The thoughts here offer a basis for ways SoLs (Societies for Organizational Learning). These societies now run across various countries across the globe. They run independently or collaborate with each other.
But more importantly it talks to the question:
How can more persons assimilate knowledge of this work? More importantly, how do they learn to turn ‘the theory’ into practice? How can they apply it in ways that allow the work to affect the world? Yes, just those two questions.
Reflections on the Practice and Positioning of the Five Disciplines in National and Regional Strategy
The prevailing notion of “adult learning” is, in my view, significantly misinformed. It implies a level of self-sufficiency. This often proves counterproductive, particularly in the context of adopting the Five Disciplines of a Learning Organization. Similarly, the phrase “Learning Organization” itself evokes assumptions of self-guided development. While aspirational, such framing can inadvertently mask the profound developmental work that this journey demands.
These assumptions are further complicated by residual attitudes from early education systems. Learning was often experienced as passive. It was also imposed. In adulthood, these memories can provoke subtle resistance, manifesting as skepticism or superficial engagement. Unlike conventional knowledge that builds on prior familiarity, these disciplines need a fundamental reorientation. They include Systems Thinking, Mental Models, Personal Mastery, Shared Vision, and Team Learning. They are not extensions of existing understanding; they are transformative practices. Very little in prior learning prepares one for the depth and rigor needed to engage with them meaningfully.
This is where the Society for Organizational Learning (SoL) holds unique value. It recognizes and supports the critical transitional space that many learners of the five disciplines must traverse. The concept of a “cross-over” period—where learners need guidance, validation, and structured support—can’t be overstated. This phase is not a sign of inadequacy. Instead, it recognizes the deep mental shift involved in internalizing these disciplines.
Without deliberate facilitation during this phase, what is taught will never truly be learned. Worse still, it risks being misinterpreted or co-opted in ways that distort its intent. The work then reverts to pre-existing habits. This will undo progress. More dangerously, it reinforces the very patterns the disciplines aim to interrupt. Based on lived experience, I can attest to the intensity of the backlash. Confusion can arise when the Five Disciplines are misunderstood or misapplied. These reactions are far more potent than those typically linked with other management tools.
Today’s conditions further exacerbate such disillusionment. These include cognitive overload, the allure of fast results, fragmented attention, and the dominance of linear thinking. All these factors work to weaken the commitment needed to sustain the disciplines over time. As a result, the potential of this work often remains unrealized. This happens not due to lack of value but due to premature abandonment. Faster is slower.
Self-discipline, which lies at the heart of this work, is not an innate trait—it is cultivated. It emerges through repeated practice and is nurtured by proximity to skilled practitioners or elders who model its application. In this sense, we grow into our ability to hold the responsibility that comes with mastering the Five Disciplines. Vision, when used properly, becomes a mechanism not merely for goal-setting but for becoming. It supports the personal transformation needed to hold the weight of systemic leadership.
Indeed, “going fast” in this context can mean giving up. The faster we rush through this work, the more we undermine its foundational principles. These are disciplines to be lived, not checked off. The only workable approach is to allow time for the work to take root. It must become as natural and necessary as breathing.
The Five Disciplines reach their fullest expression when practiced in integration. This is akin to how the human hand realizes its full strength only when its five fingers work in unison. When isolated, each discipline offers value, but when practiced together, they produce a synergistic power that is otherwise inaccessible. This integrated space—though difficult to describe—reveals itself over time, often after years of practice.
Particularly, the disciplines of Systems Thinking and Shared Vision face unique barriers when approached within rigid organizational settings. These disciplines thrive best in neutral, unencumbered environments—what I have come to describe as “shared spaces” or even “no-man’s lands.” These spaces are often lonely but critical. They are often inhabited by senior leaders, heads of state, or public servants who navigate systemic challenges. They need a degree of freedom and trust that is rarely available in routine organizational hierarchies.
In my experience, efforts to embed these disciplines within institutional contexts often face resistance or dead-ends. Participants acknowledge the value of the work. Still, they struggle to see its applicability. They express intentions to revisit it “later.” They consider other settings, like personal life or future leadership roles. Consultants and facilitators often respond by shifting their focus to the more readily accepted disciplines. These include Mental Models and Team Learning. In these areas, coaching and team-building activities offer easier entry points.
I have found that when the Five Disciplines are positioned within national or regional strategy development initiatives, they become essential. This is particularly true in response to persistent systemic issues. In such instances, Shared Vision and Systems Thinking are not only relevant but indispensable. These environments invite a scale of thinking that transcends organizational silos. In such settings, the disciplines come alive.
Over the years, I have learned to frame this work in the language of public policy, strategy, and governance. Building trust with economists, senior officials, and policymakers has enabled me to reposition the Five Disciplines within the national agenda. Often, the entry point is a deeply entrenched problem. It is something that refuses to leave a ministry’s inbox despite years of programming and significant financial investment.
Take national unemployment as an example. Regardless of how it is framed, whether as youth unemployment or structural unemployment, the underlying system is not changing. The economy’s capacity to consistently generate jobs falls short of the population’s needs. This issue is global. It is not unique to any one nation. And yet, few policy frameworks apply a systemic lens to understand its persistence. This is where SoL practitioners can offer unparalleled value.
Before engaging with this work, one must be aware of the disciplines it demands. This is required not only intellectually but also emotionally and institutionally. These are not conventional tools. They are practices that reshape how we think, relate, and lead.
Not enough consultants or strategists necessarily give it the systemic focus that it deserves. That is where SoLs comes in!
Some do’s and don’t to understand before you attempt to go on the journey into this space:
Do’s and Don’ts for Applying the Five Disciplines in National and Regional Strategy Work
Do’s and Don’ts for Applying the Five Disciplines in National and Regional Strategy Work
DOs FOR SoL NATIONAL & GLOBAL ORGANISATIONS
1. Always Refer to the Work as “The Fifth Discipline” or “The Five Disciplines of Learning Organizations.”
All communications, documentation, and references by Schools of Learning (SoLs) or affiliated organizations have to clearly recognize their work. It must be rooted in The Fifth Discipline or the five disciplines of Learning Organizations. This distinction is not merely semantic; it is foundational. The work embodies a unique epistemological and practical framework that differentiates it from other management or organizational development approaches. Mis-characterization or generalization dilutes its impact and misleads potential learners and clients.
2. Clarify What the Work Is Not. This will Illuminate What It Is.
A central role of SoLs is to educate the broader public. This is not just about the content of the disciplines. It is also about what this body of work does not represent. It must be made explicit that The Fifth Discipline is not simply another toolset or method in a crowded field. It is a paradigm shift. SoLs clearly define its uniqueness. This empowers clients and stakeholders to be guided by practitioners. It prevents them from unintentionally being led away from the essence of the work.
3. Commit to the Time Required for Deep Skill Formation
Mastery in this domain demands time, patience, and deliberate practice. Practitioners and clients must resist the urge to accelerate learning in pursuit of short-term results. The metaphor of the “Folded Arms” exercise is apt. Genuine change requires unlearning deeply embedded mental models and behavioral habits. Many of these have developed over generations or even centuries. The five disciplines serve as an antithesis to quick-fix interventions. Therefore, shortcuts undermine both the individual’s transformation and the discipline’s purpose. The Five Disciplines are not quick-fix interventions. Assign time and resources to allow the disciplines to mature and embed themselves within leadership culture and decision-making frameworks.
4. Practitioners need foundational instructional and practice hours.
Aspiring practitioners must get at least 40 hours of teaching. They also need guided practice before engaging in any research or advanced application. This applies to each of the five disciplines, totaling 200 hours. This is comparable to a two-year postgraduate commitment and should be recognized as such.
5. Do develop a competency framework.
Establishing a formal competency development framework is essential. It supports a progression from novice to advanced beginner, then competent, proficient, and ultimately to expert levels of ability. Support learners in progressing through stages of development: Build a profession around these standards.
6. Focus on Sectoral, National, Regional, and Global Applications.
Organizational contexts matter. Yet, the disciplines are particularly potent and needed within larger systems—sectors, nations, and regions. SoLs should deliberately direct their efforts to these broader arenas where systemic leverage can generate transformational change at scale. These issues offer fertile ground for illustrating the practical value of systemic thinking and shared visioning.
7. Document and Showcase Processes, Not Merely Outcomes
When presenting case studies and projects, focus equally on the processes. Highlight how these processes guided the learning journey. Don’t emphasize only the end results. The assimilation of the five disciplines must be observable in how people learn and evolve, regardless of organizational affiliation. This ensures that the work grows organically rather than being confined or limited to formal institutional boundaries. Let the human assimilation be the story.
8. Prefer Digital Publication for Case Development
Publishing case studies and related materials online ensures ongoing reflection. It also supports cost efficiency and accessibility. This also allows for the continued evolution of thought and engagement with the material over time.
9. Mandate Completion of Postgraduate-Level Programmes for Long-Term Practitioners
An individual needs to finish a structured postgraduate program. This is necessary if they wish to start a lifelong practice in this field. This is essential for anyone pursuing this path. This necessity is also applicable for those aiming for a professional path. This ensures the intellectual and ethical integrity of practitioners and safeguards the field from dilution or misappropriation.
10. Encourage Activities Dedicated Exclusively to the Five Disciplines
SoLs must uphold a commitment to focus exclusively on the five disciplines. They should actively promote them across multiple forums. Lack of understanding or first discomfort with the disciplines should not be grounds for substituting or diluting their content. Instead, SoLs must champion the emergence of their transformational potential. Key recommended activities include:
- Webinars: Hosting sessions tailored to emerging practitioners.
- Face Talks: Organizing events like workshops, symposiums, media briefings, forums, and public dialogues to introduce newcomers to the disciplines.
- Media Engagements: Promoting dialogue and curiosity in broader society through accessible and ongoing content.
- CEO’s Table Programmes: Delivering customized engagements for CEOs and their executive teams. The focus is on Mental Models, Team Learning, and Personal Mastery. Systems Thinking is presented in depth for consultants and strategic leaders.
- Postgraduate CEO Education: Collaborating with national tertiary institutions to design and deliver master’s-level programmes for CEOs. Embedded research teams support the programmes. These teams document learning, transformation, and outcomes.
DOs FOR PRACTICING CONSULTANTS
1. Do build relationships before introducing the disciplines.
Build trust with stakeholders, especially senior officials and economists, before engaging in systemic dialogue. The disciplines need vulnerability and openness, which can’t be mandated—only invited.
2. Do offer structured hand-holding during the early stages.
Treat the learning process as a cross-over period. Offer clear guidance, scaffolding, and opportunities for reflection to support new learners in engaging deeply with the work.
3. Do contextualize the disciplines in the language of governance.
Translate key concepts into strategic, policy-relevant terms. Use the language of evidence, accountability, value-for-money, and public mandate to help stakeholders grasp the significance of the work.
4. Do focus on integration, not isolation.
Emphasize that the Five Disciplines are most powerful when practiced together. Encourage participants to consider how the disciplines reinforce one another. They offer mutual strength, much like the way fingers become more effective when they form a hand.
5. Do prepare for discomfort.
Introduce the concept that learning—especially of the systemic kind—often involves unlearning. Acknowledge that dissonance is part of the process, not a sign of failure.
6. Do emphasize discipline over technique.
Frame each element as a practice, not a tool. Encourage leaders to develop a personal mastery over time, rather than seeking immediate mastery over specific methodologies.
7. Do finish the full postgraduate programme.
Aspiring lifelong practitioners should be mandated to finish formal postgraduate-level study to develop both scholarly depth and practical mastery.
8. Do curate exclusive activities for deep discipline practice.
Encourage SoLs to:
- Conduct webinars for emerging practitioners.
- Host Face Talks: workshops, symposiums, TED-style forums, book clubs, etc.
- Offer media talks to nurture communities of practice.
- Deliver CEO Table programmes focusing on personal mastery, team learning, and mental models, and on systems thinking for consultants.
- Collaborate with state institutions to design postgraduate education for CEOs, including embedded research teams.
Principles of Integrity in the Application of The Fifth Discipline:
DON’Ts FOR SoL NATIONAL & GLOBAL ORGANISATIONS
1. Schools of Learning must not encourage facilitators, trainers, or researchers. They should never value personal agendas over the development of others.
They should avoid prioritizing their own short-term needs, like financial gain, convenience of scheduling, or access to resources. These should not come over the time and care required to support the development of others in the practice. The pressure to be busy or in demand must never take precedence. Cultivating deep, sustainable learning in those they are entrusted to guide is essential. The Fifth Discipline requires time, patience, and disciplined care—there are no shortcuts.
2. Do Not Model SoLs After Conventional Consulting or Leadership Frameworks
SOLs must avoid shaping their structures, values, or delivery models along the lines of conventional management consulting bodies (e.g., International Coaching Federation), or corporate development programmes such as Balanced Scorecard, Centre for Creative Leadership, Lean Management, WITs, or The Seven Habits. These frameworks, while effective within their own logic, are rooted in fundamentally different premises. The Fifth Discipline stands as a philosophical and operational antithesis. Its essence must be protected, not blended. It offers the world a different—yet essential—way of seeing, learning, and leading.
3. Do Not Combine the Tools of The Fifth Discipline With Those of Other Frameworks
The five disciplines can stand alone. The five disciplines can stand alone. Mixing the tools and practices of The Fifth Discipline with unrelated frameworks can undermine its integrity. It also diminishes its effectiveness. Such hybridization confuses clients and participants. This subtly erodes the trust and clarity necessary for deep learning. Clients will not always articulate this confusion, but it affects their experience. It also shapes how they speak of and recommend the work. The five disciplines are fully sufficient. They stand independently. The responsibility lies with the practitioner to develop the mastery required to make them work in all contexts.
4. Do Not Allow Unqualified Practitioners to Represent the Work.
Practitioners must not affiliate with SoLs without first demonstrating a holistic understanding. They need to engage in the integrated practice of The Fifth Discipline. This includes accreditation and the ability to articulate the interdependencies of the five disciplines—not isolated or adapted interpretations. Learning organizations are not created through superficial change. Mistakes in the application of the tools should not lead to the conclusion that the tools themselves are flawed. Misuse is not evidence of irrelevance.
5. Do Not Use Generic Terminology That Dilutes Meaning
Terms such as “learning organization” have become generalized. Over time, “organizational learning” has also become a generalized term. They are often misused, which results in the erosion of their original meaning and intent. Within the context of this work, SoLs and practitioners must preserve the specificity and integrity of the language. Always refer explicitly to The Fifth Discipline or the five disciplines of Learning Organizations. Precision in language ensures clarity in purpose and integrity in practice
DON’Ts FOR PRACTICING CONSULTANTS
1. THE KEY: Exercise Caution When Engaging Organizational Challenges Absent a Broader Systemic Context
Organizational practitioners must resist the inclination to address internal challenges in isolation. They should first assess the broader systemic forces at play. This is more than a SWOT analysis. These forces exist at national, regional, or even global levels. Organizations are not standalone entities; they are nested within larger systems that often exert powerful, unseen influences. These systemic forces—characterized by circular causality and deeply entrenched behavioral patterns—can predefine the trajectory of any attempted intervention.
Where such dynamics stay unexamined, even the most well-intentioned interventions risk becoming ineffectual. These interventions aim at reversing declining revenues or reducing costs through lean management. They also apply balanced scorecard techniques or use scenario planning. Without the rigorous application of The Fifth Discipline, the organization’s outcomes will be governed by these dominant forces. These forces are unacknowledged. The resulting initiatives fail to generate meaningful change and, in some instances, accelerate systemic deterioration.
In such cases, the practitioner inadvertently becomes a participant in a failing system, misattributed with responsibility for its underperformance. The imperative is clear. All efforts at organizational transformation must be anchored in a systemic understanding. This understanding must transcend organizational boundaries. Only then can enduring, generative solutions emerge.
2. Don’t promise fast results.
Avoid setting expectations for immediate change. The transformation this work offers is profound but gradual—and its value lies in depth, not speed.
3. Don’t reduce the disciplines to facilitation tools.
Treat them as long-term capabilities, not as once-off workshop techniques. Over-simplification leads to misinterpretation and loss of integrity.
4. Don’t ignore the need for role-neutral spaces.
Systems Thinking and Shared Vision work best in spaces where formal power dynamics are relaxed. Don’t try to force these conversations inside rigid reporting structures.
5. Don’t isolate learners.
Avoid leaving individuals to process this work alone. Learning communities, coaching circles, or peer reflection groups are essential to sustain commitment and deepen insight.
6. Don’t sidestep resistance.
Where pushbacks or silence emerge, don’t retreat. Engage with the discomfort; name it, work through it, and allow space for it to be explored safely.
7. Don’t assume familiarity equals understanding.
Even among experienced professionals, exposure to these disciplines does not equate to practice. Revisit the basics often and create rituals of reinforcement.
8. Don’t rank expediency over integrity.
The pressure to “show progress” can dilute the depth of this work. Hold the line. Integrity of application will yield long-term systemic results.
9. Don’t try to apply the disciplines without personal practice.
Facilitators and consultants must embody the disciplines themselves. Inauthentic delivery erodes credibility and effectiveness.
Closing Reflections: A Call to Stewards of Deep Change
As schools of learning and practitioners or SoLs of The Fifth Discipline, we do more than deliver programmes. We implement frameworks and help change. We are stewards of a practice rooted in profound respect for human potential, generational learning, and systemic renewal. The five disciplines call for discipline in thought. They require rigor in practice. These disciplines also demand depth in relationships. None of these are achieved through speed, surface solutions, or compromise.
Let us remember that this work is not about scale for its own sake, but about depth of impact. It is not about being understood quickly but about catalyzing awareness that lasts. It is not about serving the expectations of the market. Instead, it is about helping society reclaim its capacity to learn. This process should be authentic, collective, and continuous.
“You can’t force commitment. What you can do is nudge a little here and inspire a little there. You also offer a role model. Your primary influence is the example you set.”
— Peter M. Senge, The Fifth Discipline
This body of work has always been about more than the development of organizations. It concerns the development of people, communities, and nations. Ultimately, it is about the evolution of civilization itself. Let us continue with care, courage, and an unwavering fidelity to the path less traveled.
THE NATIONAL / GLOBAL SoLs ORGANIZING STRUCTURE
- NATIONAL / GLOBAL RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT
- Draw up and develop global data capturing systems. Draw up and develop post-activity global monitoring and evaluation systems. Collate and monitor the draw-up lessons and co-publish results with national / state universities. Support the operational and administrative tasks of the unit and organization.
- GLOBAL COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT & ACCREDITATION, NATIONAL / GLOBAL PUBLICATIONS, AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS
- Reach out jointly with local SoL organizations to national or state universities. Develop and run a post-graduate programme on the five disciplines. Participants must conduct and hand in research papers on live national issues to qualify for the certification. Be the competency accreditation body. Check the quality of standards of competency for trainers, consultants, and researchers. They lead programmes with state tertiary education institutions. Produce and publish regional and global studies.
- NATIONAL / GLOBAL SYSTEMIC PROJECT CONSULTANCY DEVELOPMENT
- Conduct of reach outs to prospective global clients e.g., UN, EU, AU, SADC, ASEAN, APEC, and so on. Position national SoLs for joint collaboration. This includes collaboration across and within sectors, regions, and globally. Engage significant topic matter experts. They can offer insights on the findings of the systemic studies generated by the team.
THE THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE CONSULTING PRACTICE ORGANIZING STRUCTURE:
There are three arms to the organization structure:
- RESEARCH AND OPERATIONS (ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE) DEVELOPMENT
- Draw up and develop data capturing systems.
- Draw up and develop post-activity national monitoring and evaluation systems.
- Draw up lessons and co-publish results with national universities.
- Support the operational and administrative tasks of the unit and organization.
- TRAINING, PUBLICATIONS, AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
- Reach out to national or state universities to develop and run post-graduate programme on the five disciplines. Participants will need to conduct and submit research papers on live national issues. This is required to qualify for the certification.
- Develop programmes geared at preparing CEOs for all sectors, government, NGOs, communities, private sector, consulates.
- Graduates become qualified to lead the study of persistent issues under their charge with the SoL body.
- BUSINESS & CONSULTANCY DEVELOPMENT
- Conducting reach outs to prospective clients.
- Tailor programmes with research and training units to prepare the client for conducting the study and develop national strategies.
- Position SoL for each unit to collaborate effectively across the national university. Collaborate with the government of the nation. Engage with significant subject matter experts. These experts can provide insights on the findings. The systemic studies are generated by the team.
- Collaborate across SoLs for each nation for the conduct of regional studies.
THE PROCESS USED BY THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE CONSULTING ORGANIZATIONS:
Given the above, SoLs act as the meeting point for the following works to happen for each of their countries at national levels:
THE APPROACH & INVITATION “TO SEE” WITH A NEW PAIR OF EYES
- #1 Approach the Prime Minister’s Office. Position and leverage SoL’s services to work with their national strategy organ. Focus on the persistent issues facing their nation. Indicate that this is not an exercise at spending national budget. Most interventions of systemic issues need concerted hands and time to do reach outs and not money. In most instances, it can usually work with existing resources that are already budgeted for the nation.
- #2 Present the impact that using the five disciplines has had. Provide an example of a national issue. This helps to throw a better light on the issue at hand.
- #3 Prepare to make similar approaches to regional development platforms the country belongs to do the same, e.g. ASEAN for South East Asia. SADC for southern Africa nations. AU for the African nations. EU for European nations and so on.
- #4 Present the five disciplines as a series of introductory programmes. Plan to build on them concurrently. Do this as the research efforts are underway.
THE STRATEGIC SYSTEMIC PLANNING PROCESS
- #5 Identify persistent issues. National Development Plans (NDPs) often present opportunities to learn what these are. Focus on the nation, not just the government. The Head of the State or of the public service usually holds a unique position. They can suggest what these issues are for the state.
- #6 Develop stratified databases (by population, education, employment, natural resource, economic sector demographics) to capture data over time. This approach allows the team to recognize Behavior Over Time (BOT) graphs. These graphs can then point to underlying systemic structures (system archetypes) that are operating. As more demographics are used, inform persons or organizations who have a stake in that part of the dataset. Make sure they know about steps 2 to 6 mentioned above.
- #7 Line up the archetypes based on the Onion.
- #8 At this stage, both the SoL team and the Strategy Office would start to find the obstacles. They would understand what has been holding the nation back from achieving its goals, e.g. low or even no unemployment.
THE CONSULTANCY
- #9 Prepare the team to share the findings with persons affected by the issue. Do this at each iteration and each round of stakeholders. Additionally, this would refine the process in Steps 6-8 above.
- #10 Repeat this process with the next persistent issue.
- #11 As the country and its SoL gather more sets of case studies, it can now begin preparations. The country is gearing up to institute post-graduate programmes in the five disciplines. These programmes will be introduced at their state and national tertiary institutions. The programme will focus on preparing leaders in different segments of society. This includes the private sector, government and non-governmental sectors, and communities. They will undertake the study of the five disciplines.
Each participant must finish a research paper on a live national issue. This is necessary to qualify for the program certification. - #12 These persons eventually become organizational leaders. They lead the research study. They are involved in community efforts. They watch and guide the monitoring and evaluations of the works on the ground. Over time, they become practitioners of this work within their societies. They contribute to the growth of SoL in their country. Their efforts also impact growth across the globe.
The more these issues are understood and addressed, the better the nation begins to enjoy growth. Such growth happens on different sides.
Ideas in the making …. please add your comments below. Love to hear them!
#SystemsThinking #TheFifthDiscipline #LearningOrganizations #SystemicChange #LeadershipDevelopment #OrganizationalLearning #PeterSenge #SoLAfrica #StrategicLeadership #TransformationalLearning #NationBuildingThroughLearning #RegenerativeLeadership #MultiLevelSystems
Systems Thinking Research & Leadership Development Institute (STRLDi) 
You must be logged in to post a comment.