Practicing Mentals Models – A Self Discipline

Here is a clearer, trainee-friendly version a trainer might use when introducing this important point in a workshop:

---

🌱 Mental Models Are a Self-Discipline — Not Just a Tool You Learn

This is one of the most important things we want you to take away:

Trainers and consultants (like us!) can show you the tools — but we can’t do the inner work for you.

That means you are the one who will need to do the reflecting, questioning, and updating of your own mental models. This is where the real growth happens.

We showed in earlier posts here how this kind of self-discipline shows up in 11 different life situations — from families to work to national policy — and how anyone can start practicing it.

💡 Why This Matters:

• It makes the work open to everyone — not just experts.
• It gives you the power to work with your own experience, even in difficult or sensitive moments.
• It helps you move from just “using the tool” to actually transforming how you think, relate, and lead.

---

🔧 What This Might Look Like

For each of the 11 situations, we’ll build a guide that shows:

• A real-life example — something that actually happens.
• The common mental model people carry in that situation.
• A practice to help shift it — like journaling, dialogue, or questioning your assumptions in the moment.
• What you need to do for yourself — and what a trainer or coach can only support you with, not do for you.

It’s not about telling you “what to think.”
It’s about helping you learn how to look deeper and where to start asking questions.

---

🛠️ And What You’ll Need to Succeed

Even people who’ve studied these ideas for years find this hard when they’re tired, stressed, or afraid. You’re not alone.

So to grow this self-discipline, you’ll need:

• A safe mirror — someone who reflects what they see, without judging.
• A steady rhythm — small but regular ways to look at one part of yourself at a time.
• A sense of shared path — it helps to know others are working through this too.
• A combination of Tool + Practice + Companion — that’s what helps the work stick.

---

Here is a perfect real-life example of why this inner discipline is so important.

---

Title:
When Mastery Stalls: The Inner Traps We Don’t See Until We Surface Them
A personal journey through mental models, fear, and reclaiming authorship

---

1. Opening Scene
He had built systems for others. Trained leaders. Helped teams make sense of chaos. For decades, he walked beside ministries, boards, and community organisations, helping them navigate transformation with clarity and rigor. His frameworks made the complex visible. His clients called him a mirror.

And yet, in his own life, a silent question lingered:

Why, despite everything I know, does forward motion feel like dragging a boulder uphill?

It wasn’t burnout. He still believed in the work. The vision was clear. But something deeper felt… stuck. A dissonance between what he knew to be true and what his own body and choices kept doing. The projects stalled. The outreach was hesitant. The money didn’t flow. He poured in effort but avoided invoices. He labored in silence, but recoiled at public recognition.

He thought he was simply tired.
But the truth was more subtle.
He was trapped.

---

2. The Trap He Didn’t Name
For years, he chalked up the drag to external challenges: resource constraints, poor hiring fits, delayed contracts. All valid. But incomplete.

The real barrier was hidden.
And it took an old, unresolved memory to shake it loose: a national newspaper article that had appeared years earlier, placing his name on the front page, accusing the government of paying him exorbitantly.

The article misrepresented the facts. It implied that he was earning a salary larger than the President’s. It failed to mention that he was only paid per engagement day, not daily. It cited no feedback on his actual performance. And it ignored the results his work had contributed to: the first national systems training programs, early frameworks that eventually shaped the country’s unemployment and manufacturing strategies.

The government said nothing in his defense. The silence was deafening.

In the years that followed, he continued contributing. His study on unemployment was completed in 2018. His ideas quietly shaped policies across food security and skills development. But something inside him had shifted.

He stopped asking to be paid. He stopped seeking visibility. He quietly told himself: _”I’ll keep giving. Maybe one day, they’ll see.”

He didn’t know it yet, but this was no longer strategy. It was avoidance.

---

3. Reframing Through Reflection

When he revisited this incident recently, he did it through the tools he had taught so many others: the Ladder of Inference and the Left-Hand Column. This time, he used them on himself.

A. Ladder of Inference: The National Newspaper Article

Observable Data:

• National newspaper article questioned the value of his contract and misrepresented the fee structure.
• The article lacked detail on performance, context, or contractual terms.
• No formal response from the government.

Selected Data:

• The headline number ($1000 per day)
• Lack of response from the government
• Public silence

Meaning:

• I was exposed unfairly.
• The government was embarrassed by me.
• They agreed with the article.

Assumptions:

• If I promote myself, I will be shamed again.
• People will think I’m exploiting the country.

Conclusions:

• I should avoid public recognition.
• I must stay quiet and low-profile.

Adopted Beliefs:

• Visibility is dangerous.
• Success attracts attack.

Actions:

• Undercharge.
• Avoid pitching.
• Let people use my work freely.

---

B. Left-Hand Column Reflection: The Newspaper Article Incident

Right-Hand Column (What I said or showed):

• I kept working.
• I said nothing about the article.
• I quietly completed my unemployment study.

Left-Hand Column (What I thought or felt):

• I felt betrayed.
• I was furious and deeply hurt.
• I feared being seen as corrupt or opportunistic.
• I told myself: “Don’t draw attention.”
• I wanted them to see my value without me asking.

---

C. Emerging Themes

• Silence as self-protection
• Fear of public perception
• Unconscious belief that value must be proven in suffering
• Discomfort with receiving, especially money

---

D. What Could Be Reframed?

• I was not the author of that article.
• I was not wrong to be paid for value.
• My work created national impact.
• My silence did not earn respect; it silenced me.

---

E. The Reframed Internal Dialogue

“That article was misinformed. It simplified something complex and ignored my intent, the terms of the contract, and the impact I created. But it no longer gets to shape how I see myself.”

“The silence that followed — from government, media, or allies — hurt deeply. But their silence is not my shame to carry.”

“I don’t need to prove myself again. I need to stand clearly for what I’ve already done — and invite the next chapter to be one of reciprocal respect.”

---

F. New Ladder of Inference

Observable Data:

• My work contributed to national impact.
• There was public misunderstanding.
• The government used my insights despite the noise.

Selected Data:

• My contributions.
• Their uptake.
• My ongoing relevance.

New Meaning:

• I bring clarity and value.
• Misunderstanding happens.

New Assumptions:

• I deserve fair compensation.
• I can speak clearly about my work.

New Conclusion:

• It is time to invite right relationships.

New Action:

• Present my value transparently.
• Seek partnerships with integrity.

---

4. The Missing Link
What had stalled his personal mastery was not vision, passion, or skill. It was an unseen belief lodged deep in the emotional memory of betrayal. A fear that to stand tall would attract humiliation.

Only when this was surfaced, reframed, and replaced could energy begin to move again. Only then did the calls begin to go out. The invoices get issued. The messages reappear on his site.

Personal mastery is not blocked by a lack of discipline. It is blocked by unchallenged beliefs formed in pain.

The discipline of mental models gave him the mirror. And in it, he reclaimed motion.

---

5. Closing Note (in first person)
This is my story. But I now believe it is the story of many.

We don’t stall because we lack ambition. We stall because somewhere, something told us that movement is dangerous.

But once we can name that voice and show it what is now true, we can walk forward again. Not into the world’s approval. But into our own clarity.

I’m not afraid to tell it anymore.

And I hope it invites you to begin your own.