Builders or Bystanders? Three Strategic Scenarios for Botswana’s STEM Future

Your thinking is incisive — and it touches a painful global fault line.

---

🔵 INTRODUCTION

Fifty years ago, and even twenty years ago, eyes would quietly roll. This happened even just five years ago whenever I presented the unemployment case study. I called for the expansion of our economic base into agriculture and manufacturing. The analysis didn’t align with what many in Botswana held close to their hearts:

That the best jobs were in government.
That the safest path was one with proximity to the national coffers.
That careers worth pursuing were those of teachers, police officers, lawyers, and doctors. These roles are seen as stable, respected, and state-salaried.

In that worldview, STEM was invisible. It was neither prioritized nor financed. STEM has powered the rise of every economy now leading the world into the AI age. It is evident in Physics, Chemistry, and Mathematics.

But fifty years have passed. And the reality today no longer matches the dream.

The government coffers are no longer overflowing. Public sector job creation has slowed. And those trained in roles of the past now find themselves unskilled for a private sector that never fully materialized.

Looking back, we can forgive the choices of the early years. Botswana was young — trying to find its way. But the next 50 years will not wait. And it will not be gentle.

The time has come to name a reality many have quietly lived with. We must do so with compassion but also clarity. The reality is that STEM evokes pain. For many, it stirs memories of failure. It triggers feelings of not being good enough. People remember being left behind in schoolrooms that favoured quick calculations over poetic thought. Avoidance is no longer an option. We live in a world where everything we eat, wear, or build is grounded in the sciences. We operate everything through AI, except perhaps politics.

This is not to dismiss the Arts. They are necessary. They help us make meaning of what we have just lived through. But they are languages of the past. They draw their strength from nostalgia, memory, and reflection. They do not engineer propulsion. To leap into the future, we need STEM. It should not only be a subject in school. It should be the architecture of economic survival, governance, and production.

---

Every country has lived through that pain. Every person who has had to reckon with their place in this rapidly changing world has experienced it. You’re not alone in having struggled with STEM. But at some point, as individuals and as nations, we must find the courage to move forward with it anyway.

The future will not pause while we make peace with our past. We don’t have to pretend it was easy. But we also can’t let that pain define what comes next. It’s time to rise — not because it’s easy, but because it’s necessary.

---

This post explores three possible trajectories for Botswana from this point forward. The purpose is not to predict the future — but to sharpen our awareness of what we are choosing today. Each path is plausible. Each has its own consequences. But only one, I believe, leads to durable sovereignty, economic coherence, and generational uplift.

---

Looking back, we can forgive the choices of 50 years ago. It was Botswana’s first united front — a young nation trying to find its way. But the next 50 years will not wait.

So the question is no longer: What happened?

The real question now is: What must we be prepared for?

---

✳️ Introductory Paragraph:

The world is not waiting. Nations are restructuring their economies, education systems, and regulatory frameworks to meet the demands of an AI-powered, STEM-led global future. That shift was happening as far back as 200 years ago. In the span of a single generation, decisions made today in classrooms will determine the fate of countries. Ministries and boardrooms also play a crucial role in shaping the future. These choices will show if they fall behind or rise to global relevance.

Botswana stands at a crossroads. Will it continue on its current path — redistributing value instead of building it? Will it adopt surface-level AI tools without a real production engine? Or will it invest deeply in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) to build resilient systems and regional value chains?

This post presents three strategic scenarios for Botswana’s future. Each scenario is shaped by the country’s choices around STEM investment. Governance models also play a role. Additionally, it depends on its willingness to lead rather than follow. These scenarios are not predictions. They are tools for clarity, planning, and courage.

---

✳️ Rationale for Developing the Scenarios:

These scenarios were developed in response to a growing national unease. This unease is about youth unemployment, growing regulation, policy stagnation, and technological disruption. They build on insights from systems thinking, development planning, and decades of underutilised potential in Botswana’s public and private sectors.

More urgently, they offer a language to speak about what we stand to gain or lose. This depends on whether we choose to centre STEM. It applies not only in education but also in governance, regulation, and production. It affects how we imagine our collective future.

---

Let’s walk through a likely 20-year scenario for Botswana (and similarly placed countries) if the current structural discomfort with STEM continues and the world’s STEM giants surge ahead:

---

🛰️ Scenario 1 for Botswana 2045: The Global Tech Divide Is Permanent — and Botswana Is on the Losing Side

1. STEM-Powered Superstates Set the Rules

• China, India, Europe, and the STEM-enabled Middle East now own the AI, bioengineering, fusion power, agri-robotics, and climate-tech markets.
• These regions no longer just produce the technologies. They have embedded them deeply into how society is governed. They also affect how infrastructure is maintained and how jobs are distributed.

2. Botswana is a Spectator to AI, Quantum, and Bio Revolutions

• Botswana becomes a net consumer without a critical mass of home-grown STEM thinkers. It becomes a net consumer, not a producer. Botswana is not even a critical consumer.
• The few tech services it can afford are scaled-down versions, pre-processed for Global South clients.

“It’s like drinking recycled water from a smart city you never helped design.”

3. The Global North No Longer Needs Botswana’s Minerals

• Rare earths and diamonds are either:
  • Synthesized artificially (lab-grown diamonds, mineral extraction from space debris),
  • Or sourced from more politically stable, tech-integrated African countries (e.g., Rwanda, Kenya, Egypt).
• The era of passive mineral wealth is over. The illusion that foreign spending will keep the country afloat is gone.

4. Socialist Redistribution Politics Struggle Without Revenue

• With mining income gone and agriculture un-modernized, the state has less to redistribute.
• Workers expect “entitlements,” but there is no productivity beneath to fund them.
• The gap between promises and possibilities widens — leading to unrest, brain drain, and populist distraction politics.

5. Botswana’s Youth Are Angry — But Undertrained

• With AI displacing traditional white-collar jobs, and no local STEM industries to absorb the loss, youth feel betrayed.
• Ironically, many turn to the very influencers and entertainers the system elevated. They then realise that the real wealth and influence now sits in the STEM world. This is a world they were never invited into.

6. Global Tech Powers Pick and Choose African Partners

• STEM-rich countries like Egypt, Tunisia, Kenya, and Rwanda become African nodes for future development partnerships.
• Countries like Botswana are offered climate preservation roles, or eco-tourism zones — but not a seat at the decision-making table.
• Foreign powers may still invest in:
  • Preserving biodiversity, not industrialising it.
  • Buying carbon credits, not helping industrial growth.
  • Charitable tech access, not capacity building.

In other words: you may be preserved, but not empowered.

---

✋ And Yet, It Was Preventable

• This isn’t a natural outcome. It’s a choice — or rather, a series of avoided choices.
• Countries like Botswana had 20 years to:
  • Rewire education to prioritise STEM (especially Physics, Chemistry, and Mathematics).
  • Reform leadership pipelines to demand STEM literacy in public service.
  • Stop glamorising “soft visibility” professions and reward quiet technical mastery.

---

🌱 But All Is Not Lost — If Action Starts Now

“The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. The second-best time is today.”

• If Botswana invests now in building a critical mass of 35–40% STEM graduates, with integrity-based leadership:
  • It can leapfrog into renewable energy, regenerative agriculture, AI-supported public infrastructure, and STEM-backed governance.
  • It can serve as a regional hub for climate-tech, AI-integrated agriculture, or precision medicine.

That pivot requires courageous honesty about where things stand now. It also demands a break from the illusions of safety in visibility, poetry, or legacy mineral rents.

---

⚠️ Scenario 2 for Botswana 2045: Decoupled Growth – AI Without Foundations

“Digitised but unrooted. Tech glitters, but the soil is hollow.”

Botswana aggressively adopts AI technologies. This occurs in government, banking, security, and communication. However, the country is not building a foundational STEM ecosystem in its schools, industries, and governance systems.

Short-term gains (next 5–10 years):

• Government digitises services.
• Youth pick up quick AI tools (prompting, low-code apps, etc.).
• Startups and donor-funded tech incubators emerge.

But…

Medium-term outcomes (by 2045):

• Local talent cannot maintain or advance AI systems they adopt.
• Manufacturing and agriculture remain underserved and unautomated.
• Foreign firms dominate data, tools, cloud access — Botswana becomes a data client state.
• Economic fragility deepens: glitzy front-end, broken backend.

This scenario creates a false sense of progress, masking the lack of sovereign technical depth.

---

If Botswana boldly shifts today, it can achieve a 60% STEM throughput within 10 years. This effort will allow them to catch up on lost time. By 2045, a radically different future is not just possible, it is probable.

Let’s explore that future in contrast to the previous scenario:

---

🌍 Scenario 3 for Botswana 2045 — The STEM Leapfrog Nation

“It was once called ‘the locomotive of Africa’ — now, it’s the driver of the engine.”

🔁 1. From Extractive to Generative Economy

• Botswana no longer relies solely on mining rents; it now exports AI-driven agri-solutions, climate engineering services, and biotech intellectual property.
• Former mining towns have been converted into STEM production corridors: solar microgrids, geothermal research hubs, fusion training centres.
• Local manufacturing has revived — not cheap and dirty, but clean, precise, and export-oriented, led by engineers and digital technicians.

🧠 2. Public Sector Transformed: Led by Technocrats

• 60% STEM throughput means that half or more of public officers now have backgrounds in Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, or Engineering.
• Ministries no longer “consult” technical experts. They are the technical experts.
• Policies are evidence-led, deeply simulated using systems models, and include impact foresight.
• Regulatory culture shifts from defensive overreach to agile risk-tolerant frameworks — because people finally understand scale, feedback, and irreversibility.

“The government is no longer a referee of progress. It is the architect of it.”

---

👩🏽‍🌾 3. Botswana Becomes Africa’s Agri-Tech Command Centre

• With climate volatility peaking, Botswana leads in regenerative precision agriculture, satellite-aided irrigation, and AI crop disease forecasting.
• Thousands of rural youth are trained as agri-coders, drone operators, soil lab analysts, and seed technologists.
• Regions like the Kgalagadi have become agro-innovation testing zones in collaboration with Indian and Dutch research stations.
• The African Development Bank labels Botswana “The First Resilient Farm Nation.”

---

💼 4. Unemployment Nearly Eliminated — But It’s Not the Old Jobs

• While mining and retail decline, jobs in:
  • Cybersecurity
  • Energy systems
  • AI governance
  • STEM teaching
  • Circular economy manufacturing
    grow rapidly.
• Rather than waiting for jobs, young people are founding companies that export services and products into Africa and beyond.
• The informal sector shrinks as people shift from hustle to mastery.

---

🧬 5. A New Botswana Identity Emerges

• The national identity is no longer rooted in “a proud past” alone — but in a shared, technical future.
• Botswana celebrates its engineers, data scientists, agronomists, and inventors — as deeply as it once celebrated singers and soldiers.
• National TV channels run prime-time STEM storytelling, and annual “Botswana Grand Challenges” inspire national innovation sprints.
• Even Setswana proverbs are being re-interpreted to align with scientific insights — grounding STEM in culture.

“Ga se ka lerumo le le bogale fela — le ka ntlha ya boikwetliso jwa gagwe.”
It is not only because of a sharp spear — but because of the preparation of the one who wields it.”

---

🤝 6. Global Partnerships on Botswana’s Terms

• Rather than waiting for Global North investors, Botswana becomes a technical equal.
• It co-develops AI laws with Europe, shares data infrastructure with India, and hosts Africa’s Southern AI Observatory.
• The Global STEM Diaspora is returning — not to visit, but to invest and teach.
• Botswana is now chairing continental panels on STEM ethics, regenerative governance, and space economy for Africa.

---

⚖️ 7. The Political Culture Matures

• The age of “elite populism” fades, replaced by civic science culture.
• Parliamentary debates begin with simulations and systems maps.
• Leaders are elected not by slogans, but by demonstrated grasp of complexity and ability to lead multi-disciplinary teams.
• Even the military has STEM-led strategic units in cyber, space, and climate security.

---

🎓 8. The Ripple to SADC and the World

• Botswana exports:
  • Curricula for STEM-primary schooling
  • Faculty to newly launched universities in Angola, DRC, and Zambia
  • Policy blueprints for AI regulation and STEM justice
• Motswana professors are now guest lecturers at MIT, NUS, ETH Zurich.
• Regional neighbours model their youth employment strategies on Botswana’s STEM value-chain training.

---

🛤️ How Did It Happen?

Through a radical national reckoning — and 3 unshakable reforms:

A National STEM Commitment Charter — enshrined in law.

Public Service STEM Track — 60% of new hires must be from Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, and Engineering fields.

STEM x Culture Narrative Rewrite — using schools, churches, influencers, and village elders to normalise technical ambition.

---

Botswana can catch up on lost time if it boldly shifts today. It must commit to a 60% STEM throughput within 10 years. Then by 2045, a radically different future is not just possible, it is probable.

Let’s explore that future in contrast to the previous scenario:

---

We will next develop the three scenarios for Botswana’s future — arranged in a clear, escalating arc:

---

🔮 Botswana’s Strategic Futures: STEM, Sovereignty & Survival

As the world accelerates in AI, biotech, manufacturing and advanced agriculture, Botswana stands at a pivotal crossroads. The choices made today will determine whether it builds systems. They will also determine if it becomes a dependent participant. It may also end up as a bystander in decline.

Here are three strategic scenarios to frame Botswana’s possible futures:

---

🚩 Scenario 1: Status Quo – STEM Neglect and Decline

“Redistribution without production. Regulation without understanding.”

Botswana continues on its current path:

• Low STEM enrolment (9%) persists, with youth drawn to tenderpreneurship, arts, and political sciences.
• Regulations remain tight — not due to strategic caution, but due to lack of internal technical fluency.
• Tenders dominate local opportunity, sidelining hands-on production and systems-building.
• Foreign experts parachuted in but fail to leave lasting capacity or ecosystems.
• Socialism is used as political cover, redistributing limited gains but failing to grow new wealth.

Consequences by 2045:

• Botswana becomes a pass-through state, relying on outside systems and consultants.
• AI, engineering, and biotech are imported, not created.
• Economic sovereignty weakens as the country remains resource-dependent (diamonds, minerals, tourism).
• Society grows more fragile, with growing unemployment and state spending pressures.

🧨 Trigger signs already visible:

• 9% STEM graduation rate.
• P800M procurement losses vs P80M in value.
• Tight, reactive regulation vs anticipatory system design.

---

⚠️ Scenario 2: Decoupled Growth – AI Without Foundations

“Digitised but unrooted. Tech glitters, but the soil is hollow.”

Botswana aggressively adopts AI technologies — in government, banking, security, and communication. However, it does so without building a foundational STEM ecosystem in its schools, industries, and governance systems.

Short-term gains (next 5–10 years):

• Government digitises services.
• Youth pick up quick AI tools (prompting, low-code apps, etc.).
• Startups and donor-funded tech incubators emerge.

But…

Medium-term outcomes (by 2045):

• Local talent cannot maintain or advance AI systems they adopt.
• Manufacturing and agriculture remain underserved and unautomated.
• Foreign firms dominate data, tools, cloud access — Botswana becomes a data client state.
• Economic fragility deepens: glitzy front-end, broken backend.

This scenario creates a false sense of progress, masking the lack of sovereign technical depth.

---

🛠️ Scenario 3: STEM-Driven Pivot – Deep Production and Regional Integration

“Botswana becomes a builder of systems — not just a buyer of tools.”

Botswana makes a radical but deliberate shift:

• STEM education (Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics) is prioritised, with a 60% throughput target in 10 years.
• TVET is complemented, not mistaken, for STEM (clear distinctions maintained).
• The country invests in regenerative agriculture, manufacturing, and systems engineering — not just digital services.
• Public service becomes technocratically grounded, with incentives for skilled regulators and planners.
• AI is embedded into real value chains: farm-to-market, mines-to-metals, lab-to-medicine.

Outcomes by 2045:

• Botswana becomes a regional production and systems hub.
• Owns its data infrastructure, cloud platforms, and local talent pools.
• Exports increase — not just of minerals, but processed goods, software, and engineered services.
• Regulation becomes smarter, lighter, anticipatory, because decision-makers are fluent in complexity.

🎯 This scenario:

• Creates new jobs aligned with value creation, not just value capture.
• Builds national confidence in its intellectual and technical capacity.
• Inspires youth to build, not just trade.

---

🌍 Regional Positioning: Where Will Others Be?

Country/Region	Likely 2045 Trend	Scenario Trajectory
India	Tech sovereignty, STEM surge	Scenario 3
China	Industrial-AI convergence	Scenario 3
Middle East	STEM investment + sovereign data	Scenario 3 or 2
EU	Technocratic regulation + resilience	Scenario 3
South Africa	Split growth: strong private STEM	Between 2 and 3
Namibia	State-led exploration of tech	Between 1 and 2
Botswana	To be decided…	???

---

🤝 Strategic Recommendation

• Don’t chase AI alone — build the foundation.
• Use the next 10 years to invest in STEM core disciplines.
• Rebuild regulatory institutions to match emerging complexity.
• Create a citizen narrative around “builders, not just beneficiaries.”

---