthood can lead to a constant need for validation from external sources (e.g., work achievements, relationships, or social media).

5. Experiences of Failure or Setbacks in Adulthood

  • Influence: Failure in important life domains (e.g., career, relationships, health) can lead to a heightened fear of rejection. For example, an individual who has faced a professional failure may develop a fear. They might feel rejected from an important opportunity. Experiencing a breakup might make them feel that rejection is a reflection of their worth.
  • Narrative: These experiences may lead to the internalization of the belief that rejection equals being unworthy. The fear of rejection might cause someone to overcompensate. They might always strive to be seen as perfect or flawless. This is an attempt to avoid being rejected again.
  • Impact: This can result in behaviors like perfectionism, overwork, or people-pleasing. These behaviors are driven by a fear that any imperfection or mistake will lead to rejection.

6. Personal Identity and Self-Worth

  • Influence: A person’s self-esteem and personal identity can be greatly shaped by how much external validation they seek or receive. If an individual ties their self-worth to approval from others, rejection becomes an existential threat to their sense of value.
  • Narrative: The person may believe that “if I am rejected, I am not worthy of love, success, or happiness.” This belief system may lead them to prioritize others’ opinions over their own desires. They might place their own needs second. They constantly strive for acceptance.
  • Impact: The desire to avoid rejection can lead to overcompensation. An individual might go to extreme lengths to please others. They may also mask their true selves to prevent rejection.

7. The Desire for Control or Predictability

  • Influence: People who strongly desire control or predictability in their lives may have a heightened fear of rejection. This fear occurs because rejection represents unpredictability or a loss of control over their emotional environment.
  • Narrative: The fear of rejection in this context might stem from a particular belief. One thought could be “if I am rejected, I lose control over how others perceive me”. Another could be “rejection leads to chaos and uncertainty.”
  • Impact: These individuals may go to great lengths to ensure interactions remain predictable. They stay within their comfort zones to avoid facing the discomfort of unexpected rejection.

8. Social or Peer Comparison

  • Influence: Living in a competitive environment, where people are constantly comparing themselves to others, can foster a fear of rejection. If an individual perceives themselves as falling short in comparison to others, they may fear being left behind or rejected.
  • Narrative: These comparisons can lead to the belief. People may think, “If I am not like others or do not measure up, I will be rejected.”
  • Impact: Individuals in this situation might constantly feel the need to prove themselves. They may also try to stand out in ways that garner external validation. This is to avoid being perceived as inferior or unworthy of belonging.

How This Fear Fuels Achievement:

For individuals motivated by the fear of rejection, the sense of achievement is often experienced when they overcome this fear. They receive acceptance or validation in their endeavors. Each time they face potential rejection in personal relationships, they achieve success. Whether in professional settings or creative pursuits, they gain approval. They feel a deep sense of accomplishment. This cycle can be addictive, reinforcing their drive to seek external validation repeatedly.

Achievement in this context can be defined by:

  • Proving personal worth by being accepted or successful in a challenging situation.
  • Overcoming vulnerability and demonstrating resilience in the face of rejection.
  • Achieving social or professional recognition that counters the fear of being excluded or seen as unworthy.

For these individuals, the achievement isn’t necessarily about overcoming external rejection. It is more about quietly mastering their own internal fears. They focus on building self-worth from the acceptance and validation they seek.

How Your Responses to Fear Shape Its Impact: Reducing or Reinforcing Fear Over Time

The actions you take in response to events or experiences that trigger fear play a significant role in either reducing or reinforcing that fear over time. The way you react to fear can either help you overcome it or cause it to become more ingrained. Here’s how different types of reactions can influence your fears:

1. Avoidance or SuppressionReinforces Fear

  • What it looks like: You avoid situations that trigger fear (e.g., avoiding social situations if you fear rejection, or not taking on new challenges because you fear failure).
  • How it reinforces fear: Avoiding fear-inducing situations gives you a temporary sense of relief, but it reinforces the fear in the long term. By avoiding the fear trigger, you never fully confront and process the fear, which makes it feel more threatening each time you encounter it. This strengthens the association between the fear and the avoidance behavior.
  • Example: If you avoid networking opportunities because you’re afraid of rejection, the fear of rejection grows stronger over time. Each time you avoid the situation, you reinforce the belief that rejection is dangerous and that you’re unable to handle it.

2. Overcompensation or People-PleasingReinforces Fear

  • What it looks like: You go out of your way to please others, work excessively hard to gain approval, or behave in ways that are inauthentic to avoid potential rejection or judgment.
  • How it reinforces fear: While this may provide temporary relief by gaining acceptance, people-pleasing or overcompensating reinforces the belief that you need to earn others’ approval and that your self-worth is conditional. This feeds into the fear of not being accepted for who you are, making the fear deeper over time.
  • Example: If you constantly agree with others’ opinions to avoid conflict, you reinforce the belief that your true self is not acceptable and you have to mold yourself to be accepted.

3. Confrontation with the Fear (Gradual Exposure)Reduces Fear

  • What it looks like: You intentionally put yourself in situations that trigger your fear, but you face them with awareness and preparation. Gradual exposure to your fears in controlled ways allows you to gain confidence and build resilience.
  • How it reduces fear: When you face fear directly, particularly in a controlled and thoughtful way, you learn that the fear is often overblown and that you can handle it. Over time, you develop greater emotional resilience and mastery over the fear, which gradually reduces its hold on you. This process is central to techniques such as exposure therapy in psychological treatment.
  • Example: If you fear public speaking, starting with small groups and gradually increasing the size of your audience helps you learn that rejection or failure in those situations is not catastrophic and that you can manage your anxiety over time.

4. Reframing or Cognitive RestructuringReduces Fear

  • What it looks like: You consciously change the way you interpret and respond to fear-triggering events. Instead of seeing rejection as a personal failure, you view it as an opportunity for growth or simply as a part of life.
  • How it reduces fear: Reframing allows you to detach the emotional sting of fear from specific situations. You learn that failure or rejection doesn’t equate to personal worthlessness or an existential threat. With practice, this new perspective allows you to view fear as a manageable challenge instead of a dangerous obstacle.
  • Example: If you face rejection at work, rather than seeing it as an indication of personal failure, you reframe it as feedback or an opportunity to improve. This allows you to reduce the fear of rejection over time.

5. Acceptance and MindfulnessReduces Fear

  • What it looks like: You practice accepting your fears and experiencing them fully without judging them. Rather than trying to avoid or control the fear, you acknowledge it as a temporary emotional experience and allow it to pass naturally.
  • How it reduces fear: This approach works because it removes the resistance to fear, which often fuels it. By practicing mindfulness or acceptance, you let go of the struggle against the fear, allowing it to dissipate. Over time, this reduces your fear’s intensity and makes it less likely to trigger an overwhelming response.
  • Example: If you feel fear before a social gathering, instead of trying to control or suppress the fear, you acknowledge it and allow it to be there while still proceeding with the event. The fear gradually loses its power as you consistently face it without resistance.

6. Seeking Support and EncouragementReduces Fear

  • What it looks like: You turn to others for support, guidance, and encouragement when faced with situations that trigger your fear. This could include seeking help from a mentor, therapist, or trusted friends.
  • How it reduces fear: Social support provides comfort and validation, which helps you reframe the situation and gain perspective. Knowing you’re not alone in your fear, and that others have faced similar challenges, can reduce the sense of isolation and reinforce your belief in your ability to cope.
  • Example: If you’re facing a job interview and fear rejection, having a mentor to help you prepare, offering positive feedback, and supporting you through the process can reduce your fear and build your confidence.

7. Achieving Small WinsReduces Fear

  • What it looks like: You deliberately seek out smaller challenges or tasks that push your comfort zone without overwhelming you. Achieving small successes helps you build confidence over time.
  • How it reduces fear: Every small win becomes proof that fearful situations can be managed and survived, leading to gradual reduction in overall fear. Progressive mastery over smaller fears builds up your ability to face bigger ones without feeling overwhelmed.
  • Example: If you’re afraid of rejection in social situations, starting by saying hello to strangers and having brief conversations can build your confidence, so that over time you can tackle larger social challenges without fear.

Summary:

  • Avoidance and overcompensation reinforce fear by creating a cycle of dependence on external validation or the avoidance of challenges.
  • Confrontation, reframing, mindfulness, and support reduce fear by helping you change your perception of the fear and develop greater emotional resilience.
  • Ultimately, the way you react to fear determines whether it will continue to control you or whether you will master it. Consistently facing fear with acceptance, support, or gradual exposure can lead to a long-term reduction in fear and a greater sense of self-efficacy and accomplishment.

National Agriculture Development Matrix


Here is a draft policy statement for the National Agriculture Sector Policy for Botswana. It is grounded in the core themes here:


Policy Statement: National Agriculture Sector Policy – Republic of Botswana

That Botswana commits to developing a regenerative, market-aligned agriculture sector that ensures food sovereignty, inclusive growth, and climate resilience.


The Government of Botswana affirms that agriculture is a cornerstone of national development, food sovereignty, economic diversification, and environmental stewardship. The policy recognizes the sector’s current contribution of less than 2% to GDP. It commits to restoring agriculture as a central driver of the economy to what it was pre-Independence. The target is a progressive increase toward a 30% contribution over the next decade. In response to persistent rural poverty, this policy sets a bold and coordinated course. It aims to create industry leaders. The intention is to create formal employment for 800,000 persons in the industry in the next five years. It addresses growing food demand and increasing climate variability. The goal is an inclusive, sustainable transformation of the sector. At its core is the commitment to secure resilient livelihoods and long-term national food security.


Methodology:

This is our attempt to map the value chains for both plant and animal production. We aim to highlight their potential when more deliberately integrated into manufacturing and export. Such integration could significantly expand the scope of agricultural production in the country. We developed these value chains based on recommendations in the unemployment study. This process identified the national production systems for plants and animals. This identification helped define what the policy needs to include.

We recognize that the past decades have shown that fragmented, supply-driven models of agricultural development are insufficient. They cannot build a resilient and self-sustaining agricultural sector. These models are often isolated from market realities, ecological dynamics, and the lived experiences of producers.

Therefore, this direction is built on the following foundational commitments:

1. National Planning and Coordination:
Establish a central, data-driven national agricultural coordination system. It will synchronize planning across input supply, production, logistics, processing, and markets. This system will guide seasonal priorities, production quotas, investment, and climate-resilient land use planning across regions.

2 Producer-Led, Market-Aligned Development:
Enable and empower producers. Both small- and large-scale producers should be able to respond predictably and profitably to national and regional market demands. This includes reorienting support structures, training, subsidies, and infrastructure toward farmer-managed, demand-sensitive production systems.

3. Agroecological and Regenerative Approaches:
Transition from extractive, mono-crop models to diversified, regenerative agricultural systems. These systems restore soil health and recycle biomass. They also retain water and contribute to climate stability. This approach will be prioritized especially for horticulture, fodder, and small livestock systems.

4. Strategic Investment in High-Impact Value Chains:
Prioritize value chains with strong domestic consumption. Scale those that have export competitiveness potential. They should also enhance rural employment, such as potatoes, garlic, poultry, fodder crops, and integrated livestock-crop systems.

5. Integrated Farmer Training and Knowledge Ecosystem:
Institutionalize farmer learning hubs. These hubs deliver applied, experiential knowledge rooted in regenerative practices. They focus on market access strategies and agribusiness management. This ensures producers evolve as innovators and decision-makers in the sector.

6. Equity and Inclusive Participation:
Encourage gender inclusion in agricultural policy design. Promote youth participation in land access and financing. Include both in the value chain participation. These actions aim to foster inter-generational equity. They also support economic resilience and promote innovation.

7. Resilient Infrastructure and Climate Adaptation:
Prioritize investment in irrigation, cold storage, and feeder roads. Focus on renewable energy and digital platforms. These investments reduce losses and enable year-round production. They also buffer rural communities from climate-related shocks.

8. Evidence-Based Policy and Governance:
Develop and maintain long-term, spatially disaggregated data systems. These systems should cover rainfall, production trends, consumption patterns, and market behaviors. This approach enables responsive governance and informed policy-making.

Through this policy, Botswana aspires to build a resilient, regenerative, and inclusive agriculture system. This system feeds the nation. It sustains its landscapes. It uplifts its people and contributes to regional food security.


I. CROP PRODUCTION (ALL PLANT PRODUCTS)


AGRICULTURE PLANT PRODUCTION VALUE-CHAIN


II. ANIMAL PRODUCTION (ALL ANIMAL PRODUCTS)

AGRICULTURE ANIMAL PRODUCTION VALUE-CHAIN


Here are my general observations:

Observations on the Tone of the Policy Document

Observations on the Tone of the Policy Document

The overall tone of the policy document reflects a strong sensitivity to public and political concerns. This sensitivity is understandable given its context. These include:

  • The voices of the unemployed, which underpin references to income inequality and social inclusion. This often implicitly centres on women (framed through social justice) and youth (highlighted through a focus on technology), and graduates. The latter assumes that graduates create jobs. Unless they are organizational or industry leaders, they are unlikely to create jobs. However, they need to grow their jobs so as to keep them.
  • The perspectives of environmental advocates, whose concerns are reflected in the emphasis on sustainability and ecological resilience.
  • It is imperative to align with legacy national commitments, such as Vision 2036. Additionally, alignment with broader international frameworks, such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), is necessary.

A Cautionary Note

These policy commitments are important. However, they often prioritize short-term visibility. This comes at the expense of the long-term national institutional requirements for effective planning, coordination, production, and monitoring. These foundational systems require time and technical expertise. They also need iterative refinement. These elements are frequently sidelined in favour of more politically resonant themes.

Critically, placing agriculture as a business at the center of policy design is essential. Over time, this strategy would address many of the concerns raised above. This approach would expand employment. It would generate income and drive sustainability through economic participation.

Still, the voices of producers and agri-business practitioners face a disconnect. They are deeply focused on day-to-day operations. There may be a gap between policy narratives driven by public and political concerns. The realities of running productive, competitive enterprises may differ from these narratives. Their limited time and attention are spent on execution, not engagement. We risk not meeting the industry’s needs to operate effectively and grow. This is crucial for building a future for agriculture tomorrow.

Summary of Gaps Not Yet Covered in Policy Statement

The following areas from the National Matrix are not explicitly or adequately addressed in the current policy statement draft and should be considered for integration:

1. Demand-driven Centralized Production Planning

2. STEM capability and national education agenda

3. Explicit and Comprehensive Coverage of Input Supply Industries that mirrors the national matrix structure (e.g., seed systems, irrigation suppliers, agrochemicals)

4. Position on drought-resistant crops and climate re-balancing through non-drought crops (particularly horticulture products)

5. Detailed Distribution & Logistics Chain

6. Retail price control and market fairness

7. Clear Export Strategy and Infrastructure

8. Defined Roles of Governance and Institutions (planning units, coordinating bodies)

9. Financial Architecture (agricultural credit, risk financing, guarantees)

10. Land Use and Tenure Security

11. Monitoring & Evaluation Frameworks with Data Systems

12. Processing/Agro-Industrial Zones Strategy

Next Steps / Recommendations

  • PRIORITY: Expand the policy statement into a full policy framework that mirrors the national matrix structure.
  • FOLLOW-THROUGH: Develop annexes or implementation frameworks with Gantt charts, institutional roles, and sector-specific targets.
  • Consider linking the Policy Statement to investment promotion, especially to catalyze private sector participation.
  • Develop a Monitoring & Learning Plan that operationalizes the longitudinal data philosophy embedded in your matrix.

Warm regards,
Ms Sheila Damodaran
Managing Director
Systems Thinking Research & Leadership Development Institute (STRLDi)


Endnotes:

Here’s a breakdown to help clarify the differences between a policy statement, a strategy or planning document, and vision/goals:


1. What is a Policy Statement?

A policy statement is a high-level declaration of government or institutional intent. It captures principles, priorities, and commitments to guide future decision-making and action in a sector like agriculture.

Features:

  • Broad in scope
  • Sets the direction, not the exact route
  • Framed in normative language (“we commit to…”, “we shall…”)
  • Establishes what is important and why
  • Often endorsed at the political or executive level

Example from agriculture:

“Botswana commits to developing a regenerative, market-aligned agriculture sector that ensures food sovereignty, inclusive growth, and climate resilience.”

Think of it as:

The compass: it tells you where north is, but not how to get there step-by-step.


2. What is a Strategy or Planning Document?

A strategy or planning document translates policy into operational pathways. It outlines the how, who, when, and with what resources.

Features:

  • Breaks the policy into objectives, outputs, and activities
  • Includes targets, timelines, budgets, and responsibilities
  • Often supported by monitoring frameworks and implementation roadmaps
  • May be revised periodically (e.g., every 5 years)

Example:

A National Horticulture Development Plan with targets to expand irrigated land by 10,000 ha over five years, led by the Ministry of Agriculture.

Think of it as:

The roadmap and the vehicle maintenance manual: it tells you how to make the journey and what each actor must do.


3. Is it the same as Vision or Goals?

Not quite, though it overlaps.

✔ Vision Statement:

  • A vision is an aspirational future — the “north star”
  • Short, emotionally resonant, and time-insensitive
  • E.g., “A food-secure Botswana with thriving rural economies.”

✔ Goals:

  • Measurable, specific targets derived from the policy
  • Sits between policy and strategy
  • E.g., “Reduce agricultural imports by 40% within 5 years”

🟨 Summary of Differences

ElementPolicy StatementStrategy/Plan DocumentVision / Goals
PurposeSet direction & principlesDefine implementation pathwaysInspire / define end destination
TimeframeLong-term, enduringMedium-term (e.g., 5 years)Long-term aspiration
Level of DetailHigh-levelSpecific and operationalHigh-level for vision; mid-level for goals
ToneDeclarative, normativeInstructional, structuredInspirational (vision); action-driven (goals)
AudiencePublic, lawmakers, fundersImplementers, civil servants, donorsPublic, internal teams, stakeholders

Why You Need All Three

A strong policy statement:

  • Anchors and legitimizes future strategies
  • Clarifies why and what the country stands for
  • Builds coherence across ministries, donors, and local actors

But without a strategy, the policy remains only a declaration.

And without a vision and goals, people don’t know what success looks like.


When the World Speaks China’s Path to Growth Part I


China’s journey to becoming the global economic powerhouse it is today was built over several decades. It was marked by strategic decisions. It involved long-term planning and evolving priorities. Below is an overview of how China grew its capacities, what it emphasized over time, and what it has discontinued or started paying attention to in recent years:

1. Early Focus on Industrialization (1949 – 1978)

Key Emphasis:

  • Agrarian Reform and Central Planning: After the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) took power in 1949, China pursued land reforms. They collectivized agriculture to improve food security. These reforms aimed to reduce feudal economic structures. The focus was on central planning, as China adopted a Soviet-style command economy.
  • State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs): The government took control of most industries and aimed to create a self-sufficient, industrialized economy.

What was discontinued:

  • Feudal Agricultural System: The shift from traditional agricultural practices was significant. This included the transition from feudal landholding systems to collectivized farming. These changes were part of this early transformation.
  • Market-Driven Economy: Early on, China rejected market capitalism. Instead, it embraced a command economy with central planning. This approach eventually proved to be inefficient.

2. Opening Up and Reform (1978 – 1990s)

Key Emphasis:

  • Economic Reforms (Deng Xiaoping): In 1978, Deng Xiaoping introduced key economic reforms. He shifted the economy away from central planning towards a market economy. He emphasized “Socialism with Chinese Characteristics”. This emphasis included introducing private enterprise. It also involved establishing Special Economic Zones (SEZs) and opening up to foreign trade and investment.
  • Export-Oriented Growth: The focus was on creating an export-driven economy, attracting foreign investment, and integrating into the global market. The establishment of SEZs like Shenzhen became crucial to this strategy.
  • Infrastructure Development: A significant emphasis was placed on building transportation, energy, and communication infrastructure to support economic growth.

What has since been discontinued:

  • Strict Central Planning: The economy shifted from a centrally planned system to a more market-driven one. Private enterprise increased. Market forces are now playing a larger role.
  • Collectivization: The push for collectivized farming and state-run agriculture was gradually phased out. China moved towards private land leases and rural reforms.

3. Rapid Industrialization and Technological Catch-Up (1990s – Early 2000s)

Key Emphasis:

  • Manufacturing Hub: During the 1990s, China became known as the “World’s Factory,” with its emphasis on low-cost manufacturing and assembly. The country attracted massive foreign investment in manufacturing, textiles, electronics, and consumer goods. This influx of investment led to rapid urbanization and the development of industrial capacity.
  • Labor-Intensive Industries: China capitalized on its large, low-wage workforce. This advantage allowed it to dominate labor-intensive industries. These industries include textiles, toys, and consumer electronics.
  • Export-Led Growth: Export-oriented industries were further developed, leading to China’s status as the world’s largest exporter by the mid-2000s.

What has since been discontinued:

  • Low-Wage, Low-Value-Added Manufacturing: China has shifted its focus from just low-cost manufacturing to more value-added and advanced manufacturing processes. While it still remains a global hub for manufacturing, it has been diversifying into higher-tech industries.
  • Over-Reliance on Low-Tech Industries: China has actively sought to move away from an over-reliance on low-tech, labor-intensive industries. It is focusing on technological innovation and higher value-added production.

4. Technological Innovation and Global Trade Expansion (2000s – 2010s)

Key Emphasis:

  • Technological Advancement: China began investing heavily in technology and innovation. The country set its sights on becoming a global leader in advanced industries. Initiatives like the Made in China 2025 plan had ambitious goals. They aimed to propel China into the forefront of high-tech industries. These industries include robotics, aerospace, AI, and clean energy.
  • Infrastructure and Urbanization: Massive investment in infrastructure continued, including world-class airports, high-speed rail networks, and advanced communication networks. This infrastructure built the foundation for future technological and economic growth.
  • Global Trade Networks: China’s entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001 solidified its role in the global economy. The country became the world’s largest exporter, and it increasingly turned into a key player in global supply chains.
  • Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): China expanded its influence globally by developing trade routes through the BRI. The initiative aims to invest in infrastructure projects in Africa, Europe, and Asia.

What has since been discontinued:

  • Massive Export-Driven Growth Model: China is reducing its dependency on export-driven growth, pivoting toward consumption-driven growth and domestic innovation.
  • Heavy Dependence on Low-Tech Manufacturing: China remains a dominant player in manufacturing. However, it is no longer solely focused on low-tech, high-labor industries. Instead, it is investing in innovation to build leadership in high-tech sectors.

5. Shift Toward Domestic Consumption and Green Economy (2010s – Present)

Key Emphasis:

  • Consumption-Driven Growth: In the last decade, China has shifted its focus toward building a consumption-driven economy. Exports are still important, but there is now a stronger emphasis on fostering domestic demand. This is especially true with an expanding middle class.
  • Green and Sustainable Development: China has recently placed a greater emphasis on sustainability. The focus is on clean energy, electric vehicles, and green technologies. The country has committed to achieving carbon neutrality by 2060, signaling a shift toward more sustainable economic growth.
  • Technological Superpower Status: China invests heavily in cutting-edge technologies. These include artificial intelligence, biotechnology, quantum computing, and 5G. Companies like Huawei, Alibaba, and Tencent are at the forefront of this transition.
  • Innovation and Entrepreneurship: The Chinese government has increasingly focused on fostering a culture of innovation, entrepreneurship, and technological self-reliance. This strategy aims to reduce dependency on foreign technologies. This approach is particularly important in the face of rising geopolitical tensions with the U.S. and other Western countries.

What has since been discontinued:

  • Reliance on Traditional Industry Models: While China still maintains its industrial base, the focus is shifting away from traditional heavy industries (steel, coal, etc.). Instead its focus is turning toward tech-driven sectors like AI, green energy, and biotech.
  • Focus on Low-Cost Exports: As China’s economy matures, the focus has shifted. China is moving away from merely being the world’s factory. It is becoming a technological and innovation leader.

6. Global Geopolitical Influence and Technology Leadership (Future Focus)

Key Emphasis:

  • Geopolitical Influence: China’s global influence continues to expand. It is growing particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB). Additionally, there is increasing involvement in global institutions. China is positioning itself as a counterweight to the West, particularly in areas of trade and technology.
  • Global Technological Leadership: China is seeking to become a global leader in emerging technologies, including AI, blockchain, and digital currencies. The development of 5G networks is a key aspect of this strategy. Its ambitions to dominate the space race with initiatives like the Chang’e lunar program are also crucial.
  • Innovation in Business and Finance: The digital yuan is China’s central bank digital currency. The rapid growth of tech giants in e-commerce and fintech also signifies China’s push. It aims to lead in future financial and digital economies.

What has since been discontinued:

  • Manufacturing-Only Growth Model: Manufacturing is still crucial to China’s economy. However, it is no longer the primary driver of growth. Innovation and technological leadership are now central.
  • Heavy Dependence on Western Technologies: China is focusing more on developing its own technologies. This shift is in response to technological trade wars and restrictions. It aims to reduce reliance on foreign countries.

Summary of China’s Evolving Priorities:

  • Long-Term Focus: Over the years, China has placed a sustained emphasis on infrastructure development, industrialization, and foreign investment. However, the nation has gradually shifted its priorities from low-cost manufacturing and export-led growth to innovation, technology, and sustainable development.
  • Discontinuation: China has moved away from a strict command economy. It has reduced its reliance on low-tech manufacturing and massive export-driven growth. These are key changes that have allowed China to transition into a more diversified, innovation-led economy.
  • Recent Focus: China’s current emphasis is on technological leadership, sustainability, and geopolitical influence. This focus marks its ambition to secure a dominant position in the global economy for decades to come.

This evolving narrative has enabled China to emerge as a global economic powerhouse. The future outlook is focused on tech-driven growth, sustainability, and innovation.

Factors essential to understand China’s growth narrative

To understand China’s growth narrative fully, it’s essential to consider several factors. These include how education, family systems, and gender relations have evolved. The use of water and land, as well as the role of animals, also shape the country’s development. These factors are intricately linked to the broader political, economic, and social transformations in China.

1. Education and Emphasis on Key Subjects

Key Emphasis:

  • Focus on STEM Education: China has placed a strong emphasis on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education. This focus started in the 1980s. China has consistently prioritized science and technology education. This focus aims to fuel its industrial and technological growth. The government has heavily invested in creating a robust educational system. This system aims to equip students with the skills necessary for transforming China into a technological superpower.
  • Centralized Control and Reforms: The Chinese government has maintained significant control over the education system. It implements nationwide reforms to align curricula with national goals. From the 1980s onward, the education system was gradually reformed to produce skilled workers for a rapidly modernizing economy.
  • Vocational and Technical Training: Alongside university education, China developed a strong vocational education and training (VET) system. It focuses on preparing students for technical jobs, especially in manufacturing and engineering fields. This contributed to the country’s ability to build a labor force capable of supporting mass industrialization.
  • Recent Shifts Toward Innovation: More recently, China has placed increased emphasis on fostering creativity. It also promotes critical thinking and innovation in its education system. This focus is particularly evident through initiatives like the “Made in China 2025” plan. The plan aims to move the country up the global value chain in advanced technology.

What has changed:

  • Shift from Ideology to Innovation: Earlier decades emphasized ideological education and loyalty to the Communist Party. Now, there is a shift towards fostering innovation, entrepreneurship, and technology-driven education. This change is part of China’s modernization and shift to a market-oriented economy.
  • Internationalization: In recent years, China has encouraged academic exchange programs. It has sent students abroad for further study. The focus is on gaining expertise in emerging global technologies like AI, robotics, and renewable energy.

2. Family Systems

Key Emphasis:

  • The Traditional Chinese Family: Historically, family in China has been viewed as the foundation of society. The family system, which prioritizes respect for elders, loyalty, and familial duty, has strongly shaped China’s cultural identity. The Confucian values of filial piety, social harmony, and hierarchical relationships were central to the functioning of society.
  • One-Child Policy (1979-2015): To control population growth, China introduced the one-child policy in 1979. This had significant demographic and social implications. These included an aging population. There were also gender imbalances due to a cultural preference for male children.
  • Transition to Nuclear Families: As China urbanized, families gradually shifted from extended structures to more nuclear setups. This occurred alongside economic reforms. This change was especially noted in urban areas.

What has changed:

  • Policy Reversal and Family Support: China faced demographic challenges and an aging population. In response, it reversed the one-child policy in 2015. This change allowed families to have two children. More recently, the policy has been further relaxed to encourage larger families. The government is introducing incentives such as tax breaks and housing benefits to support childbearing.
  • Urbanization and Social Mobility: Family structures have become increasingly diverse. Many younger generations are moving to cities for work. This shift leads to changes in family dynamics and expectations. The move from rural to urban areas has also meant less emphasis on traditional farming family units.

3. Gender Relations

Key Emphasis:

  • Traditional Gender Roles: In traditional Chinese society, gender roles were strictly defined. Men were typically seen as the breadwinners. Women took on domestic duties. The Confucian ideology reinforced these roles, which persisted through much of the 20th century.
  • Women in the Workforce (Mao Era): Under Mao Zedong, China made significant strides toward gender equality. The state encouraged women to join the workforce. It also promoted their participation in education and contribution to the economy. Women were promoted as equals, but traditional gender expectations often remained in practice.
  • Post-Reform Gender Dynamics: In the post-reform period, China’s economic growth created new opportunities for women, especially in urban areas. Women entered higher education in large numbers. They also joined the workforce significantly. The country saw an increase in female entrepreneurs and business leaders.

What has changed:

  • Shift Toward Gender Equality in Education and Employment: Today, there is a strong emphasis on gender equality in education. Women are increasingly pursuing higher education. They are entering careers in traditionally male-dominated fields, such as engineering and technology. The gender gap in education has narrowed significantly. Women now account for nearly half of the university graduates in China.
  • Challenges and Gender Imbalance: Despite progress, gender imbalances persist, particularly in rural areas. There is still a significant cultural preference for male children. This preference leads to a skewed sex ratio. Additionally, women in China face challenges related to employment discrimination and unequal pay.

4. Use of Water and Land

Key Emphasis:

  • Land Reform and Agricultural Focus: After 1949, China implemented large-scale land reform programs. They redistributed land from landlords to peasants. The government also collectivized agriculture. In the 1980s, the government introduced the Household Responsibility System. This system decentralized control over farming. It allowed individual families to lease land from the state. Families could make decisions about what to grow.
  • Water Management for Agriculture: China is one of the world’s largest agricultural producers. The country has long focused on efficient water use for irrigation. The country has faced ongoing water scarcity issues, particularly in the north. It has invested heavily in major water diversion projects. These include the South-North Water Transfer Project, which aims to address regional disparities in water distribution.
  • Urbanization and Land Use: With rapid urbanization, land use has shifted significantly. The government has prioritized land acquisition for urban development, and rural areas have increasingly given way to urban expansion.

What has changed:

  • Focus on Sustainable Land and Water Use: In recent years, there has been a growing recognition. There is a need for sustainable land and water management. This need is particularly urgent in the face of climate change and environmental degradation. China is investing heavily in green technologies, renewable energy, and sustainable agriculture practices to protect its environment.
  • Water Conservation and Management: China’s water scarcity issues have led to a greater focus on water conservation technologies. This includes the development of advanced irrigation systems. It also involves wastewater treatment processes. The government has also been working to balance agricultural, industrial, and urban water needs.

5. Animals and Their Role in the Narrative

Key Emphasis:

  • Traditional Agricultural Practices: In rural China, animals have traditionally been integral to agriculture, providing labor, manure, and food. Oxen, water buffalo, and other draft animals were essential to pre-industrial farming. These farms relied heavily on manual labor and animal-powered tools.
  • Livestock and Food Security: Livestock farming, which includes pigs, chickens, and cattle, became increasingly important in China. The country sought to boost food production. It also aimed to improve dietary standards. The country has also been a major player in the global poultry and pork industries.

What has changed:

  • Industrialization of Animal Farming: With China’s rapid industrialization, animal farming has shifted toward factory farming. This shift is particularly notable for pigs and poultry. While this has helped meet the demand for protein, it has also raised concerns about animal welfare and environmental sustainability.
  • Environmental Impact: China is focusing on balancing industrial growth with environmental sustainability. There is an increasing focus on sustainable farming practices. This includes more humane and environmentally responsible methods for raising livestock.

Conclusion:

China’s development narrative is deeply intertwined with the evolution of its educational system. It is also linked to family structures, gender relations, and the use of natural resources. Over time, the nation has shifted from focusing on industrialization, collectivization, and centralized planning. Now, it embraces market-driven reforms, technological innovation, and sustainability. The country’s growth has been marked by significant progress in education. There has been advancement in gender equality and land use management. However, challenges remain in balancing economic growth with social and environmental sustainability. Moving forward, China is increasingly paying attention to innovation. The focus on green development is growing. The attention to social welfare aims to create a more balanced and sustainable future.

Cultural Characteristics of the People of China

The success of China’s economic transformation can be attributed not only to its strategic policies and infrastructure investments. It also stems from deeply ingrained cultural characteristics, beliefs, and values. These are present at all levels of society, from workers to middle management, leadership, and government. These traits helped China navigate challenges posed by its sheer size, population, and historical complexities. Below are the key aspects of the Chinese persona and belief systems that contributed to the country’s remarkable economic growth:

1. Strong Work Ethic and Discipline (Workers)

Positive Aspects:

  • Hard Work and Perseverance: One of the defining characteristics of Chinese workers is their incredible work ethic. The culture of diligence and sacrifice stems from Confucian principles. These principles highlight the importance of effort and persistence in achieving success. The Chinese have historically valued hard work as a pathway to self-improvement and prosperity.
  • Long Hours and Efficiency: Chinese workers are often willing to work long hours. There is a strong emphasis on productivity. This work ethic, along with discipline, drives industrial output. It contributes to growth in sectors such as manufacturing, technology, and services.
  • Adaptability and Learning: The ability to quickly learn new skills is crucial. Adapting to technological and industrial changes strengthens China’s workforce. This is particularly visible in the way workers quickly adjusted to high-tech manufacturing and new digital industries.

Challenges:

  • Overwork Culture and Burnout: Commitment to hard work has been a driver of success. However, the culture of overwork, especially in the private sector, has led to worker burnout. It has also resulted in poor work-life balance. The “996” work culture (working from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., six days a week) has sparked debates about the sustainability of this approach.
  • Income Inequality: Many workers have benefited from China’s growth. However, the gap between wealthy urban centers and rural areas has widened. Millions of workers face low wages, poor working conditions, and limited access to social services.

2. Collective Mindset and Nationalism (Middle Management)

Positive Aspects:

  • Collectivism and Social Harmony: The collectivist culture of China is deeply rooted in Confucianism. It emphasizes social harmony and the collective good over individualism. This sense of unity has played a key role in maintaining stability and alignment across different levels of society. Middle management has been instrumental in facilitating cooperation and ensuring that teams work toward the larger national goals.
  • Loyalty to the State and Leadership: Middle managers are often highly loyal to the state. They are also loyal to the leadership. They understand that national prosperity is tied to personal success. This loyalty helps avoid political fragmentation. It ensures that various sectors, from manufacturing to tech, remain aligned with the country’s strategic direction.
  • Pragmatism and Flexibility: Middle managers in China are known for their pragmatic approach to problem-solving. They are adaptable. They can navigate the complexities of both the domestic and global markets. They balance state directives with market demands. This allows them to be effective in managing both state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and private firms.

Challenges:

  • Authoritarianism: Loyalty and discipline have helped maintain stability. However, the top-down nature of the Chinese system pressures middle managers to enforce policies. They often do so without room for flexibility or creativity. The lack of independent decision-making at lower levels can stifle innovation and create inefficiencies in certain industries.
  • Rigid Hierarchies: The hierarchical nature of Chinese organizations can create bottlenecks in decision-making. Middle managers are often expected to execute instructions without questioning the directives from above. This expectation can limit their ability to act independently. It also hampers their capacity to innovate.

3. Visionary Leadership and Long-Term Thinking (Leadership and Government)

Positive Aspects:

  • Long-Term Vision and Strategic Planning: The Chinese government has consistently shown a remarkable ability to plan for the long term. Programs like the Five-Year Plans are emblematic of the government’s commitment to long-term goals. Visionary leaders like Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin, and Xi Jinping have set clear economic, political, and social goals. They drive national priorities like infrastructure development, technological advancement, and global trade.
  • Centralized Decision-Making and Stability: The centralized nature of China’s political system has allowed for quick, coordinated decision-making. The Communist Party’s control over the country has helped to maintain unity. This has avoided the political fragmentation seen in other large nations with similar populations. This centralized leadership, backed by a strong state apparatus, has enabled China to manage its resources efficiently.
  • Global Diplomacy and Economic Integration: Chinese leadership has successfully navigated global economic dynamics. This has positioned China as a central player in international trade and diplomacy. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), for example, has expanded China’s influence globally. Its rise as a global manufacturing and technological hub has provided wealth not only for China. Many countries involved in trade partnerships have also gained wealth.
  • Adaptation of Western Models: Chinese leaders showed great acumen in blending market-oriented reforms with socialism. This is evident in the shift from a planned economy to “Socialism with Chinese Characteristics.” Leadership studied Western economic models. They applied them with a Chinese twist. This approach has transformed China into the second-largest economy in the world.

Challenges:

  • Authoritarianism and Lack of Political Freedoms: Centralized leadership has driven stability and progress. However, it has also led to limited political freedoms and censorship. The absence of political plurality and freedom of speech can hinder creativity. It can cause discontent. This is especially true among younger generations seeking more freedoms and reforms.
  • Environmental Degradation: China’s rapid industrialization and urbanization, often driven by short-term goals, have come at a heavy environmental cost. The leadership is increasingly aware of this. It has shifted toward green growth. However, balancing economic growth with sustainability remains a significant challenge.

4. Confucian Values and Social Norms

Positive Aspects:

  • Respect for Authority and Order: Confucianism has deeply influenced Chinese culture. It promotes values such as respect for authority, social hierarchy, and the importance of harmony. These values have helped maintain order in society and facilitated cooperation at various levels of government, business, and community life.
  • Emphasis on Education and Self-Improvement: The belief in continuous self-improvement through education is deeply embedded in Chinese culture. This has driven generations of students and workers to prioritize education and skill development. Their efforts have significantly contributed to China’s economic and technological advancement.
  • Collective Responsibility: The Chinese concept of collective responsibility encourages individuals to consider the well-being of society and the nation. This mindset aligns with the government’s vision of national unity. It aims for common prosperity. Individuals contribute to the common good whether in the workplace, the community, or through national service.

Challenges:

  • Rigid Social Norms and Pressure: The emphasis on conformity, respect for hierarchy, and family duty creates immense social pressure. This is particularly evident on younger generations. The desire to meet societal expectations can sometimes stifle creativity and individualism. This can lead to mental health challenges. It also results in the inability to break free from tradition.
  • Gender Inequality: Despite progress in education and the workforce, traditional gender roles rooted in Confucianism continue to affect gender relations. Women, particularly in rural areas, may face limitations in career advancement and access to resources. The one-child policy also exacerbated gender imbalances, with a cultural preference for male children affecting demographic dynamics.

5. Family Systems and Social Cohesion

Positive Aspects:

  • Strong Family Bonds: The family unit is central to Chinese life, providing emotional, financial, and social support. This strong sense of family cohesion has helped individuals navigate the challenges of rapid urbanization, economic shifts, and personal growth.
  • Community Support: China has developed a culture where family and community support systems help maintain stability during economic transitions. People rely on their family network for jobs, housing, and even business opportunities. This reliance strengthens societal bonds. It also creates social safety nets.

Challenges:

  • Generational Tensions: Rapid economic development has caused tensions between older generations who value tradition and stability. Younger generations are more globalized and demand more personal freedom. These tensions can lead to discontent and social unrest if not properly managed.

Conclusion:

The Chinese persona is shaped by its rich cultural traditions. It reflects their work ethic and respect for authority. The collectivist mindset plays a crucial role. It enables the country to grow economically. This growth is remarkable despite its vast size and population. At the worker level, the commitment to hard work and discipline has led to significant industrial achievements. In middle management, the sense of loyalty and pragmatism has ensured that projects and policies align with national goals. Leadership and government have used centralized decision-making. They have a long-term vision and employ strategic global integration. These elements drive China’s rise as an economic superpower. While there are challenges related to authoritarian governance, overwork is common. Social pressures are also significant. However, China’s ability to harness these traits aids in pursuing common prosperity. This ability has allowed China to build wealth for its people. It has also created wealth for much of the world.

When The Community Speaks … Cracking the Botswana Productivity Code. Short Notes. Part II


 

 

BATSWANA HAVE THE WORST
WORK ETHIC IN THE WORLD – REPORT

30 Oct 2017

In its 2015 survey of African workers, South Africa’s Rand Merchant Bank found Batswana to be the laziest on the continent.  The problem is actually more acute than that.

In the 2017-2018 Global Competitiveness Report, Botswana scores the worst among the 137 countries that are tracked by the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) on 12 pillars of economic competitiveness.  From a list of 16 factors, respondents to the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey were asked to select the five most problematic factors for doing business in their country and to rank them between 1 (most problematic) and 5.  The results were then tabulated and weighted according to the ranking assigned by respondents.  One of those factors is “Poor work ethic in national labour force.”

With a score of 19, Botswana’s national workforce (which would include those in the public and private sector as well as NGOs) emerge as standard bearers of the poorest work ethic in the world survey.  Also doing poorly are Trinidad & Tobago (15.9), Brunei (14.4), Sri Lanka (11.1), Liberia (10.8), Bhutan (10.5), Seychelles (10.1), Malta (9.8), Georgia (9.7), Mauritius and Vietnam (9.5), Namibia (9.3), Bahrain (9.0), Kuwait (8.7) and United Arab Emirates and Jamaica (8.6).

WEF’s interest in labour productivity has to do with the fact that it impacts on business. A University of Botswana study by Professor John Makgala and Dr. Phenyo Thebe (“There is no Hurry in Botswana”: Scholarship and Stereotypes on “African time” Syndrome in Botswana, 1895-2011”) found that this lack of productivity has frustrated effort to attract foreign direct investment. Interestingly, there was a time when, according to literature that the authors quote, Botswana’s civil service “was generally believed to be the most efficient in the whole of the African continent.”

On a past trip to Singapore, former and late President Sir Ketumile Masire gained an appreciation on the efficiency of the country’s workers. Where a Motswana factory worker would produce one shirt within a given period of time, a Singaporean counterpart would produce six within the same period.

“This was productivity not in theory but in demonstrable terms.  When we say we are not productive, this is what we meant,” Masire recalled to Sunday Standard in 2015 of this experience which would lead to Botswana benchmarking with Singapore and delegations from the two countries travelling back and forth.

As one of the Four Asian Tigers, Singapore would provide one quarter of the inspiration to establish the Botswana National Productivity Centre (BNPC). The tigers are Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan. Along the way, however, the late president appears to have given up on ever inculcating the right work ethic in Batswana. On assessing the apparent resistance, he determined that Batswana’s poor work ethic was a result of their pastoralism.

“If you look at the life of pastoralists, they don’t have a good work ethic,” he had said.  The example he had cited was that beyond sinking a borehole for their livestock, letting out cattle to pasture and doing some other undemanding work, most of the time pastoralists are just lazing about as their cattle graze untended in the bush.  By Masire’s analysis, this is the work ethic that has been bequeathed to modern-day Botswana.

As a University of Botswana study shows, not one productivity intervention scheme by the government has produced the desired results. In his 2015/16 budget speech, the Minister of Finance and Economic Development, Kenneth Matambo, lamented the low levels of labour productivity in Botswana.  The best performers in terms of work ethic in the national labor force are from Zimbabwe and Venezuela underpinned by a perfect score.

Source: Sunday Standard.  http://www.sundaystandard.info/batswana-have-worst-work-ethic-world-%E2%80%93-report Retrieved May 23, 2018

Productivity Systemic Story by Ranking

Table 1:  Comparison of Botswana with 2017’s Best Global Labour Productivity Data

DID YOU KNOW?  THE AVERAGE PER CAPITA PRODUCTIVITY IN BOTSWANA
LAGS THE WORLD’S PRODUCTIVE COUNTRY BY 30-40 TIMES?

TALKING POINTS:

COUNTRY’S GENERAL ECONOMIC PRACTICE:

An economic system defines the mechanism of production, distribution, and allocation of goods, services, and resources. It operates in a society or country with defined rules and policies about ownership. There are also policies about administration.

The most commonly followed economic system is modern-day capitalism.  It was developed from a framework. This framework aimed to secure the supply of key elements required for industry. These elements include land, machinery, and labor.  A disruption in any of these would lead to increased risk and loss for the venture.

THE COUNTRY’S GENERAL ECONOMIC PRACTICE, ON THE OTHER HAND:

Socialists viewed this commoditization of labor as an inhuman practice. I believe those words are distinctively from the female voice. This stems from Marx’s known instances of showing great sympathy for peasants. He also showed great sympathy for women as important forces for change within Marx’s theory. It marks the genesis of a matriarchal society. Women often lead quietly from behind the scenes as a response to survive in the face of absent males. These males have needed to travel long distances. They work in the agriculture and mining industries. As a result, women left to fend on their own have become increasingly ‘masculinized’.

These, I believe, led to the birth of Karl Marx’s idealism on socialism and socialist economies across a few countries.

  • How does a socialist economy work?
  • The starting point to this form of economy is typically three-fold:
    • The country has considerable access to wealth generated by mining underground mineral and fossil fuel resources, which is demanded by other world economies and is traded in exchange for income;
    • Or it has traditionally enjoyed a monarchy and/or a pastoral economy. It has access to substantive land spaces. This allows it to multiply livestock and warm crops. These crops do not need as much attention compared to cold crops. The rates are faster than the rate at which the human population multiplies with relative ease.  The monarchy supports its people when they ask for help. It helps distribute the wealth as shared resources like land. It also provides meat and food as needed.
    • Either way, the population has a tradition and work ethic that differ from farmers in parts of Asia. In southern China, for example, rice cultivation can be intricate, laborious, and multi-seasonal within a year. The majority have limited resources. They have learned to improve the returns on their labor by becoming smarter and more collaborative. They achieve this by managing their time better and making better choices. In other words, more than simply working hard, they worked intelligently and strategically. Cultures “shaped by the tradition of wet-rice agriculture and meaningful work” produce students with fortitude. These students can “sit still long enough.” This enables them to find solutions to time-consuming and complex math problems, for instance. As such, hard work, given this context, can easily be seen as more difficult than usual. It can, hence, be regarded as inhumane. Source: “Rice Paddies and Math Tests,” Malcolm Gladwell.

THE RESULTANT REALITY OF THE ECONOMIC PRACTICE:

Botswana’s real labour productivity per capita is USD 2. It measures the employed population’s output, excluding value added by mining and real-estate sectors. This is measured against the total population of the country for a truer reflection of real per capita income. USD 2.2 per hour or USD 18 per day, and that is, before deducting costs of operations.  Luxembourg sets the pace as the global labour productivity leader at USD 93.4 per hour or USD 747 per day (or USD 16,437 per month).  At this rate, Botswana’s productivity (and therefore wealth) lags (falls behind by) at 30-40x behind that of Luxembourg.

It makes one wonder. In our efforts to avoid capitalism and obvious inhuman labour practices, at what cost have we done so? We strive for wealth accumulation and perfect equality in income distribution. Will our efforts to transform the manufacturing and industrialization sectors succeed? Can our efforts to diversify the economy, moving from the tried and tested, gain traction? We need to understand the underlying forces that detract us from such efforts.

The Question is:

  • Would we rather continue this way as if business is usual?
  • How much would we drag a burgeoning burden on the state in the process?
  • What will be the end state of that burden on the government and the country?

Gaining such understanding in our minds would mean gaining the power in our hands. If you can imagine it, then you can create it.

STEPS GOING AHEAD:

However, this approach risks deterring organizations from capitalist economies from engaging with or investing in such an economic system. These institutions have built their wealth through performance-based merit. They demonstrate resilience over time and operate within clearly defined standards. Their income and wealth growth have been consistent, driven by a disciplined focus on reducing production costs and improving efficiency. This approach not only strengthens individual enterprises but also contributes meaningfully to broader economic growth.

Interestingly, no pure socialist, capitalist, or communist economy exists in the world today.  All economic system changes were introduced with a big bang approach. They had to make “adjustments” to allow appropriate modifications as the situation developed.

Over time, most state-run subsidy systems that lack high productivity standards become unsustainable in supporting expansive social programs. Despite receiving significant external aid, poverty levels often stay high. This dynamic worsens income inequality. It deepens the divide between the wealthy and the poor. It places an overwhelming and unsustainable burden on public welfare systems.

Reform efforts often aim to transition toward a mixed economy that incorporates free-market mechanisms. This involves reducing government control over small enterprises and phasing out redundant positions within the state workforce. Such measures are put in place to facilitate self-employment. They allow a significant portion—potentially up to 40%—of government employees to transition into the private sector. This structural shift lays the groundwork for a broader income tax base. It fosters greater fiscal self-reliance. It also reduces long-term dependency on state support.

In the short term, to alleviate economic pressure, policymakers will prioritize attracting increased foreign investment. This often involves the establishment of tax-free special development zones. These zones enable foreign companies to operate with minimal restrictions. They allow for the repatriation of profits without tariffs. These measures represent a departure from traditional centrally planned, socialist economic models. However, they are not a substitute for comprehensive structural reform. Relying solely on these mechanisms risks undermining long-term economic stability and self-sufficiency.

Fundamental change requires substantive reform—even when directed at a nation’s own citizens. These reforms must establish a clear link between wages and individual productivity. They should avoid relying on rank, seniority, or attendance as the basis for compensation. Without this shift, efforts toward transformation will remain partial and ineffective. For true and lasting change, citizens must understand their productivity’s direct impact. It contributes to both national prosperity and personal income. This awareness is essential for driving accountability, performance, and sustainable economic development.


THE BOTTOM LINE

Socialist economies across the globe have existed and continue to progress. However, there may not be any standard pure socialist economy remaining.  Timely and fundamental shifts in programs and policies have allowed such economies to thrive. China is the world leader among them.  The ones taking a rigid stand are facing severe problems or developing parallel markets.

Source: Socialist Economies: How China, Cuba And North Korea Work | Investopedia https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/081514/socialist-economies-how-china-cuba-and-north-korea-work.asp#ixzz5GKkjPmXQ
Follow us: Investopedia on Facebook

Underlying Mental Models and Beliefs that perpetuate low productivity as outlined in this post.

This blog post is titled “When the Economy Speaks: Cracking the Botswana Productivity Code – Short Notes Part II”. It explores the systemic and cultural factors. These factors contribute to Botswana’s persistent productivity challenges. Drawing from systems thinking principles, the article identifies several underlying mental models and beliefs that perpetuate low productivity.

1. Short-Termism and Preference for Immediate Gains

There is a prevalent focus on achieving quick, visible results rather than investing in long-term, foundational improvements. This mindset leads to prioritizing short-term projects that offer immediate benefits. But it often sacrifices sustainable growth and systemic change. Such an approach can result in recurring issues as underlying problems stay unaddressed.

2. Equating Compensation with Rank and Tenure

A common belief equates higher compensation with seniority or rank and, hence, attendance rather than actual productivity or performance. This perspective discourages merit-based incentives. It can lead to complacency. Employees do not feel motivated to improve efficiency or innovate if rewards are not tied to performance.

3. Perception of Government as Primary Provider

There exists a widespread expectation that the government is the main source of employment and economic support. This belief can stifle entrepreneurial initiatives. It can also reduce individual accountability. Citizens rely heavily on state provisions rather than seeking self-driven economic opportunities.

4. Resistance to Change and Innovation

Cultural norms that value tradition and established practices can lead to resistance against new approaches or technologies. This reluctance to embrace change hampers the adoption of innovative practices that enhance productivity and economic diversification.

5. Limited Emphasis on Systems Thinking

A lack of systems thinking in policy and organizational decision-making leads to fragmented approaches to problem-solving. Interventions need a holistic understanding of how different components of the economy interact. Otherwise, they tackle symptoms rather than root causes. This results in ineffective solutions.

6. Underinvestment in Human Capital Development

There is insufficient emphasis on developing skills and competencies that align with the evolving demands of the global economy. This gap in human capital investment limits the workforce’s ability to adapt to new technologies. It also constrains productivity growth by hindering adaptation to new processes.

7. Over-reliance on External Aid and Resources

Dependence on foreign aid and external resources can create a false sense of security. This reduces the urgency to develop internal capacities. It also delays the creation of self-sustaining economic strategies. This reliance also leads to policy decisions that prioritize donor preferences over local needs and contexts.

Addressing these deeply ingrained beliefs and mental models requires a concerted effort. We need to shift mindsets toward valuing long-term planning, merit-based systems, innovation, and self-reliance. Integrating systems thinking into education, policy-making, and organizational practices can help offer a more holistic approach. This integration leads to a sustainable way to improve productivity in Botswana.

REQUIRED RESEARCH ANALYSIS

FOR DETAILS OF DATA REQUIRED FOR RESEARCH ANALYSIS FOR THIS TOPIC, CLICK HERE.

FOR THE FULL STORY, CLICK HERE.


When the World Speaks … The Global Village


(Comming Soon)

As part of upcoming projects. Contact us if you want to commission us to do a systemic study in this subject area.

Contact: +267-75987534 / parcforlos@gmail.com

When Nature Speaks … Erratic Weather Systems / Global Warming


As part of upcoming projects. Contact us if you want to commission us to do a systemic study in this subject area.

Contact: +267-75987534 / parcforlos@gmail.com

When Nature Speaks … the Animal Generation


As part of upcoming projects. Contact us if you want to commission us to do a systemic study in this subject area.

Contact: +267-75987534 / parcforlos@gmail.com

When Nature Speaks … Plant Generation


As part of upcoming projects. Contact us if you want to commission us to do a systemic study in this subject area.

Contact: +267-75987534 / parcforlos@gmail.com

When the Community Speaks … the Marriage Institution and Family


As part of upcoming projects. Contact us if you want to commission us to do a systemic study in this subject area.

Contact: +267-75987534 / parcforlos@gmail.com

When Nature Speaks … Non-communicable Health Concerns


As part of upcoming projects. Contact us if you want to commission us to do a systemic study in this subject area.

Contact: +267-75987534 / parcforlos@gmail.com

When Nature Speaks … Communicable Diseases


As part of upcoming projects. Contact us if you want to commission us to do a systemic study in this subject area.

Contact: +267-75987534 / sheilasingapore@gmail.com

When The Economy Speaks … Reversing National Unemployment Statistics


6 Things A National Leader Does.

https://medium.com/series/when-the-economy-speaks-cdb62e49ad36

Peter looks down at his high school examination results transcript for the first time. It is not a pretty picture. He had been praying hard the results that would peer back at him would be different but he also knew deep down that it may not. He had been dreading this moment. It has arrived.

Still, he had wished for otherwise. He is a bright student. But it had not been an easy past few years. He had just lost his older sibling to a debilitating illness. They had been very close to each other. He is also dauntingly aware his parents are not close to each other and fears they may find other partners and break up the family and sanctity that he seeks. What would that mean as a family? Where can he seek counsel? Will he be intruding? It bothers him.

Turning his eyes back at the results, he knows he can do much better than what he sees. The reality is dawning at him. He is facing it squarely. These results will not help him get into his dream course at the university of his choice. It hurts him. What should he do now?

Suddenly he remembers that he has to announce these results to his family. He has been known to be the one with a sound head on his shoulders. But now. With this. What would they think of him? Maybe they would not ask. He consoles himself.

But they did. He chose to keep quiet. Perhaps they will understand. He hopes. But meanwhile, he needs to come up with a strategy. Fast. So that his peers do not leave him behind.

He thinks.

He needs to get grades. Good grades. Fast. What subjects will help him do so? French. Perhaps. Grades that would allow him to put his foot through the door of a tertiary institution. What can he do so that he can catch up with his peers in the shortest possible time? He has the coming summer months to do so.

What jobs are out there that he should prepare for? He really did like the sounds of the field of nautical engineering. He had really enjoyed seeing and fiddling in the cockpit of a cruise ship during one of his summer vacations. It had made him feel happy and come alive. And he loves his Maths and Physics. But he has been told that manufacturing here is not a big deal in terms of jobs. What should he do? How should he decide?

Are his days of plain sailing through life over? Will he face the same dilemmas when he is out there in the big wide world looking for a job? With only four jobs available for every ten working-age population, what will become of his chances with not-so-great grades? The supply of labor is now outstripping the demand for labor. Will jobs become too slim for his picking?

He will need to figure this out. He needs time. But does he have the time?

We all know a story like this.

One way or another.

And so. Here is the situation (Click on the link to the case study). You are now charged as the Head of this State. What would you do to turn around the situation?

Run, you say? Oh, you did not say that. Good! Invite more investors, locals as well as foreigners, to invest in the country?

Your predecessors have done that. Poured trillions for decades with the help of past heads of states and a cabinet of citizen representatives. Yet, widespread unemployment today, has grown to prevail at 60%! How did that happen?

You say perhaps “they” have not done enough. That you will do more than them. That is possible. For how long would you do more of the same? What went wrong? What else could we do?

Some measures are drastic and feel more like a bitter pill to swallow. But I hope it will make the tough actions we would take at a later stage become easier to bear with. So here goes.

1. “EXPORT” UNEMPLOYMENT

Don’t have solid agricultural and manufacturing bases? Finding it too difficult to build them? Well, here’s a strategy—though said tongue-in-cheek—to ease the short-term pain of unemployment: continue exporting unemployment at the same rate you’ve been importing manufactured goods and raw materials. That way, the unemployed will follow the money being spent on goods produced outside the country (or region) but consumed within. While this may momentarily relieve some pressure, it’s a reflection of the deeper economic challenge that needs addressing.

2 “MATCH” BIRTHS TODAY TO JOB CREATION TOMORROW

If we’re confident we’ll be able to create more jobs tomorrow, then by all means, go ahead and multiply. But if we’re not sure… well, you get the idea.

An unchecked population growth leads to rising unemployment, which eventually becomes difficult to manage.

The supply of labor isn’t driven by our education system alone—it’s determined by birth rates, from twenty years ago. That’s the time for a young person to mature and be ready for the job market.

Matching the decisions made by families today with boardroom decisions twenty years from now isn’t easy. But here’s the key: the same people who bring children into this world are the ones responsible for creating the jobs those kids will need in the future. And no, I’m not talking about divine intervention—it’s you and me.

We need to believe we can build businesses that will generate jobs for the next generation. Companies shouldn’t just be a means to hustle for profit today or a temporary shell to discard once we’ve met our immediate needs. They should be about creating a legacy and shaping the future for our children.

So, the question is, do you believe you can do that?

3 NATIONAL & COMMUNITY DIALOGUES AS FAMILIES Q: What allows industries to grow?

The choices we make as families and as a nation are deeply interconnected.

Decisions about acquiring skills for agriculture and manufacturing begin within families and households. However, these decisions are often shaped by perceptions of what is happening “out there,” rather than personal experience. It feels distant and unrelated to our immediate lives.

If we believe that our population lacks the skills needed for manufacturing, and as families, we feel the country isn’t doing enough to create jobs in that sector, we find ourselves in a lose-lose situation.

To move forward, we need to clarify our intentions, address the concerns, and develop a strategy to share accurate information as a nation. In today’s world, where countries can do grocery shopping online, solving this issue may not be as challenging as we believe.

4 CONSTRUCT REGIONAL MATRIX-ED GOODS VALUE CHAINS MAP

Get your foundation in order. Know your goals and pursue them with clarity.

Understand the interconnected structure of raw material supply chains driven by regional customer needs and develop strong agricultural and manufacturing sectors by following these steps:

  • Focus on what customers demand, not just the products you currently have. Build a comprehensive value chain map.
  • Identify how goods complement each other to efficiently meet end-customer needs in local, regional, and global markets.
  • Assess what resources are available and what is lacking.
  • Leave aside the question of who holds specific resources for now; this becomes relevant once the map is fully formed.
  • Pinpoint critical processes within the chains that, if absent, could halt production and disrupt the supply chains.
  • Don’t wait for other regions to develop their maps and then approach you for manufacturing. By doing so, you risk losing the influence and value needed to manage the process.
  • Co-develop this map on an ongoing basis with private sector organizations. Bring them on board. Present the reality. Ask what they want to do. Do not push their responses to another organization. Keep the conversations going. Do not let anyone think that the government will fund them. Ask what can all do to grow the nation together. How can they collaborate with each other and respond to the market demand and forces while creating employment for more?

Once the mapping is complete, you’ll have a roadmap to align your efforts and drive progress, both as a nation and as a region.

5 ALIGN AND BUILD HUMAN RESOURCES

Align and, where necessary, develop human resource skills for the agriculture and manufacturing sectors, with a focus on building both foundational and advanced competencies in English, Mathematics, and Science—particularly in Physics and Chemistry—across the nation. This will enhance resilience and inclusivity within these two critical sectors.

6 BUILD UP THE PYRAMID OF THE ECONOMY

Establish coordinated corporations within the agricultural (crop, plant, and raw material production) and manufacturing sub-sectors, ensuring alignment with the regional industry value chain matrix and scheduling.

Economies that rely heavily on extraction industries will have large pockets of unemployment that continue to persist in the nation. These industries gross high returns but they do so by employing fewer people and more machines to keep the costs of operations under control and therefore ensure the growth of the industry. This way the GDP would certainly look good (but not the food on our tables, which is the real GDP).

Machines do not create jobs for the unemployment rates.

Plant and animal-based primary production and manufacturing economic sectors when well-developed have greater potential for creating and absorbing significant employment. Extraction-based industries are typically technology-driven and have a lower capacity for the employment of human resources.

The nation is shifting its focus to production, particularly in plants. It will learn to mitigate climate effects one country at a time. This approach would allow the region to produce consistently throughout the year. It will keep the manufacturing sector humming.

Invite regional and global industry leaders. Alternatively, incentivize and groom local captains of industry with long-term overseas stints. These leaders can lead, chart, and build the sub-sectors from the ground up. This includes efforts within households and education sectors.

When The Economy Speaks … Growing Economic Sectors


THE SHOCKING REVELATION OF WHY THE LESS DEVELOPED NATIONS STRUGGLE TO SHRUG OFF ITS DEVELOPING STATUS. DISCOVER THAT IT HAS NOT LOST ITS POWER BASE TO TRANSFORM ITSELF TO LIFT ITS STATUS. THE SAME POWER BASE THAT HAS TAKEN IT TO WHERE IT IS TODAY!

In the last 100 years, has any country gone from being “developing” to being “developed”?

Yes, there have been several countries that have transitioned from being classified as “developing” to “developed” over the past 100 years. These transitions are usually based on economic growth, improvements in infrastructure, advancements in technology, and overall development indicators. For example, developed countries have higher life expectancies, with an average of 75 years for men and 82 years for women.  Developing countries may have lower life expectancies, with an average of 63 years for men and 67 years for women.

However, developed nations do become “underdeveloped”/ ”developing” not because they lose some “development points” or anything like that, but most of the time because the rest of the world moves on without them. It can also be a result of severe political instability (Lybia), epidemics (China and Europe during the bubonic plague), severe natural disasters (Haiti), and war(Syria).

Wikipedia Commons April 2008

How does Botswana compare with Luxembourg?

Iceberg Systemic Story of Unemployment
Seeing Economies Grow Systemically

When Nature Speaks …. by “wildlife”



🌍 The Elephant Has a Viewpoint Too

Listening to Nature in the CBNRM 2025 Debate


I. When Nature Speaks, Do We Hear Her?

In traditional cultures like those of the San, nature is indivisible. Humans were never “users” of nature—they were custodians. They didn’t live nomadic lives merely for convenience, but out of deep respect for the sacred balance of ecosystems. Nature, in this view, is not composed of separate, extractable elements—air, water, land, or minerals—but an interwoven whole.

And when nature speaks, it is often not in ways we recognize. But nature does speak. It speaks through floods and droughts, through collapsing bee populations and shifting animal migrations. And, most poetically and urgently, it speaks through the elephants.


II. Reflections on the CBNRM 2025 Bill: What’s Missing?

We acknowledge and appreciate Dr. Douglas Rasbash for his detailed analysis titled “Debating CBNRM 2025: Trophy Hunting, Community Benefits, and the Illusion of Transformation”, published in The Botswana Gazette on 30 July 2025. His reflections interrogate the bill’s limited scope and challenge its claims to transformation. His work opens space for deeper discussion on how Botswana should approach resource governance with deeper layers to consider:

1. Token Transformation Without Structural Change

The bill tweaks the 2007 framework but does not challenge entrenched hierarchies. Central authorities retain control. Communities are treated as recipients—not stakeholders.

2. Trophy Hunting Revenue vs. Real Benefit

Year after year, trophy hunting revenue flows fail to trickle down to local villages. Communities bear the burden of wildlife conflict, yet remain impoverished.

3. Absence of Ecological or Economic Vision

There is no mention of carbon markets, eco-tourism models, or sustainable enterprises. Innovation is absent. Nature is still commodified, not regenerated. This is a good point and we concur.

4. Fragmented Implementation Across Ministries

Lack of cross-ministerial planning weakens delivery. The vision is still sectoral, not systemic. This is a further good point and we concur.

5. Lack of Rights-Based Framing

The bill does not position nature or communities as rights-bearing participants in governance. It lacks empathy, imagination, and transformative ambition.

In short, the bill “enshrines procedure but sidesteps power.”


III. Poaching, Elephant Gender Skew & Evolutionary Response Leading to Human-Wildlife Conflicts

What if nature could speak—not through human proxies, but through its own lived response?

Elephants, among the most sentient of Earth’s species, do exactly that. In the face of man-made threats, they don’t protest or petition. Instead, they adapt—through demographic shifts, reproductive changes, and even evolutionary transformation.

Scientific studies reveal that heavy poaching disproportionately removes adult tusked males first, driven by the ivory trade. Initially, this creates a skew toward male-biased herds. But as mature males become scarce, poachers begin targeting matriarchs as well. Over time, sex ratios tip in the opposite direction. In some regions, female elephants now outnumber males significantly.

Nature recalibrates.

Under sustained threat, elephant populations respond with what researchers call “baby boom” behavior. Birth rates increase. Female calves begin to dominate the cohorts. In time, nature goes further—selecting for tusklessness in females, genetically altering the population to survive human violence. Nature literally reshapes itself to stay alive.


🧬 A Note on Reproductive Signaling in Nature

But nature doesn’t only respond at the level of population structure or visible behavior. It encodes survival at the reproductive level, too.

In mammals—including elephants and humans—offspring sex is determined by the sperm: males produce both X- and Y-chromosome-carrying sperm, while females provide only the X. Some researchers suggest that ecological pressure and heightened sexual activity in males may shift sperm composition over time—initially favoring Y-bearing sperm, then increasingly favoring the slower moving X-bearing sperm as reproductive frequency rises. Simultaneously, females may adjust the timing and frequency of conception in ways that amplify population regrowth.

Whether or not the chromosomal shift is scientifically settled, the broader truth holds: when under threat, nature increases reproductive output. It often responds with female-biased cohorts. This is not a random pattern. It is a feedback loop—woven through biology, behavior, and ecological memory.


🐘 Nature’s Rebound Is Misread as a Problem

Yet here is the paradox: when elephants reproduce in this way—swiftly, strategically, in response to loss—it appears, to the outside observer, as an inexplicable boom. The herds grow. Their presence expands. They encroach on grazing pastures and forage across fields of crops.

People complain of destruction. Fields are trampled. Livelihoods threatened. And few connect the dots. That this “boom” is not excess—it is compensation. It is nature trying to fill the space we ourselves emptied. The link between the human decision to reduce elephant populations and the elephants’ drive to restore them is lost to most.

The boom is not the problem. It is the response. The real issue is that we forced nature into a corner, and now we are surprised when she tries to push back.


🌿 A Final Feedback

There is one more signal nature sends: the speed of this regeneration grows with each cycle. As more females dominate the birth cohorts, the population’s capacity to rebound increases. Each generation accelerates the return. And the pressure that leads elephants into human settlements, crop fields, and grazing lands is not one of malice—but of necessity.

And here lies the core insight: when humans interfere less with elephants for economic gain, elephants interfere less with humans economically. The equation is ecological. The relationship is reciprocal.

References:

Science.org

ResearchGate

WIRED

Scientific American

Your Central View: Nature Must Speak for Itself

I argue that:

  • Nature should not be merely “represented” by humans, but recognized as having its own agency—something traditional custodianship honored.
  • Modern frameworks treat nature as divisible (air, water, minerals) and commodified for use, not preserved as an indivisible system.
  • The state is held responsible for common good decisions; communities, unless guided by deeper ecological ethics, may not always act for broader collective outcomes.

This diverges from dominant policy frameworks in the following ways:

IV. My View vs. Policy Orthodoxy: A Table of Dissonance

AspectYour ViewMainstream/
National View
Dissonance
Ontology of NatureNature has agency and voice; humans are custodians.Nature is a resource for human use, managed by institutions.Nature’s rights and feedbacks are ignored in governance.
Governance ResponsibilityStates must act for common good; local communities should also be accountable beyond their borders.Empowering communities without clear responsibility to the broader system.Policies risk parochial interests overriding ecological balance.
Species Intelligence (e.g., Elephant)Elephants respond to unnatural threats by shifting reproduction—nature “speaks” through behavior.Wildlife is managed based on human needs and economic models.The ecological meaning of species behavior is not considered in policy.
Transformation DefinitionRequires fundamentally new relationships with nature.Often procedural—focused on revenue sharing or institutional realignment.Technocratic approaches miss the relational and spiritual transformation.
Traditional KnowledgeCustodianship cultures respected the indivisible nature of ecosystems.Traditional views are often not structurally embedded.Modern policy tokenizes indigenous voices rather than re-rooting practice.

V. Nature Is Not Divisible—and Never Was

In traditional worldviews, particularly those of the San and other nomadic or semi-nomadic communities, nature was never regarded as divisible. Land, water, flora, fauna, minerals, and the landscapes that shaped them were seen as one living system. To divide them—to draw borders through rivers, to build fences and walls, or to extract minerals without restoring the land—was unthinkable. It was not just about ethics; it was about survival.

These ecosystems were seen not only as resources but as regenerative companions. Forests thrived because the land was part of an unbroken ecological logic—air moved freely, seeds scattered, animals migrated, and water knew no boundaries.

Modern policy frameworks, however, fragment this logic. They assign ownership and utility, isolate resources from each other, and regulate nature in silos. Yet restoration—and indeed growth—is only possible when the system is whole. You cannot regenerate a forest by saving just the trees.


VI. Why Humans Once Moved—and Why That Matters Now

Traditionally, humans did not remain in fixed settlements. Like elephant herds or migrating buffalo, they moved with the land’s rhythm—allowing grazed pastures and riverbanks to recover. It was not just mobility for survival—it was ecological consciousness.

When humans stayed too long in one place, the land could no longer replenish itself. Food sources dwindled, water became scarce, and diseases took hold. Nomadism was not a primitive lifestyle—it was an adaptive strategy rooted in ecological respect.

This logic, however, began to shift as human settlements expanded and infrastructure brought nature to people, rather than the other way around. As populations grew and natural resources were made artificially accessible through trade, infrastructure, or aid, the idea of indivisible nature gave way to commodified, divisible “resources.”

Today, the consequences of this shift are clear. Nature is less able to recover. Land that once supported thriving ecosystems is now drying up. Desertification—the slow, often irreversible loss of biodiversity and ecological function—is nature’s way of leaving the land. The air, the water, the microorganisms, the seeds—they move on.

Modern populations cannot return to nomadism. But this makes our responsibility greater, not less. Now more than ever, humans must become builders of ecosystems rather than users of resources. We must restore and unify what we have fragmented.


VII. From Divide and Rule to Regenerate and Belong

The impulse to divide—land, water, people, responsibilities—is often a strategy born of scarcity. Where livelihoods are fragile and communities compete for dwindling opportunities, fragmentation becomes a means of control. The governance logic follows suit: divide to manage, divide to rule, divide to extract.

But this logic dissolves when people have meaningful, place-based work. When communities are rooted in dignified livelihoods—in regenerative agriculture, in value-adding manufacturing, in stewarding the lands they depend on—the pressure to extract weakens. The need to commodify nature, or to privatize what should remain whole, diminishes.

As communities gain employment in sectors that regenerate rather than exhaust, the old need to divide—to conquer nature, to compete with neighbors, to extract at the expense of ecosystems—begins to lose its grip. This is not just an economic transition. It is a political and moral one. A movement from exploitation to belonging.

Where people can build their futures, they no longer need to divide the commons. They can begin instead to rebuild the whole.


VIII. Towards a New Imagination: Nature as Kin

To address the ecological and moral blind spots in current models, we must reframe:

Recognize Nature’s Agency
Introduce rights-of-nature frameworks—not to anthropomorphize nature, but to give legal standing to species, water bodies, and ecosystems.

Invest in Post-Wildlife Economies
As rural communities access agricultural and manufacturing opportunities, dependence on trophy hunting and extractive tourism will naturally subside.

Elevate Traditional Custodianship as Governance
The knowledge systems of the San and others are not heritage—they are governance blueprints. Embed them structurally.

Rebuild Inter-Ministerial Accountability Around Ecology
Align national planning around ecological zones and systems, not ministerial silos.


IX. A Note on Inconsistencies

We accept that this position is a much harder line than that of Dr. Rasbash’s. While his article considers the bill potentially redeemable, this view challenges the foundation of its logic. Still, the divergence reflects the richness of the debate.

We also note one technical inconsistency requiring clarification: elephant sex ratios are said to skew male initially, then female. Clarification and timeline data will help deepen this important insight.


X. Conclusion: The Elephant Is Speaking

CBNRM debates have treated nature as a background actor—something to be divided, allocated, and regulated. But nature is responding. Elephants are shifting their genetic makeup. Bees are disappearing. Rivers are drying.

We must learn to govern not just for nature, but with nature.

Transformation with a capital T means:

  • Recognizing nature’s feedback.
  • Rediscovering the governance ethics of traditional custodianship.
  • Transitioning from extractive economies to regenerative systems.
  • Letting the elephant have a seat at the table.

Let us not debate in silence. Let us not legislate blindly. Let us listen to those who have always lived with the land—and to the land itself.


XI. A Final Note: Listening from the Other Side of the Pendulum

This article, while engaging with the CBNRM 2025 Bill, has deliberately chosen a different standpoint. It does not speak from the perspective of policy, nor from human interest alone. It takes the stand of nature—and of wildlife—and views the policy debates as part of a larger system in which humans are not the only actors.

The emphasis on elephants, on demographic shifts, and on nature’s feedback is intentional. It reflects a pendulum swing—a rebalancing of attention toward voices that are too often left out of our governance landscape. The voices of species, of land, of watersheds, of the quiet systems that hold our futures in place.

This is not the usual way we reason. Not in boardrooms. Not in legislative drafts. Not in community meetings. But it is a way we must begin to learn, if we are to govern with wisdom beyond self-interest.

So we leave you with this:

Supposing elephants could be in the room—and we can hear their voices—what do you think would change? What decisions might we reach if we treated them not as background, but as new members at the table?

(Although the elephants might argue they are not new at all—we are simply the latest arrivals.)


Facts to Note:

Population.  At the turn of the 20th century, there were a few million African elephants and about 100,000 Asian elephants. Today, there are an estimated 450,000 – 700,000 African elephants and between 35,000 – 40,000 wild Asian elephants.

Most captives are endangered Asian elephants; African bush elephants and African forest elephants are less amenable to training (quite possibly testament to a historical hostile relationship between man and elephants).  Animal rights organizations estimate there are 15,000 to 20,000 elephants in captivity worldwide.

That brings the total number of elephants today to about 500,000.   Half a million.

Poaching-Elephants-South-Africa-1980-2017
Level of Poaching in southern Africa not including figures from Namibia, Botswana, Zambia, Angola and Zimbabwe
HECCausalLoop
Systemic Causal Structure of the Human-Elephant Conflict

When Nature Speaks … Wildlife. Be calm. Love an elephant. What everybody should know about these gentle giants.


 

Quote2

That is … until you see them return to
the lands and vegetation we have
encroached into, when we settled in their habitat.

When elephants leave their habitats for
their watering holes, for however long,
it does not mean they have resettled.

And so, it becomes hard for us to
imagine the way a child intuitively
understands these gentle giants.  Instead, …

When we think of elephants, we conjure up
images of majesty and aggression!

ARTICLE OUTLINE:

  1. Introduction
  2. Basic Facts about elephants
    • The impact elephants have on the ecology
    • Historical reasons for the demise of elephants
  3. FAQS ABOUT HUNTING:
    • What is fuelling human’s obsession for hunting?
    • Why men trophy hunt?
  4. FAQs ABOUT POACHING:
    • About the elephants
    • About the tusk
    • About the poachers and the trade
    • About the end consumer
  5. Beijing master ivory carvers cling to their trade
  6. Who is the silent voice and what does it say?

Population. At the turn of the 20th century, there were a few million African elephants and about 100,000 Asian elephants. Today, there are an estimated 450,000 – 700,000 African elephants and between 35,000 – 40,000 wild Asian elephants.  Most captives are endangered Asian elephants; African bush elephants and African forest elephants are less amenable to training.  Animal rights organizations estimate there are 15,000 to 20,000 elephants in captivity worldwide. That brings the total number of elephants today to about 500,000.   Half a million.

The real question is, what would you do if it had been the global human population that has been decimated by up to three quarters of its numbers by another species?  And you are left with a quarter of you!

0.12957800_1460631700_27-20160430-l

 

INTRODUCTION

Elephants are among the most intelligent of the creatures with whom we share the planet, with complex consciousnesses that are capable of strong emotions.  Across Africa they have inspired respect from the people that share the landscape with them, giving them a strong cultural significance.  As icons of the continent elephants are tourism magnets, attracting funding that helps protect wilderness areas.  They are also keystone species, playing an important role in maintaining the biodiversity of the ecosystems in which they live.

Attribution:  http://www.savetheelephants.org/about-elephants-2-3-2/importance-of-elephants/

 

What is the spiritual meaning of an elephant?

Symbolic Elephant Meaning. … Symbolic elephant meaning deals primarily with strength, honor, stability and tenacity, among other attributes.  To the Hindu way of thought, the elephant is found in the form of Ganesha who is the god of luck, fortune, protection and is a blessing upon all new projects.

 

What does elephant symbolize?

Many African cultures revere the African Elephant as a symbol of strength and power.  It is also praised for its size, longevity, stamina, mental faculties, cooperative spirit, and loyalty.  South Africa, uses elephant tusks in their coat of arms to represent wisdom, strength, moderation and eternity.
 
 
DIY-frame-Majestic-African-Elephant-mammal-Animal-Art-Fabric-Poster-Print-Picture.jpg_640x640

 

 

What hunts the elephant?

Elephants generally do not have predators (animals that eat them) due to their massive size. Newborn elephants are however vulnerable to attacks from lions,tigers, and hyenas. The biggest danger to elephants are humans; elephants have been hunted for their tusks to near extinction in some cases.Oct 8, 2015
 

Yet, today they stand at the brink on its way of being wiped out.  Paving the way for the last man standing.  The man.

Yet, did you know that ….

 
 
  

As you read the article, notice the elephant (what we know about them: the facts, the emotions, the money trail, the larger-than-life images this animal conjures in our minds) that this majestic animal has brought into the room … and then, notice what is the “elephant that is not in the room”?

What do you think that is?  There right there, is our leverage.

 

BASIC FACTS ABOUT ELEPHANTS

Habitat loss is one of the key threats facing elephants. Many climate change projections indicate that key portions of elephants’ habitat will become significantly hotter and drier, resulting in poorer foraging conditions and threatening calf survival. Increasing conflict with human populations taking over more and more elephant habitat and poaching for ivory are additional threats that are placing the elephant’s future at risk.

Elephant, © Geoff Hall

 

© Geoff Hall

Defenders of Wildlife is working through the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) to maintain a ban on the sale of ivory as well as on regulations that govern worldwide elephant protection.

Of the two species, African elephants are divided into two subspecies (savannah and forest), while the Asian elephant is divided into four subspecies (Sri Lankan, Indian, Sumatran and Borneo). Asian elephants have been very important to Asian culture for thousands of years – they have been domesticated and are used for religious festivals, transportation and to move heavy objects.

Diet

Staples: Grasses, leaves, bamboo, bark, roots. Elephants are also known to eat crops like banana and sugarcane which are grown by farmers. Adult elephants eat 300-400 lbs of food per day.

Population

At the turn of the 20th century, there were a few million African elephants and about 100,000 Asian elephants. Today, there are an estimated 450,000 – 700,000 African elephants and between 35,000 – 40,000 wild Asian elephants.

Range

African savannah elephants are found in savannah zones in 37 countries south of the Sahara Desert. African forest elephants inhabit the dense rainforests of west and central Africa. The Asian elephant is found in India, Sri Lanka, China and much of Southeast Asia.

Behaviour

Elephants form deep family bonds and live in tight matriarchal family groups of related females called a herd. The herd is led by the oldest and often largest female in the herd, called a matriarch. Herds consist of 8-100 individuals depending on terrain and family size. When a calf is born, it is raised and protected by the whole matriarchal herd. Males leave the family unit between the ages of 12-15 and may lead solitary lives or live temporarily with other males.

Elephants are extremely intelligent animals and have memories that span many years. It is this memory that serves matriarchs well during dry seasons when they need to guide their herds, sometimes for tens of miles, to watering holes that they remember from the past. They also display signs of grief, joy, anger and play.

Recent discoveries have shown that elephants can communicate over long distances by producing a sub-sonic rumble that can travel over the ground faster than sound through air. Other elephants receive the messages through the sensitive skin on their feet and trunks. It is believed that this is how potential mates and social groups communicate.

Reproduction

Mating Season: Mostly during the rainy season.

Gestation: 22 months.
Litter size: 1 calf (twins rare).
Calves weigh between 200-250 lbs at birth. At birth, a calf’s trunk has no muscle tone, therefore it will suckle through its mouth. It takes several months for a calf to gain full control of its trunk.

Abstract from: https://defenders.org/elephant/basic-facts

 

The Impact Elephants have on the Ecology

Elephants are the keystone species of their habitat.

The planet earth is inhabited by diverse array of living organisms such as microorganisms, plants, animals and human beings which collectively constitute the biodiversity.  Each and every element of the living component of the system has its own role, either positive or negative, to play as a system component. So preservation and conservation of living organisms, whether they are tiny or large, become immense important in playing beneficial role in maintaining biodiversity.

Mega-herbivorous animal such as elephant has major impact on the terrestrial ecosystems in which they live and thus on the animals that depend on these habitats.  Elephant can be referred as “keystone species” because it facilitates:

    • Feeding by other herbivores that disperse seeds and supports large assemblages of invertebrates, such as dung beetles, and

 

    • Lower plants such as algae and fungi apart from enriching soil nutrients through dung piles.

 

    • These algae and fungi are preferred nutrient plants for some reptiles such as monitor lizard and star tortoise in the semiarid tropical forests.

 

    • Dung beetle accumulation attracts many insectivorous birds.

 

    • Dung deposition into water holes is being benefited to the Pisces and amphibians.

 

  • Wherever they live, elephants leave dung that is full of seeds from the many plants they eat. When this dung is deposited the seeds are sown and grow into new grasses, bushes and trees, boosting the health of the savannah ecosystem.
  • Seed dispersal through alimentary canal induces germination and survival capacity of the seedlings to maintain the forest heterogeneity; some species rely entirely upon elephants for seed dispersal.

Elephant also does some of the silvicultural practices such as

  • Creation of paths in dense forest.  When forest elephants eat, they create gaps in the vegetation. These gaps allow new plants to grow and create pathways for other smaller animals to use.
  • On the savannahs, elephants feeding on tree sprouts and shrubs help to keep the plains open and able to support the plains game that inhabit these ecosystems.
  • Maintenance of grazing lawns and height of the trees and thinning in thick vegetation cover to keep the sustainable utility of the forest.
  • Identification of subsoil water and natural salt licks through elephants’ strong sense is also shared by the other animals especially the herbivores for which intake of minerals from the natural soil is most important for many physiological activities.
  • During the dry season, elephants use their tusks to dig for water. This not only allows the elephants to survive in dry environments and when droughts strike, but also provides water for other animals that share harsh habitats.

The pachyderm (a very large mammal with thick skin, especially an elephant, rhinoceros, or hippopotamus) is under severe threat due to various conservation problems such as loss of habitat (see example below that of forest cover in Sumatra), habitat quality and corridors, reduction of home range, population increase, impact of developmental activities, human-elephant conflict issues and poaching for ivory.  Among the factors, some of them may be responsible for major proportions, and some of them involve less proportion.  But these are the reasons listed as conservation problems for the long-run conservation of elephants.

Abstract from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-6605-4_16

sumatra-forest-cover-province

 

 

Historically, trade and capture are responsible for elephants’ demise

Since the Proboscidea originated 60 million years ago, the order has included some 10 families, 45 genera and 185 species and subspecies, in a spectacular diversity of forms.  The African (Loxodonta africana and Loxodonta cyclotis) and Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) existing today are the sole remnants of that remarkable evolutionary radiation.  Representing a tiny fraction of their former numbers, the living elephants survive in only small pockets of the land they once roamed.  In many areas elephant populations have already gone extinct or are highly endangered.

Over centuries legal and illegal hunting (“poaching”) for the commercial ivory trade and, in Asia, the capture of elephants for human use, have been largely responsible for the elephant’s demise.  The number of wild Asian elephants now comprise less than a tenth of all remaining elephants, and continue to decline in shrinking habitat.  In Africa, elephants once inhabited the entire continent, from the Mediterranean down to its southern tip, but the ivory trade coupled with human expansion caused a continental decline in their numbers.  By circa 1600 North Africa was devoid of elephants. In modern Africa, poaching for ivory has been fuelled by poverty, political instability and civil unrest coupled with the easy availability of arms.  In recent history, between 1979 and 1989, Africa’s elephants underwent a dramatic and devastating decline, falling from approximately 1.3 million animals to an estimated 609,000. Human greed and rising prices of ivory were responsible for the appalling slaughter.

African elephants (Loxodonta africana) are imperiled by poaching and habitat loss.  Despite global attention to the plight of elephants, their population sizes and trends are uncertain or unknown over much of Africa.  To conserve this iconic species, conservationists need timely, accurate data on elephant populations.

Abstract from: https://www.elephantvoices.org/threats-to-elephants/-killed-for-their-ivory.html

There is an estimated population of 352,271 savannah elephants on study sites in 18 countries, representing approximately 93% of all savannah elephants in those countries.  Elephant populations in survey areas with historical data show it has decreased by an estimated 144,000 from 2007 to 2014, and populations are currently shrinking by 8% per year continent-wide, primarily due to poaching.  Though 84% of elephants occurred in protected areas, many protected areas had carcass ratios that indicated high levels of elephant mortality.  Results of the GEC show the necessity of action to end the African elephants’ downward trajectory by preventing poaching and protecting habitat.

Abstract from: https://peerj.com/articles/2354/

FAQs ON HUNTING

What is fuelling the obsession of trophy hunting poaching?

Why are savagery and violence so omnipresent among humans?
 
We suggest that hunting behaviour is fascinating and attractive, a desire that makes temporary deprivation from physical needs, pain, sweat, blood, and ultimately the willingness to kill tolerable and even appetitive.
 
Evolutionary development into the “perversion” of the urge to hunt humans, that is to say the transfer of this hunt to members of one’s own species, has been nurtured by the resultant advantage of personal and social power and dominance.  While breakdown of the inhibition towards intra-specific killing would endanger any animal species, controlled inhibition was enabled in humans in that higher regulatory systems, such as frontal lobe-based executive functions, prevent the involuntary derailment of hunting behaviour.
 
If this control – such as in child soldiers for example – is not learnt, the brutality towards humans remains fascinating and appealing.  Blood must flow in order to kill.  It is hence an appetitive cue as is the struggling of the victim.
 
Hunting for men, more rarely for women, is fascinating and emotionally arousing with the parallel release of testosterone, serotonin and endorphins, which can produce feelings of euphoria and alleviate pain. Bonding and social rites (e.g. initiation) set up the contraints for both hunting and violent disputes.  Children learn which conditions legitimate aggressive behaviour and which not.  Big game hunting as well as attack of other communities is more successful in groups – men also perceive it as more pleasurable.  This may explain the fascination with gladiatorial combat, violent computer games but also ritualized forms like football.
 
(Blog Author’s Note:  And as such conjures notions such as the “last man standing”  must necessarily therefore mean someone is more strong or witty than the rest who did not stay around to remain standing as he could.  Therefore, as such (in conclusion) no one, not his mother or his wife say he is ‘therefore not man enough’ for her.)
 

 

WHY MEN TROPHY HUNT: SHOWING OFF AND THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SHAME

Prominent evolutionary anthropologists (Brian Codding and Kristen Hawkes from the University of Utah) have studied hunter-gatherer populations for decades.

Interestingly, analyses of the types of animals hunter-gatherer men target are very similar in that they are often the largest animals in the landscape.  Importantly, they are also animals with high ‘failure rates’.  That is, men are likely to come home empty handed from hunting.  This is very different from women hunters, who target smaller animals that they are more assured to acquire and bring home as food.

On that hunt, on a lake outside Tampa, I met Jay, a hugely successful New York photographer and author, who said, “I watched Romancing The Stone as a kid. In the movie, Michael Douglas kills a crocodile and turns it into a pair of cowboy boots. That’s what I’m here. I want to wear a pair of cowboy boots and to be able to say to my friends, ‘I killed these’”.

And kill them he did, from a flat-bottomed boat after he first harpooned it with a buoy tied to a rope so it couldn’t swim away, making Jay holler “this is like something out of Jaws!”

Men who target these large, difficult-to-acquire animals, therefore, signal to others that they can absorb the costs of an inefficient behaviour.  It signals that they have high-quality underlying mental and physical characteristics to be able to absorb such costs.

This ‘costly signalling’ to which it’s referred in the evolutionary literature, provides a way for men to accrue status. And status is universally important for men to ward off competition and attract mates. (I’ll note here that hunter-gatherer populations consume the animals they kill, unlike most trophy hunters.  In no way do I advocate any opposition to the ways in which Indigenous peoples earn their livelihood).

What are your major messages?

We believe this ‘costly signalling’ model applies equally well to trophy hunters from the developed world. By paying big bucks to trophy hunt, or even forgoing smaller individuals within populations to wait for chances at the very biggest, imposes costs on trophy hunters. And it’s prestigious to signal that you can absorb these costs.  In other words, trophy hunters, whether they realize it or not, are likely hunting for status.  It’s like driving a luxury car, though in this case the lives of animals are taken.

How do your findings extend and differ from what others have written about trophy hunting?

People, including me, were confused as to why men do this.  Are they sick in the head? Bloodthirsty?  Some believe that these are appropriate terms.  For me, this evolutionary explanation goes deeper and asked, why did this behaviour evolve?  We think we offer a good explanation.

Some might argue, ‘Well, if this is natural behaviour, then it’s justified’.  I believe this is a dangerous argument referred to as the naturalistic fallacy.   My colleague and mentor, Dr. Paul Paquet of the Raincoast Conservation Foundation, makes this abundantly clear by reminding us, “Trophy hunting can neither be justified for being natural nor as an aid to help populations, given the enormous costs paid by individual animals – their lives.”

How might one apply what you found to put a stop to this reprehensible practice that some claim they do “in the name of conservation”?

One interesting observation post-Cecil (the lion’s death by trophy hunting) is that demand for lion hunting has declined owing to prohibitions on transporting the remains on planes, etc.  If hunters cannot bring the trophies home to boast with, then they have no costly signal.

 

 

FAQs ON THE POACHERS

The Elephant

How many elephants are killed by poachers every year?

100 Elephants are killed per day.  The U.N. says up to 100 elephants are being slaughtered a day in Africa by poachers taking part in the illegal ivory trade.  Mar 19, 2015.

How many wild elephants are left in the world?

Population at the turn of the 20th century, there were a few million African elephants and about 100,000 Asian elephants.  Today, there are an estimated 450,000 – 700,000 African elephants and between 35,000 – 40,000 wild Asian elephants.  That is a third or less than a third or even by as much as a quarter of the population of elephants that existed at the turn of the last century.  Three-quarters of them have disappeared effectively.

Endangered Asian elephants

Asian elephants are even more endangered than African elephants — but the threat isn’t poaching so much as human encroachment. The Asian species is smaller than the African, and none of the females and only some of the males have tusks. While some are hunted for ivory or meat, most of the Asian elephants taken from the wild are not killed, but domesticated for zoos, safari tourism, or timber hauling. There are only about 30,000 remaining wild Asian elephants, while 15,000 live in captivity. The wild herds in India, Sri Lanka, and Thailand are dwindling, too, as human development shrinks their habitat. Many populations are now cut off from migration routes and forced to inbreed.

Abstract from: http://theweek.com/articles/449437/tragic-price-ivory

The Tusk

What Exactly Is an Elephant Tusk?

An elephant’s tusk is a tooth. It’s an elongated incisor, one-third of which is embedded into the elephant’s skull. The tusk is made up of nerve endings and pulp matter, and removal is deadly.

Elephants use their tusks in a variety of ways. They are used to protect themselves and their herd from predators, and elephants can even use their tusks for digging water holes. However, elephants are also anintegral part of the environment. They are sometimes referred to as “mega gardeners,” and without them, hundreds of animal and plant species would cease to exist as well.

Why are Elephants Killed for Their Tusks?

Up to 70 percent of ivory poached goes to China, where half a kilogram of it can sell for as much as 1,000 U.S. dollars. This increase in demand has been fueled by the growth of a middle class in China.  People can now afford the material that they have grown up believing is better than diamonds.

Do Elephant Tusks fall off?

Tusks are specialized teeth and elephants have only one set that continue growing throughout the elephant’s life. They are sometimes broken off as a result of natural movements, such as digging and sparring with other elephants. If a tusk is not broken off at its root, then yes- the tusk will continue to grow.Feb 2, 2010

Can you cut off an Elephant’s Tusks without killing it?

A tusk can be removed without killing the elephant. … But poachers use darts, poison and high-powered automatic rifles with night scopes to take elephants down and, while they are dying, the tusks are gouged out of from the living elephant’s skull. Jul 30, 2014

The Poacher & The Trade

How much is a pound of Ivory worth?

Ivory fetched prices as much as $1,500 per pound due to demand in Asia, where elephant tusks are ornately carved into art.Jun 2, 2016

Poachers kill elephants for their valuable tusks — a single pound of ivory can sell for $1,500, and tusks can weigh 250 pounds.  That is USD375,000 (or just over a 1/3 million dollars) per tusk!  Nov 7, 2016

How extensive is the poaching?

Poachers are now slaughtering up to 35,000 of the estimated 500,000 African elephants every year for their tusks. A single male elephant’s two tusks can weigh more than 250 pounds, with a pound of ivory fetching as much as $1,500 on the black market. The ivory is so valuable because all across Asia — particularly in China — ivory figurines are given as traditional gifts, and ivory chopsticks, hair ornaments, and jewelry are highly prized luxuries. “China regards ivory as a cultural heritage; they are not going to ban it,” said Grace Gabriel of the International Fund for Animal Welfare. Many Chinese consumers don’t realize that elephants must be killed for their ivory; in one survey, more than two thirds of Chinese respondents said they thought tusks grew back like fingernails.

What impact has the slaughter had on the elephants?

Elephants are highly intelligent, social creatures that live in matriarchal groups, and poaching has ravaged much of their social structure. The biggest tusks are found on the largest breeding males and on the oldest females, who lead the elephant troops.  Where these animals are targeted and killed, elephant populations are reduced to leaderless groups of traumatized orphans huddling together. In the past year, even they are being wiped out, as some poachers have started dumping cyanide into watering holes, killing every animal that drinks there.  Last year, poachers killed an estimated 300 elephants in Zimbabwe’s largest park, Hwange, by lacing watering holes and salt licks with cyanide.  To read more about the impact poaching of elephants have had on Botswana, more here.

Who are the poachers?

Since the industry is illegal, those who run it largely come from criminal syndicates or terrorist organizations. Al-Shabab, the Somalia-based wing of al Qaida, raises $600,000 a month from poaching to fund its activities. Uganda’s Lord’s Resistance Army, the rebel group notorious for enslaving children, also raises money through poaching. “Poaching has become one of the most profitable criminal activities there is,” says Peter Seligmann, the CEO of Conservation International. Chinese mafia organizations mostly do the purchasing and distribution of ivory after it’s been obtained, selling it mostly in China and Southeast Asia but sometimes to markets in the U.S.

Why is the price so high?

When ivory became contraband, the supply got scarcer, but demand remained strong.  In 1989, the international community passed a global ban on the trade in new ivory to stop the killing of elephants. Only ivory that had been harvested before 1989 could be sold, so the ivory carving industry in China crumbled, and with it the demand for tusks.  Elephant populations rebounded — so much so that in 1999 the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), a global organization, decided to allow a “one-off” sale of pre-ban, stockpiled ivory to Japan (what did we not say here?).

Then in 2008 it authorized another “one-off”sale, this time to Japanese and Chinesemarkets. The Chinese carving industry roared back to life, as the Chinese government licensed dozens of carving factories and retail outlets. Since there’s no way to distinguish between pre-ban and new ivory, the illegal ivory trade has accelerated to meet the demand, and poaching is now worse than before the global ban.

(REUTERS/James Akena)

What steps are being taken to stop poaching?

Under pressure from some member nations, CITES refuses to institute a complete ban on the ivory trade.  But the U.S. is taking its own measures. The U.S. is the second-biggest ivory market, after China.  In a symbolic gesture last fall, U.S. officials smashed 6 tons of contraband ivory, including tusks and carvings, that had been seized from smugglers or confiscated from unwitting tourists. And in February, the Obama administration announced it would change regulations to ban interstate sales of all ivory except certified antiques, limit elephant trophy imports to two per hunter, and end commercial imports of antique ivory.

Is China cooperating?

Following the U.S.’s ivory crush, the Chinese government destroyed 6 tons this January, and Hong Kong authorities say they will destroy their 30-ton stockpile, one of the largest in the world.  Chinese environmentalists have also begun educating the public about the dire consequences of buying ivory. But it’s a tough sell in a country where ivory has long symbolized wisdom and nobility.With more disposable income in mainland China, many people are flaunting their wealth, and ivory is seen as a luxury product that confers status,” says Tom Milliken of the Wildlife Trade Monitoring Network.

Why is the ban so hard to enforce?

There is no reliable way to tell pre-ban from post-ban ivory, or a real antique from a fake — in any country.  “It’s not like you walk into a store and find someone selling cocaine, which is illegal on its face,” said Edward Grace, deputy assistant director for law enforcement at the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. In Chinese and U.S. shops alike, consumers simply assume that ivory trinkets are legal, and there is no way for law enforcement to prove that any particular item was made after 1989. Mary Rice, executive director of the Environmental Investigation Agency, says there’s only one real solution: “We need to learn from history and permanently shut down all ivory trade — international and domestic.

The End Consumer

Why is Ivory so popular in China?

A carved ivory ship model

Ivory is often used to make elaborate and expensive ornaments in China.

In China and Hong Kong, ivory is seen as precious material and is used in ornaments and jewelry. It’s also sometimes used in traditional Chinese medicine.

Some rich Chinese people think that owning ivory makes them look more successful. Others think that ivory will bring them good luck.

China has the biggest ivory trade in the world and wildlife experts believe that around 70 per cent of the world’s ivory ends up there.

It is said that buyers of ivory don’t understand they have blood on their hands. That notion is startling given where we are in the timeline of civilization and the increasingly global dissemination of knowledge.  Conservation efforts have never reached so far and wide through media as they do today.  So how can people not know about the tragedy behind their white gold trinkets? Accountability for this gross misconception seems to lie with the Chinese government.

EAL-IF-YOU-BUY-IVORY-YOU-KILL-PEOPLE-new-1Small

But from uncovering this bizarre ignorance, change has been set into motion.  A variety of conservation campaigns have been aimed at educating the middle class — those most likely to purchase ivory.  People who have seen these campaigns, such as posters depicting how an elephant’s life is sacrificed to harvest their tusks, are far less likely to purchase ivory products.  Japan was previously the largest demander of ivory, before organizations and celebrities raised awareness and reduced the consumption by 99 percent.

“Elephant teeth” is the direct translation of the Chinese word for ivory, xiangya, and it’s possible this has contributed to the idea that elephants are not harmed during ivory harvesting — an IFAW survey revealed that 70 percent of Chinese polled did not know that ivory was plucked from murdered elephants.

 

Beijing’s master ivory carvers cling to a controversial art

Beijing (CNN)When Li Chunke started carving ivory in 1964, the number of elephants in Africa was still on the rise. Demand for ivory in China was practically non-existent and tusks could be bought for under $7 a kilogram.

Today, this figure is closer to $1,100 — according to research by Save the Elephants.

But while this marks a significant increase over the course of Li’s career, the price of coveted xiangya (elephant teeth) has almost halved over the last 18 months.

An endangered art form?

Conservationists have welcomed the recent drop in demand, attributing it to awareness campaigns and President Xi Jinping’s commitment to abolish the ivory trade in China.

But for 65-year-old Li, these changing attitudes threaten an ancient art form and the livelihoods of many carvers.  “Ivory carving represents Chinese traditional culture” he says, sipping green tea in his small apartment in Beijing. “Chinese people love it because it is an ancient skill — it’s a practice that belongs to the imperial arts.”

At the state-owned factory where he spent his five-decade career, Li would sculpt everything from small trinkets to full-length tusks adorned with classical scenes.

Hong Kong to phase out ivory trade

Alternative raw materials to ivory

Legal restrictions mean that he is rarely able to keep raw ivory at his home.  Nonetheless, on the far side of his living room I find a small workshop besieged by chisels, drill bits and tools.  Some are electronic, but the majority are simple hand tools — the sort he trained with. From the clutter, Li picks out figurines carved from a variety of different materials.

Ivory’s rare combination of density and smoothness makes it ideal for intricate carving, but there are alternatives. Hippo, narwhal and walrus tusks possess similar qualities.  “When we don’t have ivory, we also use beeswax and agarwood,” he explains.

Li shows me a small horse statuette and an ancient goddess fashioned from a piece of mammoth tusk — an ivory substitute excavated from the Siberian permafrost.

“When we made carvings for export [in the 1960s] the products had to represent Chinese traditional culture — it was merchandise,” he recalls. “Now I can carve on any theme, including religion and modern life.”

Hong Kong’s illegal ivory trade exposed

Legal vs. illegal ivory trade

Since retiring from the factory in 2013, Li estimates he makes fewer than 10 carvings a year, and can spend as long as two months on a single item.  He appears despondent about elephant poaching and the black market that are now associated with his industry.  “We are legal ivory-carving professionals,” he says. “The ivory we used was from natural deaths. We ought to protect wildlife. I like animals and I’ve kept a puppy as a pet.  I find it shocking that elephants are killed by men.”

With the worldwide ban on ivory in 1989, factories like Li’s were able to stay open, as China still permitted domestic trade. A licensing system allowed the continued import of tusks sourced from natural elephant deaths and police seizures.

But the distinction between legal and illegal trade is becoming blurred, say conservationists.  A 2011 investigation by the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) found that almost 60% of licensed vendors and carving factories in China were involved in black market trade.

A high-profile campaign featuring former basketball star Yao Ming argues that all ivory consumption — even the licensed trade — feeds the cycle of killing.  “Yao Ming’s ‘no buying, no killing’ is only partly right — we still have to think about the inheritance of traditional Chinese culture,” Li says.  “Of course, the raw material can be replaced by alternatives, which is why my students also use woods and jade. But some of the nuances of carving — ones that can only be reflected in ivory — are at risk.”

Carvers are turning to ivory substitutes including beeswax, agarwood and even mammoth tusk dug up from Siberian permafrost.

Carvers are turning to ivory substitutes including beeswax, agarwood and even mammoth tusk dug up from Siberian permafrost.

Rise in demand for mammoth tusks

On the other side of central Beijing, one of Li’s students, Li Jiulong (no relation), leads me into his small, dusty workshop. The 26-year-old shares the space with four other apprentices. A fellow carver sits practicing her technique on a small block of wood, her engravings guided by ink markings.

Work surfaces are arranged in a square, each littered with hand tools for breaking down large chunks of tusk and more accurate electronic ones for finer details.  While his master is old enough to ignore the diminishing demand for ivory, the younger Li must keep his options open.

In addition to his apprenticeship he is also undertaking a master’s degree which sees him working with lacquer — a traditional colored finish applied to wood.  He can obtain ivory through “the proper channels,” but Li spends much of his time carving other materials, including mammoth tusks.

“These tusks have been buried underground for a long time, which can cause cracks and change their color,” he explains, sketching out their differing patterns of grain on a piece of paper. “They would [originally have been] white like the elephant tusks, but they’re also more compact than normal ivory.”

Imports of mammoth tusks from Hong Kong (the main route bringing them in from Russia) has more than tripled since 2000. But the young apprentice retains some hope for traditional ivory carving, despite the recent drop in demand.

“It’s true that ivory won’t be huge business in the future but it won’t vanish. It is part of our cultural heritage,” he says.  “It will survive and keep its place,” he argues.

Abstract from: 

https://edition.cnn.com/2016/03/13/asia/china-ivory-carvers/index.html 

 

So.

What is the “elephant” that is not in the room? Literally.

We can see what they do.  Can we see why it happens?
What do we not understand as yet?


What would that silent voice say to us?

When The Community Speaks … Cracking the Botswana Productivity Code. Short Notes. Part I


 

 

BATSWANA HAVE THE WORST
WORK ETHIC IN THE WORLD – REPORT

30 Oct 2017

In its 2015 survey of African workers, South Africa’s Rand Merchant Bank found Batswana to be the laziest on the continent.  The problem is actually more acute than that.

In the 2017-2018 Global Competitiveness Report, Botswana scores the worst among the 137 countries that are tracked by the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) on 12 pillars of economic competitiveness.  From a list of 16 factors, respondents to the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey were asked to select the five most problematic factors for doing business in their country and to rank them between 1 (most problematic) and 5.  The results were then tabulated and weighted according to the ranking assigned by respondents.  One of those factors is “Poor work ethic in national labour force.”

With a score of 19, Botswana’s national workforce (which would include those in the public and private sector as well as NGOs) emerge as standard bearers of the poorest work ethic in the world survey.  Also doing poorly are Trinidad & Tobago (15.9), Brunei (14.4), Sri Lanka (11.1), Liberia (10.8), Bhutan (10.5), Seychelles (10.1), Malta (9.8), Georgia (9.7), Mauritius and Vietnam (9.5), Namibia (9.3), Bahrain (9.0), Kuwait (8.7) and United Arab Emirates and Jamaica (8.6).

WEF’s interest in labour productivity has to do with the fact that it impacts on business. A University of Botswana study by Professor John Makgala and Dr. Phenyo Thebe (“There is no Hurry in Botswana”: Scholarship and Stereotypes on “African time” Syndrome in Botswana, 1895-2011”) found that this lack of productivity has frustrated effort to attract foreign direct investment. Interestingly, there was a time when, according to literature that the authors quote, Botswana’s civil service “was generally believed to be the most efficient in the whole of the African continent.”

On a past trip to Singapore, former and late President Sir Ketumile Masire gained an appreciation on the efficiency of the country’s workers. Where a Motswana factory worker would produce one shirt within a given period of time, a Singaporean counterpart would produce six within the same period.

“This was productivity not in theory but in demonstrable terms.  When we say we are not productive, this is what we meant,” Masire recalled to Sunday Standard in 2015 of this experience which would lead to Botswana benchmarking with Singapore and delegations from the two countries travelling back and forth.

As one of the Four Asian Tigers, Singapore would provide one quarter of the inspiration to establish the Botswana National Productivity Centre (BNPC). The tigers are Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan. Along the way, however, the late president appears to have given up on ever inculcating the right work ethic in Batswana. On assessing the apparent resistance, he determined that Batswana’s poor work ethic was a result of their pastoralism.

“If you look at the life of pastoralists, they don’t have a good work ethic,” he had said.  The example he had cited was that beyond sinking a borehole for their livestock, letting out cattle to pasture and doing some other undemanding work, most of the time pastoralists are just lazing about as their cattle graze untended in the bush.  By Masire’s analysis, this is the work ethic that has been bequeathed to modern-day Botswana.

As a University of Botswana study shows, not one productivity intervention scheme by the government has produced the desired results. In his 2015/16 budget speech, the Minister of Finance and Economic Development, Kenneth Matambo, lamented the low levels of labour productivity in Botswana.  The best performers in terms of work ethic in the national labor force are from Zimbabwe and Venezuela underpinned by a perfect score.

Source: Sunday Standard.  http://www.sundaystandard.info/batswana-have-worst-work-ethic-world-%E2%80%93-report Retrieved May 23, 2018

Productivity Systemic Story by Ranking

Table 1:  Comparison of Botswana with 2017’s Best Global Labour Productivity Data

DID YOU KNOW?  THE AVERAGE PER CAPITA PRODUCTIVITY IN BOTSWANA
LAGS THE WORLD’S PRODUCTIVE COUNTRY BY FOUR (4) TIMES?

TALKING POINTS:

Organizational Policy on Collective Responsibility and Financial Viability

1. Introduction
Economic conditions are challenging. A private organization cannot survive solely on government-issued tenders. These organizations must find alternative sources of income. To achieve long-term viability, an organization must independently generate income through domestic production and sales. It should also strategically develop export channels to meet international market demands. Organizations that fail to adopt this framework will face challenges. Continuing to depend on government-led initiatives, donors, or grants is not sustainable. They must recognize that personal incomes and livelihoods will remain uncertain. Such income sources cannot be used as bargaining tools.

Given the absence of long-term planning at the outset, urgent and decisive transformation is now required. The organization must implement immediate, radical shifts in mindset and operational practices to effectively respond to the current challenges.

2. Fundamental Organizational Principles
The next principles are essential to the organization’s integrity and must be upheld by all members. Violations occur when personal interests are prioritized over collective organizational welfare.


2.1 Collective Responsibility
The organization is a collective entity, comprising both employees and the employer. Each individual assumes equal responsibility for the organization’s success and failure upon joining. Mere attendance does not constitute work; only output that meets the employer’s standards and expectations is considered work.

Employees are not entitled to income generated by predecessors, investors, or the employer. Organizational participation demands sustained effort, alignment with the organization’s goals, and active collaboration rather than passive compliance.

Failure to internalize this principle, especially in the context of cultural and linguistic differences, can lead to miscommunication. It also weakens cooperation and causes a decline in the necessary skills for collective functioning. Such deficiencies undermine the organization’s ability to function as a cohesive and effective entity.


2.2 Authority Over Assets
The judicial system has sole authority. It determines if the organization’s assets are seized or liquidated. Employees do not have this right. Democratic processes allow employees indirect influence. Nevertheless, judicial action demands clear evidence of the employee’s direct contribution to the organization’s income generation.

Though these contributions are measurable, enforcement remains inconsistent, revealing a systemic gap. The organization does not offer exit benefits to employees without demonstrable contributions to income or growth. This is especially true during periods of financial strain or operational incapacity.


2.3 Compensation and Entitlement
Employers hire staff without long-term guarantees to sustain salaries. Still, it is structurally unsound to allow severance or exit benefits to be claimed as entitlements independent of performance. Compensation must be based on the employee’s proven ability, whether during or after employment. The employee should generate enough income to cover operational costs, return on investment (ROI), profit, and organizational growth.

Claims that exceed this threshold are unfounded. Severance is not a reward for leaving but deferred compensation for value delivered during employment. Employees are not entitled to income generated by others, like predecessors or the employer.


2.4 Salary Agreements
While salary terms are agreed upon at the time of appointment, such agreements can shield under-performance. Employees who fail to deliver measurable value still claim full compensation, leading to structural imbalance and threatening organizational sustainability.


2.5 Consequences of Non-Enforcement
Failure to set up, enforce, and adhere to these principles will lead to systemic degradation. Over time, the financial and operational stability of the organization will deteriorate, weakening its capacity to fulfill its mission.


2.6 Impact on Organizational Culture and Performance
As organizational health declines, employee morale, initiative, and innovation will suffer. Problem-solving capacity, resilience, and long-term outlook will also decline. These effects undermine both individual and collective performance, ultimately jeopardizing the organization’s sustainability.


3. Measuring Employee Contribution to Income Generation
To assess the value contributed by each employee, the following metrics should be used:

  • Revenue per Employee: The total revenue divided by the number of employees. This is a key metric for assessing productivity and profitability.
  • Sales per Employee: The total sales divided by the number of employees. This metric is particularly relevant for organizations focused on revenue generation.

This policy framework outlines essential principles that must be followed to ensure organizational integrity and long-term success. All employees must align with these principles and contribute to the organization’s collective well-being.

Mindsets and Beliefs (Thinking) that contribute to these challenges:

The article examines the systemic challenges impacting Botswana’s productivity. It highlights that certain prevailing mindsets and beliefs contribute to these challenges:

Reliance on Past Solutions: The belief that previous solutions will address current problems can be limiting. As noted in “Law #1: Today’s Problems Come From Yesterday’s Solutions,” this mindset obstructs innovation. It prevents the development of approaches necessary for current challenges. More here.

Quick-Fix Mentality: Seeking immediate remedies without considering long-term consequences can exacerbate issues. “Law #5: The Cure Can Be Worse Than The Disease” shows that short-term solutions lead to significant problems. These issues can intensify over time. More here.

Desire for Immediate Gratification: The expectation of achieving multiple benefits simultaneously without acknowledging necessary trade-offs can be problematic. “Law #9: You Can Have Your Cake and Eat It, Too” emphasizes the importance of recognizing trade-offs. It also highlights managing them in decision-making. More here.

Fostering a culture of continuous learning is essential. Embracing innovative solutions is also crucial. Understanding the complexities of systemic challenges further enhances productivity in Botswana.

Here’s a clearer breakdown of the ways of thinking and underlying beliefs that lead to the systemic challenges described in the article “Cracking the Botswana Productivity Code” by Sheila Singapore, with a focus on the mental models behind each:


1. Reliance on Past Solutions

Belief: “If it worked before, it will work again.”
Way of Thinking:

  • Linear thinking, where cause and effect are assumed to be stable and repeatable.
  • Over-reliance on tradition or precedent rather than adaptive learning.
  • Lack of reflection on whether the original solution created new unintended consequences.

Result:

  • Failure to deal with root causes in a changing environment.
  • Resistance to innovation or systems redesign.

Related Law from the article:
Law #1: Today’s Problems Come from Yesterday’s Solutions

This law warns that yesterday’s “fixes” often sow the seeds of today’s dysfunction. Over time, without continuous learning, these solutions become entrenched, even when they no longer serve the current reality.


2. Quick-Fix Mentality

Belief: “We need to act now—any action is better than no action.”
Way of Thinking:

  • Event-oriented thinking, focused on visible symptoms rather than underlying patterns.
  • Short-termism, driven by urgency or performance metrics.
  • Preference for symptomatic solutions instead of fundamental or structural ones.

Result:

  • When resources become available, there is often a tendency to focus on “low-hanging fruit.” These are initiatives that promise quick wins or visible results. While these offer short-term gains, they often come at the expense of fundamental investments (such as building the agriculture and manufacturing economic bases). These investments are necessary for long-term, sustainable growth and, therefore, profits and return. As a result, systemic issues stay unresolved, and progress becomes cyclical, fragile, and ultimately unsustainable.
  • Interventions that create new problems or worsen existing ones.
  • A culture of fire-fighting rather than strategic planning.

Related Law from the article:
Law #5: The Cure Can Be Worse Than the Disease

This law illustrates how applying quick solutions can escalate the problem in the long run. It stresses the need to pause, study the whole system, and design for lasting change rather than just immediate relief.


3. Wish for Immediate Gratification

Belief: “We can have it all now—there shouldn’t be trade-offs.”
Way of Thinking:

  • Magical or wishful thinking—assuming that multiple benefits can be achieved at the same time without tension.
  • Disregard for systemic delays and unintended consequences.
  • Inability to rank or sequence actions for sustainable impact.

Result:

  • Over-promising and under-delivering.
  • Undermining of trust and credibility when goals aren’t met.

Related Law from the article:
Law #9: You Can Have Your Cake and Eat It, Too—But Not All at Once

This law highlights the need for strategic trade-offs and pacing. It encourages leaders to resist the temptation of “everything, everywhere, all at once.” Instead, they should align their ambitions with system capacity and time.


Summary Thought:

Each of these beliefs reflects a limited mental model. Systems thinker Peter Senge cautions against this kind of model in The Fifth Discipline. These models block adaptive learning and creative problem-solving. Shifting toward systems thinking involves embracing uncertainty, learning from feedback, and engaging multiple perspectives for lasting, generative change.

Let’s map those unproductive ways of thinking and beliefs to leverage points that can help shift the process toward sustained productivity—using Donella Meadows’ leverage points framework (and with Fifth Discipline thinking sprinkled in):


🔁 Mapping Limiting Beliefs to Systemic Leverage Points

1. Reliance on Past Solutions

  • Belief: “If it worked before, it will work again.”
  • Limiting Mental Model: Fixed mindsets, failure to update strategies with changing conditions.

🎯 Leverage Point: Change the mindset or paradigm out of which the system arises (#2 on Meadows’ list)

  • Actionable Strategy:
    • Introduce system thinking education at leadership levels.
    • Help regular reflection sessions where teams critically assess past “solutions” and their unintended consequences.
    • Use learning histories or After Action Reviews to surface system feedback over time.

🧠 Fifth Discipline Insight:

Replace reactive problem-solving with “personal mastery” and “shared vision” to encourage progressive-thinking and co-created futures.


2. Quick-Fix Mentality

  • Belief: “Just do something. Anything.”
  • Limiting Mental Model: Immediate action is always the answer; no time for systems mapping or stakeholder engagement.

🎯 Leverage Point: Lengthen the delays to allow for system feedback and learning (#6)

  • Actionable Strategy:
    • Build delays into planning cycles for research, prototyping, and community engagement.
    • Adopt a “double-loop learning” model: don’t just ask “Are we doing things right?” but also “Are we doing the right things?”
    • Replace KPIs focused on immediate outputs with indicators of long-term ability (like “rate of organizational learning”).

🧠 Fifth Discipline Insight:

Avoid the “Shifting the Burden” archetype where symptomatic fixes distract from fundamental changes.


3. Desire for Immediate Gratification

  • Belief: “We can have it all right now.”
  • Limiting Mental Model: Trade-offs are unnecessary or signs of failure.

🎯 Leverage Point: Change the goals of the system (#3)

  • Actionable Strategy:
    • Redefine success to include sustainability, capability-building, and resilience—not just short-term gains.
    • Use a balanced scorecard that includes social, learning, and environmental capital alongside financial metrics.
    • Build public awareness of delayed gratification as part of national development (e.g., through storytelling or national campaigns).

🧠 Fifth Discipline Insight:

Shift to a “generative orientation”—focus on capacity to grow and evolve over time, not just on immediate results.


🔧 Practical Implementation for Botswana or Your Org:

Limiting BeliefSuggested InterventionTarget Leverage PointWho Leads?
Relying on outdated solutionsSystems thinking workshops; “sunsetting” old programsParadigm shiftResearch & Policy Units
Quick fixes preferredCreate slow-down protocols; delay mechanismsDelays in feedbackPMO / Strategic Planning Units
Wanting it all nowAlign vision with phased growth plansSystem goalsBoard / Exec Leadership

Here’s the visual causal mapping between the limiting beliefs and their corresponding systemic leverage points:

  • 🔴 Reliance on Past Solutions links to a Paradigm Shift, calling for deeper mindset transformation.
  • 🟡 Quick-Fix Mentality connects to Delays & Feedback Loops, urging better pacing and long-term learning.
  • 🔵 Desire for Immediate Gratification maps to Changing System Goals, emphasizing a shift toward sustainability and capacity building.

Here’s the enhanced systemic leverage map, showing:

  1. Limiting beliefs (left),
  2. The leverage points needed to shift the system (center),
  3. The key stakeholders or institutional roles responsible for enabling those shifts (right).

This format is ideal for strategic planning sessions or policy discussions, making it easy to assign ownership and co-design interventions.

REQUIRED RESEARCH ANALYSIS

FOR DETAILS OF DATA REQUIRED FOR RESEARCH ANALYSIS FOR THIS SUBJECT, CLICK HERE.

THE FULL STORY, CLICK HERE.

When The Community Speaks … When learning is more important than education. Short Notes.


Without learning, education will fail to deliver on its promise to eliminate extreme poverty and create shared opportunity and prosperity for all.

World Development Report 2018 calls for greater measurement, action on evidence

WASHINGTON, September 26, 2017 – Millions of young students in low and middle-income countries face the prospect of lost opportunity and lower wages in later life because their primary and secondary schools are failing to educate them to succeed in life. Warning of ‘a learning crisis’ in global education, a new Bank report said schooling without learning was not just a wasted development opportunity, but also a great injustice to children and young people worldwide.

The World Development Report 2018: ‘Learning to Realize Education’s Promise’ argues that without learning, education will fail to deliver on its promise to eliminate extreme poverty and create shared opportunity and prosperity for all. Even after several years in school, millions of children cannot read, write or do basic math. This learning crisis is widening social gaps instead of narrowing them. Young students who are already disadvantaged by poverty, conflict, gender or disability reach young adulthood without even the most basic life skills.

“This learning crisis is a moral and economic crisis,”World Bank Group President Jim Yong Kim said. “When delivered well, education promises young people employment, better earnings, good health, and a life without poverty. For communities, education spurs innovation, strengthens institutions, and fosters social cohesion. But these benefits depend on learning, and schooling without learning is a wasted opportunity. More than that, it’s a great injustice: the children whom societies fail the most are the ones who are most in need of a good education to succeed in life.

Download the World Development Report 2018: Learning to Realize Education’s Promise.

The report recommends concrete policy steps to help developing countries resolve this dire learning crisis in the areas of stronger learning assessments, using evidence of what works and what doesn’t to guide education decision-making; and mobilizing a strong social movement to push for education changes that champion ‘learning for all.’

According to the report, when third grade students in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda were asked recently to read a sentence such as “The name of the dog is Puppy” in English or Kiswahili, three-quarters did not understand what it said. In rural India, nearly three-quarters of students in grade 3 could not solve a two-digit subtraction such as “46 – 17”—and by grade 5, half still could not do so. Although the skills of Brazilian 15-year-olds have improved, at their current rate of improvement they will not reach the rich-country average score in math for 75 years. In reading, it will take 263 years.

These statistics do not account for 260 million children who, for reasons of conflict, discrimination, disability, and other obstacles, are not enrolled in primary or secondary school.

While not all developing countries suffer from such extreme learning gaps, many fall far short of levels they aspire to. Leading international assessments on literacy and numeracy show that the average student in poor countries performs worse than 95 percent of the students in high-income countries—meaning such a student would be singled out for remedial attention in a class in those countries. Many high-performing students in middle-income countries—young men and women who achieve in the top quarter of their groups—would rank in the bottom quarter in a wealthier country.

The report, written by a team directed by World Bank Lead Economists, Deon Filmer and Halsey Rogers, identifies what drives these learning shortfalls—not only the ways in which teaching and learning breaks down in too many schools, but also the deeper political forces that cause these problems to persist.

Source: Phillip Hay, Patricia da Camara, Huma Imtiaz  (2018). World Bank warns of ‘learning crisis’ in global education. World Bank. Available at: http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2017/09/26/world-bank-warns-of-learning-crisis-in-global-education [Retrieved on 19 May 2018].

GENERAL TALKING POINTS OF INTEREST (For now):

  1. To not assume that if there is education, there will be learning.
  2. Learning is not the same as teaching.  Learning happens when the learner makes the action of learning the primary responsibility of the learner, just as  teaching is the primary responsibility of the teacher.
  3. You can have teaching and no learning as the article above here illustrates.  We need to accept that is possible.
  4. Yet one could have learning in the absence of teaching.
  5. Learning takes the student much farther along, with less resources, than any amount of teaching can do for the the learner.  School and principals and student grades improve at the rate the learner seeks out learning.  Infrastructure is not the primary driver of learning.  Curiosity and the willingness to learn is.
  6. In the world of learning, we stop using the word ‘student’ and switches its reference to ‘the learner’.
  7. The student goes much farther in their journey of learning when they have piqued their curiosity about what they are learning.  That is an almost mesmerized attention to learning.  They are learning because they want to rather than they have to.
  8. All children have this innate capacity to be curious.  Often it goes unnoticed by the parent as it typically happens in their absence and not in their presence or is picked up when the child does something ‘wrong’.   And so as adults, most of us miss seeing it as it happens.  We have all gone through it ourselves but we abandoned the notion of what it is, when we got what we had wanted as a result of that process or were punished for exercising it.
  9. What is the true nature of a child’s mind that piques their interest and become mesmerized (be they clean (or unclean) interests) to want to learn?  Totto-Chan is a book written in modern times set within the context of World War II in Japan, that explores classic ideals such as curiosity, innocence, shyness, inquisitiveness, confusion, happiness and sorrow that represent some of these traits (all of which are emotional, and less mental, spiritual and physical) in nature) that promotes the mind of the child to want to learn.
  10. A learner then soon discovers that being on the journey of discovering and learning is far more exciting to be on than arriving at their destination (having learned and scored grades).  The learner then can’t wait to get on to the next big journey and it did not matter to him whether his scored grades or he did not.  That is not relevant to the learner.
  11. Once a learner discovers the joys of learning for its own sake (as opposed to ‘not wanting to fail’ or not making the grades for advancing to the next stage), the systems begins to realize it is becoming difficult for it to keep up with the pace at which learning is happening for the learner.  The learner will keep exceeding the expectations that the teachers have set for them.  The learner reaches his grades only by as far as he or she is willing to learn.  Anyone else who believes that the effort to improve grades lies elsewhere, or with the teacher, is sorely mistaken and does so at the expense of incurring huge costs to the state (as highlighted by the article above here).
  12. Now, the question is:  Where would a child imbibe the values of learning?  Or, where could the child lose such values?  What would allow or encourage the mind of the child to become mesmerized by learning?  True childhood means the curiosity that piques a child’s interest for learning.  Would that be at the school or be at the home?

REQUIRED RESEARCH ANALYSIS

FOR DETAILS OF DATA REQUIRED FOR RESEARCH ANALYSIS FOR THIS SUBJECT, CLICK HERE.